Article Versions
Export Article
Cite this article
  • Normal Style
  • MLA Style
  • APA Style
  • Chicago Style
Received October 27, 2020; Revised November 28, 2020; Accepted December 07, 2020
Open Access Peer-reviewed

Three Dimensional Digitally Designed Surgical Guides in Periodontal and Implant Surgeries: A Review

Saad Obaid Alazmi
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2020, 8(6), 150-154. DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-8-6-2
Received October 27, 2020; Revised November 28, 2020; Accepted December 07, 2020

Abstract

The development of technology in all fields resulted in replacing old and conventional strategies with a more comfortable and efficient strategy. The three-dimensional digital surgical guide is a more recent technology used for diagnosis and treatment planning for a complex implant-supported prosthesis. An electronic research process was used from 2010-2019 using PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar to obtain the articles. A three-dimensional digital guide in surgical implant placement, esthetic crown lengthening, bone regeneration, and titanium mesh showed promising results.

1. Introduction

Planning of implant prosthesis should begin much time before surgical implant insertion 1. Implants placement has been planned and facilitated for years utilizing simple panoramic radiographs 2. Surgical techniques achieve more precise implant placement at the surgical site 3, 4. A surgical guide helps diagnose, plan, and treat and facilitate proper positioning and angulation of bone implants 5. Tooth supported surgical guides accuracy of implant placement is superior to that with bone and mucosa supported guides 6, 7. There are several advantages for guided implant surgery, including helping the dentist perform less discomfort flapless implant surgery, faster working and healing time, more predictable manner, and safer placing of implants 8, 9. Conventional surgical guides are two-dimensional imaging and guide made on the dental cast; this conventional technique was used for assisting in proper surgical placement 10. Traditional surgical guides are made in dental laboratories. They allow for clinician-mediated positioning errors due to the linear deviation and inadvertent angular, leading to a reduction in accuracy 11.

Digital flow work has an essential role in contemporary dentistry 12. Recently, both digital scanning and cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) are used to plan guided implant surgery and digital workflow 13, 14. Three-dimensional imaging techniques can add an additional dimension to routinely available preoperative radiographs 15. This review aims to overview the using a three-dimensional digital guide in surgical implant placement, esthetic crown lengthening and bone regeneration, and titanium mesh.

2. Methods

An electronic research method was used to search for studies related to three-dimensional digitally designed surgical guides in periodontal and implant surgeries. Scientific websites such as PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar" were used to obtain the articles. The research review was conducted from January 2010 to February 2020 for English language articles published in the dental literature, using the keywords such as "CAD/CAM, 3D, Digital workflow, Guided bone regeneration, Titanium mesh". Thirty-four studies were obtained, 15 articles were included in this review, and the other articles were excluded.

3. Three Dimensional Techniques

They can help provide more details regarding bone quality, volume, and anatomical restrictions 16. Data obtained from CBCT, MRI, or CT can be processed in implant software and review preoperative views of anatomical structures related to a scanning template used for future restoration 17. Imaging modalities with a three-dimensional vision of the tooth and surroundings is fundamental for better diagnosis and future dentistry planning 18. The development of radiographic technology led to the introducing various three-dimensional imaging systems in the dental profession 18.

CBCT created a revolution in the dentistry field. It is dedicated to providing 3D images of oral structures and dental surroundings by expanding the role of 3 D dental images from diagnosis to image guidance of surgical procedures 18. CBCT allows the acquisition of rapid volumetric images taken in time at different points similar in contrast and geometry, making it possible to evaluate variations occurring in the fourth dimension 18. It was demonstrated that the CBCT scan provided the potential for improved patients' diagnosis, and it has a great range of clinical applications 18. The three-dimensional radiological display is frequently indicated for treatment planning of complex implant-supported prosthetic restoration and diagnosis of bone pathology; further indications include diagnosis of the maxillary sinus 18.

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) permits the production of surgical guides that are virtually designed and planned using data from 3D imagining by using computer software and digital workflow for manufacturing and planning 10.

4. Using Three Dimensional Digital Guide in Surgical Implant Placement

Dental implants became the treatment option for restoring missed teeth. Replacing missing teeth with implants has a major influence on the life of patients; this treatment is used by partially and completely edentulous patients 19. The implant's success is based not only on osseointegration but also on implant placement, allowing fabrication of prosthesis or crown with esthetic appearance 20. In implant dentistry, proper placement is one of the most critical factors 21, 22.

