Figures index

From

Vibration Control of an Electromechanical Model with Time-Dependent Magnetic Field

Usama H. Hegazy, Jihad Y. Abu Ful

Journal of Mechanical Design and Vibration. 2016, 4(1), 1-9 doi:10.12691/jmdv-4-1-1
  • Figure 1. Frequency response curves of the mechanical part at subharmonic resonance case with linear velocity feedback when: F=3.0, γ1=2.0, ω1=1.0, σ3=0.01, μ1=0.1, α1=2.5, b=0.01, G1=0.1
  • Figure 2. Frequency response curves of the electrical part at resonance case with linear velocity feedback, when: E=2.0, γ2=0.07, γ3=0.7, ω1=1.0, σ3=0.01, μ2=0.03, μ3=0.2, α2=0.02, a=0.01, G2=0.1
  • Figure 3. Force response curves of the mechanical part at resonance case with linear velocity feedback, when: σ2=0.05, γ1=2.0, ω1=1.0, σ3=0.01, μ1=0.1, α1=2.5, b=0.01, G1=0.1
  • Figure 4. Force response curves of the electrical part at resonance case with linear velocity feedback when: σ1=0.05, γ2=0.07, γ3=0.7, ω1=1.0, σ3=0.01, μ2=0.03, μ3=0.2, α2=0.6, a=0.01, G2=0.1
  • Figure 5. Non-resonant time history without control when: Ω=3.0, ω1=2.7, ω=3.5, F=0.05, E=0.05 , γ1=0.04, γ2=0.07, γ3=0.7, f1 =0.1, μ1=0.1, μ2=0.3, μ3=0.2, α1=2.5, α2=0.02
  • Figure 6. Time history solution at different resonance cases without control when: Ω=3.0, ω1=2.7, ω=3.5, F=0.05, E=0.05 , γ1=0.04, γ2=0.07, γ3=0.7, f1 =0.1, μ1=0.1, μ2=0.3, μ3=0.2, α1=2.5, α2=0.02
  • Figure 7. Subharmonic resonance time history with various control laws, when: Ω=2.0, ω1=1.0, ω=2.0, F=0.05, E=0.05, γ1=0.04, γ2=0.07, γ3=0.7, f1 =0.1, μ1=0.1, μ2=0.3, μ3=0.2, α1=2.5, α2=0.02, G1=G2=0.2
  • Figure 8. Effects of the linear velocity feedback gains G1 and G2 on the subharmonic resonance time solution, when : Ω=2.0, ω1=1.0, ω=2.0, F=0.05, E=0.05, γ1=0.04, γ2=0.07, γ3=0.7, f1 =0.1, μ1=0.1, μ2=0.3, μ3=0.2, α1=2.5, α2=0.02
  • Figure 9. Effect of the parametric excitation amplitude f1 at resonance case without control