Figures index

From

Model Selection for Count Data with Excess Number of Zero Counts

K.M. Sakthivel, C.S. Rajitha

American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2019, 7(1), 43-51 doi:10.12691/ajams-7-1-7
  • Figure 1. Standardized MSE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n=100)
  • Figure 2. SE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n = 100)
  • Figure 3. Bias of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n = 100)
  • Figure 4. Relative efficiency of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP with respect to inflation parameter for simulated data set (n=100)
  • Figure 5. Frequency of claim count
  • Figure 6. RE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP
  • Figure 7. Ratio of Standardized MSE values of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for population 1
  • Figure 8. Ratio of Standardized MSE values of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for population 2
  • Figure 1. Standardized MSE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n=100)
  • Figure 2. SE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n = 100)
  • Figure 3. Bias of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n = 100)
  • Figure 4. Relative efficiency of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP with respect to inflation parameter for simulated data set (n=100)
  • Figure 5. Frequency of claim count
  • Figure 6. RE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP
  • Figure 7. Ratio of Standardized MSE values of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for population 1
  • Figure 8. Ratio of Standardized MSE values of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for population 2
  • Figure 1. Standardized MSE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n=100)
  • Figure 2. SE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n = 100)
  • Figure 3. Bias of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for simulated data set (n = 100)
  • Figure 4. Relative efficiency of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP with respect to inflation parameter for simulated data set (n=100)
  • Figure 5. Frequency of claim count
  • Figure 6. RE of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP
  • Figure 7. Ratio of Standardized MSE values of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for population 1
  • Figure 8. Ratio of Standardized MSE values of ANN, Hurdle and ZIP for population 2