Article Versions
Export Article
Cite this article
  • Normal Style
  • MLA Style
  • APA Style
  • Chicago Style
Research Article
Open Access Peer-reviewed

Impact of Different Radiation Schemes on the Prediction of Extreme Cold Weather Events over Bangladesh

Gazi Mamunar Rashid , M. M. Touhid Hossain, Md. Abdullah Elias Akhter, M. A. K. Mallik
American Journal of Marine Science. 2022, 10(1), 10-20. DOI: 10.12691/marine-10-1-2
Received October 05, 2022; Revised November 11, 2022; Accepted November 20, 2022

Abstract

A cold wave is a weather phenomenon that is distinguished by marked cooling of the air, or with the invasion of very cold air, over a large area. In the present study, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was tested through 30 different combinations of radiation parameterization schemes to simulate the regional climate over the Bangladesh. The objective was to investigate the response to the radiation parameters schemes for dynamic down-scaling of climatic variables. The temperature from the 30 different WRF setups were compared with the BMD observed data and were found sensitive to the radiation physics. The 30 combination of radiation physics along with the fixed WRF Single-moment 3-class microphysics, Kain-Fritiches cumulus physics, Noah Land Surface Physics and YSU planetary boundary-layer physics produced comparable results for 02 to 05 January 2019, 15 to 18 January 2019, 02 to 05 February 2019 and 28 to 31 December 2019. Having analyzed the simulation results using the different radiation physics schemes on the basis of RMSE at 2-meter air temperature at 34 stations over Bangladesh, we conclude that the New Goddard for long wave and Dudhia for short wave schemes combination (2.140764) is the most appropriate to simulate in the winter Extreme temperature. Then the selected combinations of WRF parameterizations were used to downscale the Extreme cold weather events, which showed good agreement with the reference data. The suggested WRF parameters from this study could be utilized for regional climate modeling of Bangladesh.

1. Introduction

Bangladesh has a unique geographical location with the Bay of Bengal in the south and the Himalayan range in the north and is the most vulnerable in the world in respect of disasters of hydrometeorological origin. The country acts as the playground of different types of disasters like thunderstorms/tornado, drought, tropical cyclones and associated storm surges, floods, flash floods, cold waves and heat waves, heavy rainfall, erratic rainfall, etc. Of these, cold wave is the common meteorological event, which occurs in the winter season (December-February) over Bangladesh and has worst disastrous impact in the western part of the country as a whole. A cold wave is a prolonged period of abnormally cold weather. While definitions vary across and even within countries, cold waves are generally measured relative to the usual weather in the area and relative to normal temperatures for the season. Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD) uses the term ‘cold wave’ when minimum day temperature attains 10°C or less. The operational classifications of cold wave in BMD are as follows: Mild = (8.1-10)°C, Moderate = (6.1-8)°C, Severe = (4.1-6)°C and very Severe ≤ 4°C.

In this century, more frequent cold extremes are observed at mid latitudes 1. For example, bitterly cold waves occurred in Europe and the USA during the winters of 2010/2011, 2013/2014, and 2014/2015 2, 3. East Asia has also been repeatedly affected by cold waves in recent decades, with examples including the freezing disaster in southern China in early January 2008, January–February 2012, and the winter of 2015/2016 4, 5, 6. All the above cold events resulted in a huge amount of damage and great economic loss. Therefore, researchers have started to focus on midlatitude cold waves and their possible contributory factors. Given that most midlatitude cold waves originate from the Arctic, we are motivated to explore the linkage between the Arctic changes and the midlatitude cold waves. Temperatures have increased about twice as fast in the Arctic as in midlatitudes, which is known as Arctic amplification. Disparate mechanisms are responsible for the Arctic amplification, including sea ice, snow, cloud, solar cyclic, and the Planck and lapse rate effects 7, 8, 9. Some studies have proposed that upward heat flux from an ice-free ocean warms the Arctic 10 and hence the prior-autumn Arctic sea ice exerts cross-seasonal influences on subsequent-winter circulations, which induce stationary Rossby wave train propagation 11, the impact of which on the occurrence of East Asian snowstorms 12, 13 leads to cooling of midlatitudes 14, 15, 16, 17. However, the influence of sea ice is still under discussion 6, 9, 18, 19. Because there has been an enormous reduction in Barents–Kara Sea ice since 2007, it should have been cold every winter, which has not been the case 19. Francis 9 has suggested that sea ice is not the Arctic amplification; some other factors, such as water vapor, clouds, and stratosphere, which could change the atmospheric radiation and circulation, must be considered.

