Effects of Faulty Design Phase on School Buildings Maintenance in Gaza Strip

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

1.2. Literature Review

Buildings cannot remain new throughout their entire life. All buildings start to deteriorate from the moment they are completed, and at that time the need for maintenance begins. A newly completed building, also requires maintenance. Moreover, it is not possible to replace or rebuild all buildings at one time. The value of a building decreases unless maintenance is carried out on the building ^{[16, 17]}. Maintenance works are the only way to maintain and increase the value of the property. Therefore, the need for maintenance will only intensify. Building maintenance and the performance of the building constantly affect people’s comfort and productivity.

With the increasing costs of new construction, the effective maintenance of the existing building stock has become even more important. Increasingly, building owners are beginning to accept that it is not in their best interest to carry out maintenance in a purely reactive manner, but that it should be planned and managed as efficiently as any other corporate activity ^[18]. Knowing that, it is impossible to produce buildings that are maintenance free, but maintenance work can be minimized by good design and proper workmanship carried out by skilled experts or competent craftsmen using suitable codes of installation and requisite building materials and methods ^[19].

Al-Shiha ^[20] conducted a research discussing the effect of faulty design and construction factors on building maintenance. As a result, the most severe factors which affect the maintenance works and causes the high maintenance cost are determined as: inadequate structural design such as foundation, hiring unqualified designers, not complying with specification, not relating exterior materials selection to climate conditions, inadequate waterproofing and drainage, unqualified workplace, inability to read the dawning’s.

Assaf et al. ^[21] identified eleven groups of defects which are affects in building maintenance. these group were defects in civil design, architectural defects in design, design defects in maintenance practicality and adequacy, defects due to consultant firm administration and staff, defects due to construction drawing, defects due to construction inspection, defects due to civil construction, defects due to contractor administration, defects due to construction materials, defects due to construction equipment and defects due to specification.

Bin Hashem ^[22] listed some factors that influence maintenance in the design stage for building maintenance such as: deterioration, future needs and faulty of choice materials.

Cooper and Jones ^[23] defined the key factors that contributed to high levels of dissatisfaction of the approach to maintenance programs poor specification of initial requirements; unclear aims and objectives and inappropriate frameworks; an inability to predict long term cost requirements; variations in levels of experience of those conducting surveys; unrealistic claims by consultants selling survey services; inappropriate or unusable data; poor links to organizational objectives; and a lack of fit of survey data.

Hoe ^[3] studied 37 (thirty – seven) different defects were identified in four groups, these group were design defects, construction defects, defects due to consultant firm administration and staff, defects due to contractor administration and staff. He concluded that there are three important effects on maintenance due to the defects. These are increased maintenance works, increased maintenance time/duration and Increased maintenance budget.

Ali et al ^[17] conducted a survey of 200 building managers on the factors affecting the cost of building maintenance. These factors include existing building condition, building age, complaints received regarding building performance, client’s request, availability of funding, safety and health requirements. The study concluded that the cost of maintenance is affected mainly by condition of building and complaints received about building performance.

While Cobbinah ^[24] showed another type of factors as being responsible for the poor maintenance of public buildings: The age of the buildings, lack of maintenance culture, inadequate funds and high maintenance cost, pressure on building facilities by number of users and poor construction work and maintenance work done by maintenance personnel of the institution.

AL-Farra ^[25] studied and investigated the defects of the residential buildings in GS which appear mainly due to faults in design or construction phases which lead to the need for maintenance of those buildings. The survey showed that the dampness, cracks between walls and structural elements, and corrosion of reinforcement are the main defects which negatively affect the need for building maintenance. Based on his investigation improvements on tender documents were proposed in order to minimize maintenance requirements in future construction projects in Gaza. Also, the study showed the importance of applying the lessons learned concept as a tool to determine the building defects and to ensure they are not repeated in future projects.

Ali et al. ^[2] identified types of design defects that contributed to high maintenance cost for school building in Malaysia. These types include failure to follow well-established design criteria in the choice of structural system and selection of materials; ignorance of the basic physical properties of the materials; use of new materials or innovative forms of construction which have not been properly tested in use; misjudgment of user and climatic conditions under which the materials have to perform; difficulty in executing the design due to impractical issues; and poor communication between members of the design and construction teams. Therefore, it is important that the earlier decisions and initiatives are taken into consideration during the design phase to ensure the proposed building design is maintenance-friendly and sustainable throughout the whole life cycle of a building.

