Figures index

From

The Printed Patterns Investigation for the Purposes of Deformation Analysis Performed by Digital Image Correlation System

Martin Hagara, Martin Schrötter

American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2013, 1(7), 185-189 doi:10.12691/ajme-1-7-6
  • Figure 1. Configuration of the 3-D correlation system with investigated patterns bonded on a flat specimen
  • Figure 2. Pattern1 captured by the reference camera and its histogram
  • Figure 3. Pattern2 captured by the reference camera and its histogram
  • Figure 4. Pattern3 captured by the reference camera and its histogram
  • Figure 5. Dependence of the mean value of the approximated error radius of the pattern 1 on the facet size by the use of three different calibration files
  • Figure 6. Dependence of the maximal value of the approximated error radius of the pattern 1 on the facet size by the use of three different calibration files
  • Figure 7. Dependence of the mean value of the approximated error radius of the pattern 2 on the facet size by the use of three different calibration files
  • Figure 8. Dependence of the maximal value of the approximated error radius of the pattern 2 on the facet size by the use of three different calibration files
  • Figure 9. Dependence of the mean value of the approximated error radius of the pattern 3 on the facet size by the use of three different calibration files
  • Figure 10. Dependence of the maximal value of the approximated error radius of the pattern 3 on the facet size by the use of three different calibration files
  • Figure 11. Dependence of the amount of the non-correlated regions of each pattern on the facet size
  • Figure 12. Dependence of the mean value of the approximated error radius of each pattern on the facet size
  • Figure 13. Dependence of the maximal value of the approximated error radius of each pattern on the facet size