The study's objective was to implement the HACCP plan in a local dairy supply chain in Karachi, Pakistan, to eliminate or reduce the risks for safe and high-quality milk available to the general public and to assess the degree of conformance to food safety and to look into the actual complexity involved in the HACCP implementation process. Different food safety hazards may enter the dairy supply chain during milk production, processing, shipping, storage, and serving, which may have an impact on milk safety and quality. The total average bacterial count 8.5x108±0.18 CFU/mL, Coliforms 83.1±25 CFU/mL, E. coli 96.1±4.1 CFU/mL, and Staph. aureus 27±9.7 CFU/mL were recorded in the milk samples before the HACCP implementation. Although after the HACCP implementation, the count reduced to a considerable level as; 53% (2.9x104±0.15CFU/mL) reduction was noted in the total bacterial count, 80.4% (16±4.8 CFU/mL) in Coliform count, 77% (18.4±0.90 CFU/mL) in E. coli count and 83% (4.2±1.5 CFU/mL) in Staph. aureus count in the final product. Whereas, Salmonella and Listeria were not detected in any milk sample before and after HACCP system implementation. The results reflected the remarkable improvement in milk microbial hygiene. This means that our HACCP system was effective, however, continual improvement may be achieved by periodic monitoring of risks.
Pakistan's traditional milk production methods are similar to those of other underdeveloped nations 1, 2. Unhygienic methods of milk handling increase the possibility of contamination, which harms its composition, quality, and shelf life and makes it unsafe for human consumption 3. Food safety hazards (biological, chemical, or physical agents) may enter the dairy supply chain during milk production, processing, shipping, storage, and serving, which may have an impact on the safety and quality of the milk 4. Every nation is currently making an effort to reduce the health risks associated with food through a variety of means, such as improving hygienic conditions, food storage temperature, improper processing, etc. to provide customers with food that is free of contamination 5. Good manufacturing practices (GMPs), sanitation standard operating procedures (SSOPs), and the hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) system serve as the basis of food safety. However, HACCP is a preventive strategy that acknowledges the critical control points (CCPs) in the approaches to control product safety, GMPs cover several primary measures and circumstances to assure food safety following specified legislation. The implementation of SSOPs and GMP is a necessary condition for making the HACCP system effective 6.
When the HACCP plan is used, milk safety should be improved throughout the entire supply chain. The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) is a system for successful food safety program that has gained international recognition. Given that the majority of dairy products are delicate, have a limited shelf life, and are susceptible to numerous contaminants as a result of poor handling and production procedures, it is crucial to establish a food safety policy and plan for the implementation of the HACCP system 3. In the dairy food chain, from production through handling and processing to consumption, production, and safety are essentially interrelated. Therefore, a system of preventive measures that progress from the safety of animal feed through useful and effective farming practices to good manufacturing and hygiene practices, consumer safety awareness, and proper application of food safety management systems throughout the dairy chain is required to reduce the food safety risks associated with milk and dairy products 4.
For the evaluation of microbiological assessment, the dairy supply chains were studied in the five districts of Karachi (District East, West, North, South, and Central) to judge their quality and safety attributes according to the Punjab Pure Food Rules, 2007.
A total of 9 sampling spots were selected throughout the milk supply chain such as; direct milking animals, collecting jug, bucket, storage tank at dairy farms, dispensing cans, receiving cans, storage tank, collecting tubs at shops and selling points.