3D CBCT is required for implant procedure in several steps; some anatomic considerations should be known to allow the clinician to determine the best site for the implant that will meet the prosthetic goals. In addition, 3D CBCT used to determine bone dimensions (height and width), bone quality and comparative density, determining the long axis of alveolar bone, localization and identification of internal anatomies including sinus cavities and nerves, determination of boundaries of the jaw, using 3D scale and scope or identifying pathology, transferring of radiographic planning information and binding planning information with radiographic diagnostic 23. Of all the previous considerations and steps, a 3D strategy was required for three steps.

One study compared the accuracy of implant placement using 3D printing and machine milled surgical guides; it was found that both 3D printing guides and machine milling can be used in manufacturing surgical guides. However, 3D printing provided better results over machine milling 10. In a review article 18, it was demonstrated that in case of the placement of an implant invades the sinus, approaches a nerve, or penetrates out of the confines of the jawbone, CBCT 3D imagining should be offered and discussed with the patient, and the patient should be aware of benefits, risks and alternative treatment 18. It was reported that a fully digital workflow using CBCT for digital planning implant placement and application of fixed implant-supported prosthetic restoration was reliable 12.

Another study investigated the benefit of full three-dimensional virtual work to guide the placement of an implant in oligodontia. The study showed that using computer-designed surgical templates helped predict implant placement, where interdental spaces were limited, and the patient's bone was scarce 24.

In a case report of a patient with missing mandibular right first molar who underwent rehabilitation with dental implant-supported prothesis, 3D CBCT, and virtual cast were used in dental implant placement planning, and this results in less pain and discomfort experienced by the patient, the procedures consume less time compared to the conventional procedure. The authors suggested that 3D guided implant surgery is expected to be a routine procedure for rehabilitation 25.

A clinical report on a 73 years old male patient who experienced mandible and maxilla rehabilitation with implants and implant-supported prostheses using digital workflow showed that this technique predictably allowed esthetic and functional rehabilitation and integrated with the face of the patient 26.

5. Three Dimensional Esthetic Crown Lengthening Guide

One of the dental practice parts is esthetics, which results in a good smile; this depends on the architecture of the gingival tissue and dental characteristics. An interdisciplinary approach between periodontists and prosthodontists is required to achieve successful esthetic rehabilitation for the short clinical crown and excessive gingival display 27. Esthetic consideration is the first step in the treatment plan for the maxillary anterior region 28. In the case of crown lengthening is needed to be performed, the surgeon should receive all information on optimal gingival contours and tooth esthetics when. Diagnostic waxing was suggested to generate a vacuum-formed surgical guide and an acrylic resin 29, 30, 31. However, these devices are not precise in most times 32. A distance of 3 mm between the gingival margin and alveolar crest on the facial aspect is essential for periodontal health, allowing for 1 mm and 2 mm of sulcus depth and biological width, respectively 33. The amount of alveolar bone needed to be removed can be anticipated; however, the lack of a guide for bone resection may lead to undesirable post-treatment esthetics. CAD/CAM techniques helped surgeons perform predictable, accurate surgery, and improved esthetics outcomes 34. This technique references bone and gingival restoration during crown lengthening surgery; this technique increases treatment predictability and facilitates the surgical procedure. This digital approach results in pleasing esthetics and harmonious gingival and alveolar contours 34. The present clinical procedure is superior to the conventional one as it encouraging a harmonious correlation between gingival and teeth, provides more predictable alveolar and gingival margins, and allows fewer surgical errors. Limitations of such a technique involve increased cost and additional time required before surgery 34. There are only 2 case reports discussed digital techniques. One case report 35 was conducted to present the virtual planning used as an aid in periodontal surgical planning to correct the gummy smile. The authors reported that the digital smile design technique was found to be versatile and can be used for planning periodontal surgery. Another case report 36 showed that using three-dimensional printing templates and CAD/CAM techniques can guide clinicians in patients who require rebuilding an ideal contour in the esthetic zone for the marginal gingiva anterior maxillary.

