sciepub.com
Quick Submission
Effect of Mulching and Different Doses of Phosphorous in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Yield and Residual Soil Chemical Properties at Bhairahawa, Nepal
Anish Sapkota1,
, Sanjok Poudel1, Udaya Subedi1, Ruchi Shrivastav1, Janma Jaya Gairhe2, Subodh Khanal2, Keshab Raj Pande3
1BSc. in Agriculture, Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agricultiure and Animal Science, Nepal
2Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Nepal
3Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal
Abstract
A research was carried to identify the production performance of catch crop cowpea at subtropical climatic condition of Nepal (Rupandehi) during dry to wet season transition period April to July 2014 using 6 different treatments with 4 replications in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Significant result at 5% level of probability with moisture retention of 14.463% in case of mulching and 12.970% in case of no mulched was observed. Similarly highly significant (at 1% level of probability) result was found for plant height at 13 days after sowing with plant height of 17.498cm in case of mulching and 14.459cm in case of no mulching. The result shows highly significant result for effect of mulching in cowpea yield
Keywords: cowpea yield, mulching, phosphorous, catch crop, B: C ratio
Received August 25, 2015; Revised September 15, 2015; Accepted September 28, 2015
Copyright © 2015 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- Anish Sapkota, Sanjok Poudel, Udaya Subedi, Ruchi Shrivastav, Janma Jaya Gairhe, Subodh Khanal, Keshab Raj Pande. Effect of Mulching and Different Doses of Phosphorous in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Yield and Residual Soil Chemical Properties at Bhairahawa, Nepal. World Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2015, pp 163-173. https://pubs.sciepub.com/wjar/3/5/3
- Sapkota, Anish, et al. "Effect of Mulching and Different Doses of Phosphorous in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Yield and Residual Soil Chemical Properties at Bhairahawa, Nepal." World Journal of Agricultural Research 3.5 (2015): 163-173.
- Sapkota, A. , Poudel, S. , Subedi, U. , Shrivastav, R. , Gairhe, J. J. , Khanal, S. , & Pande, K. R. (2015). Effect of Mulching and Different Doses of Phosphorous in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Yield and Residual Soil Chemical Properties at Bhairahawa, Nepal. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(5), 163-173.
- Sapkota, Anish, Sanjok Poudel, Udaya Subedi, Ruchi Shrivastav, Janma Jaya Gairhe, Subodh Khanal, and Keshab Raj Pande. "Effect of Mulching and Different Doses of Phosphorous in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Yield and Residual Soil Chemical Properties at Bhairahawa, Nepal." World Journal of Agricultural Research 3, no. 5 (2015): 163-173.
| Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
At a glance: Figures
1. Introduction
Grain legumes are the important crops in terms of their contribution to human nutrition. ASD [3] reported that the grain legumes cover 10.5% of the total cultivated land of Nepal. Grain legumes occupy 10.22% of the cultivated area which is equal to 0.316 million ha with 0.27 mt production and productivity of 0.85 t/ha [2]. Per capita consumption of grain legumes in Nepal is around 10kg/annum or 27g/capita/day [26] which is 3 times less than minimum requirement (80 g/ capita/day) prescribed by WHO [42].
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) is an important crop, contributing to the health and livelihood of millions of people in tropical and sub-tropical countries, particularly Africa (Nigeria, Niger, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Senegal, Togo) and Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Nepal, China, Malaysia) [32].
On average cowpea grains contain 23-25% protein and 50-67% starch in dry bases [37]. From a single planting, one may be able to have several products such as leaves, immature pods, immature and mature seeds. Careful and positive attention to cowpea would support 850 million people in the world with high incidence of undernourishment in sub-Saharan Africa as documented by FAO [11, 12].
Cowpea is grown mostly in Terai region of Nepal. It is generally grown as intercrop in maize. The research in cowpea is very less in case of our country and farmer generally plant cowpea just for the purpose of the vegetables. They rarely used the recommended doses of different fertilizers as cowpea is considered minor crop with next major crop. Despite being the grain legumes it is an important crop that fixes atmospheric nitrogen in the soil and helps to maintain the soil health and fertility and makes soil favorable for next season crops. Cowpea responds to applied phosphorus by which it increases its root growth, nodulation and growth yield [9]. Similarly, mulching had positive effects on soil moisture conservation and improved cowpea yield [18, 33].
