The present study is aimed at devising a low cost and eco- friendly method of lead removal from aqueous medium. A comparative study of removal of Pb(II) by bentonite and bentonite activated charcoal mixture (I:I) was done. Batch experiments were done to find optimum condition as a function of variables such as pH, agitating time, initial concentration of Pb2+ adsorbent doses. The results showed that experimental results were the best fit for Langmuir isotherm. The kinetic studies confirmed the pseudo-first order reaction. The bentonite was characterised by TGA, DTA, XRD, and FITR. The maximum adsorption maximum adsorption capacity was evaluated to be 99.97percentage .Further uptake capacity by bentonite activated charcoal mixture was almost same as the bentonite. Bentonite activated charcoal mixture has emerged as a potential adsorbent of lead (II) ions from aqueous medium.
Lead is one of the most hazardous heavy metals which pollute biotic and ecosystems 1, 2. The entry- pathway of lead into the groundwater is both geochemical and anthropogenic. Owing to extraction of lead from its ore galena, association with other sulphide ores add to the contamination of groundwater. Anthropogenic activities such as paints, explosive and industries are a significant source of lead contamination in water. Lead enters the body through food chain and binds to proteins in the bloodstream causing kidney, brain and nerve damage 3. Lead pollutants have caused concern among the researchers all over the world to maintain environmental health 4. Amongst traditional methods of adsorption by biomass agriculture solid waste, bentonite has emerged as an eco- friendly low cost adsorbent for removal of lead (II) from aqueous medium 5, 6, 7. The increased adsorption potential of bentonite may be attributed to high surface area, cation exchange capacity and presence of mesophores as well as micropores. Bentonite mineral contains essentially a unit of montmorillonite unit confirmed by the blue colour test from benzidine, blue colour with paraphenylenediamine, red colour with orthophenylenediamine.
The surface area of bentonite may be increased by intercalation with cetyletrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) hexadeciletrimethyl ammonium bromide surfactant (HDTMA), amine functionalised groups and natural surfactants for greater adsorption potential 8. Cellulose has also the potential to adsorb toxic heavy metal so clay minerals modified with cellulose have also gained importance because of a number of groups on the surface.
2.1 Bentonite mineral has been procured from Barmer Rajasthan. Activated charcoal has been purchased from suppliers of Merck. Bentonite and activated charcoal mixed in the ratio of (I:1) by weight and stirred on mechanical shaker for homogeneous mixture. FTIR analysis was done by Perkins Elmer version 10.4 1 us. The XRD characterization was done by Brucker D8 advance.
TGA ,DTA was done using Perkin Elmer version (STA-6000) thermal analyser at a heating rate 10 degree per minute in N2 atmosphere .The surface morphology was done by SEM Analysis using ZEISS EVO- MA10,Germany .Calorimetric determination of SiO2 2 and Al 2O3 and the alizarin red –S complex has been done from UV Visible spectrophotometer Systronic 2203. The residual concentration of Pb(II) were known by induced couple plasma- atomic emission spectroscopy.
2.2.2 Batch adsorption studies of Pb2+ solution at different concentration was agitated at 200 RPM using magnetic shaker optics technology Delhi at various values 3-7 up to 15, 30, 60, 90 minutes.
