Figures index

From

Effects of Different Variety and Phosphorus Fertilizer Applications on Grain Starch Characteristics and Nutrient Composition of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Shanxi Province Taigu China

Shurong Wang, Hafeez Noor, Zhili Guo

Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2023, 11(1), 37-45 doi:10.12691/jfnr-11-1-4
  • Figure 1. Maximum stem number of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
  • Figure 2. Productive stem percentage of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
  • Figure 3. Leaf area index at anthesis of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
  • Figure 4. P use efficiency for grain production (PUEg) of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
  • Figure 5. Partial factor productivity of applied P (PFPp) of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)