Experimental Study of Formation of Future Philologists’ Professional Competence by Means of Internet Technologies

Veiw figure View Table

2. Pedagogical Experiment and Its Results

Detection of effectiveness of the process of formation of future philologists’ professional competence by means of Internet technologies requires proper implementation of research, which is realized through the pedagogical experiment. The pedagogical experiment is a kind of the educational process, organized to observe the pedagogical phenomena under controlled conditions. According to O. E. Zhosan, the main features of the pedagogical experiment, which at the same time characterize its essence, are [3, p. 26]: a) making some changes in the educational process according to the plan and the research hypothesis; b) creating conditions in which one can clearly see the relationship between different aspects of the educational process; c) taking into account the results of the educational process and the formulation of definitive conclusions. In the study of the formation of future philologists’ professional competence two phases of pedagogical experiment were conducted: 1) ascertaining; 2) forming. For each of these phases the aim, the objectives and methods were defined.

2.1. Contents of the Ascertaining Phase of the Pedagogical Experiment

The objectives of the experimental work on the ascertaining phase of the pedagogical experiment is the selection of complex diagnostic procedures for: 1) identifying the prerequisites for using Internet technologies in the educational process by both teachers and students; 2) determination of the level of future philologists’ motivation to use Internet technologies in their learning activities; 3) defining the levels of formation of future philologists’ professional competence; 4) conducting the research using chosen diagnostic procedures.

880 students from different regions of Ukraine took part in the experiment.

In the ascertaining stage of the pedagogical experiment two phases are combined. The purpose of the first (founding) stage is the identification of prerequisites for the usage of Internet technologies by both teachers and students in the educational process, the analysis of theoretical and practical training of teachers and students to use Internet technologies. At the first phase of the ascertaining experiment questioning of both (teachers and students) as well as practical tasks were used.

The purposes of the second (diagnostic) phase of the pedagogical experiment are: 1) the determination of the level of students’ motivation to use Internet technologies in their learning activities; 2) the determination of the level of student’ motivation to learn foreign languages using Internet technologies. At the second stage such methods as questionnaires and interviews were used.

2.1.1. Statistical Analysis of the Results ofthe Ascertaining Experiment

One of the goals of the ascertaining experiment was to identify the prerequisites of usage of Internet technologies in the educational process with the help of questionnaires given to both teachers and students. The analysis of the questioning of teachers suggests that 76 per cent of the respondents have the opportunity to use a computer with access to the Internet in their professional activities, and 24 per cent of teachers do not have this opportunity.

The usage of Internet technologies in teaching a foreign language is considered to be prospective by 82 per cent of respondents. In their turn, 16 per cent of respondents reject the prospects of their usage, and the rest couldn’t answer this question. Usage of Internet technologies is considered to be the most effective in teaching reading (82 per cent) and writing (59 per cent of respondents). It is also noted that the usage of Internet technologies can be effective in teaching speaking (28 per cent) and listening (28 per cent). Namely in the formation of lexical skills, as 90 per cent of respondents consider, the usage of Internet technologies is considered to be the most effective.

A separate set of questions concerned the usage by teachers the opportunities of the Internet for teaching foreign languages. The results indicate that 50 percent of respondents use the Internet as a source of obtaining professional information. However, 50 per cent of respondents use e-mail. Accordingly, 38 per cent of teachers do not use any opportunities of the Internet. E-mail serves primarily to receive, exchange, distribute materials, articles, reports, theses, etc. (49 per cent). 46 per cent of teachers who participated in the questioning used e-mail as a means of communication with students and colleagues from Ukraine and abroad. Thus 27 per cent of the respondents are experiencing the need to communicate with students via the Internet. In their turn, 54 per cent of teachers do not feel such a need, and the rest (19 per cent) could not answer the question.

It is clear that the integration of Internet technologies into the educational process changes the teacher’s role. According to 47.3 per cent of respondents, the teacher acts as a facilitator. Accordingly, 47.3 per cent of respondents believe that the teacher acts as a consultant. However, 29.7 per cent of the teachers took the role of a leader, and 21.6 per cent – the role of an assistant. 29.7 per cent of respondents were unable to define the role of the teacher in the implementation of Internet technologies in the educational process.

The necessity of the existence of a personal website or webpage confirmed 27 per cent of teachers. In their turn, 54 per cent of respondents indicated that they had no such a necessity, and 19 per cent of respondents could not answer the question.

