Objectives: Candida-induced denture stomatitis can be treated with different approaches; one of the most effective methods is the Photodynamic therapy (PDT). The current study aimed to assess the collective effects of PDT and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in comparison to the topical application of miconazole gel. Materials and Methods: Thirty complete denture wearers with a history of Candida-induced denture stomatitis were haphazardly divided into two groups 15 patient each. Group I: The patients were subjected to a session of methylene blue-mediated PDT followed by to 2 sessions of (LLLT) 2 times per week for 15 days, while those of Group II: were subjected to miconazole gel four times per day for fifteen days. Results: The clinical and cytolological findings revealed that 50% of the patients in Group I have been cured from denture stomatitis while in Group II the curing rate was 85%. After two weeks following treatment stoppage, 30% of Group I patients showed reappearance of symptoms while the ration of recurrence was 15% in Group II patients. Conclusion: Photodynamic therapy associated with low level laser therapy (LLLT) and Miconazole gel can be considered effective methods in the management of Candida-induced denture stomatitis with higher curing rate and lower recurrence ratio for Miconazole.
Denture stomatitis is (DS) is chronic type of erythematous candidiasis that is connected with wearing dentures and becomes populated with candida. It is considered one of the most familiar situation with denture wearers and may be ranged from scattered or rough pinpoint erythema in the palatal mucosa. 1 Candida is well thought-out to be a latent source of this inflamation, 2 as it has the capability to stick on the denture surfaces and infect the palatal mucosa. 3 On the other hand, ill fitted unstable dentures, bad oral hygiene, salivary pH, elderly, sexual category, tobacco, and some systemic diseases can be considered predisposing factors. 4
Candida-associated denture stomatitis can be diagnosed through the clinical and cytopathological examination. 2 Though Candida albicans is the most important pathogen correlated to denture stomatitis, different types of Candida had been identified, such as C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. dubliniensis. 5 Currently, it is thought that mixed C. albicans and C. glabrata biofilms might significantly participate in the pathogenesis of denture stomatitis. 6
Topical antifungals such as nystatin and miconazole are considered reliable treatments for denture stomatitis in addition to patient motivation about the importance of good oral and denture hygiene and avoidance of bad habits such as continuous wearing denture during sleeping. 3 While systemic antifungals e.g. fluconazole are usually described for patients suffering from systemic diseases. 7, 8 There is no enormously successful management protocol for denture stomatitis, and the recurrence rate still high. 9
Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and curing effects. Low Level Light Therapy (LLLT) is a safe, low intensity (non-thermal) light therapy treatment. It improves tissue repair, immune response, reduces inflammation and pain in a wide range of medical conditions. The role of LLLT still uncertain, but earlier researches stated that Low-Level Laser light is captivated by definite endogenous chromophores in fungi leading to photothermal or photodynamic growth inhibition. 10, 11 Different studies have been evaluated the effect of Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of denture stomatitis. 12, 13
Although different previous studies evaluated the effects of PDT alone in the treatment of denture stomatitis, the current study was established to evaluate the effect of PDT protocol followed by (LLLT) therapy compared to the topical effect of oral miconazole gel in the treatment of denture stomatitis.
A total of 30 patients, with clinical and cytological evidences of denture stomatitis, (Figure 1) were carefully selected from out-patient clinics of the Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, KSA, over a period from June 2016 to January 2018.
Cytological examinations were provided from selected patients with denture stomatitis after obtaining a written medical consent. The experimental protocol for examining patients and analyzing cytological specimens were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Board of Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University.
This study was carried out involving patient's aged 45 to 70 years old using acrylic complete dentures. The presence of Candida, was confirmed through rubbing the mucosa of the palate with a cytobrush and spread on a clean, dry glass slide. Immediate fixation with 95% alcohol solution then slides was stained with PAS for the presence of candidal hyphae.
Exclusion criteria include patients with a history of recent antibiotic intake, pregnant, lactating women, smokers, and those with immunological disorders.
