Tables index

From

Fertilizer Management and Bean Density Drive Productivity–profitability Trade-offs in Maize–common Bean Intercropping on a Tropical Andosol in the Western Highlands of Cameroon

Hassan Yap Mfouapon, Adalbert Onana Adibime, Jean Bosco Onguene, Primus Azinwi Tamfuh, Paulin Nana, Evariste Desire Moundjeu, Georges Simplice Kameni Kouedeu, Cynthia-rita Ngwahimo Ngnokam, Ismael Foukena Yandintoum, Alexis Boukong

World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2026, 14(3), 81-96 doi:10.12691/wjar-14-3-1
  • Table 1. Initial physicochemical properties of the 0–30 cm soil layer in the two experimental fields at Mangoum
  • Table 2. Nutrient inputs supplied by the fertilizer regimes (kg ha−1)
  • Table 3. Mean grain yields and relative differences between the two independent experiments
  • Table 4. Effects of NPK fertilizer regime, supplemental urea, and cropping system on maize plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area index (LAI) at 42 and 56 days after sowing (DAS) in experiments 1 and 2 (C1 / C2)
  • Table 5. Effects of NPK fertilizer regime, supplemental urea, and cropping system on common bean plant height and stem diameter at 42 and 56 (DAS) in experiments 1 and 2 (C1 / C2)
  • Table 6. Effects of NPK fertilizer regime, supplemental urea, and cropping system on common bean grain yield, 1000-grain weight, and number of pods per plant in experiments 1 and 2 (C1 / C2)
  • Table 7. Effects of NPK fertilizer regime, supplemental urea, and cropping system on combined physical grain yield, maize grain yield, 1000-grain weight, ear length, and ear diameter in experiments 1 and 2 (C1 / C2)
  • Table 8. Aggregated economic return to fertilizer investment across the two independent experiments