General chemistry programs at universities around the world often focus on learning from the first and second school year, in which knowledge of thermodynamics plays a fundamental role in studying the theory of chemical processes. Although it is learned early at universities that train chemistry students, but with the content is difficult and complex when developing the application of thermodynamic principles to chemical processes occurring in closed systems to research chemical equilibrium, has caused many students to lose their learning direction, leading to not good academic results. In order to overcome those difficulties, we designed a learning project based on the CDIO teaching mode to guide students in forming project ideas, project design, project implementation and operation. Through the project, students will easily access thermodynamic issues to evaluate a chemical process occurring, creating a strong motivation for students to research chemistry.
The CDIO teaching mode emphasizes basic principles, placed in the context of Ideation - Design - Implementation - Operation, bringing many practical benefits 1: The curriculum is organized around courses that support each other but have closely interwoven CDIO activities; Rich with student design-build-test projects; Integrate learning of professional skills such as teamwork and communication; Active and experiential learning features.
Project teaching based on the CDIO approach will be an ideal model for students to easily learn complex and difficult knowledge such as thermodynamics problems for chemistry students at universities. To design a learning project according to the CDIO approach, students can follow the diagram depicted in Figure 1. The application process is as follows:
Task conception and decomposition: Analyze the context, identify problems and form ideas for the project.
Project design: Overview of research documents related to the project. Analyze documents and propose specific measures for project implementation.
Project implementation: Implement the project based on proposed measures, find solutions to research problems.
Project sumary and evaluation: Operate the project for a specific problem, summarize and evaluate the advantages and limitations (if any) of the project.
Thermodynamics is fundamental and difficult knowledge for chemistry students when studying General Chemistry. However, among the many knowledge contents of thermodynamics, we see that only 3 state functions, namely enthalpy (H), entropy (S) and Gibbs function (G) are the most important because they can answer questions that each student always poses to themselves is a challenge that needs to be conquered when studying chemistry. Questions that students often ask when studying thermodynamics:
(1) Why can this reaction occur while the other reaction cannot occur?
(2) Why can this reaction occur under normal conditions but the other reaction can only occur at a specific temperature (T)?
(3) How do we need to adjust temperature, concentration, pressure or catalyst so that the reversible reaction occurs in the most favorable direction?
(4) How to build a mathematical expression to clarify Le Chatelier's equilibrium shifting principle?
Instructors can pose a question for students to propose ideas for learning projects: Among the four factors including pressure, temperature, concentration and catalyst, which factor influenced the change of the above 3 state functions?
From the set of 4 questions above, students realize that the temperature factor changes the values of the 3 state functions. Through that analysis, students will form a learning project with a hypothetical name: Research the influence of temperature on the change in the value of the three state functions enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs free energy function.
2.2. Project DesignBefore designing the project, students must search for documents related to the project idea. This is an important step for students to overview the core issues of the topic.
Research by Hafid Sokrat and colleagues 2 shows that the nature of the concepts of enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs free energy is very difficult because first-year students are not equipped with adequate mathematical knowledge to study chemistry. In particular, this difficulty is not only encountered in Vietnamese students but also in international students, affecting the psychology of students' laziness in learning chemistry.
History of invention of state functions: In 1840, Hess invented the enthalpy function; In 1824, Carnot invented the entropy function; In 1870, Gibbs was the first to introduce the concept of free energy that bears his name 3. Many studies on thermodynamics show that the methods of approaching and constructing state functions are mainly traditional and academic 4, 5.
Some properties of Gibbs free energy have been specified 6, 7:
- For reversible reactions, when the Gibbs free energy
( ) has a negative value, the reaction will occur in the forward direction and when it has a positive value, the reaction will occur in the reverse direction.
- When deduced
and at the vertex of the parabola of the graph representing the dependence of Gibbs energy on the reaction process, there will be Q = K = 1, where Q is the quotient of the product concentration (pressure) of the product compared to the reactant and K is the equilibrium constant.
- The shape of the graph represents the dependence of Gibbs energy on the probability of a reaction occurring.
- Using the Gibbs–Helmholtz equation 8 to build the liquid-gas equilibrium of CO2 at different temperature values:
![]() |
Gibbs was the first to postulate the relationship of eight thermodynamic quantities: pressure, volume, temperature, entropy, internal energy, enthalpy, Gibbs energy and work on the same 3-dimensional space diagram to describe chemical equilibrium of a system 9.
For reactions occurring under standard conditions, calculating the enthalpy of the reaction is relatively simple, but more importantly, it helps students clearly understand the relationship of enthalpy change with the breakdown and formation of bond energy 10.
David Keifer suggested that the default expression for enthalpy in Physical Chemistry textbooks should not be but to add a quantity (
) in the enthalpy expression. That means
with
to be work does not expand 11.
