The current paper generalizes the Edelstein fixed point theorem for digital (ε,k)-chainable metric spaces. In order to generalize Edelstein fixed point theorem, we study the digital topological properties of digital images. Further, we establish the Banach fixed point theorem for digital images. We give the notion of digital (ε,λ,k)-uniformly locally contraction mapping on digital (ε,k) -chainable metric spaces Finally, we generalize the Banach fixed point theorem to digital (ε,k)-chainable metric spaces which is known as the Edelstein fixed point theorem for digital images on digital (ε,k)-chainable metric spaces.
Fixed point theory plays an essential role in various branches of mathematics. The knowledge of the existence of fixed points has relevant applications in many branches of analysis and topology. Besides, it has application to some areas of computer sciences such as computer graphics, image processing, mathematical morphology and so forth. It is very useful to find out a solution if an equation has any solution. Many mathematical problems, originating from various branches of mathematics can be equivalently formulated as fixed point problems meaning that one has to find a fixed point of some functions. In metric spaces, this theory begins with the Banach fixed point theorem (also known as the Banach contraction mapping principle) by Stefan Banach in 1922 2. It is an important tool for solution of some problems in mathematics and engineering. Up to now, there are many generalizations of Banach fixed point theorem have been established 12. In 1961, Michael Edelstein generalized that theorem on -chainable metric spaces 10, 12.
Digital topology deals with the digital topological properties of digital images. It was first introduced by Resenfeld in 1979 17. To be specific, he developed the notion of digital continuity for studying
and
digital images in 1986 16. In 1994, Boxer 3, 4 expanded the digital versions of several notions such as digital continuous functions including homeomorphisms retractions and homotopies. Few years ago, the concept of digital continuity was extended into the study of
digital images 13.
The fixed point properties and fixed point theory for digital images were first given by Ege and Karaca 6 named as Lefschetz fixed point theorem. They developed some applications of the Lefschetz fixed point theorem and Nielsen fixed point theorem in digital images to count fixed points 7, 9. They also got some new results associating digital homotopy and fixed point theory 8. In 2015, they studied the Banach fixed point theorem for digital images 5. Han 12 refined and improved several notions of that paper such as digital versions of both Cauchy sequence and limit of a sequence in a digital metric spaces. Recently, approximate fixed points and the approximate fixed point property (AFPP) of digitally continuous functions are introduced 4.
This paper is organized as follows. In the first part, we give the required background about the digital images and digital topology. After that, we study the property of the completeness of digital metric spaces. In the next part, we state and prove the Banach fixed point theorem for digital images. Finally, we give the notion of digital -chainable metric spaces and then state and prove the Edelstein fixed point theorem for digital images. Lastly, we give the conclusion.
To study the Banach fixed point theorem and Edelstein fixed point theorem from the viewpoint of digital topology, we discuss some basic notions from digital topology:
Let and
represent the sets of natural numbers and integer numbers respectively. Let
where
be the sets of lattice points in the
-dimensional Euclidean space. It is useful to distinguish between a digital picture and a digital image. We say
is a digital picture 17. A digital image is a subset of
with the adjacency relation of the members of that image.
Definition 1.1: We say that two distinct points are
-(or
) adjacent for
digital images if they satisfy the followings 13:
For a natural number two distinct points
![]() |
are or
-adjacent if at most
of their co-ordinates differ by
and all other points coincide.
Using above fact, we can obtain the -adjacency relations of
as follows 13:
![]() | (2.1) |
where
Mathematically, a set with the above adjacency relation is called a digital image and denoted by
Definition 1.2 16: Let and
be digital images. Let
be a function. Then
is digitally continuous at
if and only if for every
there is a
such that
and
implies
Definition 1.3 15: Let with
, then the set
![]() |
with 2-adjacency is called a digital interval.
Using the -adjacency relations of
of (2.1), we define that a digital neighborhood of
in
is the set 16
is adjacent to
.
