We derive an explicit matrix representation for the Hamiltonian of the Ising model in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields, using as basis the eigenstates of a system of non-interacting spin 1/2 particles in external magnetic fields. We subsequently apply our results to obtain an analytical expression for the ground state energy per spin, to the fourth order in the exchange integral, for the Ising model in perpendicular external fields.
Field-induced effects in low-dimensional quantum spin systems have been studied for a long time 1, 2. Hamiltonian models incorporating external magnetic fields are gaining popularity among experimentalists as well as theoreticians (see references 3, 4, 5, 6). A longitudinal field is often introduced mainly to facilitate the calculation of order parameter and associated susceptibility as can be seen for example in references 7, 8, 9, and a transverse field to introduce quantum fluctuations 10, 11.
Our main objective in this paper is to give an explicit matrix representation for the Hamiltonian of a system of spin-1/2 particles on a cyclic one dimensional lattice chain, interacting via nearest neighbour exchange, in the presence of transverse and longitudinal external magnetic fields.
The Hamiltonian is
![]() | (1) |
where and
are the uniform external transverse magnetic fields,
is the uniform longitudinal field,
is the nearest neighbour exchange interaction,
are the usual spin-
operators and the fields
,
and
are measured in units where the splitting factor and Bohr magneton are equal to unity. Periodic boundary condition is assumed so that
, and so on. The parameters
,
,
and
are all assumed to be non-negative.
It is convenient to write , where
![]() |
and
![]() |
describes a system of
non-interacting spin
particles in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields.
The model (1) has been widely studied for various combinations of the parameters
and
especially for phase transitions (see 3, 5, 12 and the references therein). Our aim is to give an explicit matrix representation for
using the eigenstates of
as basis.
Throughout this paper we will make use of the following identities which hold for
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | (2) |
A system of non-interacting spin
particles in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields
,
and
is described by the Kronecker sum Hamiltonian
![]() |
where, for , each single particle Hamiltonian
, at the
site, has the matrix elements, in unit of
,
with respect to the eigenstates of the spin
operator
, whose elements, in unit of
, are
![]() |
The remaining two spin operators
and
have matrix elements given by
![]() |
Parameters ,
and
are the external magnetic fields and
.
Explicitly,
![]() |
Solving the eigenvalue equation , the normalized eigenstates
,
, are found to be
![]() |
with corresponding eigenvalues
![]() | (3) |
where
![]() | (4) |
Note that
![]() |
The diagonalizing matrix has elements
for
Thus,
is similar to the diagonal matrix
having elements
, that is
![]() |
With respect to the new basis, , and for
the Pauli spin matrices have the representation
![]() |
![]() |
and
![]() |
Since is a Hermitian operator that lives in a
dimensional Hilbert space,
its eigenstates form a complete orthonormal basis, suitable for giving matrix representations for operators living in
and with the same conditions at the boundary. The eigenvalue equation for
is
![]() |
For each the eigenstate
is a direct product of the eigenstates of
while the eigenvalue is the sum of the respective eigenvalues
, that is
![]() |
where
![]() |
where the floor of
is the smallest integer not greater than
Thus each state
is uniquely represented by a binary vector
.
Thus, any operator in
has the matrix representation
with elements given by
![]() |
Using (3) we get
![]() | (5) |
Note that counts the number of
states in the direct product state
. The degeneracy of the state
is therefore
Thus only the ground state and the most excited state are non-degenerate.
Explicit matrix representation
Since is diagonal in the basis
, the only task is to find the matrix elements of
and then add them to those of
. We have
![]() | (6) |
where and where we have introduced an
dimensional vector
whose components are
symmetric binary matrices
defined by
![]() | (7) |
Thus if either the two vectors
and
are one and the same vector, that is
, or they differ only at the consecutive
and
entries, otherwise
.