If the patient requires esthetic crown lengthening surgery from the right maxillary lateral to the left central incisors to treat excessive gingival display and crowns on the maxillary central incisors to correct defective existing restoration, then the following technique will be used as following 34;

a- An intraoral scanner (TRIOS; 3Shape) can be used for intraoral digital impressions that should be considered for mandible, maxilla, and maximal intercuspal position. Scanning of mandible and maxilla is performed in the semi-open mouth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The digital impressions should be saved as a "3ox" file, and you can save them in a file named File A, whereas the CBCT file can be saved as File B.

b-2dimensional clinical photography should be used to design the teeth shape and gingival contour, which is performed according to the facial treatment plan. From this, a clear image of the planned esthetic restoration for the prosthodontists and periodontists can be obtained by designing virtual restorations on a three-dimensional digital model named File A.

c-For designing a gingivectomy guide, the tooth geometrical shape and gingival margin on file A should be drawn and then printed using a digital dental printer.

d-A digital software " sigma dental CAD" uses files A, D, and virtual restoration. The two files should be merged using the best-fit algorithm by registering the clinical crowns into a single digital file, which can be saved as file C. The dental technician can notice the correlation between the virtual gingival margin and alveolar bone on the merged digital model. Drawing of the potential alveolar crest that is 3mm away from the potential gingival margin should be done. Then, the alveolectomy guide should be designed on which the open window exposes the alveolar bone to be removed and print.

e-Making of an internal bevel incision based on the gingivectomy guide and removal of collar tissue should be done. Then, reflect the full thickness flap on the labial side to expose the alveolar bone, leaving the papilla in its original site. The excess bone should be removed through the windows in the alveolectomy guide; this is followed by reposition and suturing the flap.

f-The soft and hard tissue becomes mature after three months of surgery, so restore the central incisors, which ceramic crowns.

6. Three Dimensional Techniques Used in Titanium Mesh

Both floor and orbital wall are common sites of facial bone fracture, leading to serious functional impairment 37. The treatment of such fractures is difficult as this anatomical region is complex, and hence the intra-operative view is limited. Both clinical examination and meticulous imaging are indispensable for treatment planning. Visual anesthetic and disturbance can result from inaccurate surgical techniques and unfitted implants 38. In order to achieve adequate post-operative results and stable reconstruction, individual titanium mesh implants and computer-assisted three-dimensional treatment planning are applied 39, 40.

New standardized titanium mesh is manually adjusted to fit polyamide models of each patient 41. Titanium mesh was introduced to eliminate or limit some problems such as lack of containment of the particulate graft, so they are used as a containment system for the particulate autogenous and alloplastic grafts when augmenting the atrophic mandible and maxilla 42. The use of conventional titanium mesh was explained for the first time to reconstruct osseous-maxillofacial defects and then used for the osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges 43, 44, 45. They are also used for limited alveolar ridge augmentation of ridge defects with simultaneous and secondary implant insertion 46, 47, 48. CAD/CAM technology provides satisfactory solutions for time-consuming and manually challenging disadvantages of premade TM based on the CBCT scan data of the bony defect and digital workflow system 49. One study 50 reported titanium implants suitable for daily use. These patient-specific implants (PSI) allow more time and cost-effective operative procedures. It also allows precise reconstruction of orbital fractures by using complete digital workflow, and they advised to be superior to the implant's malposition. Another study described a protocol for manufacturing individualized direct laser-sintered titanium mesh using CAD/CAM procedures and rapid prototyping. The manufactured titanium mesh can be used for bone regeneration 42.

7. Three Dimensional Techniques Used in Bone Regeneration and Titanium Mesh

Dental implant placement is a practical plan for treating lost teeth; this plan presents high survival rates after a long term of follow-up 51, 52, 53. However, such implants' long-term stability and success depend on the quantity and quality of the bone available at the post-operative implant site 54, 55. Several augmentation procedures were described and were studied in animals and humans 56. Guided bone regeneration is a therapeutic method that can be used in cases with insufficient alveolar bone width and high 57. Autologous bone or bone compensatory are used to fill the bone defect, then covered with artificial membrane; this bone augmentation enhances implantation 58.

