Effect of Combination between Methotrexate and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on Transplantable Tumor Model
Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, EgyptAbstract
Solid Ehrlich carcinoma is an undifferentiated tumor used in tumor studies. Methotrexate is an antimetabolite used in treatment of cancer, autoimmune diseases and induction of abortion. Valproic acid is used as anticonvulsant and is under investigation for treatment of cancer. The aim of this work was to study the effect of each of methotrexate and valproic acid alone and in combination on solid Ehrlich tumor in mice. Fifty albino mice were divided into five equal groups: Control untreated group, solid Ehrlich carcinoma, solid Ehrlich carcinoma + methotrexate, solid Ehrlich carcinoma + valproic acid, solid Ehrlich carcinoma + methotrexate + valproic acid. Tumor volume, tissue catalase, glutathione reductase, malondialdehyde, cholesterol and tumor necrosis factor-α were determined. A part of the tumor was examined for histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Methotrexate or valproic acid alone or in combination induced significant increase in tissue catalase and glutathione reductase with significant decrease in tumor volume, tissue malondialdehyde, cholesterol and tumor necrosis factor-α and alleviated the histopathological changes with significant increase in p53 expression and apoptotic index compared to solid Ehrlich carcinoma group. The combination of methotrexate and valproic acid has a better effect than each of methotrexate or valproic acid alone against solid Ehrlich tumor in mice.
At a glance: Figures
Keywords: methotrexate, histone deacetylase, tumor, mice
American Journal of Medicine Studies, 2014 2 (1),
pp 12-18.
DOI: 10.12691/ajms-2-1-2
Received November 29, 2013; Revised December 13, 2013; Accepted January 01, 2014
Copyright © 2013 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- Kabel, Ahmed M. "Effect of Combination between Methotrexate and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on Transplantable Tumor Model." American Journal of Medicine Studies 2.1 (2014): 12-18.
- Kabel, A. M. (2014). Effect of Combination between Methotrexate and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on Transplantable Tumor Model. American Journal of Medicine Studies, 2(1), 12-18.
- Kabel, Ahmed M. "Effect of Combination between Methotrexate and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on Transplantable Tumor Model." American Journal of Medicine Studies 2, no. 1 (2014): 12-18.
Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
1. Introduction
Solid Ehrlich tumor is an undifferentiated solid tumor that is frequently used in tumor studies. It is both used to develop a tumor model and in chemotherapy investigations [1]. Following subcutaneous injection of Ehrlich tumor cells, a tumor of 1 cm in diameter is obtained approximately within one week. This highly virulent tumor causes the death of almost 100 % of experimental animals in a short period. Large-scale virulence, quick development and infiltrative nature of the tumor reflect its high-grade malignancy [2].
Methotrexate (MTX) is an antimetabolite and antifolate used in treatment of cancer, autoimmune and as an abortifacient in induction of medical abortion [3]. MTX competitively inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme that catalyses the conversion of dihydrofolate to the active tetrahydrofolate. Folic acid is needed for DNA synthesis. MTX, therefore, inhibits the synthesis of DNA, RNA and proteins. MTX is cytotoxic during the S-phase of the cell cycle. So, it has a greater toxic effect on rapidly dividing cells (such as malignant and myeloid cells, gastrointestinal and oral mucosa), which replicate their DNA more frequently and thus inhibits growth and proliferation of these cells as well as causing many side effects [4].
Valproic acid (VPA) is a chemical compound that has found clinical use as an anticonvulsant and mood-stabilizing drug, primarily in treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and, less commonly, major depression. It is also used to treat migraine headaches and schizophrenia [5]. Recently, VPA is under investigation for treatment of HIV and various cancers [6]. VPA not only suppresses tumor growth and metastasis, but also induces tumor differentiation in vitro and in vivo. VPA increases the DNA binding of activating protein-1 transcription factor, downregulates protein kinase C activity, inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3b, activates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and blocks HDAC (histone deacetylase), causing hyperacetylation. These findings elucidate an important role of VPA for cancer therapy [7]. The aim of this work is to study the effect of each of MTX and VPA alone and in combination on solid Ehrlich tumor in mice.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Drugs Used• Methotrexate (Methotrexate 50 mg vial, Sanofi Aventis) was administered by intraperitoneal injection in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg body weight [8].
• Valproic acid (sodium salt; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in saline and administered by intraperitoneal injection in a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight [9].
