Figures index

From

Solving the Quantity Element Using New Numerical Techniques on the Discontinues Boundary Element Method

Hassan Ghassemi, Alireza Ahani

American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2017, 5(1), 14-21 doi:10.12691/ajams-5-1-4
  • Figure 1. Comparison of the quantity (u) with different elements
  • Figure 2. Problem domain (Left) and boundary discretization (Right)
  • Figure 3. Distribution of quantity along an element
  • Figure 4. Notation and numbering
  • Figure 5. Method of filling for H matrix
  • Figure 6. Linear geometry element (right) Quadratic geometry element (left)
  • Figure 7. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=1and element number 100
  • Figure 8. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=1 and element number 200
  • Figure 9. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=1 and element number 500
  • Figure 10. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=2 and element number 100
  • Figure 11. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=2 and element number 200
  • Figure 12. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=2 and element number 500
  • Figure 13. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=3 and element number 100
  • Figure 14. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=3 and element number 200
  • Figure 15. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=3 and element number 500
  • Figure 16. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=5 and element number 100
  • Figure 17. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=5 and element number 200
  • Figure 18. Comparison of the quantity value (u) for a/b=5 and element number 500
  • Figure 19. Percentage errors of DLE in 90° angle
  • Figure 20. Percentage errors of DLE in 180° angle