The recent perceived prevalence of cold waves, exacerbated by heightened media attention to each event, is at odds with a rather obvious first-order hypothesis: a warming climate should lead to warm extremes getting warmer, and cold extremes getting less cold. This first-order trend has indeed been validated, both with regard to specific cold waves becoming less severe and frequent than they would have been without anthropogenic warming 20, 21, 22, and as a regional, long-term trend toward milder and less frequent cold waves across the United States over many decades 23, 24, 25 and similarly over Europe 26. Cold waves have not been increasing in frequency and severity, rather they have been getting milder, as expected. For example, the cold winter of 2013/14 in the Upper Midwest region of the US was shown to have been 20–100 times less likely to occur in today’s climate relative to the 1880s due to long-term warming 27. Cold waves and cold stress occur almost every year in Bangladesh, the severity of which is more over western and northwestern parts of the country. These events affect severely agricultural crops, reduce crop production significantly, livelihoods and deteriorate human and animal health as well as hampers food security greatly. The wind circulations associated with cold waves at different levels of the troposphere have not yet been studied broadly in Bangladesh.

The objective of this study is to examine the Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW) model capability for the prediction by simulating the extreme cold weather event that occurred over Bangladesh during winter season with the WRF model through sensitivity test of radiation physics. The model-derived intensity and development of the cold wave will be analyzed by comparing temperature at 2m height, surface pressure, low level wind flow, and other associated parameters.

2. Experimental Setups

2.1. Model Description and Configuration

This study was conducted using the advanced weather research and forecasting regional climate model, version WRF 4.3.0. WRF is a non-hydrostatic, primitive-equation, mesoscale meteorological model with advanced climate dynamics, physics and numerical schemes. Detailed descriptions of the WRF can be found in the model manual 28 and also on the WRF user web site (https://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users). The selection of schemes and fine tuning of parameters for various modules of WRF, domain configurations and grid resolutions play a major role in the performance of WRF. The parameterization schemes in WRF are grouped into these modules: (1) microphysics (MP), (2) longwave radiation (LW), (3) shortwave radiation (SW), (4) land surface model, (5) cumulus (Cu), and (6) planetary boundary layer (PBL). Each of these modules has two or more parameterization schemes, with some schemes more applicable for climate modeling while others for weather forecasting, or both, thus making WRF a popular RCM. In fine tuning WRF, we could only test 30 combinations make with 5 long wave and 6 short-wave radiation parameterization schemes, instead of testing all possible combinations. The performance of WRF for modeling the regional weather of Bangladesh is assessed by its ability to reproduce the spatial and temporal patterns of the observed weather of Bangladesh.

2.2. Domain Configuration and Data

Domain configurations and grid resolutions play a major role in the performance of WRF. Domain will be taking 10km horizontal resolution with the center at (180 N, 890 E) and grid numbers is (w-e x s-n) 310 x 290, integration time step is 30 seconds. WRF is finally set up with 38 vertical pressure levels and the top level is at 50 hPa. The initial and lateral boundary conditions of WRF are based on the most recent, National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) final reanalysis (FNL) data for Medium Range Weather Forecasts at 10 x 1 0 resolution and 6-h time steps. Fixing the above physical parameter, model is run.

2.3. Methodology

WRF is computationally expensive and its optimal performance requires a tedious investigation over different combinations of parameterization schemes which vary from region to region. To find out the best combination of radiation physics options of WRF model, at first 6 shortwave and 5 longwave radiation physics schemes is selected among all available radiation schemes. 6 (six) shortwave radiation physics schemes are Dudhia, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Community Atmosphere model (CAM), Rapid Radiative Transfer model Goddard (RRTMG), New Goddard and Fu-Liou-Gu. Again, 5 longwave radiation physics schemes are Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTM), Community Atmosphere model (CAM), Rapid Radiative Transfer model Goddard (RRTMG), New Goddard and Fu-Liou-Gu. All of these 6 shortwaves and 5 longwave radiation physics schemes have made 30 independent combinations for 30 independent runs using WRF model. Model is run one combination of radiation (both shortwave and longwave) scheme along with fixed of other physics options. Fixed physics option is chosen for PBL, cumulus, land surface model, Surface layer and micro-physics schemes are Younsi State University (YSU), KainFritisch, Noah Unified, Monin–Obukhov similarity theory and WRF single moment 3 class respectively. From the output of WRF Model, 3 hourly 2m temperature have been extracted during the study periods. 34 meteorological stations of BMD are considered to cover the different places of Bangladesh. The WRF model output gives the control (ctl) file and which is converted into text (txt) format data by using the Grid Analysis and Display System (GrADS). These data are transformed into Microsoft Excel and finally compared with the BMD observed temperature at 34 meteorological stations. BMD observed temperature and model simulated temperatures are used for calculating RMSE. The RMSE is mathematically expressed as follows 29: RMSE= √[1/n Σ n i=1 (xi – yi ) 2]; where n is the total number of simulated outputs, x is the model simulated values, y is the observed values. After calculating the RMSE for 2m air temperature at 34 stations over the Bangladesh; for the case, the appropriate radiation combination is fixed out using average lowest RMSE value. For validation of the performance of WRF model, model output is compared with observed data obtained from BMD.

