Figures index

From

Comparative Fatigue Study of Age Hardening Al-alloys Under Residual Stress Effects

M. Benachour, N. Benachour, M. Benguediab

American Journal of Materials Science and Engineering. 2014, 2(1), 7-12 doi:10.12691/ajmse-2-1-2
  • Figure 1. Trues stress–strain curves of both Al-alloys
  • Figure 2. Sample of model analysis
  • Figure 3. Quarter of FE mesh with central hole
  • Figure 4. Stress contour for 7075 T6 at σp/σY: (a) 1.034; (b) 1.077
  • Figure 5. Stress contour for 2024 T351 at σp/σY: (a) 1.047; (b) 1.102; (c) 1.212 (d) 1.350
  • Figure 6. Residual stress along X-axis for 7075 T6
  • Figure 7. Residual stress along X-axis for 2024 T351
  • Figure 8. Effect of compressive residual stress and stress ratio on FCGRs of 7075 T6 Al-alloy
  • Figure 9. Plastic preload effect on stress ratio Reff for 7075 T6 Al-alloy
  • Figure 10. Plastic preload levels effect on FCGRs in 2024 T351 Al-alloy at R=0.25
  • Figure 11. Effect of preload levels on residual stress intensity factor Kr for 2024 T351 Al-alloy
  • Figure 12. Plastic preload effect on stress ratio Reff for 2024 T351 Al-alloy at R = 0.25