2.2. MethodologyTen samples from each sampling point were collected (n-90). For sample collection, sterile, clean polythene plastic bags were used. The sample units were quickly and aseptically transferred to the lab in a clean, chilled container after being properly sealed. Most samples were examined for bacteriological examination as soon as they arrived or within 24 hours after being held at 0-4°C. Total bacterial count, Staph. aureus, Salmonella, Listeria, Coliforms & E. coli isolates were analyzed in milk samples as per the US FDA protocol. Total bacterial count, E. coli and Staph. aureus was enumerated by using (PCA, EMB, and BPA) agar respectively by pour plate method, MPN - presumptive and confirmative tests were performed for Coliforms. However, Salmonella and Listeria spp. were analyzed by enrichment and culturing method. For the detection of Listeria monocytogenes; a 25 ml milk sample was transferred to 225 ml Listeria broth having 2.5 ml selective supplement and incubated for 24 hours at 35°C. After the incubation 1 ml was transferred to BHI (brain heart infusion) agar plates and incubated for the next 48 hours at 35°C. Similarly, for the Salmonella (Isolation): a 25 ml milk sample was mixed in 225 ml lactose broth and incubated for 24 hours at 35°C. 0.1 ml of the incubated sample was transferred to 10 ml RV (Rappaport Vassiliadis) medium and another 1 ml to 10 ml TT (Tetrathionate) broth. RV medium was incubated for 24 hours at 42°C and TT broth tubes for 24 hours at 43°C. A loopful (10 µl) of incubated TT broth was streaked on the BS (Bismuth Sulfite) agar, XLD (Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate) agar, and HE (Hektoen enteric) agar plates and incubated for 24 hours at 35°C. A similar, procedure was repeated for incubated RV medium. After incubation, the plates were examined. The same protocol was repeated for microbiological assessment after the implementation of the HACCP plan from farm to retail shops.
2.3. Implementation of the HACCPTo successfully regulate, eliminate or reduce the food safety hazardous elements to an acceptable level, the HACCP plan was created to examine the multiple latent hazard variables that could result in the contamination of raw milk during the supply chain. The research work on the implementation of HACCP was conducted in the local dairy supply chain from December 2021 to June 2022. The research methodology was established on the FAO's provided HACCP checklist and CCPs decision tree. Based on the twelve procedures outlined by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, which are summarized as follows.
To conclude the HACCP study successfully, the HACCP team was established. The interdisciplinary team consisted of dairy farm owners, employee supervisors, a veterinarian's doctor, the manager of the dairy farm, the transportation coordinator, the owners of the dairy shop, and a research scholar.
Raw milk is typically thought of as a full diet when consumed in its natural state because it contains high food values and nutrients such as water, proteins, lactose, energy-containing fat and solids-not-fat (SNF), carbohydrates, vitamins, organic acids, and enzymes. Along with the main constituent, it also contains about 150 other important nutrients 7, 8. Due to various factors, including seasonal variations, animal species, stage of lactation, feed, milking, breed diversity, age, frequency of milking, interval, diseases, stress, abnormal conditions, drug and hormone injection, all lactating animals have nearly the same chemical composition but differing concentrations 9. As illustrated in Table 1.
Due to milk's nutrient-rich nature, it is consumed by more than 6 million people worldwide and is especially popular with those who may have lowered immunity 7, 8. Milk is a very healthy and nourishing food for all individuals at any age 10, 11. In Pakistan, it is reported that 97% of milk is sold in raw form and the rest is pasteurized, the biggest yearly per capita milk consumption in Pakistan is in Sindh 246 kg, in Punjab, it is roughly 132 kg, in KPK 86 kg, in Baluchistan 108 kg 1.
The purpose of the flow diagram was to provide a clear, concise path of the procedures necessary in the entire supply chain from farms to retail stores. The flow diagram covered almost all stages of the raw milk supply chain. Through an on-farm checklist review with the stick holders, several data on farm features related to animal health and cleanliness, feeding, milking method, storage, transportation, and milk quality were gathered. Aspects of management practices were carefully investigated to complete the diagram. As shown in Figure 1.
Once the flow diagram was constructed, the HACCP team visually checked it for accuracy and completeness on the work site. The status of the animal's body cleansing, the milking technique, pre and post teat treatment, storage temperature, transportation, distribution, and various management practices were carefully noted as some of the various modifications, procedures, and activities that were required for on-site confirmation.
The HACCP team used a checklist to conduct a hazard analysis to prevent any changes in milk quality across the supply chain. Each phase of the flow chart's possible risks was initially identified, with an emphasis on how they might affect the pre and post-milk quality. Three groups of risks were identified: biological, chemical, and Physical. As shown in Table 2.
The most crucial component of a HACCP plan was identifying critical control points (CCPs) or situations when risks should be avoided, eliminated, or reduced to a manageable level. Finding CCPs based on the hazard analysis was done using the decision tree given by Codex. The members of the HACCP team established the following CCPs: animal washing/cleaning (CCP-1), (CCPs-2 & 3) pre and post-milking udder preparation, milk storage temperature (CCP-4), milk transportation (CCP-5) and (CCP-6) was fixed during milk handling at retail stores.