3. Sensitivity Test of Radiation Physics

Analysis of the meteorological fields corresponding to selected radiation combination with both of long wave and short-wave parameterization schemes and its associated impact temperature over Bangladesh has been performed using the Fifth-Generation NCAR Mesoscale WRF Model 28.

The following investigations were done for the selected cases to complete the final goal of this research work:

• Sensitivity test of the different radiation parameterization combination with both of long wave and short-wave schemes of WRF model with coupling of the other fixing physical schemes for the prediction of the temperature due to Cold wave (02-05 January 2019, 15-18 January 2019, 02-05 February 2019 and 28-31 December 2019) and to settle the suitable radiation combination scheme.

• After finalization of radiation parametrization combination schemes of WRF model, other selected parameters which related in temperature are simulated accordingly.

• Afterwards an attempt has been made to validate the simulated temperature with the observed temperature of Bangladesh Meteorological Department.

The radiation schemes provide atmospheric heating due to radiative flux divergence and surface downward long wave and shortwave radiation for the ground heat budget. This downward long wave radiation includes infrared (or thermal) radiation absorbed and emitted by gases and surfaces. Upward long wave radiative flux from the ground is determined by the surface emissivity (depends upon land-use type and the ground (skin) temperature). Shortwave radiation covers the visible and surrounding wavelengths that make up the solar spectrum. Hence, the only source is the Sun, but processes include absorption, reflection, and scattering in the atmosphere and at surfaces. For shortwave radiation, the upward flux is the reflection due to surface albedo. Within the atmosphere, the radiation responds to model-predicted cloud and water vapor distributions, as well as specified carbon dioxide, ozone, and (optionally) trace gas concentrations. All the radiation schemes in WRF currently are column (one-dimensional) schemes, so each column is treated independently. The fluxes correspond to these schemes in infinite horizontally uniform planes, is a good approximation if the vertical thickness of the model layers is much less than the horizontal grid length. This assumption would become less accurate at high horizontal resolution [Skamarock, W.C. et al., 2008].

The sensitivity test of radiation physics of WRF model has been tested, verified and found that the New Goddard long wave and Dudhia short wave scheme has captured the meteorological parameter reasonably well by which the extreme temperature in the Bangladesh can be predicted deterministically. From the Table of RMSE on the basis of 2m air temperature, it is found that radiation physics scheme New Goddard for long wave and Dudhia for short wave of WRF model respectively are finalized for this study.

  • Table 2. Final selection of radiation physics of WRF model for the prediction of the temperature due to cold wave and heat wave (02-05 January 2019, 15-18 January 2019, 02-05 February 2019 and 28-31 December 2019)

4. Result and Discussion

Extreme Temperature of 22 to 27 January 2016. An Extreme temperature (Cold Wave) events have been taken for NWP study, which was occurred on 22 to 27 January 2016 over some stations of Bangladesh at 0000 UTC. It was a severe Mild cold wave, with Northwesterly gusty wind. The wind speed at 10-meter height was 56 kmh-1. For this cold wave event, no rainfall is recorded by BMD over Bangladesh on that days, and the recorded mean sea level pressure was 1006 hPa at 0000 UTC.

