Figures index

From

Validation of Results Obtained from Different Types of Fuzzy Controllers for Diagnosis of Inclined Edge Crack in Cantilever Beam by Vibration Parameters

Ranjan K. Behera, Dayal R. Parhi

Journal of Mechanical Design and Vibration. 2014, 2(3), 63-68 doi:10.12691/jmdv-2-3-2
  • Figure 1. Schematic diagram of inclined edge crack cantilever beam
  • Figure 2. Representation of inclined crack in cantilever beam
  • Figure 3. Finite element mesh model of the cracked beam
  • Figure 4. Magnified view at the crack zone
  • Figure 5. Schematic Block Diagram of Experimental set-up
  • Figure 6. First mode relative amplitude Vs. Relative location from cantilever end at β = 0.3, α = 0.35 and Ɵ = 35°
  • Figure 7. Magnified view of First mode relative amplitude Vs. Relative location from cantilever end at β = 0.3, α = 0.35 and Ɵ = 35°
  • Figure 8. Second mode relative amplitude Vs. Relative location from cantilever end at β = 0.3, α = 0.35 and Ɵ = 35°
  • Figure 9. Magnified view of Second mode relative amplitude Vs. Relative location from cantilever end at β = 0.3, α = 0.35 and Ɵ = 35°
  • Figure 10. Third mode relative amplitude Vs. Relative location from cantilever end at β = 0.3, α = 0.35 and Ɵ = 35°
  • Figure 11. Magnified view of Third mode relative amplitude Vs. Relative location from cantilever end at β = 0.3, α = 0.35 and Ɵ = 35°
  • Figure 12. Gaussian Fuzzy Controller
  • Figure 13. Gaussian MF for Relative 1st, 2nd & 3rd Mode Natural Frequencies vs. Degree of Membership Respectively
  • Figure 14. Gaussian MF for Relative 1st, 2nd & 3rd Mode Difference vs. Degree of Membership Respectively
  • Figure 15. Gaussian MF for Relative Crack Location, Relative Crack Depth and Crack Angle vs. Degree of Membership Respectively