Science and Education Publishing
From Scientific Research to Knowledge
Submission
Browse by Subjects
Search
Journal Home
For Authors
Online Submission
Current Issue
Archive
About Us
Figure
1.
Bland-Altman plots of the bias between REE determined by indirect calorimetry and by sixteen prediction equations against the mean of the two methods. Analysis performed with the total sample. Bias (kcal/d) for each REE prediction equation was determined by subtracting mREE from pREE. The solid black line represents the mean measurement difference and the dashed black lines correspond to the 95% limits of agreement (±2 SD). The gray solid line is the regression line for the measurement bias plotted against the mean of the two methods for female and the gray dashed line for male subjects. Separate plots are presented for each equation. The name of each equation ploted is in the graphic and is referee to as the same named presented in Table 1.
For NEQ equation, underweight subjects were not evaluated as the equations developed are only for normal weight to obese subjects. For Bellafronte-Chiarello equation, the equation was evaluated using subjects form validation group (see Table 3)
From
How Well Are We Predicting the Resting Energy Expenditure in Underweight to Obese Brazilian Adults?
Natália Tomborelli Bellafronte, Daiane Leite da Roza, Paula Garcia Chiarello
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
.
2019
, 7(1), 19-32 doi:10.12691/jfnr-7-1-4
Figure
1
of 2 (
Figures index
)
Next