Internet has undeniable role in people’s life and misuse of it may cause several problems. The present study has investigated the effect of internet usage on social isolation of under graduate students. Stratified random sampling techniques were used. 257 under graduate students studying at different college affiliated to Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University, Purulia, W.B., India were selected as sample. Social isolation questionnaire and internet usage scale were used to gather data from the samples. The data thus collected were analyzed using SPSS software (Version 17). The results indicate that high internet user are more socially isolated than that of average and low internet user whereas no significant difference exist on internet usage between humanities and science under graduate students. Pearson co-efficient of correlation between internet usage and social isolation is found to 0.326 indicating a positive relationship between the variables.
Social isolation may be recognized by the lack of mutual interaction with other peoples of the society and also determined by some situational factors like little social network, infrequent interaction and rare participation in social activities. It leads to depression 1, 2, psychological well being 3 and other social and cognitive impairments 4. In the present time pupils are suffering from social disconnectedness because they are busy in virtual world through high speed internet which is quite unnatural. Fast and easy access of internet is so attractive that human minds are highly hypnotized.
Now-a-day Internet served as important information and entertainment resource for adolescents 5 and serving substantial role in changing the social lives of the people 6. The people prefer to share information through online because of easy access of internet. The dependency of human being to this technology in such a short period of time created a new era in creating and transforming of the knowledge 7. Excessive use of Internet often affects close relationship 8, 9 and creates social problems 10. Sometimes Internet addicted individual fail to communicate well in face-to-face situations 11.
Presently social isolation is a very big issue and it influenced mainly by the excessive use of internet. Teenagers are not chatting face to face manner but prefer to chat through social networking site like facebook 12, 13. Parental bonding became weaker due to excessive use of internet 14, 15 that reduced interpersonal relationships. The social problem due to excessive use of Internet has now been under close scrutiny since its emergence. In view of the above, the Investigators tried to throw some rays on the effects of the Internet usage on people's social relations.
Seif et. al. 16 established positive correlation between loneliness and internet addiction for the student of Islamic Azad University. Izanloo and Goudarzi 17 found that excessive use of the Internet leads to social isolation and a reduction in social relations. Tiwari and Ruhela 18 determined that extent of social isolation for girls is higher that of boys counterpart. Malviya et. al. 19 found that 9.5% under graduate students of MGM Medical College, Indore are internet addicted while girls student are more addicted than that of boys students 20. Akhter 21 found that internet addiction has significantly negative relationship with academic performance of under graduate students. Various Researchers have found that socially isolated individuals tend to suffer from physical illness like higher rates of morbidity and mortality 22, 23, infection 24, 25 and blood pressure 26 as well as metal illness like depression 1, cognitive decline 4, stress 2, 26 and psychological well being 3. Social acceptance level also decreases with the increases of internet usage 27.
In order to conduct the investigation smoothly, following hypotheses has been framed:
H01: There is no significant difference exist between humanities and science under graduate students on social isolation.
H02: There is no significant difference exist among low, average and high internet user on social isolation.
H03: There is no significant interaction effect exist between stream of study and internet usage on social isolation
H04: There is no significant correlation exist between Internet dependency and social isolation of under graduate students
The population of this study is all the under graduate students having age range 18 to 21 years of Purulia districts, West Bengal, India.
4.2. Sample and SamplingSample is a part of the population and it is a representative of the population. 257 samples have been collected by stratified random sampling techniques as given in Table 1. Humanities sample includes the students of Bengali, English, Sanskrit, History, Anthropology , Pol. Science, etc department where as science sample includes the students os Physics, Chemsitry, Zoology, Mathematics department from affiliated colleges under Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University, Purulia, WB, India.
