Some Fixed Point Results on Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces
1Department of Mathematics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan
Abstract
We give the concept of multiplicative partial metric space, multiplicative metric-like space, multiplicative b-metric space and multiplicative b-metric-like space. Then we build the existence and uniqueness of fixed points in a multiplicative b-metric-like space as well as in a partially ordered multiplicative b-metric-like space. We derive some fixed point results in multiplicative partial metric spaces, multiplicative metric-like spaces and multiplicative b-metric spaces as an application, some examples and an application to existence of solution of integral equations.
Keywords: Partial metric space, metric-like space, b-metric space, b-metric-like space, fixed point, integral equation
Received July 06, 2016; Revised September 12, 2016; Accepted September 20, 2016
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- Bakht Zada, Usman Riaz. Some Fixed Point Results on Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory. Vol. 4, No. 5, 2016, pp 118-131. https://pubs.sciepub.com/tjant/4/5/1
- Zada, Bakht, and Usman Riaz. "Some Fixed Point Results on Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 4.5 (2016): 118-131.
- Zada, B. , & Riaz, U. (2016). Some Fixed Point Results on Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 4(5), 118-131.
- Zada, Bakht, and Usman Riaz. "Some Fixed Point Results on Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 4, no. 5 (2016): 118-131.
Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
1. Introduction
The idea of b-metric space and partial metric space were introduced by S. Czerwik [4] and S. G. Matthews [12], respectively. S. Shukla [15] introduced another generalization which is called a partial b-metric space. Amini Harandi [9] introduced a new extension of the concept of partial metric space, called a metric-like space. After that, A. Alghamdi [1] introduce the concept of b-metric-like space which generalizes the idea of partial metric space, metric-like space, and b-metric space. They established the existence and uniqueness of fixed points in a b-metric-like space as well as in a partially ordered b-metric-like space.
In 2008, Bashirov et al. [3] studied the usefulness of a new calculus, called multiplicative calculus due to Michael Grossman and Robert Katz in the period from 1967 till 1970. By using the concepts of multiplicative absolute values, Bashirov et al. defined a new distance so called multiplicative distance. Also, Ozavsar and Cevikel [6] introduced the concept of multiplicative contraction mapings and derive some fixed point results on these mappings on a complete multiplicative metric space.
In this paper, by using the concept of multiplicity we first introduce concept of multiplicative partial metric space, multiplicative metric-like space, multiplicative b-metric space and then we introduce a new generalization of these spaces which is called multiplicative b-metric-like space. Then, we derive some fixed point results. Also, some examples and an application to integral equations are provided for the support of our constructed results.
2. Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Space
We shall begin this section with the introduction to the concept of multiplicative partial metric space.
Definition 2.1. A mapping where
is called a multiplicative partial metric on
provided that, for all
![]() |
The pair is a multiplicative partial metric space.
Definition 2.2. A mapping where
is called a multiplicative metric-like on
provided that, for all
(Ψ1)
(Ψ2)
(Ψ3)
The pair is a multiplicative metric-like space.
S. Czerwik [4] give idea of multiplicative b-metric-like space. Now we introduce concept of multiplicative b-metric space.
Definition 2.3. A mapping
is called a multiplicative b-metric on
provided that, for all
and a constant
The pair is a multiplicative b-metric space.
Definition 2.4. A mapping is called a multiplicative b-metric-like on
provided that, for all
and a constant
The pair is a multiplicative b-metric-like space.
Example 2.5. Suppose and let
be defined by
where
be a fixed real number, is a multiplicative b-metric-like for all
with
![]() |
and so holds. Clearly,
and
hold.
Similarly.
Example 2.6. Suppose and let
be defined by
, where
be a fixed real number, is a multiplicative b-metric-like space with
Example 2.7. Let The function
defined by
![]() |
where be a fixed real number, is a multiplicative b-metric-like with constant
and so
is a multiplicative b-metric like space.
As we know, if then
![]() |
This implies that
![]() |
Let be a multiplicative b-metric-like space. Then multiplicative open ball with center at
and radius
is,
![]() |
Definition 2.8. Let is multiplicative b-metric-like space, and let
be a sequence in
Then point
is the limit of the sequence
if
and we say that the sequence
is convergent to
Definition 2.9. Let is multiplicative b-metric-like space.
