Keywords: reaction-diffusion equation, BBM-Burgers equation, auxiliary function method, exact solutions
International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications, 2013 1 (1),
pp 1-5.
DOI: 10.12691/ijpdea-1-1-1
Received July 30, 2013; Revised September 07, 2013; Accepted September 11, 2013
Copyright © 2013 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
1. Introduction
In the recent years, seeking exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) is of great significance, since the nonlinear complex physical phenomena related to the NLPDEs are involved in many fields from physics, mechanics, biology, chemistry and engineering. As mathematical models of the phenomena, the investigation of exact solutions of NLPDEs will help one to understand the mechanism that governs these physical models or to better provide knowledge of the physical problem and possible applications. To this aim, a vast variety of powerful and direct methods for finding the exact significant solutions of NLPDEs though it is rather difficult have been derived. Some of the most important methods are Bäcklund transformation [1, 2, 3], Hirota’s method [4], tanh-function method [5, 6, 7, 8], extended tanh-function method [9, 10, 11, 12], homogeneous balance method [13, 14], variational iteration methods [15, 16], collocation method [17, 18, 19], Adomian Padé approximation [20], Jacobi elliptic function expansion method [21], F-expansion method [22], auxiliary equation method [23, 24, 25], Fan sub-equation method [26, 27, 28, 29, 30], extended Fan sub-equation method [31, 32], modified extended Fan sub-equation method [33, 34, 35] and so on. Recently, Sirendaoreji [36, 37] proposed a new auxiliary equation method by introducing a new first order nonlinear ordinary differential equation (NLODE) with six-degree nonlinear terms and its solutions to construct exact travelling wave solutions of NLPDEs in a unified way. Later, Zhang and Xia [38] improved this method and obtained new formal solutions of some NLPDEs.
The aim of this letter is to give a new auxiliary function method. And using the auxiliary function method to solve a class of reaction-diffusion equation.
 | (1) |
and BBM-Burgers equation
 | (2) |
2. Auxiliary Function Method
To illustrate the basic concepts of a generalized auxiliary equation method, we consider a given PDE in two independent variables
and dependent variable
:
Step 1. We use the wave transformation
, and reduce the given NLPDE
 | (3) |
To the following ODE
 | (4) |
Step 2. We seek for the solution of Eq. (4) in the following generalized ansätze
 | (5) |
with
satisfying the following new auxiliary equation
 | (6) |
where
the positive integer
can be determined by balancing the highest-order derivative term with the nonlinear terms [37],
,
and
are constants to be determined and
satisfies the variable separated ODE (6), where
and
are real constants. We have found that the auxiliary equation (6) possesses several types of following solutions
 | (7) |
where
and
are undermined constants.
Step 3. Substitute ansatz (5) along with Eq. (6) into (4) and equate the coefficients of all powers of
to zero yields a set of algebraic equations for unknowns
and
.
Step 4. Solve the set of algebraic equations by use of MAPLE can permit obtention of explicit expressions of
and
.
Step 5. Obtain exact solutions. By using the results obtained in the above steps, we can derive a series of travelling wave solutions of Eq. (3) depending on the solution
of Eq. (6). Selecting appropriate 
and substituting it into the travelling wave solutions Eq. (5), we can obtain exact solutions of Eq. (3).
3. Application
As an application, we use the new auxiliary function method to solve a class of reaction-diffusion equation and BBM-Burgers equation.
3. 1. Reaction-diffusion EquationWe make transformation
and change Eq. (1) into the form
 | (8) |
Now balancing
and
, we obtain
This suggests that
 | (9) |
where
and
are constants to be determined. Substitution of (9) into (8), we have:
 | (10) |
Substitution of (6) into (10), and equate the coefficients of all powers of
to zero, we get a set of algebraic equation as following:
 | (11) |
Solving the resulting algebraic system (11), we get the two group solutions
Case 1.
 | (12) |
Substituting (12) and (7) into (9), we get the solutions of Eq. (1)
 | (13) |
Figure 1. 
as
Case 2.
 | (14) |
Substituting (14) and (7) into (9), we get the solutions of Eq. (1)
 | (15) |
3.2. BBM-Burgers EquationWe make transformation
and change Eq. (2) into the form
 | (16) |
Now balancing
and
, we obtain
This suggests that
 | (17) |
where
and
are constants to be determined. Substitution of (17) into (16), we have:
 | (18) |
Substitution of (6) into (18), and equate the coefficients of all powers of
to zero, we get a set of algebraic equation, and solving the algebraic system, we get the four group solutions
Case 1.