A type of regulating index called a "critical limit" is employed to ensure the food's safety and quality. For each CCP that was discovered, a critical limit was established and specified. Critical limits were the parameters that were used to assess whether a procedure was producing safe milk. These constraints may be physical, chemical, or microbial. Table 3 provides some illustrations of activities that are regarded to represent important boundaries (CCPs) and their restrictions.
To ascertain whether the HACCP plan is being implemented under control, that is, within the critical limits, a monitoring system that includes testing, assessing, monitoring, and reviewing all of the actions carried out across the supply chain has been built. Monitoring techniques used during the operation were recorded and saved for future use.
Corrective actions were taken when the observation showed that a specific CCP is not under control, i.e. if the deviation is from the critical limit.
To ensure that the HACCP approach is being used properly, the internal audit was conducted as part of the verification process. When critical limits are crossed, authentication made sure that the proper alternative procedure plans are in place. 1) The HACCP team's internal audit was provided as a backup for the verification procedures. They made sure the methods were used properly, after which they issued a report explaining the flaws and possible areas for development.
The HACCP system's first written records of the correct development of all activities, from farms to retail stores, were documented with references to ensure the traceability of violations of the procedures in each step. These records allowed for reviewing, evaluations, and confirmation of the system's proper implementation. Records were kept throughout the entire HACCP plan.
2.4. Pre-requisitesTo ensure the excellent quality of raw milk, the first step was to bring all pre-requisite programs that were placed under the framework of the HACCP program and provided a widespread path to achieve zero defects in the end product. A strong system of checks against potential failures of crucial control points was ensured by several precondition programs, which formed the basis for the HACCP model. Sanitation program, which maintained effective sanitary conditions necessary for high-quality milk production, storage, and transportation under good GMP and hygienic practices to control hazards, are prerequisite programs used in the complete processing. The Risks of Milk Contamination Preventive (RMCP) program was created to produce, safeguard, and market high-quality milk without any risks of contamination. This included workers' hand wash drying, milk utensils coverage and its food grade nature, drying of the bodies of animals, sterilizing and disinfecting milking equipment, keeping an eye on worker hygiene standards, milk filtration through muslin cloth, providing clean transportation facilities and ensuring that employees behave safely and responsibly when handling milk to reduce or prevent recontamination. For each CCP that was identified, a critical limit was established and specified. Critical limits were the criteria that were used to assess if a procedure was generating safe milk.
2.5. Statistical AnalysisThe collected (pre and pro-HACCP) samples were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 22. Results were recorded as mean ± SE, and analysis of variance was performed by ANOVA procedure to compare the results by at least significant difference (LSD) at P<0.05.
Before HACCP implementation, the total bacterial count (mean log 9.3±0.18), 83.1±25 CFU/mL Coliform count, 96.1±4.1 CFU/mL E. coli and 27±9.7 CFU/mL Staph. aureus count was recorded in the selling points milk samples, and the count for each microbiology parameter was beyond the acceptable level (Table 4) according to the national microbiological food standards.
Higher bacterial counts attributed to the unsatisfactory level of hygiene milk handling, ineffective cleaning procedures, lack of cooling facilities, and workers training. After HACCP implementation, the total bacterial count (mean log 4.4±0.15), 16±4.8 CFU/mL coliform count, 18.4±0.90 CFU/mL E. coli and 4.2±1.5 Staph. aureus count was noted in the final product (raw milk) collected from the selling points, the count was reduced to a considerable level but not to an acceptable level according to the Punjab Pure Food standards. The results obtained revealed that the mean log values of total colony count (CFU/mL) of examined samples were significantly reduced at (P<0.05) after HACCP implementation. The total colony count, coliform, E. coli, and Staphylococcus aureus counts (CFU/mL) in raw milk samples were reduced by 53.76%, 80.4%, 77%, and 83.7% to the mean value respectively, as presented in Table 5.