Olanrewaju and Abdul-Aziz ^[26] identified the factors leading to maintenance building. These factors were: poor design, poor workmanship, defective materials and components usage and age, climatic and environmental factor, and nature of users.

Enshassi and El-Shorafa ^[27] studied the maintenance performance indicators in order to control the operation of hospital building maintenance in the Gaza Strip. Also, the survey studied the operational conditions and factors that carried out and affect the maintenance management and deriving a suitable framework for the minimum requirements. The study recommended developing a team vision for hospital maintenance department, changing the work style and culture towards maintenance, making certified periodic maintenance checklists, developing and implementing adequate key performance indicators for the Gaza strip hospital status.

2. Methodology

In this research, questionnaire survey (a quantitative approach) was used to collect the factual, perceptive, and attitudes of the respondents ^{[28, 29]}. Two populations were targeted in this research. The first population is UNRWA engineering department, which include around 80 of engineers; site/office, maintenance, and designers in different unit's in ICIP, among of these unit (maintenance unit, construction unit and design unit). These categories of staff will be considered in this study to assist in improving the maintenance performance of UNRWA school buildings in GS by minimizing the defects of design and construction phase to increase the lifespan of UNRWA schools buildings. The second population is Palestinian Contractors Union (PCU) categories that are classified under the maintenance of building categories in Gaza Strip. These categories are "1st, 2nd, and 3rd, maintenance of building categories" that have valid registration. The small categories (4th and 5th) were neglected due to the low practical and administrative experience of their companies in construction works and the low experience of their subcontractors specially in maintenance works. Based on the list of registered contractors at the PCU in December 2014, the size of population for the 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, maintenance building categories was 50 companies. Most of these company have been worked with maintenance of UNRWA school buildings.

To determine the sample size for each population of UNRWA Engineering staff and maintenance of contractors, Kish ^[30] equation was used.

(1)

n' is the sample size from infinite population, which can be calculated from this formula

[n' = S²/V²]. The definitions of all variable can be defined as the following:

n: sample size from finite population.

N: Total population (80 UNRWA engineers and 50 maintenance contractors)

V: Standard error of sample population equal 0.05 for the confidence level 95%, t= 1.96.

S²: Standard error variance of population elements, S²= P (1-P); maximum at P= 0.5

The sample size for UNRWA engineering staff and maintenance contractors' population can be calculated from the previous equations as follows:

Although the calculated sample size for UNRWA engineering staff is 45, the questionnaire was distributed to 60 of UNRWA engineering staff to overcome the risk of not responding from the respondents and to reflect higher reliability and benefits for the study. For the same reason, 44 questionnaires were distributed for the maintenance contractors.

Fortunately, the response rate was 75% for UNRWA engineering staff and 77% for maintenance contractors as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Sample size and response rate of the study populations

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

According to Moser and Kalton ^[31], the obtained response rates of 75% and 77% are reasonable and will reflect good results and outputs.

For the first population of UNRWA engineering staff, the selected sample represented all engineering units, which include maintenance, design and construction units. For the second population of maintenance contractors, the selected sample represented all classification categories of the maintenance contractors in GS.

The study was carried out in Gaza Strip and targeted the UNRWA engineering department and maintenance contractors distributed all over Gaza Strip as shown in Table 3 below:

Table 3. Geographical distribution of the sample

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

Based on literature review Hoe ^[3], Buys & Le Roux (2014), Razak&Jaafar ^[35], Al-Shiha ^[20], Al-Khatam (2003), Assaf et al. ^[21], and Al-Hammad et al. ^[37]. 41 main types of defects/errors in design phase that affecting maintenance of UNRWA school buildings were considered in this study. The factors were categorized under 5 groups, according to the pilot study.

The ten experts were asked to review the questionnaire and verify the validity of the questionnaire topics and its relevance to the research objective and give their advice. In general, they agreed that the questionnaire is suitable to achieve the goals of the study.