4.1. Analysis of Mean Sea Level Pressure

Model simulated MSLP of 6 days from 22 January to 27 January 2016 at 0000 UTC based on the initial conditions of 0000 UTC of 22 January 2016 are shown in Figure 1(a-f). On 22 January at 0000 UTC it is found that, a trough of westerly high (1017 – 1018) hPa is simulated over Bihar, West Bengal and adjoining nearest part of Bangladesh, while (1016 − 1017) hPa is simulated over the whole area of the country Bangladesh except Kutubdia and Teknaf (1015-1016) hPa and also a convergence zone of very low (1016 − below1015) hPa is simulated over the Mayanmer and some area of Meghalaya. The trough of high moved to east on 23 January and on 24 a convergence zone of high MSLP (1020−1019) hPa is simulated over West Bengal and adjoining whole western part of Bangladesh. The Bay of Bengal is (1015 - 1018) hPa. At 0000 UTC, simulation result shows that MSLP is continued to decrease gradually from northwest to southeast.

For the validation of model simulated MSLP, a comparison is made with 0000 UTC on 22 to 27 January 2016 observed MSLP recorded by BMD. The comparison is shown in the Figure 2. It has revealed that the model is captured to simulate MSLP very well except Ishurdi station. This station the model simulate MSLP is over estimate for the all 6 days. It has concluded that the WRF-ARW model is capable to capture the MSLP reasonably well.

4.2. Analysis of Relative Humidity at 2-meter Height

Relative Humidity (RH) is an important ingredient of CW formation. The RH of 22 January to 27 January 2016 at 0000 UTC of model simulation for 6 days based on the initial conditions 0000 UTC of 22 January are presented in Figure 3 (a-f) respectively. The high amount of RH is an important environmental variable associated with cloud and rain formation. From the analysis of relative humidity, on 22 January, (60 − 70)% RH is found over West Bengal Bihar and adjoining area Chuadanga, Jessore and Satkhira of Bangladesh and (90 − 100)% RH is found over eastern and central part of Bangladesh and Meghalaya, while the RH of western part of Bangladesh and adjoining some part of Bihar is about (70 − 90)%. The RH at the adjoining area of south-eastern part of Bangladesh, i.e. Paletwaya, Mongchu (Myanmer) is very low (0-10) hPa on 24 January and it continues next 3 days, whereas it is about (90 − 100)% in the central area of Bangladesh, on 25 and 26 January. From these Figures, model RH at 0000 UTC from 23 to 27 January is (50 − 70)% in Bay of Bengal.

To verification of model performance; from the Figure 4 it has observed that the model simulated data is always under estimate compare to the BMD observed data.

4.3. Analysis of Rain

The WRF model simulated accumulated rainfall distribution valid for 00-h, 24-h, 48-h, 72-h, 96-h & 120-h based on the initial conditions 0000 UTC of 22 January are presented in Figure 5 (a-f) respectively. No significant rainfall amount is simulated over Bangladesh on 22 to 27 January 2016 during this period. so, it is an important argument for normal temperature continuation.

4.4. Analysis of Temperature at 2-meter Height

Temperature is a vital element of CW. Model-simulated temperature at 2m height from 22 January to 27 January 2016 at 0000 UTC based on 0000 UTC of 22 January are shown in Figure 6(a-f) and comparison these result with observed simulated temperature by BMD are shown in Figure 7(a-f). From the temperature analysis it is observed that on 22 January 2016, the model simulated lowest temperature (09 − 11) °C is Mizoram (India) and connecting region of Chittagong Division, (10 − 11) °C is over the Nawabgonj (Rajshahi) and adjoing area of Murshidabad (Bihar, India), (11 − 12) °C is Bihar, west Bengal and adjoining part of Bangladesh i.e. over the Ishurdi, (12 − 13) °C is also a small part over some adjoining area of Chuadanga and the highest temperature (14 − above) °C is the middle part of Bangladesh and Bay of Bengal at 0000 UTC. On 23 January at the same time i.e. 0000 UTC, the temperature is about (07 − 10) °C in western part of Bangladesh, i.e. Dinajpur, Rajshahi, Ishurdi, Chuadanga, Jessore and also the coastal area of Bay and Chittagong Division. On that day the lowest temperature is Mizoram, Meghalaya and West Bengal (India). In Bangladesh, the lowest temperature (07 − 08) °C is Dinajpur, Rajshahi, Chuadanga and Khagrachori. And 24 January, the temperature is about (05 − 06) °C is simulated by model over Borguna and (04 − below) °C is simulated over Bihar, Meghalaya, Mizoram (India) and Mayanmer. The temperature of the most of the part of Bangladesh is (06 − 10) °C. For the validation of model simulated temperature at 2m height, a comparison is made with 0000 UTC on 22 to 27 January 2016 observed temperature recorded by BMD. The comparison is shown in the Figure 7. It has found that the model is captured to simulate temperature very well.