Clinical studies reported promising results for vertical and lateral bone reconstruction with a titanium mesh technique 59. Customized titanium mesh cage can be manufactured to fit precisely over the bone defect of augmentation situ. However, the risk of flap dehiscence with the graft site's exposure and possibly some or complete loss of the graft material remains present due to the titanium mesh's stiffness and mechanical irritation to the mucosal flap 50, 51. One rapid prototyping method called selective laser melting (SLM) is a manufacturing process for the production of an implantable dental device 62, 63, 64, which facilitates the manufacturing of microstructures or even the finer structures 65, 66. The SLM technique is a developmental rapid prototyping process that automatically integrates successive laminae as they are formed to define the desired 3 D object 67. One study reported a good and safe augmentation technique for combined and vertical defects 49. Another study 67 overviewed the successful development of a novel protocol for guided bone generation using individualized made titanium devices. The study revealed that the novel protocol was safe and simple for providing robust support for guided bone regeneration.

8. Conclusion and Future Direction

Using a three-dimensional digital guide in surgical implant placement, esthetic crown lengthening, and bone regeneration, and titanium mish showed promising results. With advanced technologies, the three-dimensional guide would be a promising tool for diagnosis and treatment planning in the future. However, the number of studies was limited studies on its role in customizing the titanium mech in the guided bone generation, so further well-designed studies and reports are required for the three-dimensional surgical guide in dentistry.

References

[1]  de Almeida Prado Naves Carneiro T. Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry. J Dent & Oral Disord. 2015; 1(1): 1002.
In article      
 
[2]  Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003; 89: 611-5.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormée J, Coudert JL. Precise Dental Implant Placement in Bone Using Surgical Guides in Conjunction With Medical Imaging Techniques. J. Oral Implantol. 2000; 26: 300-3.
In article      View Article
 
[4]  C. M. Dental Implant Prosthetics, 2e. 1 edition. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby; 2014.
In article      
 
[5]  Park C, Raigrodski AJ, Rosen J, Spiekerman C, London RM. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2009; 101: 372-381.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical Accuracy of 3 Different Types of Computed Tomography-Derived Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Implant Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 394-401.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[7]  Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 181-188.
In article      View Article
 
[8]  Mora MA, Chenin DL, Arce RM. Software tools and surgical guides in dental-implant-guided surgery. Dental Clinics. 2014 Jul 1; 58(3): 597-626.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[9]  Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014 Jan 2; 29.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[10]  Ahmed MF, AbdelHamid AM, AlAbbasy FH. ACCURACY OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES (AN INVITRO STUDY). Alexandria Dental Journal. 2019 Dec 1; 44(3): 28-33.
In article      View Article
 
[11]  Belser UC, Schmid B, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2004; 19 Suppl: 30-42.
In article      
 
[12]  Dolcini GA, Colombo M, Mangano C. From guided surgery to final prosthesis with a fully digital procedure: a prospective clinical study on 15 partially edentulous patients. International journal of dentistry. 2016; 2016.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[13]  Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PloS one. 2012; 7(8).
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[14]  Neugebauer J, Stachulla G, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Expert review of medical devices. 2010 Jan 1; 7(1): 113-29.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[15]  Rothman SL, Chaftez N, Rhodes ML, Schwarz MS, Schwartz MS. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress. Radiology 1988; 168:171-175.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[16]  Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 105-111.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[17]  D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and Complications Using Computer-Designed Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Oral Rehabilitation by Means of Dental Implants: A Review of the Literature. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research; 2012: 14(3)321-335.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[18]  Rodrigues SJ, Mundathaje M, Raju M, Qureshi S. Three Dimensional Imaging in Implant Assessment for the Prosthodontist-Utilization of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2014 Jul 3; 4(1): 23-33.
In article      View Article
 
[19]  Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2006; 21: 305-13.
In article      
 
[20]  Albrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust. Prosthodont. J. Aust. Prosthodont. Soc.1993; 7 Suppl: 15-24.
In article      
 
[21]  Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003; 90: 121-32.
In article      View Article
 
[22]  Binon PP. Treatment planning complications and surgical miscues. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007; 65: 73-92.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[23]  Curley A, Hatcher DC. Cone beam CT: anatomic assessment and legal issues—the new standards of care. J Calif Dent Assoc 2009; 37: 653-662.
In article      
 
[24]  Filius MA, Kraeima J, Vissink A, Janssen KI, Raghoebar GM, Visser A. Three-dimensional computer-guided implant placement in oligodontia. International journal of implant dentistry. 2017 Dec 1; 3(1): 30.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[25]  Maharjan SK, Mathema SR, Shrestha SM. 3D Guided Implant Surgery: A Case Report. Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society. 2018 Dec 31; 1(2): 90-5.
In article      View Article
 