The PH level was adjusted to the required level by addition of N / 2 HCl and (N/2) NaOH. After certain time intervals the used filter paper is dried and the powder mask was analysed for SEM and EDAX. The supernatant was analysed by UV double beam spectrophotometer model 2203 and the result were compared with the ICP-AES. Both the results are in good agreement with each other. Similar experiments were repeated with 2 gm and 3 gm of bentonite and bentonite charcoal mixture up to 15 minutes. The lead percent removal and uptake was evaluated by the formula given below
×V
% removal =
× 100
Where Ci= initial concentration
Ct = concentration at any time
V = volume in litres
M = mass in gram
Activated charcoal has OH groups on the surface [Gabriel, et al. 2020; O’Connell, et al.] Clay minerals have also OH- groups on its surface which makes it easier to be made tied with amino functional group 9. Bentonite minerals can also be modified with EDTA to remove Cu 2+ and Pb2+ 10. Thus EDTA modified bentonite can also be used as an effective adsorbent of heavy metals such as Pb and organic dyes. The activated charcoal has also been utilised for removal of toxic heavy metals 11. A mixture of bentonite and charcoal 1: 1 has been utilised in the present study for remediation of Pb2+ .The cation exchange capacity of bentonite ranges from 89 to 110 milli equivalent 100g- 14.The exchangeable cations are K+ Na+ and ca+2 12, 13. High cation exchange capacity along with presence of major mesopores and micropores have made it useful for industrial purposes 13. Bentonite minerals are characterised by PXRD, FTIR, TGA, DTA, and SEM 13, 14, 15. A weight loss of 16.384% in TGA confirms the presence of montmorillonite unit .The major oxides of bentonite minerals are Si and Al along with trace metals 16, 17. In view of abundance of bentonite minerals, low cost and sustainability, bentonite minerals as well as modified bentonite have emerged as the most useful method of reducing heavy metal pollution in general and Pb(II) in particular 18
A batch experiment has been done at different contact times such as 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 90 minutes (shown in Table 1). With increasing time, number of active sites of the absorbent come in contact with lead ions which contributed to the rapid uptake of Pb2+by bentonite and bentonite charcoal mixture. Several kinetic models including pseudo first order kinetics, pseudo 2nd order kinetics and intraparticle diffusion have been studied to see the best fit of experimental data. The adsorbed amount of lead ions has been measured. Amongst all the models, Langmuir model was the best fit for experimental data .The removal of lead by bentonite and bentonite charcoal mixture may be attributed to adsorption by bentonite as well as exchange.
3.2. Effect of Adsorbent DosesThe adsorbent doses have also been varied for determination of optimum condition. 2g and 3gof bentonite as well as bentonite charcoal mixture 1:1 have been treated with different initial concentrations and pH values with increased dose of adsorbent, availability of vacant sites increases leading to increased percent removal.
3.3. Effect of pHpH of solution is an important factor which affects the presence of ions on the binding surface leading to adsorption. The optimal pH has been determined by conducting the batch experiment at PH 3 and 8 with different initial concentrations of 50 ppm. The adsorbent used are pure bentonite and bentonite charcoal mixture (1:1).The increase in uptake of Pb2+ takes place with increasing pH .At low pH the repulsion between H+ ion in aqueous solution and Pb2+ in aqueous medium becomes prominent leading to reduced uptake of Pb2+ ions. At higher pH the amount of H+ in aqueous solution decreases leading to low Pb2+ uptake.
3.4. Adsorption Isotherms ModelFreundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms are frequently used to analyse the experimental data. Freundlich adsorption isotherm refers to multilayer adsorption whereas Langmuir refers to monolayer 19, 20. Elovich model of adsorption has also been analysed both for bentonite and bentonite charcoal mixture Thus linear fitting plots of Freundlich, Langmuir and Elovich isotherm models can be utilised to see the best fit of experimental data of adsorption 21, 22, 23. A comparison of the adsorption capacities of bentonite and bentonite activated charcoal mixture can be done for Pb2+ removal from aqueous medium. Despite the Freundlich isotherm is not the best fit, the adsorption process is favourable due to strong interaction between Pb2+ Ion and bentonite 24, 25, 26.
Figure 1a and 1b show TGA and DTA of bentonite mineral whereas Figure 2 and Figure 3 show XRD and FTIR respectively. Figure 4 represents percentage removal. Figure 5 and Figure 6 stand for Freundlich isotherm whereas Figure 7 and Figure 8 stand for pseudo first order reaction. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show linearity indicating that Langmuir adsorption isotherm is the best fit for experimental data. Intraparticle diffusion does not take place which becomes clear from Figure 11 and Figure 12. Figure 13 and Figure 14 clearly show that Elovich isotherm is not obeyed.
Conclusion: The studies concluded that bentonite was a potential adsorbent of Pb2+ from water. The removal percentage is 99.7 for an initial concentration of 50 ppm. The results showed that Langmuir adsorption isotherm was followed and first order kinetics fitted the experimental values.
Statement and Declarations: The authors do not have any financial or non-financial conflict of interest.
Funding Declaration: No fund had been provided by anybody for conducting the research.
Data availability declaration: We declare that all the concerned data have been incorporated and given below the Reference section. Thus all the data have been made available and the data is original and based on laboratory work.
Author Contribution declaration: All the three authors have contributed significantly.
Pallavi Kumari has done the laboratory work in the department. Dr. Ashok Kumar Jha prepared and supervised the manuscript. Dr. Usha Sharma helped in conducting analytical tests outside the laboratory.
All the data used in the manuscript are available with the author and will be provided when needed.