The teachers, who took part in the experiment, expressed their views on the problems that hinder the effective implementation of Internet technologies in the educational process. The most important ones include financial problems (lack of proper facilities, lack of public funding) and organizational-and-methodological problems (lack of teaching materials, the problem of training teachers and students to work in the Internet, etc.). Some technical and psychological problems (existence of psychological barriers, skepticism about the innovation , the lack of widespread access to the Internet, etc.) are also specified.

In this regard, 73 per cent of respondents expressed a desire to learn more about online resources for teachers of foreign languages and undergo training for improving the ability to use Internet technologies in professional activities (49 per cent).

As for questioning students, it was conducted with the purpose of: a) identification of opportunities for students to use a computer with access to the Internet in their learning activities; b) investigation the students’ opinion about the prospects of applying Internet technologies in teaching foreign languages; c) identification of the students’ need to communicate with teachers via the Internet; d) determining the students’ point of view on the necessity for teachers to have their own website or webpage.

The results of the questioning of students showed that 88 per cent of respondents have an opportunity to use a computer with access to the Internet in the learning process, but 12 per cent of students do not have this opportunity.

75 per cent of respondents consider the usage of Internet technologies in teaching foreign languages to be prospective. Consequently, 20 per cent of students denied this prospectiveness, and a small number of respondents (5 per cent) failed to answer this question.

The necessity to communicate with the teacher via the Internet experience about 38 per cent of the students, who participated in the questioning. In their turn, 54 per cent of respondents do not feel such a necessity. However, about 8 per cent of respondents did not express their point of view. Approximately the same results were fixed as for students’ opinions about the necessity for teachers to have their personal websites or webpages.

For teachers the corresponding figures are: a) the question on the usage of a computer with access to the Internet in the educational process (76 per cent – "yes", 24 per cent – "no"); b) the question on the prospects of e- learning in teaching foreign languages (82 per cent – "yes", 16 percent – "no", 2 per cent – "it’s difficult to answer"); c) the question on the need to communicate with students via the Internet (27 per cent – "yes" , 54 per cent – "no", 19% – "it’s difficult to answer").

The results are presented in the table (see Table 2).

Table 2. The Results of Questioning of Future Philologists Concerning Detection of Prerequisites for Usage of Internet Technologies in the Educational Process (the Ascertaining Experiment)

Download as

Veiw figure View Table

Among the respondents, who have an opportunity to use a computer with access to the Internet in their educational activities, teachers make up 46 per cent, but students – 54 per cent. However, among those who do not have this opportunity, 66.7 per cent – teachers, but 33.3 per cent – students. Among the respondents who consider the usage of Internet technologies in teaching foreign languages to be prospective, 52.2 per cent are teachers, but students – 47.8 per cent. In their turn, among respondents who feel the necessity to communicate via the Internet, teachers make up 41.5 per cent, but students – 58.5 per cent. Accordingly, those who consider such communication to be unnecessary, both teachers and students make up 50 per cent. Finally, among those who couldn’t answer that question, we recorded 70.4 per cent of teachers, but 29.6 per cent of students.

Heterogeneity, observed in the assessment of the same parameters by teachers and students, is caused by psychological, organizational, methodological, technical, financial and other factors.

Another aim of the ascertaining experiment was to determine by questioning the students the level of their motivation to the usage of Internet technologies in their learning activities. Evaluation of the significance of some of those reasons is performed by a seven-point scale (in ascending order of importance motif). According to the assessment scale, the levels of motivation were defined (see Table 3).

Table 3. The Results of Questioning of Future Philologists Concerning Detection of Prerequisites for Usage of Internet Technologies in the Educational Process (the Ascertaining Experiment)

Download as

Veiw figure View Table

The empirical data about the levels of motivation to the usage of Internet technologies in the training of future philologists at the stage of input control is shown in the table (see Table 4) and on the diagrams (see Figure 1).

Table 4. Levels of Motivation of Future Philologists to the Usage of Internet Technologies in the Learning Activities (the Ascertaining Experiment)

Download as

Veiw figure View Table

Figure 1. Levels of Motivation to Use Internet Technologies in the Training of Future Philologists at the Stage of Entrance Control

Download as

View current figure in a new window

Figures index

Veiw figure View Figure

View next figure

Analysis of the results of the ascertaining experiment is performed according to the following scheme:

a) the checking of the qualitative homogeneity of the groups under study (Wilcoxon’s test [^[1], p. 247]);

b) the finding of basic numerical characteristics of samples: 1) the sample mean (); 2) the variance () and the average deviation (); 3) the corrected variance () and the standard deviation (); 4) the accuracy of the assessment of the arithmetical mean (), 5) the confidence interval (). Calculations are performed according to the method from [^[1], p. 157, 181-187]);

c) the checking of normality of general populations (Pearson’s criterion [^[1], p. 251]);

d) the checking of the equality of general variances (Fisher-Snedekor's criterion [^[1], p. 207]);

e) the comparison of the average samples in the groups under study (Student’s test [^[1], p. 215]). The criterion for a given level α determines the significance of difference of the average samples in EG and CG. The criterion is used if normality of distribution of general populations and equality of their variances. This explains the presence of points c) and d) respectively in the research scheme.