The results used in this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of the sanitary, hand washing, and overall personal hygiene practices of food handlers for the entire assessment period. Milk handling workers were trained to carry out GVP, GMP, and GHP to assure the best quality of raw milk. The critical control in animal washing, pre, and post-udder preparation, utensils sterilization, hand washing, and temperature control was monitored to reduce high levels of pathogenic microorganisms, to a safe level. Purchase chemicals from authorized dealers and apply with sufficient rinsing cold water to avoid any chance of contamination, cool insulated facility maintained the milk temperature to protect it from spoilage. For proper implementation of the HACCP system, effective implementation of prerequisite programs was employed. As data revealed that before HACCP implementation any of the collected samples (100%) did not meet the microbiological criteria but after HACCP system implementation the total bacterial count in 58 (64%), coliforms in 67 (64%), E. coli in 77 (85%) and Staph. aureus in 67 (64%) samples out of a total 90 (n-90) were accounted in acceptable microbiological criteria according to the Punjab Pure Food Standards. Application of effective cleaning procedures combined with carefully planned parameters such as efficient animal washing and drying, sanitization and disinfection of pre and pro-milking udder preparation, controlled cooling temperature system in the storage tank, transportation cans, and hygienically milk handling throughout the supply chain significantly improved the bacteriological condition of the final product as shown in Table 6.
At a local site in Karachi, the HACCP system for the entire supply chain was established step-by-step using the twelve steps described in the methodology section above. The prerequisite program was made available to reduce risks and simplify the HACCP plan. The identification of hazards, monitoring of critical limits, and validation of corrective actions were carried out based on literature, manuals, and standards. The HACCP team found the CCPs by logically responding to queries presented in the decision trees. The critical control points (CCPs) were selected using the decision tree technique because it is a visual, simple-to-understand alternative to numerical charts and statistical probabilities used in other decisions. For the identified hazards, control measures were advised and for the identified CCPs, appropriate monitoring procedures and corrective actions were proposed.
3.1. Constraints in Adopting the HACCP SystemThe need for awareness and responsiveness of HACCP, a lack of dairy-related personnel training, uneducated employees and owners, resistance to traditional changes, ignorance of food safety and security, a lack of management commitment, uneven animal care, a lack of government support in the implementation of food safety management program and a lack of technical and professional expertise were just a few of the obstacles in implementing the HACCP system. Best management practices were followed in the HACCP program as preventative measures to ensure food safety. The HACCP method was found to have a better preventative approach than traditional quality milk control systems since it places more emphasis on risk management than end product analysis. Additionally, the working personnel played a major role in the HACCP methodology's performance. The benefits of employing HACCP procedures were confirmed by the high levels of satisfaction indicated by owners who took part in the implementation of this technique.
The microbiological assessment of raw milk showed a high bacterial count before the HCCAP implementation, the count was beyond the acceptance criteria in all the collected samples from selling points. This reflects the poor sanitation and hygienic practices within the supply chain.
After the HACCP implementation, the bacterial count was reduced to a considerable level in the collected milk sample from the same site. Due to limited resources, still positive progress was witnessed in the study. The results of this study reflect that there is a remarkable improvement in milk microbial hygiene, which means that our HACCP system is effective. However, continual improvement may be achieved by periodic monitoring of risk.
The authors would like to thank their colleagues for being supportive during the study.
The project was partially funded by a grant from the Dean, Faculty of Science, University of Karachi, Pakistan (AZN).
