sciepub.com
Quick Submission
Evaluation of the Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentration in Some Agricultural Products (Vegetables and Fruits) Obtained in Two Oil Fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria
Alao A.Adewumi
Abstract
The gross alpha and beta radionuclide activity concentration in two agricultural products(vegetables and fruits) obtained in selected oil fields within the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria have been studied and evaluated. Vegetables and fruits samples were harvested, collected and analysed for gross alpha and beta activity using an IN-20 model gas-flow proportional counter. The results obtained showed that the average gross alpha and beta activity for vegetables samples ranged from 0.303±0.039 Bg-1 to 0.482±0.041 Bqg-1 and 0.069±0.055 to 0.880±0.053 Bq/g respectively, while the average gross alpha and beta activity for fruit samples ranged from BDL to 0.561±0.41 Bq/g and 0.164±0.061 to 0.693±0.056 Bq/g respectively. These results revealed an elevation over the activity of the control samples taken from non-oil bearing environment and the World Health Organization standard limit of 0.1Bq/g for gross alpha activity but the average beta activity were all below the WHO standard limit of 1.0 Bq/g in all the zones studied. The elevation recorded may be due to oil exploration activities with associated artificial or anthropogenic activities such as gas flare, pollutants, transportation by air media to plant surfaces, frequent oil spillage into and back to the soil or any accidental underground pollutants into the food chain encountered in the surveyed areas. However, the results so obtained may not pose any serious detrimental health side-effects to the public consuming these products.
Keywords: Gross Alpha and Beta, Radioactivity, Oil fields, Agricultural products
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- Alao A.Adewumi. Evaluation of the Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentration in Some Agricultural Products (Vegetables and Fruits) Obtained in Two Oil Fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health. Vol. 4, No. 4, 2016, pp 78-82. https://pubs.sciepub.com/jephh/4/4/1
- A.Adewumi, Alao. "Evaluation of the Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentration in Some Agricultural Products (Vegetables and Fruits) Obtained in Two Oil Fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria." Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 4.4 (2016): 78-82.
- A.Adewumi, A. (2016). Evaluation of the Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentration in Some Agricultural Products (Vegetables and Fruits) Obtained in Two Oil Fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health, 4(4), 78-82.
- A.Adewumi, Alao. "Evaluation of the Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentration in Some Agricultural Products (Vegetables and Fruits) Obtained in Two Oil Fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria." Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 4, no. 4 (2016): 78-82.
| Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
At a glance: Figures
1. Introduction
The need to quantify gross alpha and beta particles content of ingestible materials in human body is necessary as these particles have short ranges and could deposit a lot of energy within a tissue in which they are absorbed. They are inherently charged particles and are capable of causing greater damage due to gross ionization. Radionuclide which enter the human body via foodstuffs, reaches it through a complex mechanism or food chain [3]. The season of the year determines to a great extent the magnitude of contamination of different foods or environmental components [5]. Green leafy vegetables are prone to external contamination during their growing season, while root vegetables may also become contaminated [4]. Vegetables may be subjected to direct and indirect contamination of Uranium series nuclides in vegetables. Naturally occurring Radionuclide (NORM) of Thorium and Uranium are significant contribution of ingestion dose and are present in the biotic systems of plants, animals, soil, water and air. Distribution of these radionuclides in different parts of the plants depends on the chemical characteristic and several parameters’ of the plant and soil [7]. Shanthi et al., [7] measured the gross alpha and beta radioactivity in food crops grown in naturally high background radiation areas in South West India and obtained alpha activity to be maximum in tapioca, minimum in Indian Caper (497±72 Bqkg-1) (116±14 Bqkg-1) and beta activity was maximum in paddy grain (10,946±553 Bqkg-1) and minimum in drumstick (190 BqKg-1). Olomo, [6] study on natural radioactivity in some Nigeria food stuffs varies and concluded that the major factor responsible include, application of fertilizer, soil type and irrigation pattern. Arogunjo et al., (2004) studied the level of natural radionuclide in some Nigerian cereals and tubers using HPGe detector and reported average concentration of 40K, 238U and 232Th as 130±8.12 B
kg-1, 11.5±3.86 B
kg-1, and 6.78±2.1 B
Kg-1 respectively, while 137Cs was not detected I n any of food stuffs analysed. Radionuclides have always been present in food at various levels depending on factors such as radioactivity contents in soil and the transfer characteristics from the environmental medium to foodstuff, and hence to man [3, 5, 8]. Because of a higher concentration of radioactive substances in the environment and food chain is undesirable, the crux of this research work is to evaluates the gross alpha and gross beta disposition of some agricultural products. (vegetable and fruit) samples within two oil fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria.