Their valuable comments and suggestions were used to revise the questionnaire. All suggested comments and modifications were taking into consideration. Minor changes, modifications, and additions were accommodated based on pilot study findings to develop the final questionnaire. The questionnaire was validated by the criterion-related reliability test that measures the correlation coefficients between the factors selected for in each group and for all groups as one entity, and structure validity test (Spearman test). Cornbach’s a coefficient of internal consistency reliability tests for level of frequency responses was also used. The RII technique has been widely used in construction research for measuring attitudes with respect to surveyed variables. Several researches ^{[32, 33, 34]} used the RII in their analysis. The respondents were asked to rate the identified interface problems on a five-point Likert scale (1 for the strongly disagree to 5 for the strongly agree). Based on the survey response, a RII was tabulated using the following equation:

Where W is the weighting given to each factor by the respondent, ranging from 1 to 5, (n1 = number of respondents for strongly disagree, n2 = number of respondents for disagree, n3 = number of respondents for neutral, n4 = number of respondents for agree, n5 = number of respondents for strongly agree). "A" is the highest weight (i.e 5 in the study) and N is the total number of samples. The relative importance index ranges from 0 to 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Factors Related to Defects/Errors in Civil /Structural Design (Group1)

Table 4 shows the opinion of respondents about the factors related to defects/errors in civil /structural design according to relative importance index ranked from high to low.

Table 4. Rank and RII of factors related to defects/errors in civil /structural design

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

From Table 4, it is shown that, "Lack of attention to the design details between concrete block walls and the intersection with the structural elements" was ranked in the first position by all respondents with RII of (0.763). The responding UNRWA Eng.'s ranked this factor in the first position with RII of (0.778), while the maintenance contractors ranked it in the second position with RII of (0.743). This emphasizes that, this is an important factor used by both UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors affecting on maintenance school in design stage in this group. There is no clear referring in the design details for most UNRWA schools to leave a distance not less than 15 cm between walls and columns (Infill between columns and block), installation steel bars Φ8mm each 40cm horizontally and one steel bar Φ8mm vertically, which should be cast later with a reinforcement concrete (B200), or as the opinion of the supervising engineer. Also, the design in detail drawing ignored identifying the locations of stop beads, angel beads, movement beads and metal latching in plaster works that are required to minimize shrinkage cracks between block and concrete elements. Lack of attention to the design details between concrete block walls and the intersection with the structural elements leading to causes different type of cracks which increase maintenance work. The obtained results agreed with ^[25].

On the other hand, it is shown that, "Improperly locating conduits and pipe openings at critical structural locations (sleeves)" was ranked in the second position by all respondents with RII of (0.753). The responding UNRWA Eng.'s ranked this factor in the second position with RII of (0.739), while it was ranked in the first position by the responding maintenance contractors with RII of (0.772). This emphasizes that, this is an important factor used by both UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors affecting on maintenance school in design stage in this group because, when the civil designer does not review the layout of the mechanical or electrical design, where the electrical or mechanical designer installs the conduits in a very critical structural area which will result in failure or continuous cracking of the structural elements or damage to the mechanical system of the building, e.g. breakage of water pipes or sewer leakage.

Finally, it is shown that, "Exceeding the allowable deflection limits" was ranked in the last position by all respondents with RII of (0.379). Also, maintenance contractors in the last position with RII of (0.272), while UNRWA Eng.'s was ranked in the seventh position with RII of (0.461). Where the UNRWA design engineers aware about importance to avoid exceeds the allowable structural span length. Also, they take care when they evaluate the dead and life load to be correct. And they used drop beam as a good solution to avoid any deflections. The results of this study in the first line of Razak and Jaafar ^[35] who found that, this factor was in the last position in this group.

Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient

Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρRho) is a non-parametric test for measuring the difference in ranking between target groups (UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors). For calculation of (rho), the following simple formula is applied:

^[36]

where, di = the difference in ranking between each pair of factors.

N = number of factors.

For the group of factors related to defects/errors in civil /structural design, the correlation coefficient equals to 0.694 with P-value (Sig.) = 0.000. The P-value is less than the level of significance, α = 0.05, so there is a significant relationship between UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors in this group toward the opinions in this study.

