Managing fecal sludge waste is crucial to prevent potential environmental harm, and one promising approach is its transformation into organic soil amendments. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of compost derived from various organic waste sources and assess its impact on soil fertility, maize growth, yield, and economic viability. Four distinct compost types were generated using two primary organic waste sources: household solid waste (C1) and fecal sludge (FS) combined with solid household waste (SHW) in different proportions (C2, C3, and C4). These composts were then applied at varying rates to maize plots in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications, resulting in ten treatment groups. The findings revealed a progressive improvement in the physico-chemical properties of the composts from C1 to C4. Notably, phosphorus (P) content increased from 0.29±0.03 (C1) to 0.54±0.07 (C4), and the pH levels shifted from 7.72±0.61 (C2) to 8.00±0.57 (C1). Total nitrogen (TN) ranged between 1.08±0.01 (C1) and 1.23±0.02% (C4). All compost types positively influenced soil parameters. However, the application of 20 t.ha-1 of C1 resulted in greater above-ground biomass (48.23±12.64 t.ha-1), while the application of 20 t.ha-1 of C3 yielded the tallest maize plants (195.88± 7.35cm). Notably, compost C4 at a rate of 10 t.ha-1 exhibited the highest maize production and economic returns (7.95±0.26 t.ha-1, BCR = 2.81). In summary, treatment T7 (10 t.ha-1 of C4 compost) is recommended for achieving enhanced maize production and increased profitability. This study underscores the potential benefits of using organic composts, particularly those derived from fecal sludge and household waste, to enhance soil quality and crop yields in agricultural contexts.
Every day, each adult generates approximately 130 grams of feces and expels 1.4 liters of urine 1, 2. While it’s not the most glamorous topic, it’s important to understand the risks associated with poor sanitation. The consequences of inadequate sanitation are significant, posing considerable health and environmental risks that can lead to severe public health and ecological challenges 3. Recent findings indicate that the global proportion of people using improved sanitation facilities increased from 59% to 68% in 2015. However, up to 2.4 billion people still lack proper sanitation facilities, and 946 million people practice open defecation 4, 5. In sub-Saharan Africa alone, 709 million people lacked basic sanitation facilities in 2017 6. In Cameroon, 90% of households rely on individual sanitation systems, comprising latrines and septic tanks. Remarkably, 65% of these systems consist of traditional bottomless latrines 7, 8, 9, 10. The rich nutrient content found in this sludge offers significant benefits for enhancing soil fertility 11. Yet, the improper management of fecal sludge can have dire consequences. When this liquid waste is discharged haphazardly into the environment, it can contaminate water, soil, and air, disrupting ecosystem balance and contributing to waterborne diseases 3, 13, 14.
Most medium-sized towns in developing countries lack a recycling or agronomic value chain for sludge management. However, there is a silver lining. Biological or agricultural recovery, which involves the production of organic fertilizers, is an established technology that can transform sludge into high-value-added products while minimizing pollution risks and production costs 15. Human waste, including household waste, urine, and fecal sludge, is a rich source of organic matter that can be used to improve soil fertility 1, 2. In fact, according to 16, one person produces enough excreta to grow 250 kg of grain per year, which is enough to cover their annual food needs. By using human feces in agriculture, we can significantly reduce our dependence on synthetic fertilizers and promote more sustainable agricultural production. In addition, Human feces can also improve soil structure and water holding capacity, reduce pests, and neutralize soil toxins and heavy metals 17. In the context of tropical soils, often severely depleted of nutrients due to leaching, proper management is imperative 18. However, harnessing the potential of human feces in agriculture still faces social challenges rooted in established habits that need to be addressed 18.
Amidst these challenges, maize emerges as a dietary cornerstone for urban and peri-urban communities 19. In Cameroon, maize production peaked at 2.3 million tonnes in 2019. Despite this substantial output, it consistently falls short of the national demand, which consistently hovers slightly above 2.8 million tonnes 20. Consequently, Cameroon grappled with a maize production deficit of over 500,000 tonnes in 2019, a recurring dilemma that forced brewers to rely on imports to bridge the gap 20.
One pressing issue plaguing agricultural production in developing nations revolves around preserving soil fertility under permanent crop conditions. Extensive agricultural practices often lead to reduced productivity and contribute to the physical, chemical, biological, and microbiological deterioration of soils 21, 22.
Turning our attention to Dschang, situated in Western Cameroon, the magnitude of the challenge becomes evident with daily solid waste production reaching a staggering 50 tons 22. Additionally, approximately 9.63 cubic meters of fecal sludge are generated at the Dschang Central Prison. Shockingly, much of this waste is discarded into the environment without prior treatment, and at times, inmates resort to using it directly as fertilizer for their crops. Recognizing the nutrient-rich potential of fecal sludge, effectively harnessing this liquid resource for agricultural purposes becomes crucial. This underscores the paramount importance of mastering the art of composting with appropriate feedstock to effectively close the nutrient cycle 11, 23.
To address these multifaceted challenges, the present study aims to assess the impact of two rates of FS/HW on the composting process and the resultant compost quality. Simultaneously, it seeks to evaluate the influence of fecal sludge-based compost on soil fertility improvement and maize production. By connecting these vital elements, we aim to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices in the context of nutrient-depleted tropical soils.
The study took place at the FASA Application and Research Farm (FAR) within the University of Dschang, situated in the Western Region of Cameroon. Dschang's sub-Division encompasses a vast area of 5655 hectares and boasts a population of 101,124 inhabitants 24. Geographically, it falls between Latitudes 5°25' and 5°30' North, and Longitudes 09° 50′ and 10° 20′ East. The region's average altitude reaches approximately 1500 meters above sea level. Climatically, it falls under the Cameroonian-type equatorial climate, characterized by a short dry season lasting five months (from mid-November to mid-March) and a more extended nine-month rainy season (from mid-March to mid-November) 25. Temperature fluctuations within this region span from 13.4 to 27.5°C, with an average annual temperature of 20.4°C. The area receives an average annual rainfall of 1900 mm. Dominating the landscape at the experimental site are herbaceous vegetation, with prominent species such as Tithonia diversifolia, Mimosa pudica, and Bidens pilosa. The primary soil classification at this site aligns with Ferralsol according to WRB, Oxisol according to USDA, or Ferralitic soil according to CPCS 26.
The methodology employed for this study encompassed two years of fieldwork, spanning the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 cropping seasons. The initial year was dedicated to the composting process, while the subsequent year focused on evaluating the impact of the compost on maize (Zea mays) cultivation. Throughout this research, compost samples were systematically collected during various stages of composting, including maturity assessment. Concurrently, soil samples were procured both at the onset and culmination of the field trial for subsequent laboratory analyses.
In terms of raw materials, the organic constituents utilized in this investigation were sourced from the municipal waste bins of Dschang. Over a span of six days, a substantial volume of solid household waste (SHW) was gathered. Fecal sludge (FS) was procured from the septic tanks of the Dschang Central Prison and subjected to a fifteen-day drying process on an unplanted drying bed before being transported to the composting site at the University of Dschang. Within this context, two distinct organic fertilizers were generated and deployed: household waste compost and fecal sludge compost. The plant material employed consisted of hybrid seeds (CHH 101) of Zea mays, produced by AGRO-AFRIQUE Sarl in KAMBO. These seeds boasted an impressive 100% germination rate.