2. Study Area
The study area is within two oil fields (OML 58 and OML 61) within the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. It is situated approximately between latitudes 50 131– 281N and longitude 60 351-421E of the North Western quadrant of Rivers State of Nigeria. The area is made up of Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni; Ahoada-East, Ahoada-West, Emuoha and Ikwere Local governments of Rivers State. Prominent towns and communities within the study area are Omoku, Elele-Alimini; Mbiama, Engennicommunity, Ebocha, Mgbede and Big Elele. (Figure 1).
Download as
3. Methodology
3.1. Materials and MethodsStudy area was divided into six zones, A,B,C,D,E&F within the two oil fields and total of thirty one samples (twenty vegetables and eleven fruit sample) were collected and spread in containers (properly separated to avoid contamination) and were allowed to dry at room temperature for about ten days. Samples were kept in a slow-air flow temperature of 50°C drying cabinet to help accelerate the drying process without loss of radionuclides from the sample [5]. The dried samples were ground with mortar and pestle and then allowed to pass through a 100- mesh sieve. Prepared samples were pelleted into counting planchet size using the hydraulic compressor machine.
Pelleted samples were kept in desiccators and kept for four weeks to attain a state of secular equilibrium between the respective daughter nuclides of Uranium and thorium.
All the samples were carefully prepared according to International Atomic Energy Agency [5] specifications for gross alpha and beta analysis after which the samples (contained in their panchets) were stored in desiccators awaiting counting.
Analysis were carried out using IN – 20 model gas-flow proportional counter at the Centre for Energy Research and Training,Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. The operational modes used for the counting were the ɚ - only mode for alpha counting and the B (+ɚ) mode for beta counting. Each sample was counted three times and the mean taken. The count rate of each sample was automatically processed by the computer using the equation (IN-20 Model Technical Manual, 1991) as shown below:
 | (1) |
Where C (a,) = the count rate (cpm) of the alpha or beta particle,
R (a,) = raw cont of the alpha or Beta particle,
t = count time (2700 seconds).
Also the activity of each sample was calculated using the equation (IN-20 Model Technical Manual, 1991);
 | (2) |
Where A (a,) = alpha or beta activity (Bq/L or Bq/g)
C (a,) = count rate of alpha or beta particle
B (a,) = background count of alpha or Beta particle
U (a,) = unit coefficient of alpha or beta.
(a,) = channel efficiency for alpha or beta counting
S (a,) = sample efficiency for alpha or beta counting
V = sample volume or mass (litre or g)
The error associated with sample activity was computed using (IN-20 Model Technical Manual, 1991);
 | (3) |
Where R = sample raw count, = channel efficiency
Tbgd = background count time, S = sample efficiency
U = unit coefficient (1.67 x 10-2), V = sample volume or mass.
3.2. Data Presentation
 in surveyed vegetable samples for all zones)
Download as
Download as
Download as
Download as
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Discussion of Gross Alpha & Beta Activity Concentration in Surveyed Vegetable SamplesAverage Alpha Activity Concentration in surveyed vegetable samples ranged from 0.303±0.039 Bqg-1in Zone E to 0.482±0.041Bqg-1 in Zone B. while beta activity concentration ranged from 0.432±0.055Bqg-1 in Zone F to 0.880±0.053Bqg-1 in zone E. The alpha activity concentrations in all the vegetables examined are above the practical screening level of 0.1Bqg-1 except in Pumpkin seed, zone A. This may be due to the fact that leafy vegetables seem to absorb more radionuclide like potassium (40K) (Tchokosaet al., (2011), Ortega et al., (1996). These values obtained are very low compared with Shanthiet al., [7] study on food crops grown in South West India with alpha activity concentration of 497±72Bqkg-1 obtained in Tapioca. The average beta activity obtained for vegetables in all zones are all within the practical screening level recommended by WHO,2008 though the high elevation value obtained for water leaf in zone A may be due to oil exploration activities with associated artificial or anthropogenic activities in the zone such as gas flare, pollutants transportation by air media to plant surfaces, frequent oil spillage into and back to the soil or any accidental underground pollutant into the food chain, Avwiriet al., (2011) and presence of granitic formation in the geology of the Niger Delta. However, this elevation as obtained here may not pose any danger in its consumption at this stage as a more advanced analysis using gamma stereoscopy is recommended.