In order to collect the data following tools has been administered:
i. Social isolation questionnaire developed by the investigators: In order to measure the extent of social isolation, the Investigators framed a Likert type questionnaire with 44 statements having 23 positive and 21 negative items. The scale has been standardized by following standard procedure. The reliability of the scale was determined by calculating reliability coefficient on a sample of 600 under graduate students by split half-method and fund to 0.76. Cronbach’s alpha 28 co-efficient was found to 0.83. The alpha value greater than 0.70 typically connote acceptability of overall scale reliability 29, 30.
ii. Internet dependency scale: It is developed and standardized by Mahanti et. al. 31 containing 52 items with Cronchbach’s alpha 0.96, based on Young IAD test, intend to measure internet dependency of undergraduate students.
Survey was conducted with the help of Social Isolation scale and Internet Dependency Scale to collect primary data and to verify the hypotheses. Participants were invited to give response to those scales and requested to fill the data in the schedule.
Each descriptive statistics reduces lots of data into a simpler summary. Here we present our descriptive data (Table 2) in the form of mean and standard deviation (SD) along with ‘t’ critical ratio for social isolation.
Inferential statistics plays a pivotal role in hypothesis testing where it is used to determine if a null hypothesis can be rejected or retained. For the present study we have constructed a two way (2× 3) factorial design for the analysis of different variables (Table 3).
The mean scores of social isolation for humanities and science undergraduate student is 105.59 (S.D=18.36) and 104.20 (S.D=16.76) respectively. F- value for stream of study is found to be 3.16 (Table 3) which is less than critical F value at 0.01 level. Moreover, t-value for the pair of humanities and science under graduate students is found 0.54. Both the results are not significant at 0.01 level. This clearly indicates that H01 is accepted at 0.01 level.
7.2. Testing of H02Internet usage is classified into three category i.e. high, average and low internet user base on the norms determined by Mahanti et.al. 31. From Table 3 it is clear that F value for different level of internet usage is 5.51 at df (2, 251) which is significant at 0.01 level. In order to analysis further, three pairs of comparison i.e. high and average, high and low and average and low inter user are framed. ‘t’ critical ratio (Table 2) for high vs. average and high vs. low inter user are 3.65 and 3.21 respectively which are significant at 0.1 level. Thus, Ho2 is rejected at 0.01 level. Or in other words we can say extent of inter usage affects social isolation. The results corroborates with the findings of Nie 8 and Izanloo and Goudarzi 17.
7.3. Testing of H03F value from Table 3 for the interaction between stream of study and internet usage is 2.78 which is not significant even at 0.05 level. Hence, Ho3 is accepted.
7.4. Testing of H04Pearson co-efficient of correlation between social isolation and Internet usage is found 0.326 which is higher than that of critical value (r = 0.148 at df 255) at 0.01 level indicating a high correlation between these variables. Hence, Ho4 is accepted. The result corroborates with the findings of Seif et.al. 16, Izanloo and Goudarzi 17 Nalwa and Anand 32 and Atoum and Al-Hattab 33.
This study was a partially exploratory effort to measure the social isolation due to the excessive use Internet. The result shows that social isolation depends on extent of internet usage. High internet users are more socially isolated than that of average and low user. However, the study indicates that internet usage does not dependent in which stream they are studying. It is consistent with the findings of Prabhu 34. Moreover, a significant relationship was observed between social isolation and internet usage of undergraduate students. The results are consistent with the findings of Seif et.al 16, Izanloo and Goudarzi 17, Nalwa and Anand 32 and Kraut et al., 35. It may be argued that undergraduate students using internet excessively have lower social skills because they have no adequate time for social activities. Their poor communication skills also caused for poor self esteem, feelings of isolation and create additional problems in life, such as difficulties in working with groups, making presentations, or moving to social activities.
When a person does not receive any reinforcement and rewards neither from the community nor from his family, his/her interests and emotions are taken care by the internet and he/she prefers to use internet and maintains the virtual relationship. Hence, the person becomes more addicted to internet and resigns from the community. If the extent of social interaction increases, extent of internet usage may be decreases. Thus, strengthening of social relationships from family and friends by exchanging the thoughts and ideas is highly appreciated to reduce internet dependency of undergraduate students. Planning to prevent and solve this problem by authorities of educational affairs and promoting appropriate use of this technology in society are recommended. Success in solving this problem can help to reduce its negative consequences and proper use of this valuable technology.