4.5. Analysis of 850, 500 & 200 hPa Level Wind Flow

The distribution of 850 hPa, 500 hPa and 200 hPa wind flow (ms−1) valid for 0000 UTC from 22 January to 27 January 2016 of model simulation for 6 days based on the initial conditions 0000 UTC of 22 January are shown in Figure 8(a-f), Figure 9(a-f) and Figure 10(a-f) respectively. At 850 hPa level, west/northwesterly wind of speed (6 − 8) ms−1 is simulated at Satkhira, Jashore, Mongla, Patuakhali and Borguna. Northwesterly wind of speed (8 − 10) ms−1 is simulated over Kolkata West Bengal. A convergence zone is seen over Khulna on 22 January where the wind speed is (3 − 5) ms−1. On 23 January, A backing does occur in Murshidabad (India) and also Paletwaya (Mayanmer), Northwesterly/Northerly wind is found over most of the part of Bangladesh with wind speed (0 − 3) ms−1. A convergence zone is seen over connecting area of Jashore, Sathkhira with wind speed (0 − 4) ms−1 and West Bengal (8 −10) ms−1. At 500 hPa level, strong westerly wind of speed (20 - 26) ms−1 is simulated over West Bengal and adjoining part of Rangpur division, and over Feni, Barisal, coastal area of Barisal division, neighboring Chittagong and Mizoram (India), the southwesterly wind speed is (32 − Above) ms−1 on 22 January 2016; On 23 January, forcible westerly and southwesterly wind of speed (32−34 or Above) ms−1 is found over the same area. At 200 hPa pressure level, strong westerly wind of speed (50 − 60) ms−1 is simulated over Rangpur Division and Bihar, Asam, Meghalaya, West Bengal (India) while in Chittagong, Barisal Division and nearest part of Khulna the speed is (35−40) ms−1, and during the next 2 days the westerly wind is increasing gradually with (55 − 65) ms−1 and (60 − 70) ms−1. The Bay of Bengal is (30 − 40) ms−1.

5. Conclusions

Cold Wave (CW) become significant over Bangladesh as they caused terrible damage on the live-in recent decades. Forecasting such events, especially in the winter region is quite challenging. Therefore, this study has made an attempt to simulate CW using WRF model to predict the future events more effectively. Different radiation physics schemes that is responsible for extreme temperature generation of WRF model have been used in this study. Model outputs are compared with BMD observed data. On the basis of the present study the conclusion can be drawn: The sensitivity test of different radiation parameterization schemes of WRF model show that the New Goddard for long wave and Dudhia for short wave option produces more or less realistic results in quantitative comparisons. Therefore, these schemes have been considered as the best for synoptic analysis and prediction of winter cold wave over the Bangladesh. Finally, it may be concluded that the Fifth-Generation PSU/NCAR mesoscale model WRF version 4.3.0 with the right combination of the single domain, the suitable parameterization schemes are able to simulate and predict the cold wave and its associated high impact 2m air temperature over the Bangladesh reasonably well, though there are some spatial and temporal biases in the simulated temperature.

The study recommended that WRF model may be operationally used for predicting the CW, its associated high impact temperature and its thermodynamic features over Bangladesh up to 72-hours advance. It is also recommended that similar study be extended for more number of cases for further refinement of the model application.

References

[1]  Ma, S.; Zhu, B.C.; Liu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Y.; Orsolini, J. Polarized response of East Asian winter temperature extremes in the era of Arctic warming. J. Clim. 2018, 31, 5543-5557.
In article      View Article
 
[2]  Peterson, T.C.; Stott, P.A.; Herring, S. Explaining extreme events of 2011 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 2012, 93, 1041-1067.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Herring, S.C.; Hoell, A.; Hoerling, M.P.; Kossin, J.P.; Schreck, C.J., III; Stott, P.A. Explaining extreme events of 2015 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2016, 97, S1-S145.
In article      View Article
 
[4]  Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J. The unprecedented freezing disaster in January 2008 in southern China and its possible association with the global warming. Acta Meteorol. Sin. 2008, 22, 538-558.
In article      
 
[5]  Gong, Z.; Feng, G.; Ren, F.; Li, J. A regional extreme low temperature event and its main atmospheric contributing factors. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2014, 117, 195-206.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Ma, S.; Zhu, C. Extreme cold wave over east asia in january 2016: a possible response to the larger internal atmospheric variability induced by Arctic warming. J. Clim. 2019, 32, 1203-1216.
In article      View Article
 