3.2. Factors Related to Defects/Errors in Architectural Design (Group 2)

Table 5 was tabulated from 6 different factors related to defects/errors in architectural design. Using RII, the rank order for the most important factors from the view point of the respondents is indicated. As shown in Table 5 most of the respondents graded these factors from important to very important.

Table 5. Rank and RII of factors related to defects/errors in architectural design

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

As notice in Table 5, it is shown that, "Selecting of exterior finishing and insulation material not relating to climatic condition (paint irresistible humidity and temperature)" was ranked in the first position by all respondents with RII of 0.801. The responding UNRWA Eng.'s ranked this factor in the second position with RII of (0.800), while the maintenance contractors ranked it in the first position with RII of (0.802).This emphasizes that, this is the most important factor of defects/errors used by both UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors affecting on maintenance school in design stage in this group. Because, the selection of color and type of exterior finish of a building should be suitable to the weather and environmental conditions. The ignoring to use special materials cannot resist heat and humidity will require a lot of cleaning and maintenance, some of examples are not painting buildings with dark colors in a dusty area where they require a lot of cleaning, or using paints which cannot resist heat and humidity, most of the design for UNRWA schools ignore environmental conditions, climate, ocean, where the finishing materials itself in schools that are located close to the sea are the same to finishing materials which is located in the center of the city, where they ignore this factor that leads to damage of finishing materials and peeled so as acts outside the paint and interior, as well as there are no applying to isolate by bitumen for concrete foundation in sand or clay soil .This problem leading materials to deteriorate in shorter time and lead to defects in other parts of the building. The obtained results agreed with ^{[3, 21, 35]} who found that, this factor was in the first position in this group. Also, in the first line of Al-Hammad et al. ^[37] who found that, this factor in the second position in this group from perspective of maintenance contractors.

On the other hand, it is shown that, "Ignore the effect of local weather conditions at the building site for the design of the external shapes" was ranked in the second position by both UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors with RII of (0.788). The responding UNRWA Eng.'s ranked this factor in the first position with RII of (0.817) while it was ranked in the second position by the responding maintenance contractors with RII of (0.750). This emphasizes that, this is the most important factor of defects/errors used by both UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors affecting on maintenance school in design stage in this group, because the most of UNRWA schools has the same architectures design way in deferent locations and environmental conditions that related to external shape, type, and color which lead to collection of moisture, water or dust. Such design will help to increase the maintenance works like cleaning and repairing damages due to water collection on building roofs. The obtained results matching to Razak and Jaafar ^[35] who found that, this factor was in the second position in this group.

Finally, it is shown that, "Designing narrow stairs, passage and doors that obstruct the transfer of equipment and maintenance work process" was ranked in the last position by both of the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors with RII of (0.453). Also, each of them separately ranked it in the last position with RII of (0.456) and (0.449) respectively. Which referring to the ignoring of respondents for this factor where they are take care in the design stage for the important of designing stairs and doors to be wide as possible and to transfer of maintenance tools easily. Anyway, in UNRWA school there is at least four stair case entrance to facility of students transfer and maintenance work easily. The obtained results agreed with Razak and Jaafar ^[35] who found that, this factor was in the last position in this group.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient:

For the group of factors related to defects/errors in architectural design, the correlation coefficient equals to 0.854 with P-value (Sig.) = 0.0005. The P-value is less than the level of significance, α = 0.05, so there is a good agreement between the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors in this group.

3.3. Factors Related to Defects/Errors due to Owner Administration and His Staff (Group 3)

Table 6 shows the opinion of respondents about the factors related to defects/errors due to owner administration and his staff in design according to relative importance index ranked from high to low.

Table 6. Rank and RII of factors related to defects/errors due to owner administration and his staff

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

As notice in Table 6, it is shown that, "lack of workshops to discuss construction problems between the design, supervision and implementation" was ranked in the first position by all respondents with RII of (0.873). Also, each of them separately ranked it in the first position with RII of (0.878) and (0.867) respectively. This emphasizes that, this is the most important factor used by UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors related to defects/errors owner administration and his staff during design stage. Communication between the maintenance and design groups is important to get the views of the maintenance staff on issues related the selection of material, systems and equipment. Lack of communication would result in the repetition of faulty design, which affects the cost of maintenance. The obtained results agreed with ^[38], who emphasized that this factor is an important factor that in the group related to defects due owner administration and his staff.