The experimental design for the composting phase adhered to a randomized complete block design (RCBD). This design incorporated two primary factors: solid household waste and fecal sludge. Within this framework, four distinct treatments were established, each replicated four times. These treatments comprised the following: 200 kg SHW (Control: C1), 25 Kg FS + 175 Kg SHW (C2), 50 Kg FS + 150 Kg SHW (C3), and 75 Kg FS + 125 Kg SHW (C4). These organic materials were meticulously blended using shovels and forks, then fashioned into windrows, each measuring 1m in length, 0.9 m in width, and 0.7 m in height. In cases where adjustment was necessary, 5 to 10 liters of lake water were added to achieve an optimal moisture content ranging from 40% to 60%. To shield the windrows from adverse weather conditions and facilitate the required aerobic fermentation for composting, they were meticulously covered with plastic sheets featuring strategically placed ventilation holes. The comprehensive bacteriological analysis extended to water and sludge entailed the quantification of fecal Streptococci, fecal Coliforms, Total Coliforms, and Escherichia coli.
Conversely, the maize trial embraced a randomized complete block design (RCBD) featuring three replications. Each block incorporated ten distinct treatments or experimental units (EUs). These treatments encompassed a wide range, including a control group (T0) with no compost, varying application rates of compost (ranging from 0 t.ha-1 to 20 t.ha-1), and different compost types (C1, C3, and C4). Each EU occupied an 8 m2 area and comprised five planting lines, each containing five bunches, resulting in a total of twenty plants per EU. This configuration achieved a crop density of 33334 plants per hectare. The spacing between two EUs was set at 0.5 m, while a 1 m gap separated two blocks.
Temperature measurements were conducted using a metallic thermometer (D-Werhheim 19, 2008). Moisture content was determined by subjecting samples to 105°C in an oven for a 24-hour duration. Our comprehensive analysis encompassed the evaluation of heavy metal content, including Cu, Zn, Pb, and Fe. Additionally, various physico-chemical attributes of the compost were scrutinized, such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total nitrogen, organic carbon (OC), available phosphorus, and exchangeable base cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, and Na+). All assessments adhered to established standard protocols 27. To determine pH, a glass electrode pH-meter was employed in a compost solution ratio. Salinity levels within the compost were ascertained by directly measuring electrical conductivity in a suspension of compost diluted with distilled water at a 1:5 ratio. Organic carbon content (%) was quantified through dry combustion, while total nitrogen underwent analysis via the Kjeldahl wet digestion method. Exchangeable cations, encompassing Ca2+ and Mg2+, were determined through complexometry, and Na+ and K+ were quantified using flame photometry. Total phosphorus was assessed using the Bray II method. For heavy metal analysis, the metals were brought into solution via heating in a mixture of strong acids (aqua regia) and subsequently quantified using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry.
Within the experimental units, six representative plants were meticulously chosen to serve as samples for data collection regarding growth and yield variables. This comprehensive collection encompassed various physiological parameters, including the collar diameter of the plant at a height of 20 cm above the ground and plant height. The meticulous tracking of physiological growth parameters commenced at the 30-day mark after planting and continued at a bi-weekly frequency until the emergence of male inflorescence. Upon reaching maturity, the six selected plants were carefully harvested, and grain yield was adjusted to account for 15% moisture content.
2.3. Compost and Soil Sampling AnalysisThe soil samples collected prior to the trial, already in a dry state, underwent a process of crushing and sieving using a 2 mm sieve. The resulting fine soil particles were appropriately stored in labeled plastic bags. Conversely, the soil samples collected at the conclusion of the trial were subjected to air-drying, followed by crushing and sieving, before being stored in preparation for laboratory analyses. All analyses strictly adhered to established standard procedures 27.
The determination of soil reaction, or pH, involved the measurement of pH-H2O using a 1:2.5 soil-to-water ratio and pH-KCl using a 1:2.5 soil-to-1N KCl solution, both assessed through a pH-meter. To indirectly gauge the salinity of the compost, electrical conductivity was measured on a suspension of compost diluted in distilled water at a 1:5 ratio.
Organic carbon content (%) was assessed through calcination for the organic amendments, while the Walkley and Black method was employed for the soil samples. Total nitrogen content was analyzed using the Kjeldahl method. Analysis of exchangeable base cations, including Ca and Mg, was carried out through complexometric methods, whereas Na and K levels were determined using flame photometry. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was ascertained through the sodium saturation method. Total phosphorus, both in organic amendments and soil, was quantified via spectrophotometry. For heavy metal determination, the metals were first brought into solution by subjecting them to heating in a mixture of strong acids (aqua regia) and subsequently quantified using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry.
2.4. Statistical AnalysesStatistical analyses were performed using R Studio software in the year 2020. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out with a confidence level set at 5%. In cases where a significant difference emerged between treatment means at the chosen significance level, the separation of means was accomplished using the Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) method.
2.5. Economic AnalysisThe economic analysis of the different treatments was conducted by considering both the cost of the fertilizers and the total yield's value. To determine the total cost of the fertilizers, we included factors such as the market price of fertilizers, transportation expenses, spreading costs, and packaging expenses. Evaluating the economic viability of a fertilizer involved several key factors: the productivity index, net profit, and the benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR). The BCR served as a crucial metric for assessing the profitability of the organic fertilizers employed in the trial. The relationship between BCR and profitability can be expressed as follows:
RT (%) = (BCR - 1) x 100.
Individual treatment profitability was evaluated based on the BCR, following the guidelines of the FAO 28.
Fresh fecal sludge (FFS), dehydrated fecal sludge (DFS), and household solid waste (HSW) exhibited significant levels of essential nutrients, including nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), along with organic matter, as indicated in Table 1. These substrate characteristics align with recommended criteria and standards for effective composting. Furthermore, the results reveal that DFS displays a slightly acidic pH, while raw HSW demonstrates an alkaline pH. Notably, the organic matter content exceeds 70% for dehydrated FS and 60% for SHW, making it conducive for microorganism proliferation. The C/N ratio measures 22.2±2.3 for FS and 31.5±1.1 for SHW. Importantly, all metal concentrations within these substrates fall below the threshold limits for composting materials. The dehydration process has proven highly effective in reducing pathogens within the fecal sludge, achieving an impressive 98% reduction in total coliforms, E. Coli, and Streptococci, as illustrated in Table 2.
The temperature measurements exhibited a range of 39-60°C during the fermentation phase, which subsequently decreased to 29-38°C in the maturation phase, as depicted in Figure 1. Throughout the composting process, the pH levels fluctuated among the various treatments but generally maintained an alkaline nature. The electrical conductivity initially stood at 4.80 mS/cm and decreased to 1.8 mS/cm by the conclusion of the composting process. Notably, the highest values were observed in C1 composts, while the lowest values were recorded in C2 composts, although these differences did not reach statistical significance, as illustrated in Figure 2. The C/N ratio values exhibited variability throughout the process, as demonstrated in Figure 3. Between the initial and final phases, a substantial reduction in the C/N ratio was observed, stabilizing at approximately 14. The average characteristics of the composts generated in this study are summarized in Table 3. Notably, the nutrient values meet agronomic recommendations, with significant distinctions observed for nitrogen, potassium, and magnesium.