[7]  Roy, I. Solar cyclic variability can modulate winter Arctic climate. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4864. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Commented [MHI9]: justify.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[8]  Cohen, J.; Zhang, X.; Francis, J.; Jung, T.; Kwok, R.; Overland, J.; Ballinger, T.J.; Bhatt, U.S.; Chen, H.W.; Coumou, D.; et al. Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 20-29.
In article      View Article
 
[9]  Francis, J.A. Why Are Arctic Linkages to Extreme Weather Still up in the Air? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 98, 2551-2557.
In article      View Article
 
[10]  Petty, A.A. A possible link between winter Arctic sea ice decline and a collapse of the Beaufort High? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 2879-2882.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[11]  Li, J.; Zheng, F.; Sun, C.; Feng, J.; Wang, J. Pathways of influence of the northern hemisphere mid-high latitudes on east asian climate: a review. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2019, 36, 902-921.
In article      View Article
 
[12]  Wu, Z.W.; Li, J.P.; Jiang, Z.H.; He, J.H. Predictable climate dynamics of abnormal East Asian winter monsoon: Once-in-a-century snowstorms in 2007/2008 winter. Clim. Dyn. 2011, 37, 1661-1669.
In article      View Article
 
[13]  Screen, J.A.; Simmonds, I. Exploring links between Arctic amplification and mid-latitude weather. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 959-964.
In article      View Article
 
[14]  Cohen, J.; Screen, J.A.; Furtado, J.C.; Barlow, M.; Whittleston, D.; Coumou, D.; Francis, J.; Dethloff, K.; Entekhabi, D.; Overland, J.; et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 2014, 7, 627-637.
In article      View Article
 
[15]  Mori, M.; Watanabe, M.; Shiogama, H.; Inoue, J.; Kimoto, M. Robust Arctic sea-ice infuence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades. Nat. Geosci. 2014, 7, 869-873.
In article      View Article
 
[16]  Honda, M.; Inoue, J.; Yamane, S. Infuence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 36, L08707.
In article      View Article
 
[17]  Tang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Francis, J.A. Cold winter extremes in northern continents linked to Arctic sea ice loss. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 014036.
In article      View Article
 
[18]  Goosse, H.; Kay, J.E.; Armour, K.C.; Bodas-Salcedo, A.; Chepfer, H.; Docquier, D.; Jonko, A.; Kushner, P.J.; Lecomte, O.; Massonnet, F.; et al. Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1919.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[19]  Tachibana, Y.; Komatsu, K.K.; Alexeev, V.A.; Cai, L.; Ando, Y. Warm hole in Pacific Arctic sea ice cover forced mid-latitude Northern Hemisphere cooling during winter 2017–2018. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5567.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[20]  Cattiaux J, Vautard R, Cassou C, Yiou P, Masson-Delmotte V and Codron F 2010 Winter 2010 in Europe: a cold extreme in a warming climate Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 704.
In article      View Article
 
[21]  Screen J A, Deser C and Sun L 2015 Reduced risk of north american cold extremes due to continued Arctic sea ice loss Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 1489-503.
In article      View Article
 
[22]  van Oldenborgh G J, Haarsma R, De Vries H and Allen M R 2015 Cold extremes in north america versus mild weather in europe: the winter of 2013-14 in the context of a warming world Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 707-14.
In article      View Article
 
[23]  Peterson T C et al 2013 Monitoring and understanding changes in heat waves, cold waves, floods, and droughts in the united states: state of knowledge Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94 821-34.
In article      View Article
 
[24]  EPA 2016 Climate Change Indicators: high and Low Temperatures, https://epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-high-and-low-temperatures.
In article      
 
[25]  Vose R S, Easterling D R, Kunkel K E and Wehner M F 2017 Climate Science Special Report: A Sustained Assessment Activity of the US Global Change Research Program (Temperature Changes in the United States) (Washington, DC, USA: US Global Change Research Program) pp 267-300.
In article      
 
[26]  Charlton-Perez A J, Aldridge R W, Grams C M and Lee R 2019 Winter pressures on the UK health system dominated by the Greenland Blocking weather regime Weather Clim. Extremes 25 100218.
In article      View Article
 
[27]  Wolter K, Hoerling M P, Eischeid J K, van Oldenborgh G J, Quan X-W, Walsh J E, Chase T N and Dole R M 2015 How unusual was the cold winter of 2013/14 in the Upper Midwest? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 S10-4.
In article      View Article
 