2.2. Solid Ehrlich Carcinoma (SEC) Tumor ModelA model of SEC was used, where 1X106 of the Ehrlich carcinoma cells (ECC) obtained from the Pharmacology and Experimental Oncology Unit of the NCI, were implanted subcutaneously into the right thigh of the hind limb of mice. A palpable solid tumor mass (about 100mm3) was developed within 12 days [10].
2.3. Classification of AnimalsIn this study, we used 50 mice weighing about 20–25 g. All the experiments were conducted according to the National Research Council’s guidelines. Animal handling was followed according to Helsenki declaration of animal ethics. The animals were divided into 5 equal groups of ten mice each as follows:
Group (1): is the control untreated group.
Group (2): Ehrlich tumor cells were implanted subcutaneously into the right thigh of the hind limb of mice [10].
Group (3): MTX was given by intraperitoneal injection on alternate days one week before and continued for 3 weeks after subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells into the right thigh of the hind limb.
Group (4): VPA was given by intraperitoneal injection once daily one week before and continued for 3 weeks after subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells into the right thigh of the hind limb.
Group (5): VPA and MTX were given by intraperitoneal injection one week before and continued for 3 weeks after subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells into the right thigh of the hind limb.
2.4. Assessment of the Effects of Different Treatments on Tumor Volume (TV) of SECTumor volume was measured on days 12,14,16,18,20 and 22 after implantation of ECC cells using a Vernier caliper (Tricle Brand, Shanghai, China). The following formula was used to calculate the volume of the developed tumor mass [11]:
Where A is the minor tumor axis; B the major tumor axis and π equals to 3.14.
At the end of the study, all mice were sacrificed. The tumor was excised and divided into two portions: one for homogenization and the other for histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. The tumor was homogenized for determination of tissue catalase according to the method described by Higgins et al. [12], tissue malondialdehyde according to Uchiyama & Mihara [13], tissue glutathione reductase according to the method of Manso & Wroblewski [14], tissue cholesterol using kits obtained from Biodiagnostic Co. according to the method of Richmond [15] and tissue tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) using mouse TNF-α ELISA kits supplied by RayBiotech, Inc. according to Luster & Rothenberg [16]. The SEC sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and apoptotic indices were determined [17]. Immunohistochemical staining of p53 in formaline-fixed, paraffin embedded SEC sections was done, using Zymed’s 2nd generation kit (Histostain®-Plus Kit) that utilizes the labeled streptavidin-biotin (LAB-SA) staining methodology (Zymed Laboratories Inc., Carlton Court, south San Francisco, CA.). Positive nuclei for p53 accumulation stained brown. The tumor was considered to be p53-positive if more than 10% of cells showed positive staining. The number of cells showing nuclear accumulation of p53 in positive tumors was expressed as follows: (++++): the largest number of cells showing positive nuclear staining for p53; (+++): intermediate number of p53-positive cells; (++): indicates lower number of cells with p53-stained nuclei [18].
3. Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as mean ± SEM, data were analyzed by one way analysis of normality of variance (ANOVA) using student t-test, differences between the means of different groups were considered significant at a level of p> 0.05.
4. Results
- Subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells into the right thigh of the hind limb of mice resulted in significant decrease in tissue catalase and tissue glutathione reductase with significant increase in tissue MDA, tissue cholesterol and tissue TNF-α compared to the control untreated group (Table 2, Figure 1).
- Intraperitoneal administration of MTX &/or VPA to mice resulted in significant increase in tissue catalase and tissue glutathione reductase with significant decrease in tumor volume, tissue MDA, tissue cholesterol and tissue TNF-α compared to the group that received subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells (Table 2, Figure 1).
Histopathological findings:
- Subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells resulted in development of Ehrlich solid tumor showing sheets of small, higher chromatophilic tumor cells of variable shape representing cell proliferation surrounding areas of necrosis and differentiated cells (Figure 2) with negative staining for p53 (Figure 3). This picture was significantly improved in mice given MTX &/or VPA as evidenced by increasing degrees of necrosis (Figure 2), progressively increasing apoptotic indices (4.7 ± 0.29, 3.6 ± 0.37 and 5.1± 0.41% respectively) (Table 1) and increased expression of p53 (Figure 3).