Group I (Experimental group): The clinician and the patients attained the necessary laser protective precautions including safety glasses. Fifteen patients with denture stomatitis were subjected to one session PDT by rubbing the palatal mucosa with 0.01% Chimiolux methylene blue (Chimiolux, Hypofarma, Brazil) followed by to two sessions (20 seconds each) of diode Laser (FONA, CHINA) (Figure 2) at 660 nm, with a100 mW/cm2 power density, twice a week for 15 days. After finishing the first laser scanning, the affected area was irrigated using sterile saline solution, and then it was cleaned and dried with sterile gauze. The second laser scanning was done using FONA laser alone. (Figure 3)
Group II (The control group): Fifteen patients were subjected to 20mg/g miconazole gel. 4 times per day for fifteen day. (Figure 4)
After a period of 15 days treatment, other clinical and cytological examinations were done for the entire patient in both groups by the same evaluator. The recurrence rates in both groups were determined 15 days after treatment completion.
Data were collected and statistically analyzed.
At the end of treatment period, the clinical and cytological findings revealed that the curing of denture stomatitis was only observed in 50% in the collective treatment of methylene blue-mediated Photodynamic therapy and LLLT while it was 85% in the Miconazole group. (Figure 5 - Figure 7).
Considerable decrease in pain and burning sensation was seen in both treatment groups: 75 % of Group I patients (PDT and LLLT) and 90 % of Group II (Figure 8). In addition, a 65% drop in self-reported halitosis was detected in both groups (Figure 9) The reappearance of signs and symptoms of denture stomatitis were noted in 30% of Group I patients and 15% of Group II patients. (Figure 10).
The use of PDT protocol followed by (LLLT) therapy is a possible solution to overcome the side effects of conventional antifungal therapy for denture stomatitis.
The essential methods for the management of denture stomatitis consist of denture modification, removal of the denture during sleeping, and good denture hygiene, 14 Topical antifungal application has a transient curing effect followed by reappearance of the signs and symptoms of denture stomatitis. 8 Moreover, these medications can produce microbial resistance. 4, 8, 9 It is advisable to use unconventional schemes for the management of these microorganisms, together with mouthwashes such as chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide. 4
PDT represents another anticipated option that enhanced the outcomes in both experimental 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and clinical researches. 12 PDT mechanism of action differs from that of the antifungals. PDT causes protein inactivation and lysis of the cell membrane ending with cell damage 21, 22 while antifungals reduce the ergosterol synthesis which is the main sterol in the fungi membranes. 2 PDT encourage cell wall and membrane damage, allowing access of photosensitizer into the cell leading to photo damage to inner organelles and cell death. 20, 21.
The finding of this study revealed that there was a 50% decrease in the PDT group in comparison to the superior results in the Miconazole group (85%). In addition, reappearance of denture stomatitis was observed in only 15% in the miconazole group while it was 30 % in the PDT group. These results were in accordance with that of the clinical researches of Mima et al12 and Ribeiro et al. 13.
Denture stomatitis patients may complain from pain, discomfort, objectionable taste and burning sensation related to the inflamed palatal mucosa. 4 There were significant decrease in pain and burning sensation was realized with both treatment groups: 75 % of Group I patients (PDT and LLLT) and 90 % of Group II.
One of the causes of halitosis is Oral Candida. 24 The results of this study showed that both treatments protocols produced the same clinical enhancement for halitosis (65%).
Photodynamic therapy associated with low level laser therapy (LLLT) and Miconazole gel can be considered effective methods in the treatment of Candida-induced denture stomatitis with higher curing rate and lower recurrence ratio for Miconazole gel.