A sequence
is a Cauchy
exists.
A multiplicative b-metric-like space
is complete if every cauchy sequence
in
is convergent. That is,
![]() |
Proposition 2.10. Let a multiplicative b-metric-like space and let a sequence
in
such that
Then
1. x is unique;
2.
Proof. (1) Suppose there exists such that
Then
![]() |
Hence () gives y = x.
Proof. (2) As we know from ()
![]() |
and so
![]() |
Definition 2.11. Let a multiplicative b-metric-like space , let
We say
is an open subset of
if for all
there exists
such that
Also,
is closed subset of
if
is open subset of
.
Proposition 2.12. Let be a multiplicative b-metric-like space and let
. Then
is closed if and only if for any sequence
we have
,
Proof. Let is closed and
is an open set. Then there exists
such that
Since as
, then
![]() |
Hence, there exists such that for all
we have
![]() |
So
![]() |
which yield to contradiction, since
Conversely, let we have for any sequence
in
, such that
Let
Let us prove that for
there exist
Suppose to the contrary that for
, we have
Then, for all
choose
Therefore,
for all
Hence,
as
So supposition on
implies
which is wrong. Then, for all
there exists
such that
That is,
is closed.
Lemma 2.13. Suppose be a multiplicative b-metric-like space, and let
Then
![]() |
For Lemma (2.13), we deduce the following result.
Lemma 2.14. Suppose a sequence in multiplicative b-metric-like space
such that
![]() |
for some
and each
Then
Let be a multiplicative b-metric-like space. Define
by
![]() |
for all
3. Fixed Point of Expansion Mapping in Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces
Many papers have been appeared on the work of expansive mapping see, e.g., ([1, 5, 11]). In this paper we drive fixed point results for expansive mappings in multiplicative b-metric-like space to the corresponding results of A. Alghamdi(see - [1]).
Theorem 3.1. Let ba a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space. Suppose
is onto mapping, such that
![]() | (3.1) |
where
Then
has a fixed point.
Proof. Let as
is onto, so there exists
such that
Similarly, there exists
such that
for all
In case
for some
then
is a fixed point of
Now let
for all
Then from (3.1) with
and
we have
![]() |
which implies
![]() |
and so
![]() |
Then by Lemma(2.14) we get exists (and is finite), so
is a Cauchy sequence. Since
is a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, the sequence
so that
![]() |
Since is onto, there exists
such that
From (3.1) we have
![]() |
By taking limit in the above, we get
![]() |
which implies From Proposition 2.10(1), we have
That is,
If we take I = 0 in theorem (3.1), then we have the following corollary.
Corollary 3.2. Let ba a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space. Suppose
is onto mapping and satisfies
![]() |
where
Then
has a fixed point.
Example 3.3. Let and let a multiplicative b-metric-like
be defined by
![]() |
where be a fixed real number.
Clearly is a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space.
be defined by
![]() |
Clearly, as J onto, so consider the following cases:
• Let then
![]() |
• Let then
![]() |
• Let then
![]() |
• Let and let
then
![]() |
• Let and let
then
![]() |
• Let and let
then
![]() |
That is, for all
where
The conditions of Corollary 3.2 are satisfied and
has a fixed point
Let be the class of functions
such that it satisfy the condition
where
Theorem 3.4. Let be a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space. Suppose the mapping
is onto and satisfies
![]() | (3.2) |
where
Then J has a fixed point.
Proof. Let as J is onto, so there exists
such that
Similarly, there exists
such that
for all
In case
for some
then it is clear that
is a fixed point of
Now suppose that
for all
From (3.2) with
and
we get
![]() | (3.3) |
Then the sequence is decreasing in
and so there exists
such that
Let us prove that
Suppose to the contrary that
by (3.3) with
and
we get
![]() |
Taking limit in the above, we get
Hence
![]() |
which is contradiction. That is, m = 0. We shall show that
![]() |
Suppose to the contrary that
![]() |
By (3.2) we have
![]() |
That is,
![]() |
Then by () we get
![]() |
therefore,
![]() |
Taking limit as in the above, since
and
![]() |
then we obtain
![]() |
which implies
![]() |
and so
![]() |
which is contradiction. Hence,
![]() |
Now, since exists (and finite), so
is a Cauchy sequence. Since
is complete multiplicative b-metric-like space,
in
converges to
so that
![]() |
As is onto, so there exists
such that
Let us prove that
Suppose to the contrary that
Then by (3.2) we have
![]() |
Taking limit as and by applying proposition 2.10(2), we have
![]() |
and hence
![]() |
which is contradiction. Indeed Since
for all
therefore
That is,
Example 3.5. Let and
be defined by
![]() |
Clearly, is a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space. Let
be defined by
![]() |
Also define by
Mapping
is an onto.
Suppose Now, since
so
![]() |
equivalently,
![]() |
and hence
![]() |
That is
![]() |
The condition of theorem(3.4) hold and J has a fixed point (x = 0 is a fixed point of J).
NOTE. We can obtain the following corollaries because multiplicative b-metric-like spaces are extension of multiplicative partial metric, multiplicative metric-like and multiplicative b-metric spaces.
Corollary 3.6. Let be a complete multiplicative partial metric space. Suppose
is onto and satisfies
![]() |
where
Then J has a fixed point.
Corollary 3.7. Let be a complete multiplicative metric-like space. Suppose
is onto and satisfies
![]() |
where
Then J has a fixed point.
Corollary 3.8. Let be a complete multiplicative b-metric space. Suppose
is onto and satisfies
![]() | (3.4) |
where
Then J has a fixed point.
4. Partially Ordered Multiplicative (b)-metric-like Spaces and Fixed Point Theorems
A. Alghamdi [1] proved fixed point point results which extend results of A. Harandi and someothers (see [2, 9]). Now, we prove some fixed point results in partially ordered multiplicative b-metric-like space to the corresponding results of A. Alghamdi [1].
Let be the class of functions
such that it satisfy the condition
where
Theorem 4.1. Let be a partially ordered complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, and suppose the mapping
is non-decreasing such that
![]() | (4.1) |
with
where
is bounded function and
![]() |
and
![]() |
Also, assume that the following assertions hold:
(1) for there exists
(2) for an increasing sequence where
we have
for all
then
has a fixed point.
Proof. Let If
then the result is proved. Now we assume that
Define a sequence
by
for all
Since
is non-decreasing and
then
![]() | (4.2) |
and hence the sequence is non-decreasing. If
for some
then the result is satisfied as
is a fixed point of
In what follows we will suppose that
for all
From (4.1) and (4.2) we have
![]() |
where
![]() |
Then
![]() | (4.3) |
On the other hand, from () we have
![]() |
and
![]() |
Then
![]() |
and hence
![]() |
That is
![]() |
Now by (4.3) we get
![]() |
If then
![]() |
which is contradiction. Hence,
![]() | (4.4) |
and so is decreasing sequence. Then there exists
such that
By (4.4) we have
![]() |
Taking in the above inequality, we get
![]() |
and so Now we want to show that
![]() |
Suppose to the contrary that
![]() |
At first,
![]() | (4.5) |
and
![]() |
That is,
![]() | (4.6) |
Now by (4.1) we have
![]() |
and so from (4.5) and (4.6) we get
![]() | (4.7) |
By () we have
![]() |
Taking in the above inequality, we have
![]() |
Then by (4.7) we deduce
![]() |
Now, since then
![]() |
On the other hand, since
![]() |
hence
![]() |
This implies that
![]() |
which is contradiction. Thus, Now, since
exists (and finite), so
is a cauchy sequence. Since
is complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, the sequence
in
converges to
so that
![]() |
From(2) and(4.1), with and
we obtain
![]() | (4.8) |
On the other hand,
![]() |
and
![]() |
Then Again, from Proposition 2.10(2) and 4.8, we have
![]() |
Now, if then
![]() |
This implies
![]() |
which is contradiction. Hence, That is,
Example 4.2. Let and
be defined by
![]() |
Clearly, is a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, let
be defined by
![]() |
Also define by
Let
That is for all
we have
![]() |
which implies
![]() |
equivalently,
![]() |
and so
![]() |
So Theorem (4.1) hold and J has a fixed point.