Table 2. Effect of different treatments on Tissue catalase, glutathione reductase, MDA, cholesterol and TNF-α in the studied groups
5. Discussion
Ehrlich carcinoma is an undifferentiated carcinoma that is originally hyperdiploid, has high transplantable capability, no-regression, rapid proliferation, short life span, 100% malignancy and also does not have tumor-specific transplantation antigen. Ehrlich carcinoma has a resemblance with human tumors which are the most sensitive to chemotherapy due to the fact that it is undifferentiated and has a rapid growth rate [19]. Following implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells, morphological and metabolic changes occur such as structural deterioration, decreased number of mitochondria, decreased DNA and RNA synthesis, loss of intracellular purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, nucleosides and bases, a decline of ATP concentration and turnover, decreased protein synthesis, decreased glutathione concentration and increased triglycerides, cholesterol esters and free fatty acids [20].
In the present study, subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells into the right thigh of the hind limb of mice resulted in significant decrease in tissue catalase and tissue glutathione reductase with significant increase in tissue MDA, tissue cholesterol and tissue TNF-α compared to the normal control group. These results were in agreement with Badr El-Din [21] and Zahran et al. [22]. A number of studies had indicated that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in a variety of different cellular processes ranging from apoptosis and necrosis to cell proliferation and carcinogenesis. In fact, molecular events, such as induction of cell proliferation, decreased apoptosis, and oxidative DNA damage have been proposed to be critically involved in carcinogenesis [23]. It was reported that during cancer growth, glutathione redox (GSH/GSSG) decreases in the blood of Ehrlich tumor–bearing mice. Glutathione reductase accounts for a very high GSH/GSSG ratio. The decrease in glutathione reductase activity in tissues correlated well with the decrease in G6PDH activity, decreased production of NADPH and the depletion of GSH content [24]. Cancer cells overexpress HMG-CoA reductase enzyme which is responsible for cholesterol synthesis. Ehrlich carcinoma had been characterized by increase cellular content of triglycerides and cholesterol esters [19]. The chemopreventive activity of statins against cancer is suggested to depend on inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and, thereby, cell growth [25]. TNF- α has been found to have a pro-cancerous effect. TNF-α produced by tumor cells or inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment can promote tumor cell survival through the induction of genes encoding nuclear factor-kB–dependent antiapoptotic molecules [26]. In a mouse skin model, TNF-α induces carcinogenesis. Furthermore, gene polymorphisms that increase or decrease TNF-α production confer either an increased risk or protective effect on a number of different cancers and precancerous diseases including gastric cancer, lymphoma and cervical cancer as well as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Moreover, in murine models, TNF-α promoted metastasis, tumor angiogenesis and cachexia. Trials with anti-TNF-α therapies are awaited to block this cytokine in patients with cancer [27].
Methotrexate (MTX) is an antimetabolite and antifolate drug which acts by inhibiting the metabolism of folic acid. It is known as a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), because it not only decreases pain and swelling of arthritis, but also can decrease damage to joints and long-term disability. It interferes with growth of certain body cells, especially cells that reproduce quickly, such as cancer cells, bone marrow cells and skin cells. It is used to treat certain types of cancer of the breast, skin, head and neck. It is also used to treat severe psoriasis [28].
In the present study, intraperitoneal administration of MTX to mice resulted in significant increase in tissue catalase and tissue glutathione reductase with significant decrease in tumor volume, tissue MDA, tissue cholesterol and tissue TNF-α and alleviated the histopathological changes with significant increase in the expression of p53 and apoptotic index compared to the group that received subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells. These results were in accordance with Srikanth et al. [8]. MTX is thought to affect cancer by two different pathways. It allosterically inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme that participates in the tetrahydrofolate synthesis. The affinity of MTX for DHFR is about one thousand-fold that of folate. DHFR catalyses the conversion of dihydrofolate to the active tetrahydrofolate. Folic acid is needed for the de novo synthesis of the nucleoside thymidine, required for DNA synthesis. Also, folate is needed for purine base synthesis, so all purine synthesis will be inhibited. So, MTX inhibits the synthesis of DNA, RNA, thymidylates and proteins. MTX acts specifically during DNA and RNA synthesis and so it is cytotoxic during the S-phase of the cell cycle [28]. Basak et al. [29] reported that the cytotoxic effect of MTX is associated with apoptosis enhancement, as it may be related to hyperhomocysteinemia and deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalances. Moreover, Winter-Vann et al. [30] suggested that MTX has an inhibitiory effect on Ras signaling that regulates cell growth and differentiation. Because carboxyl methylation of Ras is important for proper plasma membrane localization and function, they reported that after MTX treatment, Ras methylation was decreased by almost 90% and subsequently inhibition of carboxyl methylation. Sung et al. [31] reported that MTX suppressed the interleukin-6 induced generation of ROS and so has a protective effect against tissue damage induced by oxidative stress. Moreover, MTX blocks tetrahydrofolate dependent steps in cell metabolism resulting in adenosine overproduction which inhibits TNF-α expression in a monocytic cell line and monocytes release adenosine after treatment with MTX [32]. Schnyder et al. [33] reported that application MTX to breast cancer produced significant decrease of total cholesterol which may be due to an inhibition of cholesterol synthesis depriving the tumor of the optimal amounts of cholesterol needed for cell division.