[26]  Coachman C, Calamita MA, Coachman FG, Coachman RG, Sesma N. Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2017 May 1; 117(5): 577-86.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[27]  Ohyama H, Nagai S, Tokutomi H, Ferguson M. Recreating an esthetic smile: a multidisciplinary approach. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2007; 27: 61-9.
In article      
 
[28]  Spear FM, Kokich VG, Mathews DP. Interdisciplinary management of anterior dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 160-9.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[29]  Landi L, Manicone PF, Piccinelli S, Raia R, Marinotti F, Scutellà F. Determining osseous resection during surgical crown lengthening in the esthetic zone with the use of a radiographic and surgical template. Quintessence Dent Technol 2004; 27: 101-13.
In article      
 
[30]  Malik K, Tabiat-Pour S. The use of a diagnostic wax set-up in aesthetic cases involving crown lengthening: a case report. Dent Update 2010; 37: 303-4, 306-7.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[31]  Amato F, Macca U, Borlizzi D. Guided soft and hard tissue preparation: a novel technique for crown lengthening. Am J Esthet Dent 2014; 3: 24-37.
In article      View Article
 
[32]  Gurrea J, Bruguera A. Wax-up and mock-up. A guide for anterior periodontal and restorative treatments. Int J Esthet Dent 2014; 9: 146-62.
In article      
 
[33]  Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000; 1996(11): 18-28.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[34]  Liu X, Yu J, Zhou J, Tan J. A digitally guided dual technique for both gingival and bone resection during crown lengthening surgery. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018 Mar 1; 119(3): 345-9.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[35]  Ruhmann NL, Borrasca C, Araújo CA, Pfau EA. Aesthetic rehabilitation of the “gummy smile” associated to virtual planning with “digital smile design”–DSD. Journal of Surgical and Clinical Dentistry JSCD. 2014 Apr; 1(1): 5-9.
In article      
 
[36]  Yin J, Liu D, Huang Y, Wu L, Tang X. CAD/CAM techniques help in the rebuilding of ideal marginal gingiva contours of anterior maxillary teeth: A case report. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2017 Nov 1; 148(11): 834-9.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[37]  Shin JW, Lim JS, Yoo G, Byeon JH. An analysis of pure blowout fractures and associated ocular symptoms. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013 May 1; 24(3): 703-7.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[38]  Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, Wanschitz F, Truppe M, Seemann R, Wagner A. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2005 Jan 1; 34(1): 1-8.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[39]  Essig H, Dressel L, Rana M, Rana M, Kokemueller H, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC. Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study. Head & face medicine. 2013 Dec; 9(1): 18.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[40]  Schramm A, Suarez‐Cunqueiro MM, Rücker M, Kokemueller H, Bormann KH, Metzger MC, Gellrich NC. Computer‐assisted therapy in orbital and mid‐facial reconstructions. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2009 Jun; 5(2): 111-24.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[41]  Kozakiewicz M, Szymor P. Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions. Head & face medicine. 2013 Dec; 9(1): 32.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[42]  Ciaocca L, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Corinaldesi G & Scotti R. Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches. Med Bio Eng Comput; 2011:49: 1347-1352.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[43]  Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualities. J Am Dent Assoc. 1969; 78(4): 767-76.
In article      View Article
 
[44]  Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43(2): 87–91.
In article      View Article
 
[45]  Gongloff RK, Cole M, Whitlow W, Boyne PJ. Titanium mesh and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts to augment the maxillary alveolar ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 15(3): 263-8.
In article      View Article
 
[46]  von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(3): 387-94.
In article      
 
[47]  von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous peri-implant bone grafting using a micro titanium mesh for graft stabilization. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998; 18(2): 117-27.
In article      
 
[48]  von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autogenous bone and a micro titanium mesh: a prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10(1): 24-33.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[49]  Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E, Moergel M, Walter C, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh. International journal of implant dentistry. 2017 Dec 1; 3(1): 36.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[50]  Gander T, Essig H, Metzler P, Lindhorst D, Dubois L, Rücker M, Schumann P. Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015 Jan 1; 43(1): 126-30.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[51]  Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44(3): 377-88.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[52]  Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW, Morbach T, Ladwein C, Wegener J, Wagner W. Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast dental implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(1):127-34.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[53]  Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B, Tegner A, Sagheb K, Berres M, Kammerer PW, et al. Clinical and radiological long-term outcome of a tapered implant system with special emphasis on the influence of augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18(4): 810-20.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[54]  Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone—a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of oral implantology. 2014; 7(Suppl 2): S219-34.
In article      
 
