Science and Education Publishing
From Scientific Research to Knowledge
Submission
Browse by Subjects
Search
Journal Home
For Authors
Online Submission
Current Issue
Archive
About Us
Figures index
From
Effects of Different Variety and Phosphorus Fertilizer Applications on Grain Starch Characteristics and Nutrient Composition of Winter Wheat (
Triticum aestivum
L.) in Shanxi Province Taigu China
Shurong Wang, Hafeez Noor, Zhili Guo
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
.
2023
, 11(1), 37-45 doi:10.12691/jfnr-11-1-4
Figure 1.
Maximum stem number of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
Full size figure and legend
Figure 2.
Productive stem percentage of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
Full size figure and legend
Figure 3.
Leaf area index at anthesis of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
Full size figure and legend
Figure 4.
P use efficiency for grain production (PUEg) of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong-1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
Full size figure and legend
Figure 5.
Partial factor productivity of applied P (PFP
p
) of winter wheat under different variety and P application rate. SN-29, Shangnong-29; JM-44, Jimai-44; YN-1212, Yannong1212. Different upper-case letters indicate significant difference among three varieties according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). Within each variety, different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant difference among three P application rates according to Tukey’s HSD test (
α=0.05
). error bar, the standard deviation (± SD)
Full size figure and legend