[28]  Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Barker, M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X. Y. (2021). A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.3 (No. NCAR/TN-556+STR).
In article      
 
[29]  El-Shafie, A., Jaafer, O., Akrami, S. (2011). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-based model for rainfall forecasting in Klang River, Malaysia. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6 (12), 2875-2888, 18 July, 2011.
In article      
 

Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2022 Gazi Mamunar Rashid, M. M. Touhid Hossain, Md. Abdullah Elias Akhter and M. A. K. Mallik

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Cite this article:

Normal Style
Gazi Mamunar Rashid, M. M. Touhid Hossain, Md. Abdullah Elias Akhter, M. A. K. Mallik. Impact of Different Radiation Schemes on the Prediction of Extreme Cold Weather Events over Bangladesh. American Journal of Marine Science. Vol. 10, No. 1, 2022, pp 10-20. https://pubs.sciepub.com/marine/10/1/2
MLA Style
Rashid, Gazi Mamunar, et al. "Impact of Different Radiation Schemes on the Prediction of Extreme Cold Weather Events over Bangladesh." American Journal of Marine Science 10.1 (2022): 10-20.
APA Style
Rashid, G. M. , Hossain, M. M. T. , Akhter, M. A. E. , & Mallik, M. A. K. (2022). Impact of Different Radiation Schemes on the Prediction of Extreme Cold Weather Events over Bangladesh. American Journal of Marine Science, 10(1), 10-20.
Chicago Style
Rashid, Gazi Mamunar, M. M. Touhid Hossain, Md. Abdullah Elias Akhter, and M. A. K. Mallik. "Impact of Different Radiation Schemes on the Prediction of Extreme Cold Weather Events over Bangladesh." American Journal of Marine Science 10, no. 1 (2022): 10-20.
Share
  • Figure 2. Comparison model simulated MSLP with observation (BMD) data at 0000 UTC on 22 to 27 January 2016 at (a) Chuadanga, (b) Dinajpur, (c) Ishurdi, (d) Jessore, (e) Rajshahi and (f) syedpur
  • Figure 4. Comparison model simulated relative humidity at 2m height with observation (BMD) data at 0000 UTC on 22 to 27 January 2016 at (a) Chuadanga, (b) Dinajpur, (c) Ishurdi, (d) Jessore, (e) Rajshahi and (f) syedpur
  • Figure 7. Comparison model simulated 2m air temperature with observation (BMD) data at 0000 UTC on 22 to 27 January 2016 at (a) Chuadanga, (b) Dinajpur, (c) Ishurdi, (d) Jessore, (e) Rajshahi and (f) syedpur
  • Table 2. Final selection of radiation physics of WRF model for the prediction of the temperature due to cold wave and heat wave (02-05 January 2019, 15-18 January 2019, 02-05 February 2019 and 28-31 December 2019)
[1]  Ma, S.; Zhu, B.C.; Liu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Y.; Orsolini, J. Polarized response of East Asian winter temperature extremes in the era of Arctic warming. J. Clim. 2018, 31, 5543-5557.
In article      View Article
 
[2]  Peterson, T.C.; Stott, P.A.; Herring, S. Explaining extreme events of 2011 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 2012, 93, 1041-1067.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Herring, S.C.; Hoell, A.; Hoerling, M.P.; Kossin, J.P.; Schreck, C.J., III; Stott, P.A. Explaining extreme events of 2015 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2016, 97, S1-S145.
In article      View Article
 
[4]  Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J. The unprecedented freezing disaster in January 2008 in southern China and its possible association with the global warming. Acta Meteorol. Sin. 2008, 22, 538-558.
In article      
 
[5]  Gong, Z.; Feng, G.; Ren, F.; Li, J. A regional extreme low temperature event and its main atmospheric contributing factors. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2014, 117, 195-206.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Ma, S.; Zhu, C. Extreme cold wave over east asia in january 2016: a possible response to the larger internal atmospheric variability induced by Arctic warming. J. Clim. 2019, 32, 1203-1216.
In article      View Article
 
[7]  Roy, I. Solar cyclic variability can modulate winter Arctic climate. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4864. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Commented [MHI9]: justify.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[8]  Cohen, J.; Zhang, X.; Francis, J.; Jung, T.; Kwok, R.; Overland, J.; Ballinger, T.J.; Bhatt, U.S.; Chen, H.W.; Coumou, D.; et al. Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 20-29.
In article      View Article
 