After the conducted studying of students’ motivation to use Internet technologies in their learning activities the following results were obtained:

a) the homogeneity of samples (the qualitative homogeneity of groups under study) (Wilcoxon’s test [^[1], p. 249]):

1) the level of significance: .

2) the volume of samples: , (it is assumed that the first sample is less in volume);

3) The null hypothesis: the samples are homogeneous;

the competing hypothesis: the samples are non-homogeneous;

the critical area – double-sided;

4) The lower critical point:

we find in the table of Laplace’s function using the equation ([1, p. 389-390]). In our case, ,

5) The upper critical point:

6) The general variational series:

7) The observed value of the criterion (the sum of ordinal numbers of the first sample in the general variational series):

Since the observed value of the criterion does not exceed the critical area (), the null hypothesis of homogeneity of the sample is not refuted. CG and EG are qualitatively similar.

b) basic numerical characteristics:

1) the control group (CG – X):

(4.95, 5.25) – confidence interval.

2) the experimental group (EG – Y):

(4.91, 5.23) – CI.

c) the comparison of variance (Fisher-Snedekor's criterion):

1) the level of significance , the null hypothesis: variances are the same; the competing hypothesis: variances are different;

2) the observed value of the criterion (the relation of the greater corrected dispersion to smaller one):

3) the number of degrees of freedom:

4) the critical (tabular) value of the criterion:

Since the null hypothesis of homogeneity of variances is not refuted. The quality assessment is the same in both groups.

d) the comparison of the average sample (Student’s test):

1) the volume of samples, the sample mean, the variance corrected:

the number of degrees of freedom:

2) the observed value of the criterion:

3) the critical number of the criterion:

Since the average sample differs insignificantly.

Key figures of the CG and EG, regarding students’ motivation to use Internet technologies in their learning activities, are shown in the table (see Table 5).

Another objective of the ascertaining experiment was to determine the students’ motivation levels to the study of foreign languages using Internet technologies by means of questioning students. The grading scale and the levels of motivation are the same as in the previous case (see Table 2).

Table 5. Basic Indicators of Future Philologists’ Motivation to Learning Activities in CG and EG (the Ascertaining Experiment)

Download as

Veiw figure View Table

The empirical data about the levels of future philologists’ motivation to learn foreign languages by means of Internet technologies is shown in the table (see Table 6) and on the diagram (see Figure 2).

Table 6. Levels of Motivation of Future Philologists toStudying Foreign Languages by Means of Internet Technologies(the Ascertaining Experiment)

Download as

Veiw figure View Table

Figure 2. Levels of Future Philologists Motivation to Study Foreign Languages by Means of Internet Technologies at the Stage of Entrance Control

Download as

View current figure in a new window

Figures index

Veiw figure View Figure

View previous figure

After studying the students’ motivation to study foreign languages by means of Internet technologies the following results were obtained:

a) homogeneity of samples (qualitative homogeneity of groups under study):

The level of significance, the null and the competing hypotheses, the boundaries of the critical area are the same as in the study of levels of motivation to use Internet technologies in the training of future philologists.

1) The general variational series:

2) The observed value of the criterion:

3) the critical point:

Since the observed value of the criterion does not exceed the critical area (), the null hypothesis of homogeneity of the sample is not refuted. CG and EG are qualitatively similar.

b) basic numerical characteristics:

1) the control group (CG - X):

(4.84, 5.14) – confidence interval.

2) the experimental group (EG - Y):

(4.70, 5.00) – confidence interval.

c) the comparison of variance (Fisher-Snedekor's criterion):

The research methodology is the same as in the study of levels of motivation to use Internet technologies in the training of future philologists, that’s why the explanations are given very briefly.

1) the observed value of the criterion:

. The sample variances differ insignificant (accidentally).

d) comparison of the average sample (Student’s test):

1) the observed value of the criterion:

2) the critical number of the criterion:.

. The arithmetical mean differs insignificantly.

Key figures of CG and EG are shown in the table (see Table 7).

Table 7. Basic Indicators of Future Philologists’ Motivation to Learning Activities in CG and EG (the Ascertaining Experiment)

Download as

Veiw figure View Table