[1] | Al Tarawneh S, Bencharit S, Mendoza L, Curran A, Barrow D, et al. Clinical and Histological Findings of Denture Stomatitis as Related to Intraoral Colonization Patterns of C. albicans, Salivary Flow, and Dry Mouth. J Prosthodont.2013; 22: 13-22. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[2] | Pachava K R , Kamalakanth S K , Nadendla L K , Reddy M R. Denture Stomatitis - A Review. Indian J Dent Adv 2013; 5: 1107-12. | ||
In article | |||
[3] | Cenci P T, Cury A A, Crielaard W, et al. Development of Candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 86-94. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[4] | Ramage G, Tomset K, Wickes BL, et al. Denture stomatitis: a role for Candida biofilms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 53-59. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | Gauch M R, Pedrosa S S, FabíolaSilveira-Gomes F S, Esteves R A, et al. Isolation of Candida spp. from denture-related stomatitis in Pará, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2018;49:148-5. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[6] | Zomordian K, Haghighi N N, Rajaee N, Pakshir K, Bita Tarazooie B, et al. Assessment of Candida species colonization and denture-related stomatitis in complete denture wearers. Medical Mycology2011; 49: 208-11. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[7] | Beneyto M Y, Jornet L P, Nicolas V A, et al. Use of antifungal agents for oral candidiasis: results of a national survey. Int J Dent Hyg 2010; 8: 47-52. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[8] | Sykes J E, Hodge G, Singapuri A, Yang M L, Gelli A and Thompson G R. In vivo development of fluconazole resistance in serial Cryptococcus gattii isolates from a cat. Medical Mycology 2017; 55: 396-401. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[9] | Karine Vitor Martins K V, and de Lacerda Gontijo S M. Treatment of denture stomatitis: literature review. Rev Bras Odontol. 2017; 74: 215-20. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Verma S K, Maheshwri S, Singh R K, et al. Laser in dentistry: an innovative tool in modern dental practice. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2012; 3: 124-132. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[11] | Basso F G, Camila F. Oliveira C F, Amanda Fontana A, et al. In Vitro Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Typical Oral Microbial Biofilms. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 502-10. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[12] | Mima E G, Pavarina A C, Silva M M, et al. Denture stomatitis treated with photodynamic therapy: five cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 602-608. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[13] | Ribero D G, Pavarena AC, Dovigo L N, et al. Photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms present on complete dentures: a clinical investigation. Photodynamic disinfection of complete dentures. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 161-168. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[14] | Santos A L , Carvalho S, Prata J M , Martins M B , Souza L O, et al. Candida Albicans Involvement in Denture-Related Stomatitis: A Serious and Real Clinical Concern J Infect Dis Diagn 2016; 1: 1-4. | ||
In article | |||
[15] | Perira C A, Romeiro R L, Costa A C, et al. Susceptibility of Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic inactivation: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26: 341-348. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[16] | Mimma E G, Pavarena A C, Ribeiro D G, et al. Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy for the inactivation of Candida spp. on dentures: in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29: 827-833. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[17] | Soarees B M, Da Silva D L, Sosa G R, et al. In vitro photodynamic inactivation of Candida spp. growth and adhesion to buccal epithelial cells. J Photochem Photobiol 2009; B94: 65-70. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[18] | Tegoos G P, Anbe M, Yange C, et al. Protease-stable polycationic photosenstizer conjugates between polyethyleneimine and chlorine for broad-spectrum antimicrobial photoinactivation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1402-1410. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[19] | Blisse J M, Bigelouw C E, Foster T H, et al. Susceptibility of Candida species to photodynamic effects of photofrin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:2000-2006. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[20] | Bertolni G, Redi E, Gata M, et al. Factors influencing the haematoporphyrin sensitized photoinactivation of Candida albicans. J Gen Microbiol 1989; 135: 957-966. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[21] | Donelly R F, McCaron P A, Tunney M M. Antifungal photodynamic therapy. Microbiol Res 2008; 163: 1-12. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[22] | Konpka K, Goslnski T. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 694-707. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[23] | Alemayehu R. Antifungal Drugs and their Resistance Mechanism. Res Med Eng Sci. 2017; 1: 1-2. | ||
In article | |||