Transforming the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation into the form: will help students easily calculate the equilibrium constant Kp of the ammonia synthesis reaction at different temperatures 12.
Using mathematical knowledge, students will build the equation k = f(T) from the Arrhenius equation to calculate the rate constant of the reaction at different temperatures 13.
Roger Araujo established the Gibbs function according to the traditional method and calculated the equilibrium constant of the oxidation reaction of Fe2+ ions to Fe3+ under the influence of oxygen gas 14.
After studying the theory, we see that the enthalpy (), entropy (
) and Gibbs free energy (
) values of the substance (under standard conditions) are easy to look up. So if the experiment is conducted at a temperature other than 25 oC, will these values change and what are their values?
Therefore, we need to build a general mathematical expression that shows the relationship of the values of enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs free energy according to the temperature. Mean:
![]() |
![]() |
In other words, enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs free energy of a substance are functions that depend on temperature.
With knowledge of derivatives, differentials and integration, students can build the dependence of each state function on temperature.
(1) For the enthalpy function
Derived from the expression for calculating the change in heat capacity of the reaction:
![]() | (1.1) |
Kirchhoff separated the variables, then integrated both sides of equation (1.1) and the temperature changed from 298 K to T, we get:
![]() | (1.2) |
(2) For the entropy function
According to the second law of thermodynamics, for reversible reactions (no phase change of the substances during the reaction), the temperature-dependent entropy is
![]() | (2.1) |
Integrating both sides of equation (2.1) we get:
![]() |
or
![]() | (2.2) |
(3) For the Gibbs function
We have three methods to represent the dependence of the Gibbs function on temperature.
Method 1. Use the Gibbs equation:
![]() |
Method 2. Use equation:
![]() | (3.1) |
We set up the equation (3.1).
We have:
![]() |
When the reaction is reversible: or
(3.2)
Adding the differential d(PV –TS) to both sides of equation (3.2), we get:
![]() | (3.3) |
Substituting into (3.3) and then differentiating we get:
![]() | (3.4) |
On the other hand, G is a function of two variables: G = f(T, P). Differentiating the function G we get:
![]() | (3.5) |
Because G is a state function, dG is a total differential. Therefore from (3.4) and (3.5) we have:
![]() | (3.6) |
Separating the variables, then integrating both sides of equation (3.6), we get the equation (3.1):
![]() |
Method 3. Using the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation:
![]() | (3.7) |
We also set up equation (3.7) as follows:
Take the derivative of the function () with respect to T:
![]() |
Substituting (from 3.6) and
into the above equation, we get:
![]() |
Or for chemical reactions:
![]() | (3.8) |
Separating the variables and then integrating equation (3.8), we get:
![]() | (3.7) |
In the simple case that the enthalpy variation of reactions does not depend on temperature, the integration of equation (3.7) will be:
![]() | (3.9) |
Consider the problem of ammonia synthesis:
![]() |
Thermodynamic values are referenced in the following table:
a) Calculate of the reaction.
b) Construct the equation = f(T),
= f(T).
c) Construct the equation = f(T) using three different methods.
d) Calculate of the reaction at 127 oC.
Solution:
a) Calculate of the reaction
First we calculate 2 values: and
then calculate
.
Inferred:
![]() |
b) Build the equation: = f(T),
= f(T).
Apply equation: (1.2)
Apply the equation (2.2):
We have:
Therefore:
c) Construct the equation = f(T) using three different methods:
(1) Use the Gibbs equation:
(2) Using the equation (3.1):
We have:
Therefore:
(3) Use the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation (3.7):
We have:
Therefore:
So
d) Calculate of the reaction at 127 oC
Substituting T = 400 K into the above equation, we get:
Through designing the CDIO learning project, students have completed some important content of the following thermodynamics topic:
(i) Three state equations have been explicitly established:;
and
. Especially for the first time, when constructing the expression:
and the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation, students used mathematical knowledge (differential, integral) that is very close and easy to understand, available in the math program studied at universities. That shows the need to integrate interdisciplinary knowledge together in learning and research.
(ii) In some exercises where it is assumed that the enthalpy change of the reaction does not change with temperature (= const), the Gibbs free energy of the reaction at the temperature being studied is often approximated as:
The reason for this is because:
Therefore, understanding the nature of each formula will help students solve problems in a natural and interesting way.
(iii) Students can use three different methods to calculate the change in Gibbs free energy of a reaction at a certain temperature T.
(iv) A solid relationship between the equilibrium shift of the reversible reaction according to Le Chatelier's principle and the change of the reaction according to the investigated temperature has been determined.
