Figures index

From

Parental Incentive and Student’s Performance in SAEB 2015 Portuguese Language Evaluation: Does Parental Incentive Compensate for Mean Differences by Sex?

Regina Albuquerque

American Journal of Educational Research. 2020, 8(7), 508-512 doi:10.12691/education-8-7-9
  • Figure 1. Distribution of students’ results on SAEB 2015 Portuguese Language Evaluation by gender. Source: INEP, 2019
  • Figure 2. Students' results distribution in the SAEB 2015 Portuguese Language Evaluation (Source: Produced by the author using SAEB 2015 data)
  • Figure 3. Distribution of student’s results according to parental incentive, considering mean scores across the country. The graph has as reference the value of 275 points that divides proficient to non-proficient students (Source: Produced by the author using SAEB 2015 data)
  • Figure 4. Distribution of the students' results with low NSE according to the degree of parental incentive, controlled by the student's gender. The graph has as reference the value of 275 points that divides proficient to non-proficient students (Source: Produced by the author using SAEB 2015 data)
  • Figure 5. Distribution of the students' results with moderate NSE according to the degree of parental incentive, controlled by the student's gender. The graph has as reference the value of 275 points that divides proficient to non-proficient students (Source: Produced by the author using SAEB 2015 data)
  • Figure 6. Distribution of the students' results with high NSE according to the degree of parental incentive, controlled by the student's gender. The graph has as reference the value of 275 points that divides proficient to non-proficient students (Source: Produced by the author using SAEB 2015 data)