Figures index

From

Physical Mechanical Properties and Durability of Mortars Containing Tuff from Burkina Faso as Partial Substitution of CEM I

Sidiki KABRE, Nafissatou SAVADOGO, Abdou LAWANE, Adamah MESSAN

American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2018, 6(2), 46-53 doi:10.12691/ajcea-6-2-1
  • Figure 1. Location of the Tuff
  • Figure 2. Particle size distribution of Cement and Tuff
  • Figure 3. X-ray diffractogram of Tuff
  • Figure 4. Shrinkage measuring device
  • Figure 5. Shrinkage measuring device
  • Figure 6. Evolution of the heating according to the substitution rate of the Tuff
  • Figure 7. Effet of the Tuff on total shrinkage of mortars
  • Figure 8. Shrinkage versus of weight loss
  • Figure 9. Evolution of compressive strength over time
  • Figure 10. Influence of fineness on compressive strength at 28 days versus of substitution rates
  • Figure 11. Influence of the addition of Tuff on the capillary absorption of motars
  • Figure 12. Influence of the variation of the temperature on the resistances of the mortars of Tuff
  • Figure 13. Evolution of mass loss of Tuff mortars versus the exposure time in sulfuric acid (H2SO4)
  • Figure 14. Visual aspect of degradation of Tuff mortars by (H2SO4)