Valproic acid (VPA), a well known anticonvulsive agent, emerged as an antineoplastic agent as well, when findings indicated that VPA inhibited proliferation and induced differentiation of primitive neuroectodermal tumor cells in vivo [7]. In the present study, intraperitoneal administration of VPA to mice resulted in significant increase in tissue catalase and tissue glutathione reductase with significant decrease in tumor volume, tissue MDA, tissue cholesterol and tissue TNF-α and alleviated the histopathological changes with significant increase in the expression of p53 and apoptotic index compared to the group that received subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells.
The antitumor effects of VPA were attributed to that it is one of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors [7]. HDACs regulate the expression and activity of numerous proteins involved in both cancer initiation and cancer progression. HDACs bind to and deacetylate a variety of cellular proteins including transcription factors implicated in control of cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis [34]. It was suggested that VPA inhibits the proliferation of malignant tumor cells by a mechanism tightly coupled with HDAC. It was reported that VPA down-regulates HDAC-activity in neuroblastoma cells and so has antitumor activity [35].
Fourcade et al. [36] reported that VPA corrected the oxidative damage and decreased the levels of monounsaturated very long chain fatty acids and induced antioxidant effects in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Glauben et al. [37] demonstrated that HDAC inhibitors including VPA suppressed cytokine production (Including TNF-α) and induced apoptosis and histone acetylation which reduced the risk of malignancies. VPA significantly suppressed mRNA levels of interferon-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-17 in the lymph nodes and greatly attenuated accumulation of macrophages, T cells and B cells in experimental autoimmune neuritis [38].
Other studies reported that VPA is a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis either directly by interfering with endothelial cells or indirectly by modulating tumor cells. VPA supressed the production of angiogenesis-related growth factors. Application of VPA to the colon adenocarcinoma not only led to a significant reduction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, but also to a down-regulation of protein expression as well as VEGF coding mRNA [39]. Moreover, VPA was found to modulate the MAP kinase pathway which plays an important role in the development of cancer, an effect that could be mediated through HDAC inhibition [40]. Additionally, Beger et al. [41] reported that VPA inhibited glycogen and RNA ribose turnover and disrupted glucose-derived cholesterol synthesis in mice which will deprive the tumor from cholesterol which is needed for tumor growth. Also, HDAC inhibitors were proven to reduce cholesterol accumulation in fibroblasts [42].
In the present study, intraperitoneal administration of MTX concomitantly with VPA resulted in significant increase in tissue catalase and tissue glutathione reductase with significant decrease in tumor volume, tissue MDA, tissue cholesterol and tissue TNF-α and alleviated the histopathological changes with significant increase in the expression of p53 and apoptotic index compared to the group that received subcutaneous implantation of Ehrlich tumor cells. This can be explained by the combined anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effect of MTX and VPA with their abilities to protect against the harmful effects of ROS, deprive the tumor of the optimal amounts of cholesterol needed for cell division and induction of apoptosis.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the combination of MTX and VPA has a better effect than each of MTX or VPA alone against Ehrlich solid tumor in mice.
Acknowledgement
Many thanks to Dr. Mohamed El-Rasheedy, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, , for his valuable help and revising the pathological study.