Furthermore, we often use the notation 15
![]() |
Definition 1.4 11: A digital image is
-connected if and only if every pair of different points
there is a sequence
of points of a digital image
such that
and
with
and
are
-neighbors. Now we can say that there is a simple
-path with
elements whose length is the number
denoted by
For a digital image as a generalization of
the digital
-neighborhood of
with radius
is defined in
to be the following subset 13 of
![]() |
where is the length of a shortest simple
-path from
to
and
Concretely, for
we obtain
![]() |
Proposition 2.1 13: Let and
be digital images in
and
respectively. A function
is digitally
-continuous if and only if for every
According to Proposition 2.1, we see that the points is mapped into the points
which implies that for the points
which are
-adjacent a
-continuous map
has the property
![]() |
Definition 2.1 3, 12: Let and
be digital images in
and
respectively. Then a map
is called a
-isomorphism if
is a digital
-continuous, bijective and further
is
-continuous which can be denoted by
Definition 3.1 5: Let denote a digital metric space with
-adjacency relation, where
is the standard Euclidean function on
In relation to the study of Banach fixed point theorem and Edelstein fixed point theorem, we recall the following:
Definition 3.2 5: A sequence of points of a digital metric space
is a Cauchy sequence if for all
there exists
such that for all
then
![]() |
Since the sequence is defined in the digital metric space
Han 12 observed that the Euclidean distance between any two distinct points
is greater than or equal to 1 as follows:
Proposition 3.1 12: In a digital metric space consider two points
in a sequence
of
such that they are
-adjacent
or
and
Then they have the Euclidean distance
Proof: Since the Definition 2.1 implies that any two distinct points in the digital metric space
has at most
of their co-ordinates which differs by
and all other coincide. Thus the Euclidean distance
depending on the position of that two points. For instance, in Figure 1 (a), the Euclidean distance of any two points 2-adjacent in
is 1. In Figure 1 (b), the Euclidean distance of any two points 4-adjacent in
is 1. In Figure 1 (c), the Euclidean distance of any two points 8-adjacent in
is either 1 or
depending on the position of the given two points. For instance, consider two 8-adjacent points of
in
are
and
Now the Euclidean distance of these two points are
and
. Similarly, in three dimensional case, we have Euclidean distances
depending on the positions of the two points.
Thus by using the above Proposition 3.1, we obtain the following:
Proposition 3.2 12: A sequence of points of a digital metric space
is a Cauchy sequence if and only if there is
such that for all
we have
![]() |
for all
By using the Proposition 3.1, we can define the convergency of a sequence of a digital metric space as follows:
Definition 3.2 12: A sequence of points of a digital metric space
converges to a limit
if there is
such that for all
we have
![]() |
Definition 3.3 12: A digital metric space is a complete digital metric space if any Cauchy sequence
of points of
converges to a point
Definition 4.1 5: Let be a digital metric space and
be a self-mapping. If there exists
such that for all
, we have
then
is called a digital contraction mapping.
Proposition 4.1: Every digital contraction mapping is digitally continuous.
Proof: Let be a digital metric space and
be a digital contraction mapping. Let
and
by the Proposition 3.1, we have
![]() |
![]() |
where for all
Then
is a digitally
-continuous.
Motivated by the paper 5, here we give the Banach fixed point theorem in the following way:
Theorem 4.1 (Banach contraction principle for digital images): Let be a complete digital metric space with Euclidean metric
on
Let
be a digital contraction mapping. Then
has a unique fixed point.
Proof: For notational purposes, we define and
inductively by
and
To show existence, we select
We first show that
is a Cauchy sequence.
Notice for that
![]() |
Thus for we have
![]() |
![]() |
By Proposition 3.1, we have which implies
. This shows that
is a Cauchy sequence and since
is complete, so there exists
such that
Moreover, the continuity of yields
![]() |
Therefore, is a fixed point of
For uniqueness, suppose that is a another fixed point of
such that
and
then
![]() |
But so
Therefore,
and our proof is completed.
An extension of Banach fixed point theorem was given by Edelstein to a class of mappings on - chainable metric spaces 10. Based on that we discuss Edelstein fixed point theorem for digital
chainable metric spaces from the viewpoint of digital topology. In this regard, we discuss digital
-chain,
-uniformly locally contractive mapping and
-chainable metric spaces for digital topology.
Definition 5.1: Let be a sequence of points of a digital metric space
and suppose
Then the sequence
is said to be
chain joining
and
if
and
are neighbors,
Definition 5.2: The digital metric space is said to be digitally
-chainable metric space if each pair
of its points, there exists an
-chain joining
and
Definition 5.3: A mapping is called digitally
-uniformly locally contractive if there exists
and
such that
which implies
for each
Theorem 5.1 (Edelstein fixed point theorem for digital images): Let be a complete digital
-chainable metric space and
be a digital
- uniformly locally contractive mapping. Then
has a unique fixed point
in
Proof: Given is a complete digital
-chainable metric space. Now we define a new metric by
![]() |
where infimum is taken over all chains
joining
and
. Then the metric
on
satisfies
(i)
(ii) for
Then the metric is complete whenever
is complete. With given
and any
-chains
joining
and
we have
![]() |
where for
.
Now we can write
![]() |
Hence, by the Definition 5.3, we have
![]() |
So is an
-chain joining
and
Then
![]() |
Now being an arbitrary
-chain, we have
![]() |
Since has a unique fixed point
given by
for any
[By Banach fixed point theorem].
But by we have
Therefore, our proof is completed.