Soil is vital to life and thus called 'the greatest heritage of mankind'. Humans were historically dependent on hunting and gathering of food to sustain life. With the increase in human population, organized agricultural systems were needed to ensure food security. Our relationship with soil is based upon cultivation of soil throughout human history and led to success of civilizations. This relationship between humans, the earth and the food sources upholds the soil as the foundation of agriculture [29]. Soil is the integrated component of agriculture, forest and grassland ecosystems [4]. The ecosystem approach in the study of soil allows us to use an integrated approach in the management of the soil problems [15]. Mitigating soil problems results in healthy soil, improved supply of essential nutrients for plant growth, good soil environment and reduced environmental hazards.
Hence, to make the use of land which is being barren after the harvest of wheat and before plantation of rice here in case of Bhairahawa, Nepal and to prevent soil leaching and loss of nutrients by the activity of nodules this research attempts is made to see the feasibility and practical application of growing cowpea under two different factors; mulching and different doses of phosphorous.
Though Nepal has tremendous capacity for the production of cowpea there is lack of support for research on cowpea improvement with respect to manpower and operational Nepal Government funds. In addition there is little improved technology to extend inclusively improved seeds, lack of credits, production inputs and poor planning and inadequate management. Nepalese farmers are leaving land barren between two successive crops due to lack of knowledge about catch crops and short duration crops that have both economical and ecological importance. Cowpea is among various grain legumes that have short crop cycle bearing both economic and ecological importance. Similarly farmers are adopting improper cultivation practices of cowpea using different doses of fertilizers that are not recommended and cowpea is being considered crop of minor importance.
Likewise due to insufficient research works on the management of cowpea, different doses of phosphorous, effect of mulching and sowing times farmers are unable to exploit the potential yield of Cowpea under Bhairahawa condition and similar agro-climatic condition of Nepal.
The increase in productivity of cowpea will assist to fulfill the increasing demand of protein food. Careful and positive attention to cowpea would support 850 million people in the world with high incidence of undernourishment as documented by FAO [11, 12].
Cowpea is a newly introduced crop in case of Nepal. Farmers are cultivating it without any information of accurate time of sowing and nutrient application. Sole cropping of cowpea is not usually being practiced by farmers as they prefer intercropping with maize. Knowledge about soil health and soil productivity in relation to yield and growth and benefit of planting legumes is still not in reach among many farmers. After field survey to know about biodiversity status of people residing around this Paklihawa, Bhairahawa we found that between the periods of wheat harvest to rice plantation they rarely cultivate in the field. This condition degrades the soil causing leaching and flow of soil nutrient. Temperature during summer ranges between 35-40°C, mulching plays great role in conserving soil moisture and gives crops suitable growing condition [10] this leads to good cultivation and production. Growing legume crops fixes atmospheric nitrogen and makes soil reach in nitrogen which is another major benefit. Mulching helps to add organic matter as well in long period.
As there is limited research in the field of cowpea and effect of mulching and phosphorous in this region, our experiment wants to disclose the feasibility of growing cowpea as catch crop under different treatments for both economical and ecological benefit for the farmers. So finding of this research work will help to increase the productivity of cowpea as well as livelihood status of the people involved in its cultivation. An attempt was made to find the feasibility of mulching and application of different doses of fertilizer to enrich the fertility status of soil.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cropping History and Experimental DesignExperiment was conducted at Horticulture Farm of IAAS, Paklihawa Campus, Bhairahawa which was barren for past few months. Initial chemical properties of the research field reads as given in the table below.
)
Bhairahawa is a low land in plain area and dominantly prevails with alluvial clay soil. Soil of the experimental site was low in organic matter content & total available Nitrogen but Medium in exchangeable potassium and available soil Phosphorus with Neutral pH.