Note that
![]() | (8) |
where we have introduced another dimensional vector
whose components are
symmetric binary matrices
with elements given by
![]() | (9) |
Thus if either the two vectors
and
are one and the same vector,
, or they differ only at the
component, otherwise
.
Motivated by the definitions in (7), (8) and (9) we introduce two more dimensional vectors,
and
whose components are
symmetric binary matrices, in terms of which the
and
matrices may also be expressed. The
and
matrices are defined through their elements by
![]() |
It is straightforward to verify the following properties for the and
matrices:
![]() | (10) |
where
![]() |
is the all-ones matrix. The
and
matrices are singular and have trace equal to
. The eigenvalues of
are
repeated twice and
repeated
times while those of
are
repeated four times and
repeated
times. Finally using multinomial expansion theorem and (10), it is readily established that the matrices
and
satisfy
![]() |
It is now obvious that
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
From (11) and (12) we find
![]() |
and
![]() |
Explicitly
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
and
![]() |
From the definitions of the and
matrices the following additional properties are evident:
1. ,
, for
.
2. The eigenvalues of are
and
, each repeated
times while those of
are
, repeated
times, and
, repeated
times.
3. The and
matrices are singular and have trace
.
Returning to (6) and substituting for the matrix elements we find, after some algebra,
![]() |
where, (for ),
![]() |
and
![]() |
where
![]() |
Explicitly,
![]() |
and
![]() |
Putting the results together we finally have the matrix elements for the Ising interaction Hamiltonian, , to be explicitly given by
![]() |
where
![]() |
Since we therefore have that the matrix elements of the Ising model in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields are given by
![]() |
with as defined above.
Defining
![]() |
we have
![]() | (13) |
and
![]() | (14) |
where
![]() |
When the exchange integral is small, the Ising interaction term
can be treated as a perturbation of
. In this section, we employ (13) to find corrections, up to the fourth order in
, to the energy of the ground state of weakly interacting spin
particles in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields. Since the ground state of
, the unperturbed system, is non-degenerate, we will apply the non-degenerate Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory.
The following particular cases of (13) will often be useful.
![]() | (15) |
In particular,
![]() | (16) |
For
![]() | (17) |
where
![]() |
In particular,
![]() | (18) |
Note also from (5) that
![]() | (19) |
The first order correction to the energy of the ground state of is the expectation value of the perturbation
in the ground state
of
.
Thus, quoting (16), we have
![]() | (20) |
The second order correction to the energy of the ground state of is given by
![]() |
According to (18),
![]() |
We therefore see that contributions to come only from states with either
(corresponding to
) or
(corresponding to
in the case when the two
states of the direct product state
are consecutive). A typical state with
is the state
![]() |
while a particular state with (and
) is the state
![]() |
Therefore
![]() |
and since there are vectors with
and N vectors with
, and using (19), we obtain
![]() | (21) |
The results (20) and (21) were also obtained in 13.
4.3. Third Order Correction to the EnergyThe third order correction to the energy of the ground state of is obtainable from the formula
![]() |
where
![]() |
Note that in the above derivation we made use of the following summation identity
![]() |
Evaluation of
• Contribution from states with (
)
![]() |
The contribution of the states with
to the sum
is therefore
![]() |
• Contribution from states with (provided that
)
![]() |
The states with
therefore contribute
![]() |
to .
Putting these results together we have
![]() | (22) |
Evaluation of
![]() |
In each term of the sum, one of four different scenarios is possible, namely, or
or
or
We look at each possible situation in turn.
• Contribution to when
In this case, for each vector, there are two possible
vectors for which the matrix element
does not vanish, as typified below:
![]() |
In such a situation,
![]() |
We also have
![]() |
Since there are
states, the contribution to the sum
when
is
![]() |
• Contribution to when
As in the previous case, for each vector, there are only two possible
vectors for which the matrix element
does not vanish, as typified below:
![]() |
In such a situation,
![]() |
There is therefore zero contribution to when
.
