Science and Education Publishing
From Scientific Research to Knowledge
Submission
Browse by Subjects
Search
Journal Home
For Authors
Online Submission
Current Issue
Archive
About Us
Figures index
From
Is CMB just an Observational Effect of a Universe in Accelerated Expansion?
Arne Bergstrom
International Journal of Physics
.
2013
, 1(6), 133-137 doi:10.12691/ijp-1-6-1
Fig
ure
. 1
a.
Simulated received radiation energy P[
x
] accumulated (10
5
histories) from different directions
x
in a small region of the sky (with
x
= 0 … 10,000), and with closer sources assumed to be completely opaque to the radiation from more distant ones in the same direction. The corresponding spectrum is shown in Figure 1b to be essentially indistinguishable from an exact Planck spectrum.
b.
Energy spectrum S[ω] (suitably scaled, with ω
= 10 … 100) accumulated (3010
5
histories) from the received radiation energy P[
x
] in Figure 1a. The sampled spectrum (black) is seen to be virtually indistinguishable from the Planck spectrum (red) also shown
Full size figure and legend
Fig
ure
. 2a.
Plot showing successive exponential expansions of type
r
(
t
) = exp(
t - t
0
) -1 (green) for different (past) values of
t
0
≥ 0, together with the trajectory of a light ray (red) through the present (defined as
r
= 0,
t
= 0). The choice of
r
= 0 and
t
= 0 as the present is arbitrary; it is a property of the exponential function that the curves would look the same if plotted for any other
r
and
t
chosen to define the present. (To the observer, both space and time appear subjected to exponential transformation ).
b.
Detail of Figure 2a around
t
= -1 and
r
= -1 showing how the set of exponential functions in Figure 2a seemingly form an essentially horizontal set of lines parallel to the
t
-axis, with decreasing separation for successively more distant
r
from the observer at
r
= 0 and piling up at
r
= -1. This property of exponential functions is important for the formation of a Planck spectrum as is illustrated in Figure 5 below
Full size figure and legend
Fig
ure
. 3.
The cumulative distribution function
F
(
R
,
t
0
) in (6) as function of
t
0
for values of
R
= 1, 2, 3, 4…, illustrating that for values of
R
greater than
R
≈ 5, the function
F
(
R
,
t
0
) is well approximated by the function
F
(
t
0
) = 1 –
exp
(-
t
0
) in (7)
Full size figure and legend
Fig
ure
. 4.
Plot of the function
F
1
= -1 - ln(P)/1000 as in (9) [and for comparison
F
2
= -P
1/1000
(coinciding)], illustrating that this function gives only a small variation in the value of
r
when P varies, which is the reason for the discussed piling-up at
r
= -1
Full size figure and legend
Fig
ure
. 5.
Sampled (10
8
histories) energy spectra S[ω] as in Figure 1b for A) a Gaussian distribution (galaxies transparent), B) a Planck distribution (galaxies opaque, exponentially accelerated expansion), and C) a Planck-type distribution with distorted tail (galaxies opaque, but no accelerated expansion)
Full size figure and legend