2.2. Experimental Setup2.2.1. Field Layout
The experiment was laid out on Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 4 replications. First factor was different doses of Phosphorous (48, 40 and 32 Kg/ha), which was incorporated in the field prior to seed sowing and next factor was mulching (mulched and no mulched) which was done in selected plots after sowing of seed. Plant to plant spacing was maintained 20 cm and row to row spacing was maintained 60 cm. The area of each plot was (1x1.5) 1.5 m2 and spacing between plots in same replication was 20 cm. There were 24 plots and total area under cultivation was thus (24 x1.5) 36 m2. Two adjoining replications were separated by distance of 1m. There was two row in each plots and 7 plants in each row.
2.2.2. Treatment Detail
The research consists of 3 levels of phosphorous and 2 types of mulching.
Recommended dose (20:40:20 Kg NPK/ha)
High dose of phosphorous: (20:48:20 Kg NPK/ha)
Control dose of phosphorous: (20:00:20 Kg NPK/ha)
All these doses are coupled with 20kg/ha of Farm Yard Manure.
So, there were all together 6 treatments.
2.2.3. Cultivation Practices Adopted
Two ploughing followed by harrowing was done manually to break down the clods, water channels were made around the field and the field for experiment was raised few centimeters than the normal level of the field. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds were collected from Siddhartha Agrovet of Bhairahawa Market. Long Yard Bean (Pole type) was the variety used for the experiment. Two seeds per hill was sown with two rows and seven hills per row is a single plot 0f 1.5 m2 area. Full dose of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium was applied after preparation of the field before sowing. Farm Yard Manure was also applied in the field at the rate of 20 Ton/ha in whole field. Immediately after sowing of the seed in the plot Mulching was done as per the treatment in respective plots. Mustard straw was used as a Mulching material. Mulching of 6 t/ha was maintained in the field. Mustard has a C:N ratio of 33:1. Mustard straw is easily available around those areas so it was selected for the research purpose Irrigation, weeding and hoeing were done at regular interval.
2.3. Soil and Plant Parameter Studied2.3.1. Recording of Soil pH, Nitrogen, Phosphorous, Potassium and Organic Matter Content
Soil samples were collected in a Z-shape with 15 spots from each replication at a depth of 20 cm before application of FYM and fertilizers. A composite sample was made for each replication by mixing the soil of 15 spots of each replication. It was then be shade-dried, ground, sieved through 1.4 mm sieve and subjected to determine their major nutrient status of experimental site. Similarly, final soil sample was collected from each plots, total 24 samples were taken after harvesting. Their nutrient status was determined using following analysis method;
2.3.2. Phenological Observation of Cow pea
Six sample plants from each plot were selected randomly to determine various Phenological characters such as plant height, yield attributing characters and yields. The height was measured from the point near to soil surface to the longest portion of the plant tip. The following parameters were taken under consideration: Number of pods/plant, No of seeds/pod, length of the pods, number of seeds /pod, weight per/pod, weight of the seed/pod, Green pod yield (ton/ha) and dry weight of pods
2.4. Statistical AnalysisAll the recorded data were compiled and analyzed through MSTAT-C package. Mean were separated by Least Significant Difference test (LSD) and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).
2.5. Economic AnalysisCost of cultivation was calculated on the basis of local rates of inputs used during the research, gross return was calculated from the value of grain yield/ha and the difference of gross return and cost of cultivation was the net return obtained then the Benefit: Cost ratio was calculated for the purpose of economic analysis.
2.6. Meteorological Data during Cropped SeasonThe experimental site lies in the sub-tropical humid climatic zone of Nepal. It is characterized by three distinct seasons: Rainy Monsoon, Cool Winter and Hot Spring. The meteorological data such as temperature (maximum, mean and minimum), and rainfall were recorded during cropping period from nearest point of agro meteorological data recorder, Bhairahawa Airport, Bhairahawa. Maximum temperature, mean temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation recorded during the period is recorded is show in the Figure below. Data reveals that maximum temperature recorded was 41°C and minimum temperature was 17°C with precipitation only for three times recording 8mm maximum and 4mm minimum.
Download as
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Soil Moisture3.1.1. Effect of Mulching in Soil Moisture
Moisture content of the soil varies significantly with the effect of the mulching. Mulching had positive effects on soil moisture conservation and improved cowpea yield [19, 33]. Our field research shows significant result at 5% level of probability with moisture retention of 14.463% in case of mulching and 12.970% in case of no mulched. Tolk et al. [39] and Liu et al. [22] has concluded that mulching increases soil moisture and nutrients availability to plant roots, in turn, leading to higher grain yield.