The soil characteristics, both before and after the maize treatments, are detailed in Table 4. Notably, there was an increase in pH-H2O for all treatments following the amendments, with the exception of the control group (T0). Among the treatments, the lowest variation was observed in compost 1 (T4), while the highest variation was recorded in Compost 3 (T3). After harvesting, all exchangeable cations in the soil showed substantial increases across the various treatments, except for Mg (T1, T3; T4 and T8), which exhibited slight decreases in some instances, along with K (T4) and Na (T7). Despite the negative variations in certain treatments, the cumulative sum of base cations generally increased significantly. The CEC in all treatments exhibited notable variations, ranging from 19.4 cmol(+).kg-1 (T4 and T7), representing the smallest change, to 26.4 cmol(+).kg-1 (T3), indicating the largest change.
Furthermore, both organic carbon and total nitrogen in the soils displayed substantial increases in the treated plots. The most significant variation was observed for carbon in T9 (4.4%) and for nitrogen in T5 and T8. However, T1 exhibited the lowest variation in organic carbon (3.6%), while the lowest variation in total nitrogen (0.18%) was recorded in plots T1, T2, and T4. These findings highlight the positive impact of the treatments on soil characteristics, with varying degrees of improvement across the different treatments.
3.4. Effect of Treatment on Growth and Yield Variables of MaizeThe final growth and yield variables exhibited statistically significant differences among the treatments (Table 5). The plant height was significantly influenced by the different treatments. T2 and T3 resulted in the tallest plants, while T6 and T9 led to the shortest ones. It's worth mentioning that Compost 3 treatments had a more pronounced impact on plant height. Generally, plant height increased with the dose of C1 compost, whereas it decreased with the dose in the other treatments. This trend was also observed for the heights at the male inflorescence of the plants. However, for the height at the male inflorescence, T7 exhibited a more significant influence on this variable, whereas T6 and T9 had a lesser effect.
Additionally, collar diameter increased with the quantity of fertilizer in each treatment, with the highest value recorded in T9 (3.72 ± 0.29 cm) and the lowest in T0 (3.10 ± 0.07 cm). Fresh biomass was predominantly influenced by T5 (48.23 ± 12.64 t.kg-1), while T1 (30.63 ± 6.03 t.kg-1) had the least impact on this variable. Similarly, dry biomass was less affected by T1 (9.75 ± 1.89 t.kg-1), while T5, T6, and T9 showed a more pronounced influence on this variable. The maize grain yield reached its peak in T7 (7.95 ± 0.26 t.kg-1), with the control group registering the lowest yield (3.20± 1.11 t.kg-1). The remaining treatments yielded satisfactorily, with no significant differences observed among T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T8, and T9.
It's noteworthy that although the yields were not significantly different for most of the treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T8, and T9), there was a noticeable trend where values increased with the quantity of compost C3 but decreased with the quantity in compost C1, as well as compost C4. In conclusion, at the conclusion of the study, the ranking of treatments based on their positive influence on performance was as follows: T7 > T8 > T3 > T4 > T2 > T9 > T1 > T5 > T6 > T0.
3.5. Economic Analysis of the Different TreatmentsThe economic analysis of the various treatments unveiled that treatment T6 (20 t.kg-1 of household waste compost) incurred higher costs compared to the other treatments (Table 6). The benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) exhibited the following variation: T7 > T4 > T1 > T8 > T2 > T5 > T3 > T9 > T6. With the exception of T6, all treatments proved to be profitable, with T7 emerging as the most profitable, yielding a profit of 1,070,575 FCFA and boasting a BCR of 2.81. In contrast, T6 displayed the lowest marginal net return (37,955 FCFA) and a BCR of 0.97.
The quality of compost is inherently influenced by the composition of the initial substrate. If these raw materials are not properly sanitized beforehand, they can potentially contaminate soils and agricultural products 29. The substrates examined in this study exhibited minimal pathogen levels after the dehydration of fecal sludge (FS), signifying the highly positive impact of dehydration in reducing pathogens. Specifically, there was a remarkable reduction rate of 98.7% for E. Coli and 85.43% for fecal Coliforms (CF). Dehydration exhibited a more pronounced impact on electrical conductivity (EC), total Coliforms (TC), and Streptococci (SF) compared to CF. These findings are consistent with previous research conducted during the co-composting of domestic fecal sludge in Senegal 30. In an aerobic composting process where temperatures approach 60°C, pathogens are efficiently destroyed 31. In our study, similar temperatures (between 50 and 60°C) were achieved in various treatments, likely resulting in the complete elimination of pathogens that had resisted dehydration, thus explaining their absence at the end of the process.
The variations and differences in pH recorded during composting can be attributed to the initial composition of the substrates 31. The decline in pH can be elucidated by the generation of organic acids during the degradation of carbohydrates, lipids, and other humic substances 30. Additionally, the production of CO2 during aerobic degradation contributes to environmental acidification through the formation of carbonic acid, further contributing to pH reduction 30. These pH values align with those reported in numerous studies 33, 34, 35. The decrease in electrical conductivity (EC) may be attributed to the binding of salts by organic matter and the leaching of metallic cations due to the addition of low-salinity lake water during compost hydration 36. The initial low salt content in raw fecal sludge from septic tanks could explain the low EC values in FS treatments 30. The decrease in the C/N ratio in the treatments likely results from microbiological activity that decomposes organic matter and mineralizes it into nitrogen. Similar decreases in the C/N ratio were observed in a study on co-composting raw fecal sludge and market organic waste in Nigeria 35. These findings also parallel those of a study involving composting of cocoa residues with Tithonia diversifolia in Central Cameroon 37. The final compost exhibited a C/N ratio below 15 in all treatments, underscoring that the composting process leads to organic matter decomposition and carbon and nitrogen consumption, resulting in a decreased C/N ratio 38.
4.2. Agronomic Quality of CompostsThe concentrations of nitrogen (N), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg) are significantly higher in the final composts with lower fecal sludge (FS) content compared to those with C1 compost. Although phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) values are not significantly different, there is an observable increase in their concentrations in treatments corresponding to higher FS quantities. Composts C3 and C4, which contain more FS, exhibit greater quantities of these nutrients. The elevated agronomic value of these composts may be attributed to the larger proportions of FS in their composition. These nutrient levels align with international standards 30 and surpass those reported by a previous study in Central Cameroon, which involved co-composting sewage sludge with Echinochloa pyramidalis 39. Additionally, the nutrient concentrations in the present study exceed those obtained from co-composting raw fecal sludge and market organic waste in Nigeria 35. In accordance with international standards 40, the final composts boast high organic carbon (OC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents, along with low C/N ratios. However, they exhibit average concentrations of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg). These outcomes may be attributed to the nature of the initial organic substrates and the composting process employed 41. The FS-to-household solid waste (HSW) ratios likely account for the variations in nutrient content among the composts, with higher FS proportions leading to elevated OC and mineral element concentrations in composts such as C4. Such nutrient-rich compost is highly beneficial and is expected to significantly contribute to the nutritional requirements of plants during growth and development when applied in the field.
4.3. Variation of Soil Characteristics with TreatmentFollowing the application of compost, a minor increase in the initial soil pH was observed, consistent with findings by 42 in Togo. This pH elevation could be attributed to the presence of hydroxyl groups from certain ions in the composted waste materials, as suggested by 43. Initially low levels of exchangeable cations in the soil before maize cultivation increased after harvesting, with a few exceptions. This increase is likely associated with the addition of compost, which potentially released these cations into the soil. In some cases, a decrease in exchangeable cations after harvest was observed, as seen with magnesium (Mg) in treatments T1, T3, T4, and T8, as well as potassium (K) in treatment T4. This decrease could indicate an augmented uptake of basic cations by the plants, in agreement with the findings of 44, 45.