[1] | Heikkinen, R., and Kauppinen, M. (2004). Depressive Symptoms in Late Life: A 10-year Follow-up, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 38, pp. 239-250. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[2] | Steptoe, A., Owen, N., Kunz-Ebrecht, S.R. and Brydon, L. (2004). Loneliness and Neuroendocrine, Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Stress Responses in Middle-aged Men and Women, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, pp. 593-611. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Cardak, M. (2013). Psychological Well-being and Internet Addiction among University Students, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(12), pp. 134-141. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Wilson, R.S., Krueger, K.R., Arnold, S.E., Schneider, J.A., Kelly, J.F., Barnes, L.L., Tang, Y., and Bennett, D.A. (2007). Loneliness and Risk of Alzheimer Disease, Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, pp. 234-240. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | Chou, C. and Peng, H. (2007). Net-friends: Adolescents’ Attitudes and Experiences vs. Teachers’ Concerns, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2394-2413. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. and Orr, R. (2009). Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | Sepehrian, F. and Lotf, J. J. (2011). The Rate of Prevalence in the Internet Addiction and Its Relationship with Anxiety and Students’ Field of Study, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10), pp. 1202-1206. | ||
In article | |||
[8] | Nie, N.H. (2001). Sociability, Interpersonal Relations and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings, American Behavioral Science, 45, pp. 420-35. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | Nie, N.H., and Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford Inst. Quant. Study Soc., Stanford, CA. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M. L., and Lester, D. (2007). Shyness, Internet use and personality. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10, pp. 713-716. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[11] | Leung, L. (2007). Stressful Life Events, Motives for Internet Use, and Social Support among Digital Kids, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(2), pp. 204-214. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[12] | Forest, A.L. and Wood, J.V. (2012). When Social networking is not working: individuals with low esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self disclosure on face book, Psychological Science, 23(3), pp. 295-302. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D. and Graham, L.T. (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Science, Perspective Psychological Science, 7(3), pp. 203-20. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[14] | Sanders, C., Field, T. F., Diego, M. and Kaplan, M. (2000). The Relationship of Internet Use to Depression and Social Isolation among Adolescents, Adolescence, 35 (138), pp 237-242. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[15] | Bhagat, G. and Sehgal, M. (2011). The Relationship of Parental Bonding and Internet Addiction, Indian Journal of Psychological Science, 2(2), pp. 29-37. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[16] | Seif, G.M., Hoseini, H.M., and Sharifi, A.R. (2014). The Relationship between Internet Addiction and Social Support and Hopefulness, World Scientific News, 5, pp. 1-11. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[17] | Izanloo, M., and Goudarzi, C. (2011). The Relationship between Internet Addiction and Social Isolation and Quality of Social Interaction, First Congress of Social Psychology, 1 & 2, pp. 37-40. | ||
In article | |||
[18] | Tiwari, P. and Ruhela, S. (2012). Social Isolation and Depression among Adolescent: A Comparative Perspective, Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, Singapore. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[19] | Malviya, A., Dixit, S., Shukla, H., Mishra, A., Jain, A. and Tripathi, A. (2014). A Study to Evaluate Internet Addiction Disorder among Students of a Medical College and Associated Hospital of Central India, National Journal of Community Medicine, 5, pp. 93-95. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[20] | Goel, D., Subramanyam A. and Kamath, R. (2013). A Study on the Prevalence of Internet Addiction and Its Association with Psychopathology in Indian adolescents, Indian journal of Psychology, 2(55), 140-143. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[21] | Akhtar, N. (2013). Relationship between Internet Addiction and Academic Performance among University Undergraduates, Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1793-1796. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[22] | Taylor, S.E., Repetti, R.L.and Seeman, T.E. (1979). Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annual Review of Psychology, 48 (411-447). | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[23] | Thoits, P. (1995). Stress, Coping and Social Support Processes: Where are We? What Next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, pp. 53-79. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[24] | Cohen, S., Doyle, W.J., Skoner, D.P., Rabin, B.S.and Gwaltney, J.M. (1997). Jr. Social Ties and Susceptibility to the Common Cold, Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, pp. 1940-1944. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[25] | Pressman, S.D., Cohen, S., Miller, G.E., Barkin, A., Rabin, B.S. and Treanor, J.J. (2005). Loneliness, Social Network Size, and Immune Response to Influenza Accination in College Freshmen, Health Psychology, 24, pp. 297–306. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[26] | L.C., Burleson, M.H., Berntson, G.G. and Cacioppo, J.T. (2003). Loneliness in Everyday Life: Cardiovascular Activity, Psychosocial Context and Health Behaviors, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, pp.105-120. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[27] | Askarizadeh, G., Amiri, A. and Karamoozian, M. (2015). The Relationship between Personality Traits and Social Acceptance Level and Internet Addiction, Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 4 (11), pp. 1129-1132. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[28] | Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297-334. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[29] | DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[30] | Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[31] | Mahanti, J., Mondal B.C. and Saha, B. (2016). Internet Dependency of Undergraduate Students: An Empirical Study, American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 15(2), pp. 171-174. | ||
In article | |||
[32] | Nalwa, K. and Anand, A. (2003). Internet Addiction in Students: A Cause of Concern, Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 6 (6). | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[33] | Atoum, A.U, and Al- Hattab, L.H (2015). Internet Addiction and its Relation to Psychosocial Adaptation among Jordanian High Basic Stage Students, Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 3(1), pp. 96-104. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[34] | Prabhu, P.S. (2016). Internet addiction among Arts and Science College Students, IOSR Journal Humanities and Social Science, 21(9), pp. 76-81. | ||
In article | |||
[35] | Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. and Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet Paradox : A Social technology That reduces social involvement and psychological well being, American Psychologst, 53(9), pp. 1017-1031. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2018 Sourav Chandra Gorain, Agamanai Mondal, Karim Ansary and Birbal Saha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | Heikkinen, R., and Kauppinen, M. (2004). Depressive Symptoms in Late Life: A 10-year Follow-up, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 38, pp. 239-250. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[2] | Steptoe, A., Owen, N., Kunz-Ebrecht, S.R. and Brydon, L. (2004). Loneliness and Neuroendocrine, Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Stress Responses in Middle-aged Men and Women, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, pp. 593-611. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[3] | Cardak, M. (2013). Psychological Well-being and Internet Addiction among University Students, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(12), pp. 134-141. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[4] | Wilson, R.S., Krueger, K.R., Arnold, S.E., Schneider, J.A., Kelly, J.F., Barnes, L.L., Tang, Y., and Bennett, D.A. (2007). Loneliness and Risk of Alzheimer Disease, Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, pp. 234-240. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | Chou, C. and Peng, H. (2007). Net-friends: Adolescents’ Attitudes and Experiences vs. Teachers’ Concerns, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2394-2413. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[6] | Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. and Orr, R. (2009). Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[7] | Sepehrian, F. and Lotf, J. J. (2011). The Rate of Prevalence in the Internet Addiction and Its Relationship with Anxiety and Students’ Field of Study, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10), pp. 1202-1206. | ||
In article | |||
[8] | Nie, N.H. (2001). Sociability, Interpersonal Relations and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings, American Behavioral Science, 45, pp. 420-35. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[9] | Nie, N.H., and Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford Inst. Quant. Study Soc., Stanford, CA. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M. L., and Lester, D. (2007). Shyness, Internet use and personality. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10, pp. 713-716. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[11] | Leung, L. (2007). Stressful Life Events, Motives for Internet Use, and Social Support among Digital Kids, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(2), pp. 204-214. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[12] | Forest, A.L. and Wood, J.V. (2012). When Social networking is not working: individuals with low esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self disclosure on face book, Psychological Science, 23(3), pp. 295-302. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D. and Graham, L.T. (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Science, Perspective Psychological Science, 7(3), pp. 203-20. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[14] | Sanders, C., Field, T. F., Diego, M. and Kaplan, M. (2000). The Relationship of Internet Use to Depression and Social Isolation among Adolescents, Adolescence, 35 (138), pp 237-242. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[15] | Bhagat, G. and Sehgal, M. (2011). The Relationship of Parental Bonding and Internet Addiction, Indian Journal of Psychological Science, 2(2), pp. 29-37. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[16] | Seif, G.M., Hoseini, H.M., and Sharifi, A.R. (2014). The Relationship between Internet Addiction and Social Support and Hopefulness, World Scientific News, 5, pp. 1-11. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[17] | Izanloo, M., and Goudarzi, C. (2011). The Relationship between Internet Addiction and Social Isolation and Quality of Social Interaction, First Congress of Social Psychology, 1 & 2, pp. 37-40. | ||
In article | |||
[18] | Tiwari, P. and Ruhela, S. (2012). Social Isolation and Depression among Adolescent: A Comparative Perspective, Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, Singapore. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[19] | Malviya, A., Dixit, S., Shukla, H., Mishra, A., Jain, A. and Tripathi, A. (2014). A Study to Evaluate Internet Addiction Disorder among Students of a Medical College and Associated Hospital of Central India, National Journal of Community Medicine, 5, pp. 93-95. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[20] | Goel, D., Subramanyam A. and Kamath, R. (2013). A Study on the Prevalence of Internet Addiction and Its Association with Psychopathology in Indian adolescents, Indian journal of Psychology, 2(55), 140-143. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[21] | Akhtar, N. (2013). Relationship between Internet Addiction and Academic Performance among University Undergraduates, Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1793-1796. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[22] | Taylor, S.E., Repetti, R.L.and Seeman, T.E. (1979). Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annual Review of Psychology, 48 (411-447). | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[23] | Thoits, P. (1995). Stress, Coping and Social Support Processes: Where are We? What Next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, pp. 53-79. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[24] | Cohen, S., Doyle, W.J., Skoner, D.P., Rabin, B.S.and Gwaltney, J.M. (1997). Jr. Social Ties and Susceptibility to the Common Cold, Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, pp. 1940-1944. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[25] | Pressman, S.D., Cohen, S., Miller, G.E., Barkin, A., Rabin, B.S. and Treanor, J.J. (2005). Loneliness, Social Network Size, and Immune Response to Influenza Accination in College Freshmen, Health Psychology, 24, pp. 297–306. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[26] | L.C., Burleson, M.H., Berntson, G.G. and Cacioppo, J.T. (2003). Loneliness in Everyday Life: Cardiovascular Activity, Psychosocial Context and Health Behaviors, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, pp.105-120. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[27] | Askarizadeh, G., Amiri, A. and Karamoozian, M. (2015). The Relationship between Personality Traits and Social Acceptance Level and Internet Addiction, Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 4 (11), pp. 1129-1132. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[28] | Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297-334. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[29] | DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[30] | Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[31] | Mahanti, J., Mondal B.C. and Saha, B. (2016). Internet Dependency of Undergraduate Students: An Empirical Study, American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 15(2), pp. 171-174. | ||
In article | |||
[32] | Nalwa, K. and Anand, A. (2003). Internet Addiction in Students: A Cause of Concern, Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 6 (6). | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[33] | Atoum, A.U, and Al- Hattab, L.H (2015). Internet Addiction and its Relation to Psychosocial Adaptation among Jordanian High Basic Stage Students, Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 3(1), pp. 96-104. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[34] | Prabhu, P.S. (2016). Internet addiction among Arts and Science College Students, IOSR Journal Humanities and Social Science, 21(9), pp. 76-81. | ||
In article | |||
[35] | Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. and Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet Paradox : A Social technology That reduces social involvement and psychological well being, American Psychologst, 53(9), pp. 1017-1031. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||