On the other hand, it is shown that, "Inadequate QA/QC programs during the design stage" was ranked in the second position by all respondents with RII of (0.854). Also, each of them separately ranked it in the second position with RII of (0.861) and (0.846) respectively.

This emphasizes that, this is the most important factor used by UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors related to defects/errors owner administration and his staff during design stage, where that the implementation for quality assurance and quality control programs on design is very important to reduce the number of defects and mistakes in design. This procedure requests one group to do the design and another group to review and highlight the design defects. The obtained results agreed with Assaf et al. ^[21], Razak and Jaafar ^[35] who found that, this factor was in the second position in this group.

"Lack of technical updating and adequate training of staff and lack of awareness of construction technology" was ranked in the third position by all respondents with RII of (0.779). Also, each of them separately ranked it in the third position with RII of (0.778) and (0.779) respectively. This referring to the important of owners in update and expose their staff to the latest construction material and methods in the market. In addition, they should maintain and keep track of the new materials redundant or construction methods and make sure that they perform adequately in the existing building environment. All UNRWA schools till now not used the technology and modern finishing materials in schools as examples, in new covering materials like acoustic texture exterior paint (popcorn Gargamish paint), that are resistant to dampness and bad weather. The obtained results agreed with Razak and Jaafar ^[35] who found that, this factor was in the second position in this group.

Finally, it is shown that, "Not be assigned to the engineer designing the parts that belonged to" was ranked in the last position by both of the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors with RII of (0.522). Also, each of them separately ranked it in the last position with RII of (0.861) and (0.846) respectively because, there are many numbers of specialist engineers in design unit, where every engineer responsible for his specialization.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient:

For the group of factors related to defects/errors due to owner administration and his staff in design stage, the correlation coefficient equals to 0.929 with P-value (Sig.) = 0.0007. The P-value is less than the level of significance, α = 0.05, so there is a total agreement between UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors in this group.

3.4. Factors Related to Defects/Errors due to Drawing (Group 4)

Table 7 was tabulated from 5 different factors related to defects/errors due to drawing in design stage. Using RII, the rank order for the most important factors from the view point of the respondents is indicated. As shown in Table 7 most of the respondents graded these factors from important to very important.

Table 7. Rank and RII of factors related to defects/errors due to drawing

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

As notice in Table 7, it is shown that, "Lack of auditing and archiving of approved as-built drawing documents electronically " was ranked in the first position by all respondents with RII of (0.832). Also, in the first position by maintenance contractors with RII of (0.860). While, in the second position by UNRWA Eng.'s with RII of (0.811). Which means the importance of as built drawing where, the construction contractors sometime do not provide accurate as-built drawings to the owner after completed the works. Such drawings are used by the maintenance contractor discrepancies between actual conditions and conditions reflected in the as-built drawings would draw the maintenance contractor to wrong assumptions.

On the other hand, it is shown that, Dependence on repetition and lack of updating " was ranked in the second position by both UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors with RII of (0.829). Also, in the second position by maintenance contractors with RII of (0.816), while, in the first position by UNRWA Eng.'s with RII of (0.839). This emphasizes that, this is the most important factor used by UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors related to defects/errors due to drawing in design stage. The wrong sections and not update lead to repeat the same mistake and repeat the same works that you need to remove and increase the cost and time to repeat.

Finally, it is shown that, "Lack of references such as cross sections and detailed " was ranked in the last position by all respondents with RII of (0.529). Each of them separately ranked it in the last position with RII of (0.567) and (0.478) respectively. Which means most of UNRWA school buildings design drawings were show the cross section and detailed references clearly on the drawing. Also, the designer not allow to the contractors to construct the building according to his understanding and experience to avoid defects and errors which lead to increasing of maintenance work.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient:

For the group of factors related to defects/errors due to drawing in design stage, the correlation coefficient equals to 0.920 with P-value (Sig.) = 0.0012. The P-value is less than the level of significance, α = 0.05, so there is a total agreement between the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors in this group.

3.5. Factors related to defects/errors due to specification (Group 5)

Table 8 shows the opinion of respondents about the factors related to defects/errors due to specification in design stage according to relative importance index ranked from high to low.