4.2. Discussion of Gross Alpha & Beta Activity Concentration in Surveyed Fruits SamplesAlpha activity concentration in surveyed fruit samples ranged from BDL in Plantain and Orange in zone A to 0.561±0.041Bqg-1 in Plantain in zone F while beta activity concentration ranged from 0.164±0.061Bqg-1 in Plantain, zone A to 0.693±0.056Bqg-1 in Orange, Zone E .The BDL for alpha activity obtained in Plantain and Orange in zone A compared with high value in zone F may be attributed to heterogeneity of radionuclide deposited, since it could be greatly influenced by the type of soil, water transportation and man activity in the environment. The average value obtainedfor fruit exceeded the practical screening level stipulated by WHO [10] (Figure 4). In comparison, the gross alpha activity obtained here was far below 80.2±10.1Bqkg-1 obtained in banana in South West India [7].
5. Conclusion
The gross alpha and beta activity concentrations in the surveyed samples from the zones vary from location to location. This may be due to the heterogeneity of radionuclide deposited, since it could be greatly influenced by the type of the soil, water transportation, and man activity in the environment etc. The average alpha activity concentration obtained were all higher than the WHO [9] recommended safe limit (0.1 Bq/g) but that of beta activities were all below recommended safe limit by WHO, 2003. The results obtained in this work provide a baseline data on radioactivity contents in some agricultural products in two oil fields in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Finally, all the results obtained revealed that the commonly consumed food crops / stuffs surveyed are safe for consumption without posing any immediate radiological threat to the public as further analysis using gamma stereoscopy is recommended as this will give the activity concentration of the radionuclides. However, inhabitants are cautioned against excessive exposure to avoid further accumulative dose of these radiations.
References
| [1] | Avwiri; G.O and Agbalagba, E.O (2007).Survey of gross alpha and gross beta radionuclide activity in Okpare-Creek, Delta State, Nigeria. Asian Network for scientific Information. J. Appl. S. 7 (22) 35442-3546. | ||
 In article | |||
| [2] | Albrecht, A., Schultze U, Liedgens M, Fluhler H, and Frossard E,(2002). Incorporating soil structure and root distribution into plant uptake models for radionuclides: Toward a more physically based transfer model. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 59: 329-350. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [3] | Amaral, E.C.S., Rochedo, E.R.R., Paretzke., H.G,(1998). The radiological impacts of agricultural activities in an area of high natural radioactivity .Radiation protection Dosimetry 45: 289-292. | ||
| In article | |||
| [4] | Badran, H.M., Sharshar, T., and Elnimer T. (2003).Levels of 137Cs and 40K in edibles Parts of some vegetables consumed in Egypt. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 67, 181-190. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [5] | IAEA, (1989). International Atomic Energy Agency, Measurement of radionuclides in food and the environment. A guidebook, Technical Report Series No. 295, IAEA, Viena. | ||
| In article | |||
| [6] | Olomo, J.B., (1990). Natural radionuclide content of some Nigeria foodstuffs.Nuci.Inst. And Methods in Phys. Res. A299:666-669. | ||
| In article | |||
| [7] | Shanthi G., Maniyan C.G, Allan Guana Ray G, Thamp K.J, (2009). Radioactivity in food crops from high background radiation area in South west India. Current Science, Vol.97, No 9. | ||
| In article | |||
| [8] | Thiry, Y., Goor, F, and Riesen, T, (2002). The true distribution and accumulation Ofradiocaesium in stem of Scots Pine (PinusSylvestris L).Journal of Environmental Radioactivity Vol.60 (1-2); 235-248. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [9] | WHO, (2003). Guidelines for drinking water quality.Third ed., Radiological quality of drinking water, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. | ||
| In article | |||
| [10] | WHO, (2008). Guidelines for drinking water quality and other screening levels of various categories of foods. 6th ed.,World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. | ||
| In article | |||
CiteULike
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
 standard){kind=link}
 standard){kind=link}
 standard){kind=link}
 standard){kind=link}
