Figures index

From

The Extension of the QL Method to Solve the Radiative Heat Transfer Problem in a 3D Square Enclosure Containing Non-grey Gas

Pedram Tazraei

American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2016, 4(2), 71-81 doi:10.12691/ajme-4-2-5
  • Figure 1. Result of the first case: the radiative source term between two infinite parallel surfaces
  • Figure 2. (a) The geometry of the second and third test cases and (b) the radiative source term along the midsection of the enclosure for the second case and (c) the radiative flux on the left wall of the enclosure for the second case
  • Figure 3. Results of the third case (a) the radiative source term along the midsection of the enclosure and (b) the radiative flux on the left wall of the enclosure
  • Figure 4. Results of the forth case; the radiative source term along (a) along the centerline (x=1m, y=1m, z) and (b) along (x, y=1m, z=0.24m)
  • Figure 5. Results of the fifth case (a) the radiative source term along the centerline (x=1m, y=1m, z) and (b) the radiative flux along the line (x=2m, y=1m, z)
  • Figure A1. (a) A 3D control volume with 24 integration points, (b) neighbor nodal points and auxiliary coordinates around ip=2, (c) neighbor nodal points and auxiliary coordinates around ip=12, (d) a 3D control volume with 6 integration points, (e) a 2D control volume with 4 integration points, (f) a 1D control volume with 2 integration points and (g) a 2D boundary control volume
  • Figure A2. Solution algorithm
  • Figure A3. The effect of number of integration points for a 2D problem (a) κH=10 and (b) κH=0.1
  • Figure A4. The effect of number of integration points for a 3D problem (a) the incident radiation in a cubic enclosure at z=0.5m (b) the heat flux in an ideal furnace at (x, y=1m, z=2m)