[55]  Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(Suppl): 49-70.
In article      
 
[56]  Kammerer PW, Palarie V, Schiegnitz E, Nacu V, Draenert FG, Al-Nawas B. Influence of a collagen membrane and recombinant platelet-derived growth factor on vertical bone augmentation in implant-fixed deproteinized bovine bone—animal pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24(11): 1222-30.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[57]  Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL: Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol; 2001: 72: 215e229.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[58]  Retzepi M, Donos N: Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010: 21: 567e576.
In article      
 
[59]  Rasia-dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D, Beretta M, Maiorana C. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 19(6): e639-46.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[60]  Boudet C. Platelet-rich fibrin in mesh exposure repair. Dentistry today. 2014; 33(1): 112-3.
In article      
 
[61]  Lizio G, Corinaldesi G, Marchetti C. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh: a three-dimensional evaluation of factors affecting bone augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(6): 1354-63.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[62]  Lin CY, Wirtz T, LaMarca F, Hollister SJ: Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process. J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007: 83: 272e279.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[63]  Warnke PH, Douglas T, Wollny P, Sherry E, Steiner M, Galonska S, et al: Rapid prototyping: porous titanium alloy scaffolds produced by selective laser melting for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2009: 15: 115e124.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[64]  Gittard SD, Narayan RJ: Laser direct writing of micro- and nano-scale medical devices. Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010: 7: 343e356.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[65]  Wilkinson JM: Micro- and nanotechnology fabrication processes for metals. Med Device Technol; 2004: 15: 21e23.
In article      
 
[66]  Rausch Y: Laser micro machining of medical devices. Med Device Technol; 2009: 20: 29e33.
In article      
 
[67]  Sumida T, Otawa N, Kamata YU, Kamakura S, Mtsushita T, Kitagaki H, Mori S, Sasaki K, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Yamaguchi A. Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: clinical application and the comparison with conventional titanium mesh. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015 Dec 1; 43(10): 2183-8.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 

Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2020 Saad Obaid Alazmi

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Cite this article:

Normal Style
Saad Obaid Alazmi. Three Dimensional Digitally Designed Surgical Guides in Periodontal and Implant Surgeries: A Review. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2020, pp 150-154. https://pubs.sciepub.com/ijdsr/8/6/2
MLA Style
Alazmi, Saad Obaid. "Three Dimensional Digitally Designed Surgical Guides in Periodontal and Implant Surgeries: A Review." International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research 8.6 (2020): 150-154.
APA Style
Alazmi, S. O. (2020). Three Dimensional Digitally Designed Surgical Guides in Periodontal and Implant Surgeries: A Review. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research, 8(6), 150-154.
Chicago Style
Alazmi, Saad Obaid. "Three Dimensional Digitally Designed Surgical Guides in Periodontal and Implant Surgeries: A Review." International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research 8, no. 6 (2020): 150-154.
Share
[1]  de Almeida Prado Naves Carneiro T. Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry. J Dent & Oral Disord. 2015; 1(1): 1002.
In article      
 
[2]  Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003; 89: 611-5.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormée J, Coudert JL. Precise Dental Implant Placement in Bone Using Surgical Guides in Conjunction With Medical Imaging Techniques. J. Oral Implantol. 2000; 26: 300-3.
In article      View Article
 
[4]  C. M. Dental Implant Prosthetics, 2e. 1 edition. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby; 2014.
In article      
 
[5]  Park C, Raigrodski AJ, Rosen J, Spiekerman C, London RM. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2009; 101: 372-381.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical Accuracy of 3 Different Types of Computed Tomography-Derived Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Implant Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 394-401.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[7]  Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 181-188.
In article      View Article
 
[8]  Mora MA, Chenin DL, Arce RM. Software tools and surgical guides in dental-implant-guided surgery. Dental Clinics. 2014 Jul 1; 58(3): 597-626.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[9]  Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014 Jan 2; 29.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[10]  Ahmed MF, AbdelHamid AM, AlAbbasy FH. ACCURACY OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES (AN INVITRO STUDY). Alexandria Dental Journal. 2019 Dec 1; 44(3): 28-33.
In article      View Article
 