References
[1] | Silva LA, Nascimento KA, Maciel MC, Pinheiro MT, Sousa PR, Ferreira SC, et al: Sunflower Seed Oil-Enriched Product Can Inhibit Ehrlich Solid Tumor Growth in Mice. Chemotherapy 2006; 52: 91-94. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[2] | Sakai M, Ferraz-de-Paula V, Pinheiro ML, Ribeiro A, Quinteiro-Filho WM, Rone MB, et al.: Translocator protein (18 kDa) mediates the pro-growth effects of diazepam on Ehrlich tumor cells in vivo. Euro J Pharmacol 2010; 626 (2-3): 131-138. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[3] | Mol F, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ: Current evidence on surgery, systemic MTX and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14 (4): 309-19. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[4] | Kabel AM, Abdel-Rahman MN, El-Sisi AE, Haleem MS, Ezzat NM, El Rashidy MA: Effect of atorvastatin and methotrexate on solid Ehrlich tumor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013; 713(1-3):47-53. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[5] | Perucca E: Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of valproate: a summary after 35 years of clinical experience. CNS Drugs 2002; 16 (10): 695-714. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[6] | Sagot-Lerolle N, Lamine A, Chaix ML, Boufassa F, Aboulker JP, Costagliola D, et al.: Prolonged valproic acid treatment does not reduce the size of latent HIV reservoir. AIDS 2008; 22 (10): 1125-29. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[7] | Blaheta RA, Michaelis M, Driever PH, Jr JC: Evolving Anticancer Drug Valproic Acid: Insights into the Mechanism and Clinical Studies. Medicinal Research Reviews 2005; 25(4): 383-397. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[8] | Srikanth K, Debnath B, Nayak SS, Tarun JHA: Enhanced regression of tumors in mice with combined chemotherapy & immunotherapy. Ind J Pharmacol 2002; 34: 172-177. | ||
In article | |||
[9] | Basselin M, Chang L, Chen M, Bell JM, Rapport S: Chronic administration of valproic acid reduces brain NMDA signaling via arachidonic acid in unanesthetized rats. Neurochem Res 2008; 33(11): 2229-2240. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[10] | Osman A, Sayed-Ahmed M, Khayyal M, El Merzebani M: Hyperthermic potentiation of cisplatin on solid Ehrlich carcinoma. Tumori 1993; 79: 268-72. | ||
In article | |||
[11] | Attia M, Weiss DW: Immunology of spontaneous mammary carcinomas in mice infected with mammary tumor virus. Cancer Res 1966; 26:1787-800. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[12] | Higgins CP, Bachner R, McCallister J: Polymorpho-nuclear leukocyte species differences in the disposal of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1978; 158: 478-481. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[13] | Uchiyama M, Mihara M: Determination of malondialdehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal Biochem 1979; 86: 271-278. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
[14] | Manso C, Wroblewski F: Glutathione reductase activity in blood and body Fluids. J Clin Investigation 1958; 37: 214-218. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[15] | Richmond W: Preparation and properties of a cholesterol oxidase from Nocardia sp and its application to the enzymatic assay of total cholesterol in serum. Clin Chem 1973; 19 (12): 1350-1356. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[16] | Luster AD, Rothenberg ME: Role of the monocyte chemoattractant preotein ane eotaxin subfamily chemokines in allergic inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 1997; 62:620. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[17] | Sarraf CE, Bowen ID: Kinetic studies on murine sarcoma and an analysis of apoptosis. Br J Cancer 1988; 54: 989-98. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
[18] | Manne U, Weiss HL, Myers RB, Danner OK: Nuclear accumulation of p53 in colorectal adenocarcinomas: prognostic importance differs with race and location of tumor. Cancer 1998; 83: 2456-67. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
[19] | Ozaslan M, Karagoz ID, Kilic IH, Guldur ME: Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. Afr J Biotechnol 2011; 10(13): 2375-2378. | ||
In article | |||
[20] | Segura JA, Ruiz-Bellido MA, Arenas M, Lobo C, Marquez J, Alonso FJ: Ehrlich Ascites Tumor Cells Expressing Anti-Sense Glutaminase RNA Lose Their Capacity to Evade the Mouse Immune System. Int J Cancer 2001; 91: 379-384. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
[21] | Badr El-Din NK: Protective role of sanumgerman against γ-irradiation–induced oxidative stress in Ehrlich carcinoma-bearing mice. Nutrition Research 2004; 24: 271-291. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