Available phosphorus levels increased for all treatments except T0, which is highly favorable for maize production. This increase may result from the release of this element into the soil due to compost application during plant growth. Similar results were reported by 46, who demonstrated that compost influences phosphorus availability in three ways: as a source of soluble and exchangeable phosphorus to the soil, by enhancing soil phosphorus availability through its impact on phosphorus complexation and metabolism, and by reducing phosphorus leaching through adsorption and improved retention by the soil, thereby facilitating its uptake by plants. The presence of an optimal level of available phosphorus is crucial for crop growth and yield, particularly in tropical regions, where regular rainfall occurs 47.
The diverse findings collectively indicate that the composts corrected the cation balance and C/N ratio of the soil under study. This correction is highly beneficial since these composts supplied ample amounts of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and organic matter (OM) 48. The increased availability of soil nutrients following manure application enhances their uptake by plant roots. These results align with previous studies showing that compost derived from household waste and fecal sludge can enhance maize growth and yields, primarily due to improved chemical and physical soil properties 49, 50.
4.4. Effects of Treatments on YieldThe results obtained for yield and plant size in various treatments were significantly different from the control. The addition of different composts positively influenced growth and yield, with the extent of this improvement depending on the concentration applied. Notably, plants treated with sludge-based compost (C3) exhibited the highest values for plant height at male flowering and height at cob insertion. This increase in plant height is likely attributed to the availability of essential nutrients for plant growth in compost C3 compared to compost C1 or C4. Nitrogen, a crucial element for plant growth, and calcium, which enhances cell division, are abundant in fecal sludge composts (FS), promoting cell multiplication and optimal vegetative growth. This finding aligns with previous studies that have reported increased growth and crop yields with compost treatment 51, 52. Additionally, the pH increase due to compost application likely contributed to enhanced plant height. Elevated pH may facilitate the release of nutrients that support maize growth, as major cations can raise soil pH, creating a favorable environment for nutrient availability 51.
The results for total grain yields (t.kg-1) indicated a significant difference (P<0.05) among the various treatments. The positive impact of organic matter on yield, as demonstrated in this study, is consistent with previous research 53. Organic matter significantly increased barley yields compared to the control. The average yields obtained in this study (5 - 10 t.kg-1) are in line with those observed in a similar humid tropical ecosystem in Cameroon by 54. These yields are also higher than the national averages reported in Burkina Faso 48, the Democratic Republic of Congo 55, and Togo 56, where maize yields ranged from 4 to 5 t.kg-1. While highly significant yield differences were not observed, the results suggest that the addition of organic matter leads to yield increases. Therefore, the incorporation of organic matter is essential to maintain or enhance soil productivity, as supported by 54 and 57.
Regarding the economic profitability of maize cultivation using organic matter, particularly compost, only treatments T1, T4, and T7 (10 t.kg-1) were found to be profitable, with benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of 2.02, 2.10, and 2.81, respectively, covering the producers' expenses. The BCR decreased with increasing concentration. These results indicate that profitability is excellent at low concentrations of 10 t.kg-1, suggesting that profitability is not solely determined by the quantity applied 58. These findings align with recommendations from 59 and 60, who advised the use of small quantities of compost in various crops. According to these studies, the optimal economic rates for profitable use of organic fertilizers depend on resource availability and market price variations for crops. Inputs of 10 t.kg-1 can be recommended to farmers with a high probability of acceptance. However, considering the limited purchasing power of most farmers in the study area, option T7 (7.95± 0.26 t.kg-1of C4 compost), which exhibited the highest profitability, is the most recommendable choice. Similar studies 19, 57 have also demonstrated that low concentrations of organic fertilizers, such as Tithonia diversifolia compost, can increase crop profitability.
This study has demonstrated the potential of using household solid waste (SHW) and dehydrated fecal sludge (DFS) to produce organic soil amendments for agricultural purposes. Four compost types were created from organic waste materials collected from the Dschang Central Prison. These composts included one made solely from SHW and others made from mixtures of dehydrated fecal sludge and SHW. The characterization of these composts revealed that C1 compost (household waste) had the lowest nutrient concentrations, while C4 (household waste + maximum fecal sludge) had the highest nutrient concentrations. Importantly, all four compost types met WHO standards for nutrient content.
Field applications of these composts, including C1, C3 and C4, at various rates had significant positive effects on maize growth, yield, economic profitability, and soil properties. Fecal sludge compost (C3) had a particularly beneficial impact on soil pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC), while household waste compost (C1) had a lesser influence on these parameters. Compost C4 had the most substantial influence on soil carbon and nitrogen levels.
The study also demonstrated that differences in compost types and application rates had a significant effect on plant height, yield, and economic profitability of maize. For example, compost C3, applied at a rate of 20 t.kg-1, produced the tallest plants, while the 15 t.kg-1 rate of compost C1 resulted in the highest fresh and dry biomass. Compost C4, applied at a rate of 10 t/ha, produced the highest maize yield and economic return.
Overall, this research highlights the potential benefits of using composted organic fertilizers to enhance the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil, particularly in regions with poor, nutrient-depleted soils like the humid tropics. These findings suggest that fecal sludge and household waste composts have promising agronomic advantages and can be valuable tools for sustainable agriculture in such areas.
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the University of Dschang (Cameroon) for generously providing access to the Teaching and Research Farm and laboratory facilities, which were instrumental in the successful completion of this research. They also want to express their gratitude to the African Water Association for funding this project through the Young Water & Sanitation Professionals program, which was made possible by USAID funds. Additionally, special thanks are due to the International Evangelical Federation of Friends of Cameroon (FEIAC) for their valuable support throughout the project.