We have reviewed some notions of digital topology for image processing technique. Further, we have studied the Banach fixed point theorem for digital images. At last, we have discussed the digital version of Edelstein fixed point theorem for digital images which is the generalization of Banach fixed point theorem in metric spaces. We hope that all results in this paper help us to understand better structure of digital images.
In future, we will study the other fixed point theorem for digital images in digital topology.
The authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] | R. P. Agarwall, M. Meehan, D. O’Regan, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2001. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[2] | S. Banach, Sur less opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux equations integrates, Fund. Math. 3(1922), 133-181. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | L. Boxer, Digitally Continuous Function, Pattern Recognition Letter, 15(1994), 833-839. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | L. Boxer, O. Ege, I. Karaca, J. Lopez and J. Louwsma, Digital fixed points, approximate fixed points, and universal functions, Applied General Topology, 17(2), 159-172 (2016). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[5] | O. Ege, I. Karaca, Banach fixed point theorem for digital images, J. Nonlinear. Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 237-245. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | O. Ege, I. Karaca, Lefschetz fixed point theorem for digital images, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, 2013, 2013:253. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | O. Ege and I. Karaca, Applications of the Lefschetz number to digital images, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society - Simon Stevin, 21(5), 823-839 (2014). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | O. Ege and I. Karaca, Digital homotopy fixed point theory, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 353(11), 1029-1033 (2015). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | O. Ege and I. Karaca, Nielsen fixed point theory for digital images, Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 22(5), 874-880 (2017). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | M. Edelstein, An Extention of Banach’s Contraction Principle, Amer. Math. Soc., 12(1961), 7-10. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | G.T. Herman, Oriented surfaces in digital spaces, CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 55(1993). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[12] | S. E. Han, Banach fixed point theorem from the viewpoint of digital topology, J. Nonlinear. Sci. Appl. 9(2016), 895-905. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | S. E. Han, Non-product property of the digital fundamental group, Inform. Sci., 171(2005), 73-91. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[14] | M. C. Joshi, R.K. Bose, Some Topics in Non-linear Functional Analysis, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi 110 002, 1985. | ||
In article | |||
[15] | T. Y. Kong, A. Rosenfeld, Topological Algorithms for the Digital Image Processing, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1996. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[16] | A. Rosenfeld, Continuous functions on digital pictures, Pattern Recognition Letter, 4(1986), 177-184. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[17] | A. Rosenfeld, Digital topology, Amer. Math. Soc., 86(1979), 621-630. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2017 Akram Hossain, Razina Ferdausi, Samiran Mondal and Harun Rashid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | R. P. Agarwall, M. Meehan, D. O’Regan, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2001. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[2] | S. Banach, Sur less opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux equations integrates, Fund. Math. 3(1922), 133-181. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | L. Boxer, Digitally Continuous Function, Pattern Recognition Letter, 15(1994), 833-839. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | L. Boxer, O. Ege, I. Karaca, J. Lopez and J. Louwsma, Digital fixed points, approximate fixed points, and universal functions, Applied General Topology, 17(2), 159-172 (2016). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[5] | O. Ege, I. Karaca, Banach fixed point theorem for digital images, J. Nonlinear. Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 237-245. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | O. Ege, I. Karaca, Lefschetz fixed point theorem for digital images, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, 2013, 2013:253. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | O. Ege and I. Karaca, Applications of the Lefschetz number to digital images, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society - Simon Stevin, 21(5), 823-839 (2014). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | O. Ege and I. Karaca, Digital homotopy fixed point theory, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 353(11), 1029-1033 (2015). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | O. Ege and I. Karaca, Nielsen fixed point theory for digital images, Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 22(5), 874-880 (2017). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | M. Edelstein, An Extention of Banach’s Contraction Principle, Amer. Math. Soc., 12(1961), 7-10. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | G.T. Herman, Oriented surfaces in digital spaces, CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 55(1993). | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[12] | S. E. Han, Banach fixed point theorem from the viewpoint of digital topology, J. Nonlinear. Sci. Appl. 9(2016), 895-905. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | S. E. Han, Non-product property of the digital fundamental group, Inform. Sci., 171(2005), 73-91. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[14] | M. C. Joshi, R.K. Bose, Some Topics in Non-linear Functional Analysis, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi 110 002, 1985. | ||
In article | |||
[15] | T. Y. Kong, A. Rosenfeld, Topological Algorithms for the Digital Image Processing, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1996. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[16] | A. Rosenfeld, Continuous functions on digital pictures, Pattern Recognition Letter, 4(1986), 177-184. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[17] | A. Rosenfeld, Digital topology, Amer. Math. Soc., 86(1979), 621-630. | ||
In article | View Article | ||