[11]  Belser UC, Schmid B, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2004; 19 Suppl: 30-42.
In article      
 
[12]  Dolcini GA, Colombo M, Mangano C. From guided surgery to final prosthesis with a fully digital procedure: a prospective clinical study on 15 partially edentulous patients. International journal of dentistry. 2016; 2016.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[13]  Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PloS one. 2012; 7(8).
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[14]  Neugebauer J, Stachulla G, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Expert review of medical devices. 2010 Jan 1; 7(1): 113-29.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[15]  Rothman SL, Chaftez N, Rhodes ML, Schwarz MS, Schwartz MS. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress. Radiology 1988; 168:171-175.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[16]  Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 105-111.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[17]  D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and Complications Using Computer-Designed Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Oral Rehabilitation by Means of Dental Implants: A Review of the Literature. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research; 2012: 14(3)321-335.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[18]  Rodrigues SJ, Mundathaje M, Raju M, Qureshi S. Three Dimensional Imaging in Implant Assessment for the Prosthodontist-Utilization of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2014 Jul 3; 4(1): 23-33.
In article      View Article
 
[19]  Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2006; 21: 305-13.
In article      
 
[20]  Albrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust. Prosthodont. J. Aust. Prosthodont. Soc.1993; 7 Suppl: 15-24.
In article      
 
[21]  Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003; 90: 121-32.
In article      View Article
 
[22]  Binon PP. Treatment planning complications and surgical miscues. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007; 65: 73-92.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[23]  Curley A, Hatcher DC. Cone beam CT: anatomic assessment and legal issues—the new standards of care. J Calif Dent Assoc 2009; 37: 653-662.
In article      
 
[24]  Filius MA, Kraeima J, Vissink A, Janssen KI, Raghoebar GM, Visser A. Three-dimensional computer-guided implant placement in oligodontia. International journal of implant dentistry. 2017 Dec 1; 3(1): 30.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[25]  Maharjan SK, Mathema SR, Shrestha SM. 3D Guided Implant Surgery: A Case Report. Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society. 2018 Dec 31; 1(2): 90-5.
In article      View Article
 
[26]  Coachman C, Calamita MA, Coachman FG, Coachman RG, Sesma N. Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2017 May 1; 117(5): 577-86.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[27]  Ohyama H, Nagai S, Tokutomi H, Ferguson M. Recreating an esthetic smile: a multidisciplinary approach. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2007; 27: 61-9.
In article      
 
[28]  Spear FM, Kokich VG, Mathews DP. Interdisciplinary management of anterior dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 160-9.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[29]  Landi L, Manicone PF, Piccinelli S, Raia R, Marinotti F, Scutellà F. Determining osseous resection during surgical crown lengthening in the esthetic zone with the use of a radiographic and surgical template. Quintessence Dent Technol 2004; 27: 101-13.
In article      
 
[30]  Malik K, Tabiat-Pour S. The use of a diagnostic wax set-up in aesthetic cases involving crown lengthening: a case report. Dent Update 2010; 37: 303-4, 306-7.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[31]  Amato F, Macca U, Borlizzi D. Guided soft and hard tissue preparation: a novel technique for crown lengthening. Am J Esthet Dent 2014; 3: 24-37.
In article      View Article
 
[32]  Gurrea J, Bruguera A. Wax-up and mock-up. A guide for anterior periodontal and restorative treatments. Int J Esthet Dent 2014; 9: 146-62.
In article      
 
[33]  Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000; 1996(11): 18-28.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[34]  Liu X, Yu J, Zhou J, Tan J. A digitally guided dual technique for both gingival and bone resection during crown lengthening surgery. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018 Mar 1; 119(3): 345-9.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[35]  Ruhmann NL, Borrasca C, Araújo CA, Pfau EA. Aesthetic rehabilitation of the “gummy smile” associated to virtual planning with “digital smile design”–DSD. Journal of Surgical and Clinical Dentistry JSCD. 2014 Apr; 1(1): 5-9.
In article      
 