Table 8. Rank and RII of factors related to defects/errors due to specification

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

Table 8 shows that the all respondents ranked " Not specifying quality assurance & control procedures " in the first position with RII of (0.801). The responding UNRWA Eng.'s ranked this factor in the second position with RII of (0.789), while the maintenance contractors ranked it in the first position with RII of (0.816).

This emphasizes that, this is the most important factor used by UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors related to defects/errors due specification in design stage. This means the old specification in UNRWA schools building do not specify the relation between owner, the inspector and contractor, and how to communicate properly to avoid any defect or solve any problem. Also, not specify the responsibility of each party, but I think in the updated specifications, there are referring to this issues and identify the responsibilities for the entire party. The obtained results agreed with Razak and Jaafar ^[35] who found that, this factor was in the second position in this group.

On the other hand, it is shown that, "Lack of local specifications and standards related of requirements of materials and workmanship " was ranked in the second position by all respondents with RII of (0.788). The responding UNRWA Eng.'s ranked this factor in the first position with RII of (0.794), while the maintenance contractors ranked it in the second position with RII of (0.779). This means the important of standard and specification documents to building maintenance, as it constitutes a schedule of instructions to contractor and workmanship requirement .

Finally, it is shown that, "Inadequate experience and expertise to design concrete admixtures" was ranked in the last position by all respondents with RII of (0.342). Each of them separately ranked it in the last position with RII of (0.367) and (0.309) respectively. Which means ignoring this factors by all respondents, where the UNRWA design section have a designers, which design the concrete mix to meet the strength requirements and the equality and durability side.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient:

For the group of factors related to defects/errors due to drawing in design stage, the correlation coefficient equals to 0.777 with P-value (Sig.) = 0.0001. The P-value is less than the level of significance, α = 0.05, so there is a good agreement between the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors in this group.

3.6. Comparison between All Groups of Factors Leading to Errors/Defects in Design Stage

Table 9 shows the opinions of the respondents about the groups of factors leading to errors/defects in design stage according to relative index from high to low.

Table 9. Rank and RII group of factors related to defects/errors in design stage

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table

From Table 9, it is shown that, "factors related to defects/errors due to drawing "was ranked in the first position by all respondent's with RII of (0.705). Each of them separately ranked it in the first position with RII of (0.702) and (0.709) respectively. This emphasizes that, this is the most important group used by both the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors which affecting maintenance of UNRWA schools building in design stage. Because, lack of references, cross sections and details of structural elements will lead the contractor to construct the building according to his understanding and experiences, which cause many maintenance defects which can only be discovered during building operation.

On the other hand, it is shown that, "factors related to defects/errors due to owner administration and his staff " was ranked in the second position by all respondents with RII of (0.659). Each of them separately ranked it in the second position with RII of (0.647) and (0.676) respectively. This emphasizes that, this is the most important group used by both the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors which affecting maintenance of UNRWA schools building in design stage. Because the experiences of owners and his staff which play big role in maintenance works to avoid a lot of maintenance defects. This referring to the importance of owner role in minimizing of defects through identifying type of errors, causes, and proposed prevention methods to minimize it appearance in future projects.

Finally, it is shown that, "factors related to defects/errors in civil/ structural design" was ranked in the last position by both of the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors with RII of (0.523). Each of them separately ranked it in the last position with RII of (0.519) and (0.527) respectively. This means the ignoring of responding to this factor, where there is a big design unit in ICIP at UNRWA, which have a number of experts and trained staff in all specialties of construction.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient:

For the group of factors related to groups factors leading to defects / errors in design stage, the correlation coefficient equals to 0.953 with P-value (Sig.) = 0.0001. The P-value is less than the level of significance, α = 0.05, so there is a total agreement between the UNRWA Eng.'s and maintenance contractors in this group.

3.7. Top Ten Factors Leading to the Errors/Defects in Design Stage

Table 10 was tabulated from ten (10) factors leading to the errors/defects which affecting maintenance of UNRWA schools buildings in design stage ranked from high to low.

Table 10. Top ten factors leading to errors/defects in design stage

Download as

Tables index

Veiw figure View Table