Figures index

From

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Impact of Climate Change on Lake Ontario Tributary

Sadik Ahmed, Ioannis Tsanis

American Journal of Water Resources. 2016, 4(1), 1-15 doi:10.12691/ajwr-4-1-1
  • Figure 1. Chicago storm of 24 hr 100 year for city of Mississauga IDF parameters
  • Figure 2. Hydrologic model schematic for Clearview Creek catchment
  • Figure 3. Geometric data schematic showing cross-section and culvert locations
  • Figure 4. Scatterplot of design storm depths calculated from observed data and NARCCAP future datasets
  • Figure 5. Difference between observed and NARCCAP future average storm depths for case 1
  • Figure 6. Difference between observed and NARCCAP future average storm depths for case 2
  • Figure 7. Difference between observed and NARCCAP future average storm depths for case 3
  • Figure 8. Box-plots of relative change calculated from observed and NARCCAP future storm depths
  • Figure 9. Comparison of CV of future storm depths for different return period and duration for case 1
  • Figure 10. Comparison of CV of future storm depths for different return period and duration for case 2
  • Figure 11. Comparison of CV of future storm depths for different return period and duration for case 3
  • Figure 12. Flow difference for observed and NARCCAP future average storms
  • Figure 13. Flows from observed and NARCCAP future average storms at hydrologic element 101 (outlet of the catchment)
  • Figure 14. Flows from observed and NARCCAP future average storms at hydrologic element 1003
  • Figure 15. Flows from observed and NARCCAP future average storms at hydrologic element 1005
  • Figure 16. Box-plots of relative change of flows from observed and NARCCAP future storm depths
  • Figure 17. CV of future storm depths and flows for 24 hour storms at hydrologic element 101 (outlet of the catchment)
  • Figure 18. CV of future storm depths and flows for 24 hour storms at hydrologic element 1003
  • Figure 19. CV of future storm depths and flows for 24 hour storms at hydrologic element 1005
  • Figure 20. Increase of W.S. elevation and top width (top left, top right, bottom left and bottom right represent station 2674, 357, 1465 and average of 45 stations) along the Creek
  • Figure 21. Flood line map for a section of Clearview Creek (orthophoto courtesy of the Credit Valley Conservation)
  • Figure 22. CV of storm depths, flows at outlet and average of flow areas at all cross-sections