Download as
Table 4. Effect of mulching and different doses of phosphorous in cowpea plant height in Paklihawa, Bhairahawa, Nepal, 2014
3.2.1. Effect of Mulching on Plant Height
13 DAS
Soil moisture plays crucial role during growth and vegetative stage. Result reveals that effect of mulching in regards to plant height is highly significant (at 1% level of probability) till 13 days after sowing with plant height of 17.498cm in case of mulching and 14.459cm in case of no mulching.
18 DAS
Result reveals that effect of mulching solely doesn't have any significant result in case of plant height. But revealed data suggested interaction of mulching and different doses of phosphorous have significant result at 5% level of probability with maximum height of 28.780 cm in mulching and control dose of phosphorous interaction and minimum height of 22.293 cm in no mulching and control dose of phosphorous interaction.
23 DAS
Mulching solely doesn't reveal any significant results but their interaction with different doses of phosphorous shows significant result at 5% level of probability. Maximum height was recorded to be 37.640 cm in mulching and control dose of phosphorous interaction and minimum height was recorded to be 26.855 cm in no mulching and control dose of phosphorous interaction.
28 DAS
With increase in days after showing, interaction of mulching and control dose of phosphorous recorded maximum plant height measuring 57.492 cm at 28 DAS and minimum in no mulching and control dose of phosphorous interaction with height of 36.912 cm. These interactions were found significant at 5% level of probability.
Download as
3.2.2. Effect of Phosphorous in Plant height
Result obtained revealed no any significant result solely in response to different phosphorous doses. But the interaction of control dose of phosphorous with mulching has significant results at 5% level of probability with maximum plant height measuring 57.492 cm at 28 DAS and minimum in no mulching and control dose of phosphorous interaction with height of 36.912 cm.
Download as
Table 5. Effect of mulching and different doses of phosphorous in residual soil chemical properties in Paklihawa, Bhairahawa, Nepal, 2014
3.3.1. Effect of Mulching in Soil Chemical Properties
3.3.1.1. Effect of Mulching in Residual Organic Matter Content
No significant results were observed in organic matter content due to the use of mulching. As the research was of short term and increase in organic matter content is long and gradual process it is not likely to increase organic matter content in this short period. However, organic matter content of the soil was measured 2.113% in mulched soil and 2.066% in no mulched as shown in Figure 5. This data revealed that organic matter content is low [40].
3.3.1.2 Effect of Mulching in Residual Nitrogen Content of Soil
Effect of mulching in soil nitrogen content was found highly insignificant. However the nitrogen content in the field was recorded medium when measured with Kjeldahl distillation [6] recording 0.106% and 0.104% respectively in mulched and no mulched soil as show in Figure 5.
Download as
3.3.1.3. Effect of Mulching in Residual Phosphorous Content of Soil
Insignificant result was observed for the effect of mulching in phosphorous content of the soil. Soil samples tested after final harvest reveals that the phosphorous content was found 147.117 kg P2O5/ha in mulched soil and 159.675 kg P2O5/ha in no mulched soil which is shown in Figure 5. Though the result is insignificant the phosphorous content of soil is satisfactory and is labeled as very high when measured through Olsen’s bicarbonate.
3.3.1.4. Effect of Mulching in Residual Potash of the Soil
Highly significant result, as shown in Figure 5, was observed on the effect of mulching in potash content of the soil at (1 % level of probability) measuring 219.992 kg K2O/ha in mulched soil and 154.208 kg K2O/ha in no mulched soil.
3.3.1.5. Effect of Mulching in pH of the Soil
Soil pH was less likely affected by mulching and is found insignificant measuring 7.6 and 7.617 in mulched and no mulched soil which is clearly shown in Figure 5.
3.3.2. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in Soil Chemical Properties
3.3.2.1. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in Residual Organic Matter Content.
No significant results were observed in organic matter content due to the use of different doses of phosphorous. As the research was of short term and increase in organic matter content is long and gradual process it is not likely to increase organic matter content in this short period. However, organic matter content of the soil was measured 2.087%, 2.170% and 2.011% in high dose, recommended dose and control dose application of phosphorous which is shown in Figure 6.