[1] | Rose, C., Parker A., Jefferson, B., Cartmell, ‘The characterization of feces and urine: a review of the literature to inform advanced treatment technology’, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 45, no. 17, pp. 1827–1879, 2015. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[2] | Simha, P., Ganesapillai, M., 2017. Ecological sanitation and nutrient recovery from human urine: how far have we come? A review’, Sustain. Environ. Res., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 107–116, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Talla, A., Sezawo, R., Ngohe-Ekam, P.S. ‘Characterization of Depotted Faecal Sludge into the Environment and Design of a Suitable Treatment System: Case of Nomayos Area in Yaounde City’, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Silpa, K., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., Van Woerden, F., 2018. “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050.” Overview booklet. World Bank, Washington, DC. 2018. | ||
In article | |||
[5] | UNICEF/WHO, ‘Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines’, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[6] | AMCOW, ‘African Sanitation Policy Guidelines. Abuja, Nigeria, African Ministers’ Council on Water’, 2021. | ||
In article | |||
[7] | Bemmo N., Njine T., Nola M., Ngamga G. Techniques utilisées au niveau des quartiers périurbains de Yaoundé (Cameroun) pour l'évaluation des eaux usées et excreta humains. Proposition de systèmes appropriés. Rapport final, Action de recherche n°4, programme Alimentation en eau potable dans les quartiers périurbains et les petits centre, 126p. 1998. | ||
In article | |||
[8] | INS, ‘Troisième Enquête Camerounaise Auprès des Ménages’, Rapport d’études sur le profil et les déterminants de la pauvreté au Cameroun entre 2001 et 2007, 2007. Accessed: Aug. 05, 2023. | ||
In article | |||
[9] | Tabué, G., Ntamack, D., Feumba, R., Ngnikam, E., Wethe, J., Tanawa, E., ‘Vulnérabilité des eaux souterraines et périmètres de protection dans le bassin versant de la Mingoa (Yaoundé, Cameroun)’, Rev. L’Université Monction., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 71–96, 2009. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Berteigne, B, ‘Quantification et caractérisation des boues de vidange issues des villes de Douala et Yaoundé (Cameroun) et proposition de traitement. Mémoire d’après Césure/Projet MAFADY, 130p. | ||
In article | |||
[11] | Bian, R., Sun, Y., Li, W., Ma, Q., Chai, X. 2017. ‘Co-composting of municipal solid waste mixed with matured sewage sludge: The relationship between N2O emissions and denitrifying gene abundance’, Chemosphere, vol. 189, pp. 581–589, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[12] | Klingel, F., Montagero, A., Kone, D., Strauss, M., ‘Gestion des boues de vidange dans les pays en développement’, SANDECEAWAG Dübendorf Suisse, 2002. | ||
In article | |||
[13] | Blunier, P., Koanda, H., Strauss, M., Klutse, A., Tarradellas, J. ‘Quantification des boues de vidange. Exemple de la ville de Ouahigouya, Burkina Faso’, in Forum de recherche en eau et assainissement, 2004. | ||
In article | |||
[14] | Smith, S.R., ‘A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge’, Environ. Int., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 142–156, 2009. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[15] | Strande, L., and Brdjanovic, D, Faecal sludge management: Systems approach for implementation and operation. IWA publishing, 2014. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[16] | Wolgast, M., Recycling system, Broch. Prod. by WM-Ekologen, AB, Stock. Sweden, 1993. | ||
In article | |||
[17] | Septien, S., Mirara, S.W.,Makununika, B.S.N., Singh, A., Pocock, J., Velkushanova, K., Buckley, C.A., 2020. Effect of drying on the physical and chemical properties of faecal sludge for its reuse’, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 103652, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[18] | Cofie O., Koneb D., Rothenbergerb S., Moser D., Zubruegg, C, Co-composting of faecal sludge and organic solid waste for agriculture: Process dynamics’, Water Res., vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 4665–4675, 2009. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[19] | Useni, S.Y., Chukiyabo, K.M., Tshomba, K.J., Muyambo, M.E., Kapalanga, K.P., Ntumba, N.F., Kasangij, K.P., Kyungu, K., Baboy, L.L., Nyembo, K.L., Mpundu M.M., ‘Utilisation des déchets humains recyclés pour l’augmentation de la production du maïs (Zea mays L.) sur un ferralsol du sud-est de la RD Congo’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 66, pp. 5070–5081, 2013. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[20] | MINADER, ‘Le maïs au Cameroun céréale la plus consommée dans le pays’, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[21] | Kouassi, Y.F., Gbogouri, G.A., N’guessan, K.A, Bilgo, A., PascalanguI, K.T, Ama, J.T, 2019. ‘Effets de fertilisants organique et organominéral à base de dechets vegetaux et animaux sur la croissance et le rendement du soja (glycine max (l.) merrill) en zone de savane de Côte d’Ivoire’, Agron. Afr., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2019. | ||
In article | |||
[22] | Temgoua, E., Ngnikam, E., Dameni, H., Kouedeu, S, ‘Valorisation des ordures ménagères par compostage dans la ville de Dschang, Cameroun.’, Tropicultura, vol. 32, no. 1, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[23] | Nsiah-Gyambibi, R., Essandoh, K.M.H., Asiedu, Y.N., Fei-Baffoe, ‘Valorization of fecal sludge stabilization via vermicomposting in microcosm enriched substrates using organic soils for vermicompost production’, Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[24] | Temgoua, E., Ntangmo Tsafack, H., Azinwi Tamfuh, P., and Ndzana, G. M, ‘Testing soil fertility, potato (Solanum tuberosum) production and residual effect on green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) performance using different rates and mixtures of compost and mineral fertilizer’, J. Plant Nutr., pp. 1–11, 2023. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[25] | Azinwi, T.P., Ibrahim, B.A., Asafor, C.H., Cham, C.G., Wirba, N.L., Mfouapon. Y.H., Moundjeu, E.D., Kabeyene, K.V., Bitom, D. 2022. ‘Fertilizing Potential of Basalt and Granite Fines for Vigna unguiculata Production and Residual Effect on Telfaira occidentalis Perfomance in the Cameroon Western Highlands: Fertilizing potential of basalt and granite fines’, Int. J. Earth Sci. Knowl. Appl., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 395–406, 2022. | ||
In article | |||
[26] | IUSS, ‘World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps’, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[27] | Pauwels JM, Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Mvondo Ze A, ‘Manuel de Laboratoire de Pédologie-méthodes d’analyses de sols et de plantes; equipment et gestion des stocks de verrerie et de produits chimiques. Publications Agricoles no. 28, AGCD, Bruxelles, Belgium, 1992, 180 p, 1992. | ||
In article | |||
[28] | FAO. 199O. The design of agricultural investment Projects-Lessons from experience. Technical paper 5, Investment Centre, FAO, Rome, 15. | ||
In article | |||
[29] | Nartey, E.G., Amoah, P., Ofosu-Budu, G.K., Muspratt, A., Pradhan, S.K., ‘Effects of co-composting of faecal sludge and agricultural wastes on tomato transplant and growth’, Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., vol. 6, pp. 23–36, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[30] | Maïmouna, L., Sonko, M.E., Dieng, D., Ndiaye, S., Diop, C., Seck A., Gueye, A., ‘Co-compostage de boues de vidange domestiques avec des déchets maraîchers et des déchets de poissons à Dakar (Sénégal)’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2914–2929, 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[31] | Compaoré, E., Nanema, L.S., Bonkoungou, S., et Sedogo, M.P, ‘Évaluation de la qualité de composts de déchets urbains solides de la ville de Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso pour une utilisation efficiente en agriculture’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 33, pp. 2076–2083, 2010. | ||
In article | |||