[9]  Francis, J.A. Why Are Arctic Linkages to Extreme Weather Still up in the Air? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 98, 2551-2557.
In article      View Article
 
[10]  Petty, A.A. A possible link between winter Arctic sea ice decline and a collapse of the Beaufort High? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 2879-2882.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[11]  Li, J.; Zheng, F.; Sun, C.; Feng, J.; Wang, J. Pathways of influence of the northern hemisphere mid-high latitudes on east asian climate: a review. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2019, 36, 902-921.
In article      View Article
 
[12]  Wu, Z.W.; Li, J.P.; Jiang, Z.H.; He, J.H. Predictable climate dynamics of abnormal East Asian winter monsoon: Once-in-a-century snowstorms in 2007/2008 winter. Clim. Dyn. 2011, 37, 1661-1669.
In article      View Article
 
[13]  Screen, J.A.; Simmonds, I. Exploring links between Arctic amplification and mid-latitude weather. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 959-964.
In article      View Article
 
[14]  Cohen, J.; Screen, J.A.; Furtado, J.C.; Barlow, M.; Whittleston, D.; Coumou, D.; Francis, J.; Dethloff, K.; Entekhabi, D.; Overland, J.; et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 2014, 7, 627-637.
In article      View Article
 
[15]  Mori, M.; Watanabe, M.; Shiogama, H.; Inoue, J.; Kimoto, M. Robust Arctic sea-ice infuence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades. Nat. Geosci. 2014, 7, 869-873.
In article      View Article
 
[16]  Honda, M.; Inoue, J.; Yamane, S. Infuence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 36, L08707.
In article      View Article
 
[17]  Tang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Francis, J.A. Cold winter extremes in northern continents linked to Arctic sea ice loss. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 014036.
In article      View Article
 
[18]  Goosse, H.; Kay, J.E.; Armour, K.C.; Bodas-Salcedo, A.; Chepfer, H.; Docquier, D.; Jonko, A.; Kushner, P.J.; Lecomte, O.; Massonnet, F.; et al. Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1919.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[19]  Tachibana, Y.; Komatsu, K.K.; Alexeev, V.A.; Cai, L.; Ando, Y. Warm hole in Pacific Arctic sea ice cover forced mid-latitude Northern Hemisphere cooling during winter 2017–2018. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5567.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[20]  Cattiaux J, Vautard R, Cassou C, Yiou P, Masson-Delmotte V and Codron F 2010 Winter 2010 in Europe: a cold extreme in a warming climate Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 704.
In article      View Article
 
[21]  Screen J A, Deser C and Sun L 2015 Reduced risk of north american cold extremes due to continued Arctic sea ice loss Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 1489-503.
In article      View Article
 
[22]  van Oldenborgh G J, Haarsma R, De Vries H and Allen M R 2015 Cold extremes in north america versus mild weather in europe: the winter of 2013-14 in the context of a warming world Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 707-14.
In article      View Article
 
[23]  Peterson T C et al 2013 Monitoring and understanding changes in heat waves, cold waves, floods, and droughts in the united states: state of knowledge Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94 821-34.
In article      View Article
 
[24]  EPA 2016 Climate Change Indicators: high and Low Temperatures, https://epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-high-and-low-temperatures.
In article      
 
[25]  Vose R S, Easterling D R, Kunkel K E and Wehner M F 2017 Climate Science Special Report: A Sustained Assessment Activity of the US Global Change Research Program (Temperature Changes in the United States) (Washington, DC, USA: US Global Change Research Program) pp 267-300.
In article      
 
[26]  Charlton-Perez A J, Aldridge R W, Grams C M and Lee R 2019 Winter pressures on the UK health system dominated by the Greenland Blocking weather regime Weather Clim. Extremes 25 100218.
In article      View Article
 
[27]  Wolter K, Hoerling M P, Eischeid J K, van Oldenborgh G J, Quan X-W, Walsh J E, Chase T N and Dole R M 2015 How unusual was the cold winter of 2013/14 in the Upper Midwest? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 S10-4.
In article      View Article
 
[28]  Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Barker, M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X. Y. (2021). A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.3 (No. NCAR/TN-556+STR).
In article      
 
[29]  El-Shafie, A., Jaafer, O., Akrami, S. (2011). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-based model for rainfall forecasting in Klang River, Malaysia. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6 (12), 2875-2888, 18 July, 2011.
In article