3.3.2.2. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in Residual Nitrogen of Soil
Effect of different doses of phosphorous in soil nitrogen content was found insignificant as shown in Figure 6. However the nitrogen content in the field was recorded medium when measured with Kjeldahl distillation [6] recording 0.106%, 0.107% and 0.101% when high, recommended and control dose of phosphorous are applied respectively. This result shows that high dose of phosphorous would not aid to increase nitrogen content of the soil.
3.3.2.3. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in Residual Phosphorous of Soil
Insignificant result was observed for the effect of phosphorous in phosphorous content of the soil. Soil samples tested after final harvest reveals that the phosphorous content was found 153.387 kg P2O5/ha when high dose of phosphorous is applied, 161.637 kg P2O5/ha when recommended dose of phosphorous is applied and 145.163 kg P2O5/ha when control dose of phosphorous is applied and is shown in Figure 6. Though the result is insignificant the phosphorous content of soil is satisfactory and is labeled as very high when measured through Olsen’s bicarbonate [28]. This result shows that application of more phosphorous than recommended would not aid to increase phosphorous content of the soil.
3.3.2.4. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in Residual Potassium of the Soil
Effect of phosphorous shows no any significant results in potassium content of the soil but measures 184.825 kg K2O/ha when high dose of phosphorous is applied, 184.837 kg K2O/ha when recommended dose of phosphorous is applied and 191.637 kg K2O/ha when control dose of phosphorous is applied.
3.3.2.5. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in pH of Soil
Soil pH was less likely affected by application of different doses of phosphorous and is found insignificant, as shown in Figure 6, measuring 7.537, 7.637 and 7.650 when high, recommended and control dose of phosphorous are applied respectively.
Download as
Table 6. Effect of mulching and different doses of phosphorous in cowpea biological parameters in Paklihawa, Bhairahawa, Nepal, 2014
3.4.1. Effect of Mulching in Biological Parameters
3.4.1.1. Effect of Mulching in Number of Pods/Plot
Insignificant result was obtained for the effect of mulching in number of pods. However, the average length of 76.750 cm and 69.000 cm are recorded for mulched and no mulched plot respectively and is shown in Figure 7.
Download as
3.4.1.2. Effect of Mulching in Pod Length
Effect of mulching and interaction of mulching and different doses of phosphorous shows significant result at 5% level of probability in case of pod length. The length of pod recorded in mulched plot was found to be 43.651 cm and 39.531 cm in no mulched plot. Similarly, maximum length of 46.920 cm was recorded when mulching and recommended dose of phosphorous interacted and minimum of 38.497 cm when control dose of phosphorous interacted with no mulching condition.
3.4.1.3. Effect of Mulching in Green Pod Weight/Plot
Green pod weight is found insignificant to the effect of mulching however the green pod yield of 855.908 gm/plot of 1.5 m2 and 632.277 gm/plot of 1.5 m2 were recorded in mulched and no mulched condition.
3.4.1.4. Effect of Mulching in Total Pod Yield
Mulching shows significant result in total pod yield of cowpea recording 5.706 ton/ha in mulched field and 4.215 ton/ha in no mulched field. Simpson and Gumbs [33] reported that mulched plots gave higher seed yield than that of unmulched plots. Mulching had positive effects on soil moisture conservation and improved cowpea yield. [18, 33]. This aids to our research finding as our finding is being similar to previous research activities.
Similar findings was recorded by B.K Singh 2014 suggesting Mulching of French bean with dried grasses and crop residues led to higher single pod weight, pod length, pod weight/ plant and pod yield by 10.9, 12.8, 20.1 and 20.2 %, respectively.
3.4.2. Effect of Different Doses of Phosphorous in Biological Parameters
Different doses of phosphorous shows insignificant result to number of pod/plot, pod length, green pod weight and total pod yield. However its interaction with mulching shows significant result for pod length. Interaction of both mulching and different doses of phosphorous shows maximum height recorded of 46.920 cm when mulching and recommended dose of phosphorous interacted and minimum of 38.497 cm when control dose of phosphorous interacted with no mulching condition. Abdel-ati [1] reported that phosphorus application had a significant effect on pod length of cowpea this showcase our finding on pod length is similar to previous research activities.