Also we derive the following corollaries.
Corollary 4.3. Let be a partially ordered complete multiplicative partial metric space, and suppose the mapping
is non-decreasing such that
![]() | (4.9) |
with
, where
is bounded function and
![]() |
and
![]() |
Also, assume that the following assertions hold:
(1) for there exists
;
(2) for an increasing sequence where
we have
for all
then
has a fixed point.
Corollary 4.4. Let be a partially ordered complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, and suppose the mapping
is non-decreasing such that
![]() | (4.10) |
for all with
, where
is bounded function and
![]() |
and
![]() |
Also, suppose that the following assertions hold:
(1) for there exists
;
(2) for an increasing sequence where
we have
for all
then
has a fixed point.
5. Fixed Point Results for Cyclic Contraction
A.Alghamdi [1] proved some results which is the generalization of the results proved by Edelstein [7], Suzuki [16] and Kirk [10]. Ozavar and Cevikel [6] introduce the concepts of Banach-contraction in multiplicative metric spaces. By using the idea, in this section we derive some results to the setting of multiplicative b-metric-like spaces corresponding to the results proved by Alghamdi [1].
Theorem 5.1. Let be a multiplicative b-metric-like space, and suppose the family
of non-empty closed subsets of
with
Let
be a map satisfying
![]() | (5.1) |
Assume that
![]() |
This implies,
![]() | (5.2) |
for all and
where
and
Then
has a fixed point in
Proof. Let and define a sequence
in the following way:
![]() | (5.3) |
We have for some
then, clearly, the fixed point of the map
is
Hence, we assume that
for all
Clearly,
Now, from (5.2) we have
![]() |
which implies
![]() | (5.4) |
From () we have
![]() |
and
![]() |
and so
![]() | (5.5) |
Also,
![]() |
Then
![]() | (5.6) |
Hence, by (5.4), (5.5) and (5.6) we get
![]() |
and then
![]() |
where
![]() |
Now since then
![]() |
which implies
![]() |
Then by lemma 2.14 we have Now, since
exists (and finite), so
is a cauchy sequence. Since
is complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, the sequence
in
converges to
so that
![]() |
As Since
subsequence
the subsequence
and similarly the subsequence
All the m subsequences are convergent in the closed sets
and all have the same limit
Assume that there exists
such that the following inequalities Satisfied:
![]() |
Then
![]() |
which is contradiction. Hence, for every we have
![]() |
and so by (5.2) we have
![]() | (5.7) |
or
![]() | (5.8) |
Assume that (5.7) holds. Then, by taking limit as in (5.7), we get
![]() |
and hence by using proposition 2.10(2) we obtain
![]() |
Therefore,
![]() |
If we take and
then
That is,
Hence,
i.e.,
If (5.8) holds, then by a similar method, we can deduce that
If we take in the above theorem for all m, then we have the following corollary.
Corollary 5.2. Let be a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, and let
be a self-mapping on
. Suppose that
![]() |
This implies
![]() |
where
and
Then
has a fixed point.
If in theorem (5.1) we take then we deduce the following corollary.
Corollary 5.3. Let be a multiplicative b-metric-like space, and let
be a family of non-empty closed subsets of
with
Let
be a map satisfying
![]() |
Assume that
![]() |
This implies
![]() |
for all and
where
![]() |
Then J has a fixed point in
If in Corollary(5.2) we take then we deduce the following corollary.
Corollary 5.4. Let be a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space, and let
be a self-mapping on
. Assume that
![]() |
This implies
![]() |
for all and
where
![]() |
Then J has a fixed point in
Corollary 5.5. Let be a complete multiplicative metric-like space,
let
be non-empty closed subsets of
and
Suppose that
is an operator such that
(1) is a cyclic representation of
with respect to
(2) Suppose there exists such that
![]() |
where
![]() |
for
where
and
is Lebesgue-integrable mapping satisfying
for
Then J has a fixed point.
Corollary 5.6. Let be a complete multiplicative metric-like space, and let
such that for any
there exists
such that
![]() |
where
![]() |
and is Lebesgue-integrable mapping satisfying
for
Then J has a fixed point.