Example for reaction:
![]() |
According to Le Chatelier's principle, when the temperature increases, the equilibrium of the above reaction runs in the direction of NH3 decomposition (reverse direction). This is completely consistent with the results of calculating the values
and
The results show that when the temperature increases from 298 K to 400 K, the Gibbs free energy value of the reaction increases. This means that the efficiency of the ammonia synthesis reaction will decrease as the temperature of the system increases. In fact, the most suitable temperature for this reaction is about 450oC.
The research was supported by the Vietnamese Ministry of Education and Training, grant No. B2022-TDV-02. We sincerely thank you for that support.
The Authors have no competing interests.
[1] | Malmqvist, J., Edström, K. & Rosén, A. CDIO Standards 3.0 - Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 8–11, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | Hafid Sokrat, Soumia Tamani, Mohammed Moutaabbid, Mohamed Radid. Difficulties of Students from the Faculty of Science with Regard to Understanding the Concepts of Chemical Thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, 116, 368-372. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Stanley I. Sandler and Leslie V. Woodcock. Historical Observations on Laws of Thermodynamics, J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 55, 10, 4485–4490. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Robert G. Mortimer. Physical Chemistry, third edition, Elsevier Inc, 2008, pp 153-182. | ||
In article | |||
[5] | Srinivasan S. Iyengar and Romualdo T. de Souza. Teaching Thermodynamics and Kinetics to Advanced General Chemistry Students and to Upper-Level Undergraduate Students Using PV Diagrams, J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 91 (1),74-83. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | Arthur C. Ferguson. The Gibbs Free Energy of a Chemical Reaction System As a Function of the Extent of Reaction and the Prediction of Spontaneity, J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81, 4, 606. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | Raymond S. Ochs. Thermodynamics and Spontaneity, J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 10, 952. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | Paul M. Mathias. The Gibbs–Helmholtz Equation in Chemical Process Technology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | Robert M. Hanson. A Unified Graphical Representation of Chemical Thermodynamics and Equilibrium, J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 12, 1526–1529. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Sebastian G. Canagaratna. A Visual Aid in Enthalpy Calculations, J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 9, 1178. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | David Keifer. Enthalpy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 7, 1407–1411. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[12] | G. Huybrechts and G. Petre. Determining the Kp for the ammonia synthesis as a function of temperature, J. Chem. Educ. 1976, 53, 7, 443. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | Yingbin Ge. Agreement, Complement, and Disagreement to “Why Are Some Reactions Slower at Higher Temperatures?” J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 6, 821-823. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[14] | Roger Araujo. Potential Functions in Chemical Thermodynamics, J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75, 11, 1490. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2024 Cao Cu Giac, Cao Thi Van Giang and Tran Van Thanh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | Malmqvist, J., Edström, K. & Rosén, A. CDIO Standards 3.0 - Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 8–11, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | Hafid Sokrat, Soumia Tamani, Mohammed Moutaabbid, Mohamed Radid. Difficulties of Students from the Faculty of Science with Regard to Understanding the Concepts of Chemical Thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, 116, 368-372. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Stanley I. Sandler and Leslie V. Woodcock. Historical Observations on Laws of Thermodynamics, J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 55, 10, 4485–4490. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Robert G. Mortimer. Physical Chemistry, third edition, Elsevier Inc, 2008, pp 153-182. | ||
In article | |||
[5] | Srinivasan S. Iyengar and Romualdo T. de Souza. Teaching Thermodynamics and Kinetics to Advanced General Chemistry Students and to Upper-Level Undergraduate Students Using PV Diagrams, J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 91 (1),74-83. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | Arthur C. Ferguson. The Gibbs Free Energy of a Chemical Reaction System As a Function of the Extent of Reaction and the Prediction of Spontaneity, J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81, 4, 606. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | Raymond S. Ochs. Thermodynamics and Spontaneity, J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 10, 952. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | Paul M. Mathias. The Gibbs–Helmholtz Equation in Chemical Process Technology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | Robert M. Hanson. A Unified Graphical Representation of Chemical Thermodynamics and Equilibrium, J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 12, 1526–1529. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Sebastian G. Canagaratna. A Visual Aid in Enthalpy Calculations, J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 9, 1178. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | David Keifer. Enthalpy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 7, 1407–1411. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[12] | G. Huybrechts and G. Petre. Determining the Kp for the ammonia synthesis as a function of temperature, J. Chem. Educ. 1976, 53, 7, 443. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | Yingbin Ge. Agreement, Complement, and Disagreement to “Why Are Some Reactions Slower at Higher Temperatures?” J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 6, 821-823. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[14] | Roger Araujo. Potential Functions in Chemical Thermodynamics, J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75, 11, 1490. | ||
In article | View Article | ||