Download as
Data from economic analysis revealed that Mulching leads to significant high yield as compared to non-mulching and was economic method of cultivation of cowpea.
The then Labor cost was NRs.25/hr and selling price of Cowpea was NRs. 25/Kg. Based on these rates and the then market prices of other inputs used following economic calculation was made.
Both net return and B: C ratio was higher from Mulched plot as compared to unmulched plot. The average cost of cultivation was 17.34% lower from Mulched plot as compared to Non Mulching.
4. Summary & Conclusion
4.1. SummaryField experiment was conducted to know the effect of mulching and different doses of fertilizer in cowpea yield and residual soil chemical properties in IAAS, Paklihawa Campus, Bhairahawa. There were 24 plots each measuring 1x1.5 m2 with four replications and six different treatments. The whole experiment was designed in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). In about 80 days, the whole field work, starting from land preparation to harvesting and final soil sample collection was finished. There were 14 plants in each plot of 1.5m2 divided in two rows containing 7 plants in each row. Different biological parameters like, pod length, pod weight, number of pods/plant, green pod weight and total pod yield was recorded. Likely, soil chemical parameters like Nitrogen, Phosphorous, Potassium and organic matter content of the soil and soil pH were analyzed using appropriate methods. Data on soil moisture and plant height were also recorded. The data thus obtained were analyzed using MSTAT-C and bar/line graphs were designed using Microsoft Excel.
Soil moisture was affected by mulching showing significant result at 5% level of probability with moisture retention of 14.463% in case of mulching and 12.970% in case of no mulched.
Likely mulching showed highly significant role during germination and vegetative growth stage recording plant height of 17.498cm in case of mulching and 14.459cm in case of no mulching when measured in 13 DAS. 13 DAS significant effect of interaction of mulching and different doses of phosphorous was seen. Interaction of mulching with control dose of phosphorous recorded higher plant height whereas lower plant height was seen in the interaction of no mulching and control dose of phosphorous. There were no any significant results solely by different doses of phosphorous to cowpea plant height.
Increase in soil organic content is a lifelong process which will take many years to increase its content. As our research was carried for short period, we were not able to see significant result of mulching and different doses of phosphorous application to soil chemical parameters. Significant result was observed in soil potassium due to effect of mulching measuring 219.992 kg K2O/ha in mulched soil and 154.208 kg K2O/ha in no mulched soil. Besides this, mulching has no any significant result to soil organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous and pH. Similarly, no any significant results were there for the effect of phosphorous in soil parameters like organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and pH.
Mulching showed no any significant result to number of pod/plot and green pod weight but was significant to pod length and total pod yield. The length of pod recorded in mulched plot was found to be 43.651 cm and 39.531 cm in no mulched plot which was significant at 5% level of probability in case of pod length. Similarly, mulching revealed significant result in total pod yield of cowpea recording 5.706 ton/ha in mulched field and 4.215 ton/ha in no mulched field.
Effect of phosphorous has no any significant result in regards to organic matter content, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and pH of the soil. However, the interaction of phosphorous and mulching shows significant results for pod length with maximum height recorded of 46.920 cm when mulching and recommended dose of phosphorous interacted and minimum of 38.497 cm when control dose of phosphorous interacted with no mulching condition.
4.2. ConclusionSoil moisture, plant height, pod length, total yield and potassium content were significantly affected by mulching. Interaction of mulching with different doses of phosphorous also showed significant results for plant height and pod length. Soil parameters, like organic matter content, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and pH to show significant results required long duration research period. Mulching also addresses on going conservation practices for sustainable and profitable farming. As cowpea yield are increased through the use of mulching we could suggest farmers to adopt mulching practices for profitable farming through sustainability. Though effect of phosphorous didn't showed any significant result but it was clear that there were no decrease in soil parameters content than that was in initial sample. It is also a great help to preserve soil nutrient. As farmers usually leave the land barren after wheat harvesting to before rice plantation, the short period between that could be best utilized through to preserve soil nutrient loss because of leaching and sun burn through the use of cowpea as catch crop.