[32] | Krou, M.N., Baba, G., Martín-Pascual, J., Toro, Z.M, ‘Stabilization by co-composting dry drain sludge with fermentescible fractions of household garbage from the city of Sokodé (Togo)’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3234–3246, 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[33] | Gupta, R., Garg V.K., Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting’, J. Hazard. Mater, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 1023–1030, 2008. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[34] | Chennaoui, M., Salama, Y., Makan, A., Mountadar, M, Compostage en cuve des déchets ménagers et valorisation agricole du compost obtenu. Algerian journal of arid environment, vol. 6, no. 2, pp 53-66, 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[35] | Olufemi, O.A., Elizabeth, O.O., Godson R.E.E., Taiwo, B.H., Olusegun, T.A., ‘Characteristics of co-composts produced from raw faecal sludge and organic market waste in Osun state, southwest Nigeria’, Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 333–347, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[36] | Francou, C,‘Stabilisation de la matière organique au cours du compostage de déchets urbains: Influence de la nature des déchets et du procédé de compostage-Recherche d’indicateurs pertinents’, Thèse de doctorat, INAPG (AgroParisTech), 2003. | ||
In article | |||
[37] | Maboune, T.S.A., Tchinmegni, F.I., Mounjouenpou, P., Tchana, K.E., Temgoua, E, ‘Valorisation of Cocoa Pod’s Shells Production in the Area of South-Central Cameroon by Composting with Addition of Tithonia Diversifolia’, Int J Res Pharm. Biosci, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 32–42, 2017. | ||
In article | |||
[38] | Giroux, M., Audesse, P,‘Comparaison de deux méthodes de détermination des teneurs en carbone organique, en azote total et du rapport C/N de divers amendements organiques et engrais de ferme’, Agrosol, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 6–8, 2004. | ||
In article | |||
[39] | Wafo, G.V.D., Nguemte, P.M., Nzouebet, W.A.L., Djocgoue, P.F., Kengne, L.M, ‘Co-composting of sewage sludge and Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.) Hitchc. & Chase plant material from a constructed wetland system treating domestic wastewater in Cameroon’, Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 272–282, 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[40] | WHO, ‘Urban Solid Waste Management, Ed. 1985 and 1990-1993’, 1993. | ||
In article | |||
[41] | Raj, D., Antilb R.S., Evaluation of maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared from agro-industrial wastes’, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 2868–2873, 2011. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[42] | Toundou, O., Tozo, K., Feuillade, G., Pallier, V., Tchegueni, S., Dossou, K.S.S., ‘Effets de composts de déchets sur les propriétés chimiques du sol et la solubilité d’éléments minéraux sous deux régimes hydriques en conditions contrôlées au Togo’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1917–1926, 2014. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[43] | Mkhabela, M, Warman, P.R, ‘The influence of municipal solid waste compost on yield, soil phosphorus availability and uptake by two vegetable crops grown in a Pugwash sandy loam soil in Nova Scotia’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2005. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[44] | Kalyani, G., Joga, R.H., Prasanna Kumar, Y., King, P, ‘Potential of biochar and compost in soil amendment for enhancing crop yield. Int. J. Chem. Sci, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 173-185, 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[45] | Mensah, A.K., Frimpong, K.A., ‘Biochar and/or compost applications improve soil properties, growth, and yield of maize grown in acidic rainforest and coastal savannah soils in Ghana’, Int. J. Agron., vol. 2018, 2018. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[46] | Guo, X-X., Liu, H-T., Zhang, J, ‘The role of biochar in organic waste composting and soil improvement: A review’, Waste Manag., vol. 102, pp. 884–899, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[47] | Yan, J., Li, X., Hu, D., Liu, G., Chen, C., and Zhou, Z. ‘Study on degradation of organic matter and maturity of corn straw compost by enzymes’, in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[48] | Yerima, B.P.K., Tiamgne, A.Y., Van Ranst, E., ‘Réponse de deux variétés de tournesol (Helianthus sp.) à la fertilisation à base de fiente de poule sur un Hapli-Humic Ferralsol du Yongka Western Highlands Research Garden Park (YWHRGP) Nkwen-Bamenda, Cameroun, Afrique centrale.’, Tropicultura, vol. 32, no. 4, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[49] | Cissé, D., Cornelis, J.T., Traoré, M., Saba, F., Coulibaly, K., Lefebvre, D., Colinet, G., Nacro, H.B., ‘Co-composted biochar to decrease fertilization rates in cotton–maize rotation in Burkina Faso’, Agron. J, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 5516–5526, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[50] | Elsalam, H.E.A.; El- Sharnouby, M.E.; Mohamed, A.E.; Raafat, B.M.; El-Gamal, E.H. ‘Effect of sewage sludge compost usage on corn and faba bean growth, carbon and nitrogen forms in plants and soil’, Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 628, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[51] | Ilyas, M., Ayub, G., Hussain, Z., ‘Response of Tomato to different levels of calcium and magnesium concentration’, World Appl. Sci. J., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1560–1564, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[52] | Rabah, S.S., Mamat, SA., Al-Shaheen, R.A., ‘The Effect of Soil PH, High-Calcium Compost and Cadmium on Some of Growth Characters in Corn (Zea mays L.)’, ARC J Pharm Sci, vol. 5, pp. 16–27, 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[53] | Mbonigaba, M.J.J., ‘Étude de l’impact des composts à base de biomasse végétale sur la dynamique des indicateurs physico-chimiques, chimiques et microbiologiques de la fertilité des sols: application sur trios sols acides tropicaux du Rwanda’, Thèse de doctorat, Fac. Univ. Sci. Agron. Univ. Gembloux, 2007. | ||
In article | |||
[54] | N’Dayegamiye, A., Drapeau, A., Laverdière, M.R, ‘Effets des apports de composts de résidus ménagers sur les rendements des cultures et certaines propriétés du sol’, Agrosol, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 57–71, 2005. | ||
In article | |||
[55] | Temgoua, E., Ntangmo, H., Ngnikam, E., Takuete, R., Dongmo, G., 2017. ‘Fertilisation du maïs (Zea mays L.) à base d’urines humaines hygiénisées dans un oxisol de l’Ouest Cameroun’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2071–2081, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[56] | Tshibingu1, M.R., Mukadi, T.T., Mpoyi, M.B., Ntatangolo, M.B., Musenge, K.D., Tshibingu, M.I., Kazadi, N.J., Nyembo, N.D., Mushambani, M.T., 2017. ‘Évaluation de la productivité du maïs (Zea mays L.) sous amendements organique et minéral dans la province de Lomami, République Démocratique du Congo’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 109, pp. 10571–10579, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[57] | Toundou, O., ‘Evaluation des caractéristiques chimiques et agronomiques de cinq composts de déchets et étude de leurs effets sur les propriétés chimiques du sol, la physiologie et le rendement du maïs (Zea mays L. Var. Ikenne) et de la tomate (Lycop ersicum esculentum L. Var. Tropimech) sous deux régimes hydriques au Togo’, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Limoges; Université de Lomé (Togo), 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[58] | Kaho, F., Yemefack M., Feujio-Teguefouet P., Tchatchouang J.C., ‘Effet combiné des feuilles de Tithonia diversifolia et des engrais inorganiques sur les rendements du maïs et les propriétés d’un sol ferralitique au Centre Cameroun’, Tropicultura, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2011. | ||
In article | |||
[59] | Kitabala, M.A., Tshala, U.J., Kalenda, M.A., Tshijika, I.M., Mufind, K.M, ‘Effets de différentes doses de compost sur la production et la rentabilité de la tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) dans la ville de Kolwezi, Province du Lualaba (RD Congo)’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 102, pp. 9669–9679, 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[60] | M’zée, S.P, ‘Influence d’apports en matières organiques sur l’activité biologique et la disponibilité du phosphore dans deux sols de la région des grands lacs d’Afrique’, Thèse de doctorat, Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux, 2008. | ||