 | (19) |
Substituting (19) and (7) into (17), we get the solutions of Eq. (2)
 | (20) |
Case 2.
 | (21) |
Substituting (21) and (7) into (17), we get the solutions of Eq. (2)
 | (22) |
Case 3.
 | (23) |
Substituting (23) and (7) into (17), we get the solutions of Eq. (2)
 | (24) |
Case 4.
 | (25) |
Substituting (25) and (7) into (17), we get the solutions of Eq. (2)
 | (26) |
4. Conclusion
In this letter, a new auxiliary function method is given, and some exact solutions of the auxiliary function are given too. Reaction-diffusion equation and BBM-Burgers equation are solved by using the new auxiliary function method. Obviously, the auxiliary function method can be applied to solve other type of nonlinear partial differential equations as well.
References
| [1] | M.J. Ablowitz, P.A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, Press, , 1991. |
| In article | CrossRef PubMed |
| |
| [2] | M.R. Miurs, Bäcklund Transformation, , 1978. |
| In article | |
| |
| [3] | A. Coely, et al. (Eds.), Bäcklund and Darboux Transformations, Amer. Math. Soc., , 2001. |
| In article | |
| |
| [4] | R. Hirota, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27 (1971). |
| In article | |
| |
| [5] | C.L. Bai, H. Zhao, Chaos Solitons Fractals 27 (2006) 1026. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [6] | M.F. El-Sabbagh, A.T. Ali, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 6 (2005) 151. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [7] | Y.G. Zhu, Z.S. Lu, Chaos Solitons Fractals 27 (2006) 836. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [8] | H.A. Abdusalam, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 6 (2005) 99. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [9] | E.G. Fan, Phys. Lett. A, 277 (2000) 212. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [10] | E.G. Fan, Z. Naturforsch. A: Phys. Sci. 56 (2001) 312. |
| In article | |
| |
| [11] | Z.Y. Yan, Phys. Lett. A 292 (2001) 100. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [12] | B. Li, H.Q. Zhang, Chaos Solitons Fractals 15 (2003) 647. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [13] | M.L. Wang, Phys. Lett. A 213 (1996) 279. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [14] | Z.Y. Yan, H.Q. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 285 (2001) 355. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [15] | M.A. Abdou, A.A. Soliman, Physica D 211 (2005) 1. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [16] | M.A. Abdou, A.A. Soliman, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 181 (2005) 245. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [17] | A. A Soliman, K.R. Raslan, Int. J. Comput. Math. 78 (2001) 399. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [18] | A.A. Soliman, Int. J. Comput. Math. 81 (2004) 325. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [19] | A.A. Soliman, M.H. Hussein, Appl. Math. Comput. 161 (2005) 623. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [20] | T.A. Abassy, M.A. El-Tawil, H.K. Saleh, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 5 (2004) 327. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [21] | S.K. Liu, Z.T. Liu, Q. Zhao, Phys. Lett. A 289 (2001) 69. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [22] | Y.B. Zhou, M.L. Wang, Y.M. Wang, Phys. Lett. A 308 (2003) 31. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [23] | Sirendaoreji, J. Sun, Phys. Lett. A 309 (2003) 387. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [24] | E. Yomba, Chaos Solitons Fractals 22 (2004) 321. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [25] | E. Yomba, Chaos Solitons Fractals 21 (2004) 75. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [26] | E.G. Fan, Phys. Lett. A 300 (2003) 243. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [27] | E.G. Fan, Y. Hon, Chaos Solitons Fractals 15 (2003) 559. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [28] | J.Q. Hu, Chaos Solitons Fractals 23 (2005) 391. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [29] | R. Sabry, M.A. Zahran, E.G. Fan, Phys. Lett. A 326 (2004) 93. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [30] | Y. Chen, Q. Wang, Chaos Solitons Fractals 23 (2005) 801. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [31] | E. Yomba, Chin. J. Phys. 43 (2005) 789. |
| In article | |
| |
| [32] | E. Yomba, Phys. Lett. A 336 (2005) 463. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [33] | S. Zhang, T.C. Xia, Phys. Lett. A 356 (2006) 119. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [34] | E. Yomba, Chaos Solitons Fractals 27 (2006) 187. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [35] | E. Yomba, Chaos Solitons Fractals 26 (2005) 785. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [36] | Sirendaoreji, Phys. Lett. A 356 (2006) 124. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [37] | Sirendaoreji, Phys. Lett. A 363 (2007) 440. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [38] | S. Zhang, T.C. Xia, Phys. Lett. A 363 (2007) 356. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |