Figures index

From

Selection of a Significant Numerical Model of Plasticity for the Purpose of Numerical Analysis of Plastic Reinforcement

Jozef Bocko, Ingrid Delyová, Peter Sivák, Marián Tomko

American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2017, 5(6), 334-340 doi:10.12691/ajme-5-6-21
  • Figure 1. Surfaces of the plasticity for the von Mises and Tresca's criteria of plasticity
  • Figure 2. Deviatoric sections for the von Mises and Tresca's criteria of plasticity
  • Figure 3. Biaxial stress for the von Mises and Tresca's criteria of plasticity
  • Figure 4. Model and the real specimen HS 001/17
  • Figure 5. Model and the real specimen HS 002/17
  • Figure 6. Load-deformation (tensile) diagram of the specimen HS 001/17
  • Figure 7. Load-deformation (tensile) diagram of the specimen HS 002/17
  • Figure 8. Stress-strain curve of the S355J2C+N
  • Figure 9. Stress-strain curve of the 42CrMo4
  • Figure 10. Finite element network, boundary conditions and load of virtual models of the specimens HS 001/17 and HS 002/17
  • Figure 11. Result of simulation for HS 001/17 and the von Mises model
  • Figure 12. Result of simulation for HS 002/17 and the von Mises model
  • Figure 13. Virtual stress-strain diagram for HS 001/17 and the von Mises model
  • Figure 14. Virtual Stress-strain diagram for HS 002/17 and the von Mises model
  • Figure 15. Result of simulation for HS 001/17 and Tresca model
  • Figure 16. Result of simulation for HS 002/17 and Tresca model
  • Figure 17. Virtual stress-strain diagram for HS 001/17 and Tresca model
  • Figure 18. Virtual stress-strain diagram for HS 002/17 and Tresca model
  • Figure 19. Comparison of the experimental and numerical analysis results - von Mises (HS 001/17)
  • Figure 20. Comparison of the experimental and numerical analysis results - von Mises (HS 002/17)
  • Figure 21. Comparison of the experimental and numerical analysis results - Tresca (HS 001/17)
  • Figure 22. Comparison of the experimental and numerical analysis results - Tresca (HS 002/17)