[24] | Kapoor U, Sharma G, Juneja M, Nagpal A. Halitosis: Current concepts on etiology, diagnosis and management. Eur J Dent 2016; 10: 292-300. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2018 Mohamed Y Abdelfattah, Ahmed Abdelaziz Mohamed Essa and Mohammed K Fahmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | Al Tarawneh S, Bencharit S, Mendoza L, Curran A, Barrow D, et al. Clinical and Histological Findings of Denture Stomatitis as Related to Intraoral Colonization Patterns of C. albicans, Salivary Flow, and Dry Mouth. J Prosthodont.2013; 22: 13-22. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[2] | Pachava K R , Kamalakanth S K , Nadendla L K , Reddy M R. Denture Stomatitis - A Review. Indian J Dent Adv 2013; 5: 1107-12. | ||
In article | |||
[3] | Cenci P T, Cury A A, Crielaard W, et al. Development of Candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 86-94. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[4] | Ramage G, Tomset K, Wickes BL, et al. Denture stomatitis: a role for Candida biofilms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 53-59. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | Gauch M R, Pedrosa S S, FabíolaSilveira-Gomes F S, Esteves R A, et al. Isolation of Candida spp. from denture-related stomatitis in Pará, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2018;49:148-5. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[6] | Zomordian K, Haghighi N N, Rajaee N, Pakshir K, Bita Tarazooie B, et al. Assessment of Candida species colonization and denture-related stomatitis in complete denture wearers. Medical Mycology2011; 49: 208-11. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[7] | Beneyto M Y, Jornet L P, Nicolas V A, et al. Use of antifungal agents for oral candidiasis: results of a national survey. Int J Dent Hyg 2010; 8: 47-52. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[8] | Sykes J E, Hodge G, Singapuri A, Yang M L, Gelli A and Thompson G R. In vivo development of fluconazole resistance in serial Cryptococcus gattii isolates from a cat. Medical Mycology 2017; 55: 396-401. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[9] | Karine Vitor Martins K V, and de Lacerda Gontijo S M. Treatment of denture stomatitis: literature review. Rev Bras Odontol. 2017; 74: 215-20. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Verma S K, Maheshwri S, Singh R K, et al. Laser in dentistry: an innovative tool in modern dental practice. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2012; 3: 124-132. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[11] | Basso F G, Camila F. Oliveira C F, Amanda Fontana A, et al. In Vitro Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Typical Oral Microbial Biofilms. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 502-10. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[12] | Mima E G, Pavarina A C, Silva M M, et al. Denture stomatitis treated with photodynamic therapy: five cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 602-608. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[13] | Ribero D G, Pavarena AC, Dovigo L N, et al. Photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms present on complete dentures: a clinical investigation. Photodynamic disinfection of complete dentures. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 161-168. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[14] | Santos A L , Carvalho S, Prata J M , Martins M B , Souza L O, et al. Candida Albicans Involvement in Denture-Related Stomatitis: A Serious and Real Clinical Concern J Infect Dis Diagn 2016; 1: 1-4. | ||
In article | |||
[15] | Perira C A, Romeiro R L, Costa A C, et al. Susceptibility of Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic inactivation: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26: 341-348. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[16] | Mimma E G, Pavarena A C, Ribeiro D G, et al. Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy for the inactivation of Candida spp. on dentures: in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29: 827-833. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[17] | Soarees B M, Da Silva D L, Sosa G R, et al. In vitro photodynamic inactivation of Candida spp. growth and adhesion to buccal epithelial cells. J Photochem Photobiol 2009; B94: 65-70. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[18] | Tegoos G P, Anbe M, Yange C, et al. Protease-stable polycationic photosenstizer conjugates between polyethyleneimine and chlorine for broad-spectrum antimicrobial photoinactivation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1402-1410. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[19] | Blisse J M, Bigelouw C E, Foster T H, et al. Susceptibility of Candida species to photodynamic effects of photofrin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:2000-2006. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||
[20] | Bertolni G, Redi E, Gata M, et al. Factors influencing the haematoporphyrin sensitized photoinactivation of Candida albicans. J Gen Microbiol 1989; 135: 957-966. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[21] | Donelly R F, McCaron P A, Tunney M M. Antifungal photodynamic therapy. Microbiol Res 2008; 163: 1-12. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[22] | Konpka K, Goslnski T. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 694-707. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[23] | Alemayehu R. Antifungal Drugs and their Resistance Mechanism. Res Med Eng Sci. 2017; 1: 1-2. | ||
In article | |||
[24] | Kapoor U, Sharma G, Juneja M, Nagpal A. Halitosis: Current concepts on etiology, diagnosis and management. Eur J Dent 2016; 10: 292-300. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed PubMed | ||