The authors do not have any conflict of interest
| [1] | A. L. Obsa, N.T. Shibeshi, E. Mulugeta, G. A. Workeneh, Results in Engineering, 21, 101756, (2024). 101756. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [2] | P.I. Sevak, B. K. Pushkar, P.N. Kapadne, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19(6), 4463-4488, (2021). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [3] | H.R. Rafiei, M. Shirvani, O. A. Ogunseitan, Applied water science, 6, 331-338, (2016). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [4] | E. Abu-Danso, S. Peräniemi, T. Leiviskä, T. Kim, K. M. Tripathi, A. Bhatnagar, Journal of hazardous materials, 381, 120871.381, Article, 120871, (2020). 10.1016|J.Jhanzmat.2019.120871. | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [5] | V. P. Dinh, P.T. Nguyen, M. C. Tran, A. T. Luu, N. Q. Hung, T. T. Luu, T. C. Nguyen, Chemosphere, 286, 131766, (2022). 10.1016|J.Chemosphere.2021. | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [6] | C. S. Araújo, I. L. Almeida, H. C. Rezende, S. M. Marcionilio, J. J. Léon, T. N. de Matos, Microchemical Journal, 137, 348-354, (2018). 10.1016/j.micro.2017.II.009. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [7] | A. Kumari, A. K. Jha, K. Kumari, Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 14(2), 937-948, (2021). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [8] | D. Sternik, A. Gładysz-Płaska, E. Grabias, M. Majdan, W. Knauer, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 129, 1277-1289 (2017). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [9] | S. Majumder, A. K. Jha, Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 19(5), 1847-1852, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [10] | M. L. F. A. De Castro, M. L. B. Abad, D. A. G. Sumalinog, R. R. M. Abarca, P. Paoprasert, M. D. G. de Luna, Sustainable Environment Research, 28(5), 197-205, (2018). 10.1016/u.serj.2018.04.001. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [11] | H. O. Chukwuemeka-Okorie, P. N. Ekemezie, K. G. Akpomie, C. S. Olikagu, Frontiers in chemistry, 6, 370062, (2018). 10.3389/tchem.2018.00273. | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [12] | A. K. Jha, B. Mishra, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 89(4), 519, (2012). | ||
| In article | |||
| [13] | A. K. Jha, A. K. Jha, A. K. Mishra, V. Kumari, B. Mishra, Asian journal of water, environment and pollution, 8(4), 93-96, (2011). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [14] | S. Majumder, A. K. Jha, Journal of Chemical Sciences, 132, 1-14, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [15] | S. Majumder,A. K. Jha, K. K. Mishra, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 97(9 B), 1604-1608, (2020). | ||
| In article | |||
| [16] | A. Gupta, M. Kumar, A. K. Jha, B. K. Mishra, J. Choudhary, B. Mishra, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23(12), 5491, (2011). | ||
| In article | |||
| [17] | A. K. Jha, R. Thakur, S. Verma, S. Sikdar, ES Materials & Manufacturing, 20, 840, (2023). | ||
| In article | |||
| [18] | A. K. Jha, Acta Scientific Agriculture, 4(12), 63-64, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [19] | S. Verma, A. K. Jha, P. Kumari, International Journal Of Chemical And Biochemical Sciences, 25(14), 548-552, (2024). | ||
| In article | |||
| [20] | A. A. Taha, M. A. Shreadah, A. M. Ahmed, H. F. Heiba, Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 4(1), 1166-1180, (2016). 10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.025. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [21] | U. Kumar, R. S. Singh, J. Mandal, A. K. Nayak, A. K. Jha, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 99(5), (2022). 100334. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [22] | T. Gabriel, A. Belete, F. Syrowatka, R. H. Neubert, T. Gebre-Mariam, International journal of biological macromolecules, 158, 1248-1258, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [23] | D. W. O’Connell, C. Birkinshaw,T. F. O’Dwyer, Bioresource technology, 99(15), 6709-6724, (2008). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [24] | F. Wang, Y. Pan, P. Cai, T. Guo, H. Xiao, Bioresource technology, 241, 482-490. (2017). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [25] | Y. Chen, Y. Long, Q. Li, X. Chen, X. Xu, International journal of biological macromolecules, 126, 107-117. (2019). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [26] | A. K. Jha, Journal J. Indian. Chem. Soc, 95, 35, (2018). | ||