References
| [1] | Abdel-ati, Y.Y. 2000. Growth and yield of cowpea as affected by irrigation regime, phosphorus application and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae infection treatments. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31 (2): 21-28. | ||
 In article | |||
| [2] | Anon. 2005. Statistical information in Nepalese agriculture HMG/MOA. Agricultural Statistics, Singh Darwar, Kathmandu. | ||
| In article | |||
| [3] | ASD. 2001. Area, production and yield of pulse crops in Nepal. Kathmandu, Sajha publications. | ||
| In article | |||
| [4] | Brady, N.C. and R.R. Weil. 2005. The nature and properties of soil. 13th edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 887, 902, 905 and 960p. | ||
| In article | |||
| [5] | Bremner, J. M. 1965. Total Nitrogen. In: C. A. Black (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbial properties. Number 9 in series Agronomy. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Publisher, Madison, USA. Pp. 1049-1178. | ||
| In article | |||
| [6] | Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S. (1982) “Total nitrogen”, In: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeny, (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 1119-1123. | ||
| In article | |||
| [7] | C.S. Kamara (1980). Effects of Planting Date and Mulching on Cowpea in Sierra Leone. Experimental Agriculture / Volume 17 / Issue 01 / January 1981, pp 25-31. | ||
| In article | |||
| [8] | Choudhary, G.L. and Yadav, L.R. 2011. Effect of fertility level and foliar nutrition on cowpea productivity. Journal of Food Legume, 24 (1): 67-68. | ||
| In article | |||
| [9] | Chowdhary, M.S., 1981, Nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes under mixed cropping system. Field Crop Abstract, 32 (5):468. | ||
| In article | |||
| [10] | Erenstein, O., 2002. Crop residue mulching in tropical and semi-tropical countries: An evaluation of residue availability and other technological implications. Soil and Tillage Research 67, 115-133 | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [11] | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations), 2005. The state of food and agriculture. Document prepared for the International Conference on Worlds’ state of food. FAO, Rome, Italy. | ||
| In article | |||
| [12] | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations), 2006. The state of food and agriculture:Food aid for food security? From: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0800e/a0800e01.pdf Cited on 21/07/2014. | ||
| In article | |||
| [13] | FAOSTAT (2011) FAO Statistics Division 2011 (accessed 21/07/2014). | ||
| In article | |||
| [14] | Gandhi, D.V.; Wagh, R.G. and Thorat, S.T. 1991. Effect of sowing times and fertilization on yield and quality of cowpea. Agricultural Science Digest, 11: 178-180. | ||
| In article | |||
| [15] | Goh, K.M. 2004. CArnon sequestration ans stabilization in soils: Implications for soil productivity and climate change. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 50:467-476. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [16] | J.P. Gupta (1986). Effect of tillage and mulch on soil and the growth and yield of cowpea grown in the arid tropics. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation Volume 1, Issue 3, 1987 | ||
| In article | |||
| [17] | Kabululu, M.S. 2008. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) variety mixtures for stable and optimal leaf and seed yields when intercropped with maize in Central Tanzania. MSc thesis at Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany. 75 pp. | ||
| In article | |||
| [18] | Kamara, D.S. 1981. Effects of planting date and mulching on cowpea in Sierre Leone. Expl Agric. 17: 25-31. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [19] | Khera, K.L., Singh, G., 1995. Effect of Paddy Straw mulch and Rainfall Intensity on Runoff and Soil Loss under Stimulated Rainfall. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation. 23, 20-23. | ||
| In article | |||
| [20] | Krishna, S., Kamal, D.K. and Sharma, A.P. 2001. Effect of starter doses of nitrogen on nodulation, yield and nutrient uptake of chickpea. Legume Research, 24 (2): 275-277. | ||
| In article | |||
| [21] | Ledgard, S.F and Steel, K.W. (1992). Biological Nitroen Fixation in mixed legumes/grass pasture. Plant and soil journal, 141: 1337-153. | ||
| In article | |||
