Figures index

From

Application of Seal Integrity and Fault Connectivity Analysis in Selecting Suitable Subsurface Geological Sites for Carbon Capture and Storage

Josephine Maximus, Livinus Nosike

Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2024, 12(2), 24-35 doi:10.12691/jgg-12-2-1
  • Figure 1. Tectonostratigraphic Evolution of Guyana basin
  • Figure 2. An Analogous comparison between Offshore Guyana and Offshore Niger Delta
  • Figure 3. Methods of study – from regional to local seismic cross section and maps, through to correlation of stratigraphic units on which sealing parameters are tested
  • Figure 4. Schema showing the throw in a geologic unit with sandstone (yellow) and shale (grey) intervals on the foot and hanging wall of a normal fault
  • Figure 5. Fault zone showing very low permeabilities in turbiditic deposits of outcrops in the Annot Sandstone
  • Figure 6. Tight and loose microfabrics similar to observation in fault zone and fault wall respectively
  • Figure 7. Case fault X in the Niger Delta turbidites was modeled to show impact of burial and fault zone property on sealing potential
  • Figure 8. Guyana Basin showing similar depositional architecture with incised values and basin floor reservoir lobes (usually offset by faults to form trap compartments
  • Figure 9. Plot of contact angle against effective stress
  • Figure 10. Impact of Burial on Fault Zone Hydraulic Property
  • Figure 11. Structural profile showing depleted Well-X and Well-Y adjacent to the storage compartments in the Njak and Opoto prospective storage sites