In this paper, we have study some concepts of minimal open, closed sets and minimal functions. Further, we have shown that these properties preserved under conjugate maps.
Let
be a compact topological space. All maps under consideration are supposed to be continuous. The set of all continuous maps f: X → X is denoted by C(X). By a system
we mean a compact topological space (phase space) X and
In a topological space a trajectory consists of a sequence of points
and can possibly contain additional attributes a measured at each point. Trajectories can be generated by moving objects but also by moving phenomena, e.g. measurement points on a hill slide. The pointscan be captured at regular intervals or irregularly A point
“moves,” its trajectory 1 being the sequence
where
is the nth iteration of
The point
is the position of the point x after n units of time. The set of points of the trajectory of x under f is called the orbit of x, denoted by
. A map f ∈ C(X) is (topologically) transitive if for any two nonempty open sets U and V in X, there is a nonnegative integer n such that
. If X has no isolated points then this definition is equivalent to the existence of a dense orbit, i.e.
. If every orbit of f is dense, the map f is called minimal. Denote by
the set of transitive self-maps of the space X. A minimal map
is necessarily surjective if
is assumed to be Hausdorff and compact.
Now, to study the existence of minimal sets, given a system
a set
is called a minimal set if it is non-empty, closed and invariant and if no proper subset of
has these three properties. So,
is a minimal set if and only if
is a minimal system. A system
is minimal if and only if X is a minimal set in
The basic fact discovered by G. D. Birkhoff is that in any compact system
there are minimal sets. This follows immediately from the Zorn's lemma. Since any orbit closure is invariant, we get that any compact orbit closure contains a minimal set. This is how compact minimal sets may appear in non-compact spaces. Two minimal sets in
either are disjoint or coincide. A minimal set A is strongly
i.e.
Provided it is compact Hausdorff
Definition 2.1
1. (Minimal Hausdorff spaces) 3
A topological space
is said to be minimal Hausdorff if
is Hausdorff and there exists no Hausdorff topology on X strictly weaker than
Thus this minimality property is topological.
2. Two topological spaces
and
are called homeomorphic 5 if there exists a one-to-one onto function
such that
and
are both continuous.
3. Two topological systems
and
are said to be topologically conjugate if there is a homeomorphism
such that
We will call h topological Conjugacy. Thus, the two topological systems with their respective function acting on them share the same dynamics(see the following diagram )
![]() |
Definition 2.2 (minimal open set). Recall that a proper non empty open subset U of a topological space X is said to be a minimal open set, if any open set which is contained in U is empty set or U.
Definition 2.3 Recall that a proper non empty closed subset F of a topological space X is said to be a minimal closed set if any closed set which is contained in F is empty set or F.
Definition 2.4
A system
is called minimal if
does not contain any non-empty, proper, closed
subset. In such a case we also say that the map
itself is minimal. Thus, one cannot simplify the study of the dynamics of a minimal system by finding its non- trivial closed subsystems and studying first the dynamics restricted to them.
Proposition 2.5
Let
be continuous function. The following are equivalent:
1.
is minimal.
2. The only closed invariant sets of X are X itself and the empty set.
3. For any non-empty open subset
then
.
Proof:
(1)
(2)
Suppose that
is a non-empty closed invariant set. Let
Then since C is invariant,
Since C is closed, so
, but
since the orbit
is dense, this means
. Thus X=C.
(2)
(3), let
be a non-empty open set. Put
then C is closed and invariant. Since
by (2) we must have 
(3)
(1), let
and let U be an arbitrary non-empty open subset. Then by (3),
for some
. Thus
, and hence
Since U was arbitrary,
is dense, i.e. f is minimal.
Definition 2.6 (minimal) Let X be a topological space
And
be continuous map on X. Then
is called minimal system (or f is called minimal map on X) if one of the three equivalent conditions hold:
(1) The orbit of each point in X is dense in X
(2)
for each x
X.
(3) Given x
X and a nonempty open U in X, there exists
such that 
Definition 2.7 A subset M of X is said to be minimal under provided that M is non-empty, closed and invariant, that is
and no proper subset of M has all these properties.
Theorem 2.8 4 Any two minimal sets must have empty intersection.
Proof: Let
be two distinct minimal sets, and suppose that
. Then A is closed, and fore very a ∈ A and every n ∈ N,
, so A is invariant. But then A is a proper subset of both
and
which is closed, invariant and non-empty, contradicting the fact that
are minimal.
Definition 2.9 Two topological systems
and
are said to be topologically conjugate if there is a homeomorphism
such that
. We will call h a topological Conjugacy.