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Abbreviation: Full name
HACCP: Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
CCPs: Critical Control Points
GMPs: Good manufacturing practices
SSOPs: Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures
FDA: Food and Drug Administration
BAM: Bacteriological Analytical Manual
PCA: Plate Count Agar
EMB: Eosin Methylene Blue
BPA: Baird-Parker Agar
MPN: Most Probable Number
BHI: Brain Heart Infusion
RV: Rappaport Vassiliadis
TT: Tetrathionate
XLD: Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate
HE: Hektoen enteric
FOA: Food and Agriculture Organization
[1] | Sattar, A. Milk Production in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) 2020; Available from: https://pide.org.pk/blog/milk-production-in-pakistan/. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | Economic Adviser's Wing. The Pakistan Economic Survey 2019-20, 2020. Government of Pakistan. https://www.finance.gov.pk/. | ||
In article | |||
[3] | Jan, T., Yadav, K. and Borude, S. Study of HACCP implementation in milk processing plant at Khyber Agro Pvt. Ltd in Jammu & Kashmir. J Food Process Technol, 7(610). 2. 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Owusu-Kwarteng, J., Akabanda, F., Agyei, D. and Jespersen, L. Microbial safety of milk production and fermented dairy products in Africa. Microorganisms, 8(5).752. 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | Javed, A. Food borne health issues and their relevance to Pakistani Society. American Academic Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 26(4). 235-251. 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[6] | Cusato, S., Gameiro, A. H., Corassin, C. H., Santana, A. S., Cruz, G. A., Faria, J. A. and Oliveira, C. A. Food safety systems in a small dairy factory: Implementation, major challenges, and assessment of systems' performances. Foodborne pathogens and disease, 10(1). 12. 2013. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[7] | Shkromada, O., Skliar, O., Paliy, A., Ulko, L., Gerun, I., Naumenko, O., Ishchenko, K., Kysternaet, O., Musiienko, O. and Paliy, A. Development of measures to improve milk quality and safety during production. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (11). 30-39. 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | Marri, N., Losito, F., Boffe, L., Giangolini, G., Amatiste, S., Murgia, L., Arienzo, A. and Antonini, G. Rapid microbiological assessment in raw milk: validation of a rapid alternative method for the assessment of microbiological quality in raw milk. Foods, 9(9). 1186. 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[9] | Muhammad, K., Altaf, A., Hanif, A., Anjum, A. A. and Tipu, M. Y. Monitoring of hygienic status of raw milk marketed in Lahore City, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 19(2). 74-77. 2009. | ||
In article | |||
[10] | Melini, F., Melini, V., Luziatelli, F. and Ruzzi, M. Raw and heat-treated milk: From public health risks to nutritional quality. Beverages, 3(4). 54. 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | Quintana, Á.R., Sesena, S., Garzon, A. and Arias, R. Factors affecting levels of airborne bacteria in dairy farms: A review. Animals, 10(3). 526. 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2023 Sayed Zaheer Abbas, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Anjum Zehra Naqvi, Kashan Kaif, Nargis Tabassum, Zulfiqar Ali Mirani, Abdul Basit Khan, Anila Siddiqui and Mazahir Hussain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | Sattar, A. Milk Production in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) 2020; Available from: https://pide.org.pk/blog/milk-production-in-pakistan/. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | Economic Adviser's Wing. The Pakistan Economic Survey 2019-20, 2020. Government of Pakistan. https://www.finance.gov.pk/. | ||
In article | |||
[3] | Jan, T., Yadav, K. and Borude, S. Study of HACCP implementation in milk processing plant at Khyber Agro Pvt. Ltd in Jammu & Kashmir. J Food Process Technol, 7(610). 2. 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Owusu-Kwarteng, J., Akabanda, F., Agyei, D. and Jespersen, L. Microbial safety of milk production and fermented dairy products in Africa. Microorganisms, 8(5).752. 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | Javed, A. Food borne health issues and their relevance to Pakistani Society. American Academic Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 26(4). 235-251. 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[6] | Cusato, S., Gameiro, A. H., Corassin, C. H., Santana, A. S., Cruz, G. A., Faria, J. A. and Oliveira, C. A. Food safety systems in a small dairy factory: Implementation, major challenges, and assessment of systems' performances. Foodborne pathogens and disease, 10(1). 12. 2013. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[7] | Shkromada, O., Skliar, O., Paliy, A., Ulko, L., Gerun, I., Naumenko, O., Ishchenko, K., Kysternaet, O., Musiienko, O. and Paliy, A. Development of measures to improve milk quality and safety during production. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (11). 30-39. 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | Marri, N., Losito, F., Boffe, L., Giangolini, G., Amatiste, S., Murgia, L., Arienzo, A. and Antonini, G. Rapid microbiological assessment in raw milk: validation of a rapid alternative method for the assessment of microbiological quality in raw milk. Foods, 9(9). 1186. 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[9] | Muhammad, K., Altaf, A., Hanif, A., Anjum, A. A. and Tipu, M. Y. Monitoring of hygienic status of raw milk marketed in Lahore City, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 19(2). 74-77. 2009. | ||
In article | |||
[10] | Melini, F., Melini, V., Luziatelli, F. and Ruzzi, M. Raw and heat-treated milk: From public health risks to nutritional quality. Beverages, 3(4). 54. 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | Quintana, Á.R., Sesena, S., Garzon, A. and Arias, R. Factors affecting levels of airborne bacteria in dairy farms: A review. Animals, 10(3). 526. 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||