Figures index

From

Optical Analysis in CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3PbI2Cl Based Thin-Film Perovskite Solar Cell

Wayesh Qarony, Yesmin Ara Jui, Gloria Mithi Das, Tashfiq Mohsin, Mohammad Ismail Hossain, Syed Nurul Islam

American Journal of Energy Research. 2015, 3(2), 19-24 doi:10.12691/ajer-3-2-1
  • Figure 1. (a) Schematic cross section of simulated perovskite solar cell on smooth substrate; corresponding power loss profile for monochromatic illumination of wavelength (b) 400 nm, and (c) 700 nm
  • Figure 2. Short circuit current as a function of the thickness of TiO2. Corresponding comparison of quantum efficiency for perovskite based solar cell with the variation of TiO2 layer thickness (Inset)
  • Figure 3. Short circuit current as a function of the thickness of P3HT. Corresponding comparison of quantum efficiency for perovskite based solar cell with the variation of P3HT layer thickness (Inset)
  • Figure 4. Short circuit current as a function of the thickness of perovskite (CH3NH3PbI3) layer. Corresponding comparison of quantum efficiency for perovskite based solar cell with the variation of perovskite layer thickness (Inset)
  • Figure 5. Quantum Efficiency and Parasitic absorption losses of optimized perovskite based thin-film solar cell
  • Figure 6. a) Comparison of short circuit current with the variation of perovskite based thin film solar cell with and without Cl; b) Comparison of quantum efficiency plots for 360 nm of perovskite based thin film solar cell with and without Cl
  • Figure 7. Comparison of parasitic absorption losses between CH3NH3PbI2Cl and CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite based thin-film solar cells in a) ITO, b) TiO2, c) P3HT, and d) Au layers