In article | |||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2023 R.E. Kenne, W. Fogang Noubep, P. Azinwi Tamfuh, D. Lekemo Mbaveng, S.A. Kom Tchuente, R.K. Enang, G.M. Ndzana, H. Ntangmo Tsafack, E. Temgoua1 and D. Bitom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | Rose, C., Parker A., Jefferson, B., Cartmell, ‘The characterization of feces and urine: a review of the literature to inform advanced treatment technology’, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 45, no. 17, pp. 1827–1879, 2015. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[2] | Simha, P., Ganesapillai, M., 2017. Ecological sanitation and nutrient recovery from human urine: how far have we come? A review’, Sustain. Environ. Res., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 107–116, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Talla, A., Sezawo, R., Ngohe-Ekam, P.S. ‘Characterization of Depotted Faecal Sludge into the Environment and Design of a Suitable Treatment System: Case of Nomayos Area in Yaounde City’, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Silpa, K., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., Van Woerden, F., 2018. “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050.” Overview booklet. World Bank, Washington, DC. 2018. | ||
In article | |||
[5] | UNICEF/WHO, ‘Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines’, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[6] | AMCOW, ‘African Sanitation Policy Guidelines. Abuja, Nigeria, African Ministers’ Council on Water’, 2021. | ||
In article | |||
[7] | Bemmo N., Njine T., Nola M., Ngamga G. Techniques utilisées au niveau des quartiers périurbains de Yaoundé (Cameroun) pour l'évaluation des eaux usées et excreta humains. Proposition de systèmes appropriés. Rapport final, Action de recherche n°4, programme Alimentation en eau potable dans les quartiers périurbains et les petits centre, 126p. 1998. | ||
In article | |||
[8] | INS, ‘Troisième Enquête Camerounaise Auprès des Ménages’, Rapport d’études sur le profil et les déterminants de la pauvreté au Cameroun entre 2001 et 2007, 2007. Accessed: Aug. 05, 2023. | ||
In article | |||
[9] | Tabué, G., Ntamack, D., Feumba, R., Ngnikam, E., Wethe, J., Tanawa, E., ‘Vulnérabilité des eaux souterraines et périmètres de protection dans le bassin versant de la Mingoa (Yaoundé, Cameroun)’, Rev. L’Université Monction., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 71–96, 2009. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Berteigne, B, ‘Quantification et caractérisation des boues de vidange issues des villes de Douala et Yaoundé (Cameroun) et proposition de traitement. Mémoire d’après Césure/Projet MAFADY, 130p. | ||
In article | |||
[11] | Bian, R., Sun, Y., Li, W., Ma, Q., Chai, X. 2017. ‘Co-composting of municipal solid waste mixed with matured sewage sludge: The relationship between N2O emissions and denitrifying gene abundance’, Chemosphere, vol. 189, pp. 581–589, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[12] | Klingel, F., Montagero, A., Kone, D., Strauss, M., ‘Gestion des boues de vidange dans les pays en développement’, SANDECEAWAG Dübendorf Suisse, 2002. | ||
In article | |||
[13] | Blunier, P., Koanda, H., Strauss, M., Klutse, A., Tarradellas, J. ‘Quantification des boues de vidange. Exemple de la ville de Ouahigouya, Burkina Faso’, in Forum de recherche en eau et assainissement, 2004. | ||
In article | |||
[14] | Smith, S.R., ‘A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge’, Environ. Int., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 142–156, 2009. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[15] | Strande, L., and Brdjanovic, D, Faecal sludge management: Systems approach for implementation and operation. IWA publishing, 2014. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[16] | Wolgast, M., Recycling system, Broch. Prod. by WM-Ekologen, AB, Stock. Sweden, 1993. | ||
In article | |||
[17] | Septien, S., Mirara, S.W.,Makununika, B.S.N., Singh, A., Pocock, J., Velkushanova, K., Buckley, C.A., 2020. Effect of drying on the physical and chemical properties of faecal sludge for its reuse’, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 103652, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[18] | Cofie O., Koneb D., Rothenbergerb S., Moser D., Zubruegg, C, Co-composting of faecal sludge and organic solid waste for agriculture: Process dynamics’, Water Res., vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 4665–4675, 2009. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[19] | Useni, S.Y., Chukiyabo, K.M., Tshomba, K.J., Muyambo, M.E., Kapalanga, K.P., Ntumba, N.F., Kasangij, K.P., Kyungu, K., Baboy, L.L., Nyembo, K.L., Mpundu M.M., ‘Utilisation des déchets humains recyclés pour l’augmentation de la production du maïs (Zea mays L.) sur un ferralsol du sud-est de la RD Congo’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 66, pp. 5070–5081, 2013. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[20] | MINADER, ‘Le maïs au Cameroun céréale la plus consommée dans le pays’, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[21] | Kouassi, Y.F., Gbogouri, G.A., N’guessan, K.A, Bilgo, A., PascalanguI, K.T, Ama, J.T, 2019. ‘Effets de fertilisants organique et organominéral à base de dechets vegetaux et animaux sur la croissance et le rendement du soja (glycine max (l.) merrill) en zone de savane de Côte d’Ivoire’, Agron. Afr., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2019. | ||
In article | |||
[22] | Temgoua, E., Ngnikam, E., Dameni, H., Kouedeu, S, ‘Valorisation des ordures ménagères par compostage dans la ville de Dschang, Cameroun.’, Tropicultura, vol. 32, no. 1, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[23] | Nsiah-Gyambibi, R., Essandoh, K.M.H., Asiedu, Y.N., Fei-Baffoe, ‘Valorization of fecal sludge stabilization via vermicomposting in microcosm enriched substrates using organic soils for vermicompost production’, Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[24] | Temgoua, E., Ntangmo Tsafack, H., Azinwi Tamfuh, P., and Ndzana, G. M, ‘Testing soil fertility, potato (Solanum tuberosum) production and residual effect on green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) performance using different rates and mixtures of compost and mineral fertilizer’, J. Plant Nutr., pp. 1–11, 2023. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[25] | Azinwi, T.P., Ibrahim, B.A., Asafor, C.H., Cham, C.G., Wirba, N.L., Mfouapon. Y.H., Moundjeu, E.D., Kabeyene, K.V., Bitom, D. 2022. ‘Fertilizing Potential of Basalt and Granite Fines for Vigna unguiculata Production and Residual Effect on Telfaira occidentalis Perfomance in the Cameroon Western Highlands: Fertilizing potential of basalt and granite fines’, Int. J. Earth Sci. Knowl. Appl., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 395–406, 2022. | ||
In article | |||
[26] | IUSS, ‘World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps’, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[27] | Pauwels JM, Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Mvondo Ze A, ‘Manuel de Laboratoire de Pédologie-méthodes d’analyses de sols et de plantes; equipment et gestion des stocks de verrerie et de produits chimiques. Publications Agricoles no. 28, AGCD, Bruxelles, Belgium, 1992, 180 p, 1992. | ||
In article | |||
[28] | FAO. 199O. The design of agricultural investment Projects-Lessons from experience. Technical paper 5, Investment Centre, FAO, Rome, 15. | ||
In article | |||
[29] | Nartey, E.G., Amoah, P., Ofosu-Budu, G.K., Muspratt, A., Pradhan, S.K., ‘Effects of co-composting of faecal sludge and agricultural wastes on tomato transplant and growth’, Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., vol. 6, pp. 23–36, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[30] | Maïmouna, L., Sonko, M.E., Dieng, D., Ndiaye, S., Diop, C., Seck A., Gueye, A., ‘Co-compostage de boues de vidange domestiques avec des déchets maraîchers et des déchets de poissons à Dakar (Sénégal)’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2914–2929, 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[31] | Compaoré, E., Nanema, L.S., Bonkoungou, S., et Sedogo, M.P, ‘Évaluation de la qualité de composts de déchets urbains solides de la ville de Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso pour une utilisation efficiente en agriculture’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 33, pp. 2076–2083, 2010. | ||
In article | |||