| [22] | Liu C.M., Zhang X.Y., Zhang Y.Q. 2002. Determination of Daily Evaporation and Evapotranspiration of Winter Wheat and Maize by Large-Scale Weighing Lysimeter and Microlysimeter. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 111, 109-120. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [23] | Magani, I.E. and Kuchinda, C (2009). Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on growth, yield and crude protein content of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata[L.] Walp) in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Biosciences 23: 1387 -1393 | ||
| In article | |||
| [24] | Mishra, S.K. 1999. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and seed inoculation on vegetable cowpea (Vigna signensis Savi). Annals Agricultural Research, 20 (3): 308-312. | ||
| In article | |||
| [25] | MoAC, 2008. Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture, 2007/2008, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Kathmandu. | ||
| In article | |||
| [26] | NARC. 2002. Annual report 2001/2002. National grain legumes research program, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal. | ||
| In article | |||
| [27] | Okeleya K A, O. M. (1997). Effect of phosphorous fertilizer on nodulation, growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) varieties. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 67, No 1. | ||
| In article | |||
| [28] | Olsen S, Cole C, Watanabe F, Dean L (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular Nr 939, US Govt. Print. Office, Washington, D.C. | ||
| In article | |||
| [29] | Parikh, S.J. and B.R. James. 2012. Soil: The Foundation of Agriculture. NAture Education Knowledge 3(10): 2. | ||
| In article | |||
| [30] | Polthanee, A.(1999-2000). Soil mulching effects on growth and yield of cowpea following rice in the post-monsoon season of Northeastern Thailand. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science 2000 Vol. 33 No. 3/4 pp. 167-178. | ||
| In article | |||
| [31] | Puspendra, K. and Singh, N.P. 1990. The effect of phosphorus and potash on yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Cv. Pusa Komal. Haryana Journal Horticultural Science, 19: 210-212. | ||
| In article | |||
| [32] | Rachie, K.O. 1985. Introduction. Pages xxi — xxviii in Cowpea Research, Production, and Utilization. (Eds S.R. Singh and K.O. Rachie. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 460 pp. | ||
| In article | |||
| [33] | Simpson, L.A. and F.A. Gumbs. 1986. A system of crop and soil management for the wet season production of food crops on a heavy clay soil in Guyana: b. Effect of mulching and tillage on germination, growth, nutrient uptake and yield. Trop. Agric. 63: 311-315. | ||
| In article | |||
| [34] | Singh, A., Baoule, A., Ahmed, H., Dikko, A., Aliyu, U., Sokoto, M., Alhassan, J., Musa, M. and Haliru, B. (2011) Influence of phosphorus on the performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.) varieties in the Sudan savanna of Nigeria. Agricultural Sciences, 2, 313-317. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [35] | Singh, B.B., O.L. Chambliss and B. Sharma, 1997. Recent advances in cowpea. In: B.B. | ||
| In article | |||
| [36] | Singh, D.R. Mohan Raj, K.E. Dashiel and L.E.N. Jackai (eds.). Advances in cowpea research. Co-publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp. 30-49. | ||
| In article | |||
| [37] | Quin, F.M., 1997. Introduction. In: B.B. Singh, D.R. Mohan Raj, K.E. Dashiel and L.E.N. Jackai (eds.). Advances in cowpea research. Co-publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). Ibadan, Nigeria. | ||
| In article | |||
| [38] | Timsina, J. and R.B. Thapa. 1991. Effect of defoliation on grain yield of cowpea. J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci. 12: 109-113. | ||
| In article | |||
| [39] | Tolk, J.A., T.A. Howell and S.R. Evett, 1999. Effect of mulch, irrigation and soil type on water use and yield of maize. Soil Till. Res., 50: 137-147 | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [40] | Walkley, A., and Black. 1934. An experimentation method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37: 29-38. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [41] | Wright, C. H. 1939. Soil Analysis. A handbook of physical and chemical methods. Thomas-Murty and Co. London. | ||
| In article | |||
| [42] | Yadav, C. R. 2000. Production Technology of Rajmas. Nepal Agriculture Research Council. Grain Legume Research Program, Rampur, Chitwan. | ||
| In article | |||
| [43] | Yadav, R. N. and A. P. Shrestha. 1993. Effect of different doses of Phosphorus and Potassium on grain yield of mungbean (Vigna radiata) under upland condition of Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal. IAAS Research Reports (1985-1991). Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci., Rampur, Chitwan: 341-345. | ||
| In article | |||
CiteULike
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
){kind=link}
