Figures index

From

Atmospheric Water Vapour Determination Using Gps Signals for Numeric Weather Prediction in Tanzania

Mlawa, A., Saria, E. E

Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2023, 11(3), 88-96 doi:10.12691/jgg-11-3-3
  • Figure 1. GUAN Ground based GPS stations as of February 2021 as recorded by ECMWF. Stations that contain both daytime and nighttime data are denoted by green crosses, whereas daytime-only stations are denoted by red diamonds, and nighttime-only stations are denoted by blue triangles.
  • Figure 2. Comparison of GNSS computed PWs for site DODM. Yellow is gLAB computed PW weather dependent, gray is GAMIT computed PW and red is gLAB computed PW weather free.
  • Figure 3A. The Correlation between gLAB computed PW weather free against the GAMIT computed PW. The computed Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.9867
  • Figure 3B. The Correlation between gLAB computed PW weather dependent against the gLAB computed PW weather free. The computed Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.9967
  • Figure 3C. The Correlation between gLAB computed PW weather dependent the GAMIT computed PW. The computed Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.9922
  • Figure 4. Comparison of global interpolated PW and gLAB computed PW weather dependent for site DODM . Blue is gLAB computed PW weather dependent and Green is global interpolated Pw from ERA-Interim.
  • Figure 5. Trend and differences between global interpolated PW and gLAB computed PW weather dependent for site DODM with respect to time
  • Figure 6. Comparison of global interpolated PW and gLAB computed PW weather free for site DODM. Orange is gLAB computed PW weather dependent and Green is global interpolated Pw from ERA-Interim
  • Figure 7. Trend and differences between global interpolated PW and gLAB computed PW weather free for site DODM with respect to time
  • Figure 8. Comparison of global interpolated PW and GAMIT computed PW for site DODM. Orange is GAMIT computed PW and Green is global interpolated Pw from ERA-Interim
  • Figure 9. Trend and differences between global interpolated PW and GAMIT computed PW for site DODM with respect to time
  • Figure 10A. The Correlation between gLAB computed PW weather dependent with the global interpolated PW for DODM site. The computed Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.9688
  • Figure 10B. The Correlation between gLAB computed PW weather-free with the global interpolated PW for DODM site. The computed Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.9588
  • Figure 10C. The Correlation between GAMIT computed PW with the global interpolated PW for DODM site. The computed Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.9672