| In article | |||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2025 Pallavi Kumari, Ashok Kumar Jha and Usha Sharma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
| [1] | A. L. Obsa, N.T. Shibeshi, E. Mulugeta, G. A. Workeneh, Results in Engineering, 21, 101756, (2024). 101756. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [2] | P.I. Sevak, B. K. Pushkar, P.N. Kapadne, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19(6), 4463-4488, (2021). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [3] | H.R. Rafiei, M. Shirvani, O. A. Ogunseitan, Applied water science, 6, 331-338, (2016). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [4] | E. Abu-Danso, S. Peräniemi, T. Leiviskä, T. Kim, K. M. Tripathi, A. Bhatnagar, Journal of hazardous materials, 381, 120871.381, Article, 120871, (2020). 10.1016|J.Jhanzmat.2019.120871. | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [5] | V. P. Dinh, P.T. Nguyen, M. C. Tran, A. T. Luu, N. Q. Hung, T. T. Luu, T. C. Nguyen, Chemosphere, 286, 131766, (2022). 10.1016|J.Chemosphere.2021. | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [6] | C. S. Araújo, I. L. Almeida, H. C. Rezende, S. M. Marcionilio, J. J. Léon, T. N. de Matos, Microchemical Journal, 137, 348-354, (2018). 10.1016/j.micro.2017.II.009. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [7] | A. Kumari, A. K. Jha, K. Kumari, Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 14(2), 937-948, (2021). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [8] | D. Sternik, A. Gładysz-Płaska, E. Grabias, M. Majdan, W. Knauer, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 129, 1277-1289 (2017). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [9] | S. Majumder, A. K. Jha, Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 19(5), 1847-1852, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [10] | M. L. F. A. De Castro, M. L. B. Abad, D. A. G. Sumalinog, R. R. M. Abarca, P. Paoprasert, M. D. G. de Luna, Sustainable Environment Research, 28(5), 197-205, (2018). 10.1016/u.serj.2018.04.001. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [11] | H. O. Chukwuemeka-Okorie, P. N. Ekemezie, K. G. Akpomie, C. S. Olikagu, Frontiers in chemistry, 6, 370062, (2018). 10.3389/tchem.2018.00273. | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [12] | A. K. Jha, B. Mishra, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 89(4), 519, (2012). | ||
| In article | |||
| [13] | A. K. Jha, A. K. Jha, A. K. Mishra, V. Kumari, B. Mishra, Asian journal of water, environment and pollution, 8(4), 93-96, (2011). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [14] | S. Majumder, A. K. Jha, Journal of Chemical Sciences, 132, 1-14, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [15] | S. Majumder,A. K. Jha, K. K. Mishra, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 97(9 B), 1604-1608, (2020). | ||
| In article | |||
| [16] | A. Gupta, M. Kumar, A. K. Jha, B. K. Mishra, J. Choudhary, B. Mishra, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23(12), 5491, (2011). | ||
| In article | |||
| [17] | A. K. Jha, R. Thakur, S. Verma, S. Sikdar, ES Materials & Manufacturing, 20, 840, (2023). | ||
| In article | |||
| [18] | A. K. Jha, Acta Scientific Agriculture, 4(12), 63-64, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [19] | S. Verma, A. K. Jha, P. Kumari, International Journal Of Chemical And Biochemical Sciences, 25(14), 548-552, (2024). | ||
| In article | |||
| [20] | A. A. Taha, M. A. Shreadah, A. M. Ahmed, H. F. Heiba, Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 4(1), 1166-1180, (2016). 10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.025. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [21] | U. Kumar, R. S. Singh, J. Mandal, A. K. Nayak, A. K. Jha, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 99(5), (2022). 100334. | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [22] | T. Gabriel, A. Belete, F. Syrowatka, R. H. Neubert, T. Gebre-Mariam, International journal of biological macromolecules, 158, 1248-1258, (2020). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [23] | D. W. O’Connell, C. Birkinshaw,T. F. O’Dwyer, Bioresource technology, 99(15), 6709-6724, (2008). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [24] | F. Wang, Y. Pan, P. Cai, T. Guo, H. Xiao, Bioresource technology, 241, 482-490. (2017). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [25] | Y. Chen, Y. Long, Q. Li, X. Chen, X. Xu, International journal of biological macromolecules, 126, 107-117. (2019). | ||
| In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [26] | A. K. Jha, Journal J. Indian. Chem. Soc, 95, 35, (2018). | ||
| In article | |||