In this study, it was shown that the existence of fixed points of some surface transformations was defined as an example according to the theorems in functional analysis in differential geometry. It was shown that fi real-valued coordinate functions of F triangular space mapping defined from En to Em has a single fixed point, if
In this study, we defined the triangular mapping in addition to surface mapping which exist in differential geometry. We proof that this triangular surface mapping has a unique fixed point and we examine the condition of convergence to this fixed point. I define a triangular surface mapping and examine the conditions of existence and uniqueness of this surface map’s fixed point by originating the study “A Fixed Point Theorem For Triangular Mappings” made by F. Sart 2.
2.1. Definition: Let be any space and
a map of
, or of a subset of
into .
.A point
is called a fixed point for
if
. The set of all fixed point of
is denoted by Fix (f) 5.
2.2. Definition: Let be a normed space, let
be a non-empty subset of
and
be a transformation. If
and for
and
![]() |
Then, F is called a quasi-convergence transformation 7.
2.1. Example:
Let be a sphere surface. Let’s define a surface transformation
at
In this case, since
and
, then
becomes a fixed point at the transformation of
(See Figure 1).
F surface transformation is a quasi-convergence transformation because for.
Theorem 2.1: Let be a Banach space, let
be a non-empty, compact convex subset of
and let
be a continuous transformation. In such case, F has at least one fixed point 6.
2.2. Example: Let be a transformation defined on a saddle surface
.
This transformation has at least one fixed point according to the Theorem 2.1.
For. Under the
transformation,
is a fixed point and F has infinite fixed points.
Moreover, F surface transformation is a quasi-convergence transformation because for
![]() |
2.3. Definition: Giving a function let
denote the real-valued functions on
such that
![]() |
for all points in
These functions are called the Euclidean coordinate functions of
and we write
![]() |
The function is differentiable provided its coordinate functions are differentiable in the unusal sense. A differentiable function
is called a mapping from
to
1.
2.4. Definition: Let :
→
be a mapping. If
is a tangent vector to
at P, let
be a initial velocity of the curve t →
(p + t
). The resulting function
send tangent vectors to
to tangent vectors to
and is called the tangent map of
1.
2.5. Definition: A function :
→
from one surface to another is differentiable provided that for each patch
in
and
in
the composite function
is Euclidean differentiable (and defined on an open set of R2).
is then called a mapping of surfaces 1.
2.6. Definition: Let be a open-convex subset of
and C be nonempty compact subset of
Let
be real-valued and differentiable functions. If mapping
is defined with
and
![]() |
then is called triangular mapping.
2.3. Example:
![]() |
If the Jakobian matrix of function is stated as following:
![]() |
Lets take . In this case,
![]() |
2.7. Definition: A square matrix is called upper triangular if all etries below the main diagonal are zones. Similarly, a square matrix is called lower triangular if all the entries above the main diagonal are zeros. A matrix that is either upper or lower triangular is called triangular 4.
Theorem 2.2. Let be an open convex set of
, and
a non-empty compact subset
Let
be a triangular mapping of
, i.e. of a type
![]() |
which has the following properties:
1. F is a self-map on ,
2. F is continuous and differentiable on
3. F has a bounded derivative on such that
![]() |
Then;
F has a unique fixed point in
For any in
the iterative sequence
converges to the unique fixed point.) 2.
Uniquenses proof. Suppose that X and Y are two different fixed points. By using fixed point definition
![]() |
On the other hand, by the mean-value theorem (Lagrange’s theorem), there is an n-tuble of points such that
![]() |
where
![]() |
W1, W2, … , Wn being each on the line segment joining X and Y. Therefore
![]() |
and thus 1 is eigenvalue of the matrix . As it is triangular 1 belongs to diagonal, which contradicts the assumption on those elements 2.
2.4. Example: Lets state the Jakobiyen matrix of transformation as following
![]() |
From here,
![]() |
![]() |
The number of fixed points of F transformation is one according to Theorem 2.2. This fixed point is the point of
Then,
2.5. Example: For and
![]() |
![]() |
From here,
![]() |
Then,
![]() |
If
![]() |
for the
function has infinite fixed-points according to Theorem 2.2.
Theorem 2.3. If a function is continuously differentible in an open set of
containing the points
and
and the line segment connecting them, then an equation
![]() |
Where (a, b, c) an interior point of the line segment, is valid. (PlaneMath: mean value theorem for several variables=3) 3
Following definition 3.1 is triangular space mapping which was defined by using definition 2.1 and 2.5, and 2.6.
Definition 3.1: Let and
be surfaces in
Euclid space, and let
be a mapping of surface. In addition, if
is a triangular mapping, then
is called triangular space mapping.
Theorem 3.1: Let be a surface and, let
be a triangular space mapping. If including the transformation of
to a single fixed point
![]() |
where are real-valued coordinate functions of
.
Proof: Let be triangular space mapping which has a single fixed point. Then, from Theorem 2.2
![]() |
Determinant value of this matrix can be 1. If this value is 1, then the determinant value belongs to the diagonal of this matrix. Because, this matrix is the lower triangular matrix. At that rate,
![]() |
3.1. Example: Let’s define a triangular surface transformation as ,
![]() |
and
![]() |
![]() |
For Jakobiyen matrix it is obvious that is true for
![]() |
Because each component is within the interval of
It can be told that JF.
Then, according to Theorem 4.2.2 transformation of has limited derivative at
In this case;
1) has one fixed point at
2) For any Picard iteration progression of
converges to this fixed point.
This point is
![]() |
The Picard iteration progression of
![]() |
converges to the point of .
In this case Then
is a fixed point of transformation of
.
That means
[1] | O’neill B. 1997. Elementary Differential Geometry, Second Edition, Academic Press, San Diego, USA. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | Sart F., 2007. A Fixed Point Theorem For Triangular Mappings, Journal of Applied Analysis, Vol.13, No.1, 2007, 77-81. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | PlaneMath: mean value theorem for several variables, https://www.planemath.com. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Anton H. 1977. Elementary Linear Algebra, Second Edition, Quinn & Boden Com, USA. | ||
In article | |||
[5] | Granas A. Dugundji J. 2003. Fixed Point Theory, Springer-Verlag New York, USA. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | Khamsi, M. A. and Kirk W. A., 2001. An Introduction to Metric Spaces and Fixed Point Theory. | ||
In article | |||
[7] | Petryshyn, W. V. and Williamson, T. E., 1973. Strong and weak convergence of thesequence of successive approximations for quasi-nonexpansive mappings, J.Math. Anal. Appl., 43, 459-497. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2018 Şükrü İLGÜN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | O’neill B. 1997. Elementary Differential Geometry, Second Edition, Academic Press, San Diego, USA. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | Sart F., 2007. A Fixed Point Theorem For Triangular Mappings, Journal of Applied Analysis, Vol.13, No.1, 2007, 77-81. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | PlaneMath: mean value theorem for several variables, https://www.planemath.com. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Anton H. 1977. Elementary Linear Algebra, Second Edition, Quinn & Boden Com, USA. | ||
In article | |||
[5] | Granas A. Dugundji J. 2003. Fixed Point Theory, Springer-Verlag New York, USA. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | Khamsi, M. A. and Kirk W. A., 2001. An Introduction to Metric Spaces and Fixed Point Theory. | ||
In article | |||
[7] | Petryshyn, W. V. and Williamson, T. E., 1973. Strong and weak convergence of thesequence of successive approximations for quasi-nonexpansive mappings, J.Math. Anal. Appl., 43, 459-497. | ||
In article | View Article | ||