[22] | Zahran MA, Salem TA, Samaka RM, Agwa HS, Awad AR: Design, synthesis and antitumor evaluation of novel thalidomide dithiocarbamate and dithioate analogs against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma-induced solid tumor in Swiss albino mice. Bioorg Med Chem 2008; 16(22): 9708-9718. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[23] | Matés JM, Segura JA, Alonso FJ, Márquez J: Intracellular redox status and oxidative stress: implications for cell proliferation, apoptosis, and carcinogenesis. Arch Toxicol. 2008; 82(5): 273-99. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[24] | Sarkar S, Yadav P, Bhatnagar D: Effect of cadmium on glutathione metabolism and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in rat tissues: role of vitamin E and selenium. Trace Elem Electrol 1998; 15: 101-105. | ||
In article | |||
[25] | Takahashi HK, Nishibori M: The antitumor activities of statins. Curr Oncol 2007; 14 (6): 246-247. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[26] | Luo JL, Maeda S, Hsu LC, Yagita H, Karin M: Inhibition of NF-κB in cancer cells converts inflammation-induced tumor growth mediated by TNF- α to TRAIL-mediated tumor regression. Cancer Cell 2004; 6: 297-305. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[27] | Waterston A, Bower M: TNF and cancer: good or bad?. Cancer Therapy 2004; 2:131-148. | ||
In article | |||
[28] | Ravi R, Zhiquan Z, Lynn MC, Mary D,Benkovic SJ, Hammes G: Interaction of dihydrofolate reductase with MTX: Ensemble and single-molecule kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2002; 99 (21): 13481-6. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[29] | Basak C, Andeerea KL, Qing W, Rima R: Methotrexate-induced apoptosis is enhanced by altered expression of methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase. Anti- Cancer Drugs 2009; 20: 787-793. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[30] | Winter-Vann AM, Kamen BA, Bergo MO, Young SG, Melenyk S, James SJ, et al.: Targeting Ras signaling through inhibition of carboxyl methylation: an unexpected property of methotrexate. PNAS 2003; 100: 6529-6234. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[31] | Sung JY, Hong JH, Kang HS, Choi I, Lim SD, Lee JK, et al.: Methotrexate suppresses the interleukin-6 induced generation of reactive oxygen species in the synoviocytes of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunopharmacology 2000; 47: 35-44. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
[32] | Cutolo M, Sulli A, Pizzorni C, Seriolo B: Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 729-735. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[33] | Schnyder B, Drexel J, Sauter C: Influence of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil on serum cholesterol (Meeting abstract). ASCO Annual Meeting 1996; No. 312. | ||
In article | |||
[34] | Glozak MA, Seto E: Histone deacetylases and cancer. Oncogene 2007; 26: 5420-5432. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[35] | Cinatl J, Kotchetkov R, Blaheta R, Driever PH, Vogel JU, Cinatl J: Induction of differentiation and suppression of malignant phenotype of human neuroblastoma BE(2)-C cells by valproic acid: Enhancement by combination with interferon-alpha. Int J Oncol 2002; 20:97-106. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[36] | Fourcade S, Ruiz M, Guilera C, Hahnen E, Brichta L, Naudi A, et al.: Valproic acid induces antioxidant effects in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Human Molecular Genetics 2010; 19 (10): 2005-2014. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[37] | Glauben R, Batra A, Fedke I, Zeitz M, Lehr HA, Leoni F, et al.: Histone Hyperacetylation Is Associated with Amelioration of Experimental Colitis in Mice. J Immunol 2006; 176:5015-5022. | ||
In article | PubMed | ||
[38] | Zhang Z, Zhang ZY, Fauser U, Schluesener HJ: Valproic acid attenuates inflammation in experimental autoimmune neuritis. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65: 4055-4065. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[39] | Zgouras D, Becker U, Loitsch S, Stein J: Modulation of angiogenesis-related protein synthesis by valproic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;316: 693-697. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[40] | Gurvich N, Tsygankova OM, Meinkoth JL, Klein PS: Histone deacetylase is a target of valproic acidmediated cellular differentiation. Cancer Res 2004;64: 1079-1086. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[41] | Beger RD, Hansen DK, Schnackenberg LK, Cross BM, Fatollahi J, Lagunero FT, et al.: Single valproic acid treatment inhibits glycogen and RNA ribose turnover while disrupting glucose-derived cholesterol synthesis in liver as revealed by the [U-13C6]-d-glucose tracer in mice. Metabolomics 2009; 5(3): 336-345. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||
[42] | Pipalia NH, Cosner C, Huang A, Chatterjee A, Bourbon P, Farley N, et al.: Histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment dramatically reduces cholesterol accumulation in Niemann-Pick type C1 mutant human fibroblasts. PNAS 2011; 108(14): 5620-5625. | ||
In article | CrossRef PubMed | ||