We have stated a new proposition as follows:
Proposition 2.10 if
are topologically conjugated by
. Then
is a minimal open set in X if and only if
is a minimal open set in Y.
Definition 2.11 Let X be a topological space, and
a continuous map. We say f is (topologically) transitive if for any nonempty open sets
there exists n > 0 such that
. We say f is strongly transitive 3 if for any nonempty open set
for some s > 0. For more knowledge see 4.
Definition 2.12 A subset S of X is called
-set if it is the intersection of open sets containing S.
Definition 2.13 Recall that a subset of a topological space
is called λ-closed set if
where S is
-set and C is a closed set.
Proposition 2.14 Let
be topological space and A be a nonempty λ-closed
invariant set of X. Then A is a λ-type transitive set of
if and only if
is λ-type transitive.
Proof:
Let
be two nonempty λ-open subsets of A. For a nonempty λ-open subset
of A, there exists a λ- open set U of X such that
Since A is a λ-type transitive set of
, there exists n ∈ N such that
Moreover, A is invariant, i.e.,
which implies that
Therefore,
, i.e.
. This shows that
is λ- type transitive.
Let
be a nonempty λ-open set of A and U be a nonempty λ-open set of X with
Since U is an λ-open set of X and
, it follows that U ∩ A is a nonempty λ-open set of A. Since
is topologically λ-type transitive, there exists n ∈ N such that
which implies that
. This shows that A is a λ-type transitive set of 
Theorem 2.15 Let X be a non-empty λ-compact Hausdorff space. Then the intersection of a countable collection of λ-open λ-dense subsets of X is λ -dense in X.
Definition 2.16 Let
be a topological space. Recall that subset A of X is called λ -dense in X if λCl(A)=X.
Corollary 2.17 A subset A of a space
is λ -dense if and only if
for all
other than
.
Proof: If A is λ -dense set in X, then by definition,
, and let U be a non-empty λ-open set in X. Suppose that A∩U=ϕ. Therefore
is λ-closed and
So,
, i.e.
, but
, so X
B, this contradicts U ≠ φ.
Theorem 2.18 Let
be a non-empty λ-compact Hausdorff space and
is λ -irresolute map and that X is λ-type separable. Suppose that f is topologically λ -type transitive. Then there is an element
such that the orbit
is λ -dense in X.
Proof: Let
be a countable basis for the λ -topology of X. For each i, let
for some 
Then, clearly
is λ -open and λ -dense. It is λ -open since f is λ -irresolute, so,
is λ - open and λ -dense since f is topological λ- transitive map. Further, for every λ -open set V, there is n>0, such that
since f is λ- transitive.
Now, apply theorem 2.15 to the countable λ -dense set {
} to say that
is λ -dense and so non-empty. Let
. This means that, for each i, there is a positive integer n such that
for each i. By corollary 2.17, this implies that
is λ -dense in X.
| [1] | Bruckner A. M., Hu Thakyin On scrambled sets for chaotic functions,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 301.1 (1987), 289-297. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [2] | Anuradha N1 and Baby Chacko2, On Minimal Regular Open Sets and Maps in Topological Spaces, Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Vol.6(4), April 2015. Pp. 182-192. | ||
| In article | |||
| [3] | A. KAMEYAMA, TOPOLOGICAL TRANSITIVITY AND STRONG TRANSITIVITY, Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXI, 2(2002), pp. 139-145. | ||
| In article | |||
| [4] | Mohammed Nokhas Murad Kaki, Introduction to Topological Dynamical Systems II, Lambert academic publisher, Germany. | ||
| In article | |||
| [5] | P.S. Aleksandrov, H. HopfTopologieSpringer Verlag, Berlin (1935). | ||
| In article | |||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2018 Dana Mawlood Mohammed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
| [1] | Bruckner A. M., Hu Thakyin On scrambled sets for chaotic functions,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 301.1 (1987), 289-297. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [2] | Anuradha N1 and Baby Chacko2, On Minimal Regular Open Sets and Maps in Topological Spaces, Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Vol.6(4), April 2015. Pp. 182-192. | ||
| In article | |||
| [3] | A. KAMEYAMA, TOPOLOGICAL TRANSITIVITY AND STRONG TRANSITIVITY, Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXI, 2(2002), pp. 139-145. | ||
| In article | |||
| [4] | Mohammed Nokhas Murad Kaki, Introduction to Topological Dynamical Systems II, Lambert academic publisher, Germany. | ||
| In article | |||
| [5] | P.S. Aleksandrov, H. HopfTopologieSpringer Verlag, Berlin (1935). | ||
| In article | |||