[36]  Yin J, Liu D, Huang Y, Wu L, Tang X. CAD/CAM techniques help in the rebuilding of ideal marginal gingiva contours of anterior maxillary teeth: A case report. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2017 Nov 1; 148(11): 834-9.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[37]  Shin JW, Lim JS, Yoo G, Byeon JH. An analysis of pure blowout fractures and associated ocular symptoms. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013 May 1; 24(3): 703-7.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[38]  Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, Wanschitz F, Truppe M, Seemann R, Wagner A. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2005 Jan 1; 34(1): 1-8.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[39]  Essig H, Dressel L, Rana M, Rana M, Kokemueller H, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC. Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study. Head & face medicine. 2013 Dec; 9(1): 18.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[40]  Schramm A, Suarez‐Cunqueiro MM, Rücker M, Kokemueller H, Bormann KH, Metzger MC, Gellrich NC. Computer‐assisted therapy in orbital and mid‐facial reconstructions. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2009 Jun; 5(2): 111-24.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[41]  Kozakiewicz M, Szymor P. Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions. Head & face medicine. 2013 Dec; 9(1): 32.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[42]  Ciaocca L, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Corinaldesi G & Scotti R. Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches. Med Bio Eng Comput; 2011:49: 1347-1352.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[43]  Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualities. J Am Dent Assoc. 1969; 78(4): 767-76.
In article      View Article
 
[44]  Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43(2): 87–91.
In article      View Article
 
[45]  Gongloff RK, Cole M, Whitlow W, Boyne PJ. Titanium mesh and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts to augment the maxillary alveolar ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 15(3): 263-8.
In article      View Article
 
[46]  von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(3): 387-94.
In article      
 
[47]  von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous peri-implant bone grafting using a micro titanium mesh for graft stabilization. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998; 18(2): 117-27.
In article      
 
[48]  von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autogenous bone and a micro titanium mesh: a prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10(1): 24-33.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[49]  Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E, Moergel M, Walter C, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh. International journal of implant dentistry. 2017 Dec 1; 3(1): 36.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[50]  Gander T, Essig H, Metzler P, Lindhorst D, Dubois L, Rücker M, Schumann P. Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015 Jan 1; 43(1): 126-30.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[51]  Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44(3): 377-88.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[52]  Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW, Morbach T, Ladwein C, Wegener J, Wagner W. Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast dental implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(1):127-34.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[53]  Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B, Tegner A, Sagheb K, Berres M, Kammerer PW, et al. Clinical and radiological long-term outcome of a tapered implant system with special emphasis on the influence of augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18(4): 810-20.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[54]  Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone—a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of oral implantology. 2014; 7(Suppl 2): S219-34.
In article      
 
[55]  Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(Suppl): 49-70.
In article      
 
[56]  Kammerer PW, Palarie V, Schiegnitz E, Nacu V, Draenert FG, Al-Nawas B. Influence of a collagen membrane and recombinant platelet-derived growth factor on vertical bone augmentation in implant-fixed deproteinized bovine bone—animal pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24(11): 1222-30.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[57]  Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL: Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol; 2001: 72: 215e229.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[58]  Retzepi M, Donos N: Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010: 21: 567e576.
In article      
 
[59]  Rasia-dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D, Beretta M, Maiorana C. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 19(6): e639-46.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[60]  Boudet C. Platelet-rich fibrin in mesh exposure repair. Dentistry today. 2014; 33(1): 112-3.
In article      
 
[61]  Lizio G, Corinaldesi G, Marchetti C. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh: a three-dimensional evaluation of factors affecting bone augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(6): 1354-63.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[62]  Lin CY, Wirtz T, LaMarca F, Hollister SJ: Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process. J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007: 83: 272e279.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[63]  Warnke PH, Douglas T, Wollny P, Sherry E, Steiner M, Galonska S, et al: Rapid prototyping: porous titanium alloy scaffolds produced by selective laser melting for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2009: 15: 115e124.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[64]  Gittard SD, Narayan RJ: Laser direct writing of micro- and nano-scale medical devices. Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010: 7: 343e356.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[65]  Wilkinson JM: Micro- and nanotechnology fabrication processes for metals. Med Device Technol; 2004: 15: 21e23.
In article      
 
[66]  Rausch Y: Laser micro machining of medical devices. Med Device Technol; 2009: 20: 29e33.
In article      
 
[67]  Sumida T, Otawa N, Kamata YU, Kamakura S, Mtsushita T, Kitagaki H, Mori S, Sasaki K, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Yamaguchi A. Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: clinical application and the comparison with conventional titanium mesh. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015 Dec 1; 43(10): 2183-8.
In article      View Article  PubMed