6. Application to Integral Equations
Integral equation method is very useful for solving problems in applied fields. Many papers consist on the problem of existence of solutions of nonlinear integral equations and the results are established by using different fixed point techniques, see e.g., [1, 8, 13, 14]. Inspired by the work. Consider the following integral equation
![]() | (6.1) |
where
and
![]() |
are continuous functions. Let be a set of real continuous functions on
We endow
with the complete multiplicative b-metric-like
![]() |
Clearly, is a complete multiplicative b-metric-like space.
Let be such that
![]() | (6.2) |
Assume that for all , we have
![]() | (6.3) |
and
![]() | (6.4) |
Let, for all be a decreasing function, that is,
![]() | (6.5) |
Assume that
![]() | (6.6) |
Also suppose that for all for all
with (
and
) or (
and
).
![]() | (6.7) |
where and
Theorem 6.1. Under assumptions (6.2)-(6.7), integral equation (6.1) has a solution in
![]() |
Proof. Define the closed subsets of and
by
![]() |
and
![]() |
Also define the mapping by
![]() |
Let us prove that
![]() | (6.8) |
Suppose that that is,
![]() |
Applying condition (6.5), since for all
we obtain that
![]() |
The above inequality with condition (6.3) imply that
![]() |
for all Then we have
Similarly, let that is,
![]() |
Using condition (6.5), since for all
we obtain that
![]() |
This implies the above inequality with condition (6.4)
![]() |
for all Then we have
Also, we deduce that (6.8) holds.
Now, let that is, for all
![]() |
From condition(6.2) that for all
![]() |
Now, by condition (6.6) and (6.7), we have, for all
![]() |
![]() |
which implies
![]() |
Similarly, the above inequality hold if
So, Conditions of Theorem (5.1) satisfied and has a fixed point
in
![]() |
That is, is the solution to,
![]() |
References
[1] | M. A. Alghamdi, N. Hussain, and P. Salimi, Fixed point and coupled fixed point theorems on b-metric-like spaces. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, article 402, (2013). | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[2] | Agarwal, El-Gebeily, ORegan, Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Appl. Anal., (2008). | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[3] | A. E. Bashirov, E. M. Kurpinar, A. Ozyapici, Multiplicative calculus and its applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 337 (2008), 36-48. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[4] | S. Czerwik, Contraction mappings in b-metric spaces. Acta Mathematica et Informatica Universitatis Ostraviensis, vol. 1, (1993). | ||
![]() | |||
[5] | Daffer, Kaneko, On expansive mappings. Math. Jpn. (1992). | ||
![]() | |||
[6] | Ozavsar, Cevikel, Fixed points of multiplicative contraction mappings on multiplicative metric spaces. arXiv:1205.5131v1 [math.GM] (2012). | ||
![]() | |||
[7] | Edelstein, On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 37, (1962). | ||
![]() | |||
[8] | S. Gaulyaz, E. Karapinar and V. Rakocevic and P. Salimi, Existence of a solution of integral equations via fixed point theorem. Journal of Inequalities and Appl, (2013). | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[9] | Amini-Harandi, Metric-like spaces, partial metric spaces and fixed points. Fixed Point Theory and Applications, (2012). | ||
![]() | |||
[10] | Kirk,WA, Srinavasan, PS, Veeramani, Fixed points for mapping satisfying cyclical contractive conditions. Fixed Point Theory 4, (2003). | ||
![]() | |||
[11] | Kumar, Garg, Expansion mapping theorems in metric spaces. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. (2009). | ||
![]() | |||
[12] | S. G. Matthews, Partial metric topology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. General Topology and Applications, vol. 728, (1994). | ||
![]() | |||
[13] | H. K. Pathak, M. S. Khan and R. Tiwari, A common fixed point theorem and its application to nonlinear integral equations. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, (2007). | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[14] | H. K. Pathak, S. N. Mishra and A. K. Kalinde, Common xed point theorems with applications to nonlinear integral equations. Demonstratio Math., XXXII (1999). | ||
![]() | |||
[15] | S. Shukla, Partial b-metric spaces and fixed point theorems. Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, (2013). | ||
![]() | |||
[16] | Suzuki, A new type of fixed point theorem in metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 71(11), (2009). | ||
![]() | |||