[32] | Krou, M.N., Baba, G., Martín-Pascual, J., Toro, Z.M, ‘Stabilization by co-composting dry drain sludge with fermentescible fractions of household garbage from the city of Sokodé (Togo)’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3234–3246, 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[33] | Gupta, R., Garg V.K., Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting’, J. Hazard. Mater, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 1023–1030, 2008. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[34] | Chennaoui, M., Salama, Y., Makan, A., Mountadar, M, Compostage en cuve des déchets ménagers et valorisation agricole du compost obtenu. Algerian journal of arid environment, vol. 6, no. 2, pp 53-66, 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[35] | Olufemi, O.A., Elizabeth, O.O., Godson R.E.E., Taiwo, B.H., Olusegun, T.A., ‘Characteristics of co-composts produced from raw faecal sludge and organic market waste in Osun state, southwest Nigeria’, Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 333–347, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[36] | Francou, C,‘Stabilisation de la matière organique au cours du compostage de déchets urbains: Influence de la nature des déchets et du procédé de compostage-Recherche d’indicateurs pertinents’, Thèse de doctorat, INAPG (AgroParisTech), 2003. | ||
In article | |||
[37] | Maboune, T.S.A., Tchinmegni, F.I., Mounjouenpou, P., Tchana, K.E., Temgoua, E, ‘Valorisation of Cocoa Pod’s Shells Production in the Area of South-Central Cameroon by Composting with Addition of Tithonia Diversifolia’, Int J Res Pharm. Biosci, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 32–42, 2017. | ||
In article | |||
[38] | Giroux, M., Audesse, P,‘Comparaison de deux méthodes de détermination des teneurs en carbone organique, en azote total et du rapport C/N de divers amendements organiques et engrais de ferme’, Agrosol, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 6–8, 2004. | ||
In article | |||
[39] | Wafo, G.V.D., Nguemte, P.M., Nzouebet, W.A.L., Djocgoue, P.F., Kengne, L.M, ‘Co-composting of sewage sludge and Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.) Hitchc. & Chase plant material from a constructed wetland system treating domestic wastewater in Cameroon’, Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 272–282, 2016. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[40] | WHO, ‘Urban Solid Waste Management, Ed. 1985 and 1990-1993’, 1993. | ||
In article | |||
[41] | Raj, D., Antilb R.S., Evaluation of maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared from agro-industrial wastes’, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 2868–2873, 2011. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[42] | Toundou, O., Tozo, K., Feuillade, G., Pallier, V., Tchegueni, S., Dossou, K.S.S., ‘Effets de composts de déchets sur les propriétés chimiques du sol et la solubilité d’éléments minéraux sous deux régimes hydriques en conditions contrôlées au Togo’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1917–1926, 2014. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[43] | Mkhabela, M, Warman, P.R, ‘The influence of municipal solid waste compost on yield, soil phosphorus availability and uptake by two vegetable crops grown in a Pugwash sandy loam soil in Nova Scotia’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2005. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[44] | Kalyani, G., Joga, R.H., Prasanna Kumar, Y., King, P, ‘Potential of biochar and compost in soil amendment for enhancing crop yield. Int. J. Chem. Sci, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 173-185, 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[45] | Mensah, A.K., Frimpong, K.A., ‘Biochar and/or compost applications improve soil properties, growth, and yield of maize grown in acidic rainforest and coastal savannah soils in Ghana’, Int. J. Agron., vol. 2018, 2018. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[46] | Guo, X-X., Liu, H-T., Zhang, J, ‘The role of biochar in organic waste composting and soil improvement: A review’, Waste Manag., vol. 102, pp. 884–899, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[47] | Yan, J., Li, X., Hu, D., Liu, G., Chen, C., and Zhou, Z. ‘Study on degradation of organic matter and maturity of corn straw compost by enzymes’, in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[48] | Yerima, B.P.K., Tiamgne, A.Y., Van Ranst, E., ‘Réponse de deux variétés de tournesol (Helianthus sp.) à la fertilisation à base de fiente de poule sur un Hapli-Humic Ferralsol du Yongka Western Highlands Research Garden Park (YWHRGP) Nkwen-Bamenda, Cameroun, Afrique centrale.’, Tropicultura, vol. 32, no. 4, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[49] | Cissé, D., Cornelis, J.T., Traoré, M., Saba, F., Coulibaly, K., Lefebvre, D., Colinet, G., Nacro, H.B., ‘Co-composted biochar to decrease fertilization rates in cotton–maize rotation in Burkina Faso’, Agron. J, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 5516–5526, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[50] | Elsalam, H.E.A.; El- Sharnouby, M.E.; Mohamed, A.E.; Raafat, B.M.; El-Gamal, E.H. ‘Effect of sewage sludge compost usage on corn and faba bean growth, carbon and nitrogen forms in plants and soil’, Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 628, 2021. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[51] | Ilyas, M., Ayub, G., Hussain, Z., ‘Response of Tomato to different levels of calcium and magnesium concentration’, World Appl. Sci. J., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1560–1564, 2014. | ||
In article | |||
[52] | Rabah, S.S., Mamat, SA., Al-Shaheen, R.A., ‘The Effect of Soil PH, High-Calcium Compost and Cadmium on Some of Growth Characters in Corn (Zea mays L.)’, ARC J Pharm Sci, vol. 5, pp. 16–27, 2019. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[53] | Mbonigaba, M.J.J., ‘Étude de l’impact des composts à base de biomasse végétale sur la dynamique des indicateurs physico-chimiques, chimiques et microbiologiques de la fertilité des sols: application sur trios sols acides tropicaux du Rwanda’, Thèse de doctorat, Fac. Univ. Sci. Agron. Univ. Gembloux, 2007. | ||
In article | |||
[54] | N’Dayegamiye, A., Drapeau, A., Laverdière, M.R, ‘Effets des apports de composts de résidus ménagers sur les rendements des cultures et certaines propriétés du sol’, Agrosol, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 57–71, 2005. | ||
In article | |||
[55] | Temgoua, E., Ntangmo, H., Ngnikam, E., Takuete, R., Dongmo, G., 2017. ‘Fertilisation du maïs (Zea mays L.) à base d’urines humaines hygiénisées dans un oxisol de l’Ouest Cameroun’, Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2071–2081, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[56] | Tshibingu1, M.R., Mukadi, T.T., Mpoyi, M.B., Ntatangolo, M.B., Musenge, K.D., Tshibingu, M.I., Kazadi, N.J., Nyembo, N.D., Mushambani, M.T., 2017. ‘Évaluation de la productivité du maïs (Zea mays L.) sous amendements organique et minéral dans la province de Lomami, République Démocratique du Congo’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 109, pp. 10571–10579, 2017. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[57] | Toundou, O., ‘Evaluation des caractéristiques chimiques et agronomiques de cinq composts de déchets et étude de leurs effets sur les propriétés chimiques du sol, la physiologie et le rendement du maïs (Zea mays L. Var. Ikenne) et de la tomate (Lycop ersicum esculentum L. Var. Tropimech) sous deux régimes hydriques au Togo’, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Limoges; Université de Lomé (Togo), 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[58] | Kaho, F., Yemefack M., Feujio-Teguefouet P., Tchatchouang J.C., ‘Effet combiné des feuilles de Tithonia diversifolia et des engrais inorganiques sur les rendements du maïs et les propriétés d’un sol ferralitique au Centre Cameroun’, Tropicultura, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2011. | ||
In article | |||
[59] | Kitabala, M.A., Tshala, U.J., Kalenda, M.A., Tshijika, I.M., Mufind, K.M, ‘Effets de différentes doses de compost sur la production et la rentabilité de la tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) dans la ville de Kolwezi, Province du Lualaba (RD Congo)’, J. Appl. Biosci., vol. 102, pp. 9669–9679, 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[60] | M’zée, S.P, ‘Influence d’apports en matières organiques sur l’activité biologique et la disponibilité du phosphore dans deux sols de la région des grands lacs d’Afrique’, Thèse de doctorat, Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux, 2008. | ||
In article | |||