• Contribution to when
In this case, typical situations with an vector and the two
vectors for which
does not vanish are depicted below
![]() |
From (17) we have
![]() |
signifying a zero contribution to the sum.
• Contribution to when
Here as in the previous case we have , so that again there is zero contribution to the
sum.
Adding all the contributions we have
![]() | (23) |
Evaluation of
![]() |
From (16), (18) and (19) we have immediately that
![]() | (24) |
Finally combining (22), (23) and (24), we obtain the third order correction to the energy of the ground state of as
![]() | (25) |
The fourth order correction to the energy of the ground state of is given by the standard Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation formula
![]() |
Calculations completely analogous to those in the previous sections, but much more involved, give as
![]() | (26) |
Adding the energy corrections (20), (21), (25) and (26) to the ground state energy (obtained by setting in (5)) of the non-interacting spin
particles in external magnetic fields we therefore find, to the fourth order in the exhange integral,
, that the energy of the ground state,
of the one dimensional Ising model in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields, for
spin sites is given by
![]() |
that is
![]() |
where is the ground state energy per spin,
and
.
Since , we can also write
![]() |
or, in a more compact form,
![]() | (27) |
with
![]() |
Note that when , then
![]() |
in perfect agreement with the exact result for the ground state energy of the transverse field Ising model 10:
![]() |
where is a complete elliptic integral of the second kind.
The form of (27) suggests an exact result for the ground state energy per spin of the Ising model in external magnetic fields:
![]() |
where are positive rational numbers, and in particular,
for
.
The knowledge of allows the derivation of approximate analytic expressions for physical quantities such as the magnetization in each direction and the spin-spin correlation function for neighbouring spins.
Invoking the Hellmann-Feynman rule in (1) gives for the magnetization
![]() |
and similar expressions for and
, the
and
magnetizations.
According to (27),
![]() |
so that for we obtain
![]() | (28) |
Thus for ,
![]() |
and for and
, respectively,
![]() |
and
![]() |
Note that in the absence of interaction, (),
.
The spin-spin correlation, , is given by
![]() |
yielding
![]() |
Note that in the absence of interaction, , we have
while
gives
.
We have given an explicit matrix representation for the Hamiltonian of the Ising model in mutually orthogonal external magnetic fields, with basis the eigenstates of a system of non-interacting spin particles in external magnetic fields. We subsequently applied our results to obtain an analytical expression for the ground state energy per spin, to the fourth order in the exchange integral, for the Ising model in perpendicular external fields. Since the Hamiltonian of the non-interacting spin
particles in external magnetic fields is a Hermitian operator that lives in a
dimensional Hilbert space, its eigenstates form a complete orthonormal basis, suitable for giving matrix representations for any operator living in the same Hilbert space and with the same conditions at the boundary.
[1] | I. Affleck and M. Oshikawa (1999), Field- induced gas in Cu benzoate and other S=1/2 antiferromagnetic chain, Phys. Rev. B, 60:1038. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[2] | A. Langari and S. Mahdavifar (2006), Gas exponent of the XXZ model in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. B, 73: 054410, 2006. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Parongama Sen. (2001), Quantum-fluctuation-induced spatial stochastic resonance at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. E, 63: 016112. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[4] | M. Kenzelmann, R. Coldea, D. A: Tennant, D. Visser, M. Hofmann, P. Smeibidl, and Z. Tylczynski (2002), Order-to-disorder transition in the XY-like quantum magnet Cs2CoCl4 induced by non commuting applied fields, Phys. Rev B., 65: 144432. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[5] | A.A. Ovchinnikov, D. V. Dmitriev, V. Ya. Krivnov, and V. O. Cheranovskii (2003), The antiferromagnetic Ising chain in a mixed transverse and longitudinal magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B, 68:214406, 2003. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | D. V. Dmitriev and V. Ya. Krivnov (2004), Anisotropic Heisenberg chain in coexisting transverse and longitudinal magnetic, fields, Phys. Rev. B, 70: 144414. 2004. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | L. G. Marland (1981), Series expansions for the zero-temperature transverse Ising model, J. Phys. A.: Math. Gen., 14: 2047-2057. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | M. N. Barber and P. M. Duxbury (1982), Hamiltonian studies of the two-dimensional axial-next-nearest-neighbor Ising (ANNI) model, J. Stat. Phys., 29:427. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | C. J. Hamer and M. N. Barber (1981), Finite-lattice methods in quantum Hamiltonian field theory I. The Ising model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 14: 241-257. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | P. Pfeuty (1970), The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field, Ann. Phys., 57:79. 1970. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | Heiko Rieger and Genadi Uimin (1996), The one-dimensional ANNI model in a transverse field: analytic and numerical study of effective Hamiltonian, Z. Phys B, 101:597-611. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[12] | A. Dutta, U. Divakaran, D. Sen, B. K. Chakrabarti, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli (2012), Quantum phase transitions in transverse field spin models: from statistical physics to quantum information, ArXiv: 1012.0653v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. | ||
In article | |||
[13] | Kunle Adegoke (2009), Non-interacting spin 1/2 particles in non-commuting external magnetic fields, E. Journ. Theor. Phys., 6(20): 243-256. | ||
In article | |||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2019 Kunle Adegoke, Henry Otobrise, Tolulope Famoroti, Adenike Olatinwo, Funmi Akintujoye and Afees Tiamiyu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | I. Affleck and M. Oshikawa (1999), Field- induced gas in Cu benzoate and other S=1/2 antiferromagnetic chain, Phys. Rev. B, 60:1038. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[2] | A. Langari and S. Mahdavifar (2006), Gas exponent of the XXZ model in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. B, 73: 054410, 2006. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Parongama Sen. (2001), Quantum-fluctuation-induced spatial stochastic resonance at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. E, 63: 016112. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[4] | M. Kenzelmann, R. Coldea, D. A: Tennant, D. Visser, M. Hofmann, P. Smeibidl, and Z. Tylczynski (2002), Order-to-disorder transition in the XY-like quantum magnet Cs2CoCl4 induced by non commuting applied fields, Phys. Rev B., 65: 144432. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[5] | A.A. Ovchinnikov, D. V. Dmitriev, V. Ya. Krivnov, and V. O. Cheranovskii (2003), The antiferromagnetic Ising chain in a mixed transverse and longitudinal magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B, 68:214406, 2003. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | D. V. Dmitriev and V. Ya. Krivnov (2004), Anisotropic Heisenberg chain in coexisting transverse and longitudinal magnetic, fields, Phys. Rev. B, 70: 144414. 2004. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | L. G. Marland (1981), Series expansions for the zero-temperature transverse Ising model, J. Phys. A.: Math. Gen., 14: 2047-2057. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[8] | M. N. Barber and P. M. Duxbury (1982), Hamiltonian studies of the two-dimensional axial-next-nearest-neighbor Ising (ANNI) model, J. Stat. Phys., 29:427. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | C. J. Hamer and M. N. Barber (1981), Finite-lattice methods in quantum Hamiltonian field theory I. The Ising model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 14: 241-257. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | P. Pfeuty (1970), The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field, Ann. Phys., 57:79. 1970. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | Heiko Rieger and Genadi Uimin (1996), The one-dimensional ANNI model in a transverse field: analytic and numerical study of effective Hamiltonian, Z. Phys B, 101:597-611. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[12] | A. Dutta, U. Divakaran, D. Sen, B. K. Chakrabarti, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli (2012), Quantum phase transitions in transverse field spin models: from statistical physics to quantum information, ArXiv: 1012.0653v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. | ||
In article | |||
[13] | Kunle Adegoke (2009), Non-interacting spin 1/2 particles in non-commuting external magnetic fields, E. Journ. Theor. Phys., 6(20): 243-256. | ||
In article | |||