Article Versions
Export Article
Cite this article
  • Normal Style
  • MLA Style
  • APA Style
  • Chicago Style
Research Article
Open Access Peer-reviewed

Impact of Forest Degradation on Soil Carbon in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State, Nigeria

Ale Olanrewaju Olabode , Oke David
Applied Ecology and Forestry Science. 2024, 6(1), 10-17. DOI: 10.12691/aefs-6-1-2
Received November 10, 2024; Revised December 12, 2024; Accepted December 19, 2024

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the impact of forest degradation on the status of total, particulate and mineral-associated soil organic carbon content. This study was carried out in three selected sites based on the level of degradation (undisturbed, partly degraded and degraded forest parts) in Akure Forest Reserve which is geographically located in a humid rainforest zone of Akure South local government area of Ondo State, Nigeria. Four sampling plots of 25m x 25m in dimension were laid in alternate positions along the transect cut through each of the selected forest sites. Soil core samples were collected at 5 different points along the diagonal of each plot at the depths of 0-10cm, 10-20cm and 20-30cm using a soil auger. At the end of this study, it was found that total organic carbon (TOC) was highest in soil under partially degraded forest and the lowest in soil from undisturbed forest. Particulate organic carbon (POC) was highest in partially degraded forest (9.71) and lowest in undisturbed forest (7.89). In contrast, soil under undisturbed forest had the highest mineral-associated organic carbon (14.32), while soil under degraded forest had the lowest (13.21). The results of the analysis show a significant difference at P>0.05 among the different forest degradation type and across soil depths (0-10 cm > 10-20 cm > 20-30 cm). Soil under partially degraded forest stored significant organic carbon due to litter deposition from illegally felled trees, enhancing carbon levels. This soil also shows improved physicochemical properties. The stable fraction of organic carbon (MOC) was highest in soil under undisturbed forest, while particulate organic carbon (POC) peaks in soil under partially degraded forest. The study also assessed soil physical and chemical properties, finding that degradation led to increased bulk density and reduced porosity, potentially affecting water retention and root penetration. pH levels were slightly lower in degraded areas, while available phosphorus and total nitrogen showed marked decreases. These findings highlight the significant impact of forest degradation on soil carbon stocks and overall soil health, emphasizing the importance of forest conservation for maintaining ecosystem services and mitigating climate change.

1. Introduction

Nigeria's population is currently over 140 million, with the majority of people living in rural areas. Poverty, hunger, ignorance, diseases, a lack of basic social amenities, and limited property holdings characterize rural settlements 1. The rural people rely heavily on the forest for everyday subsistence and livelihood because of its location and the many commodities and services it can provide "for free” 2. The increase in human population, demand for more agricultural land for food production, urbanization, and the expansion of land use activities have all put pressure on the tropical forest, resulting in a progressive shift in tree composition, cover, and structure 1. Degradation of the forest reduces the forest's ability to act as an environmental regulator. Natural regeneration, soil and water conservation, and carbon dynamics are all affected. The influence of forest degradation on carbon dynamics is still poorly understood. Estimating variations in the forest soil carbon pool is essential for understanding carbon storage linked with different levels of degradation in different forest types 3.

Humans have been interested in soil quality and functionality since the birth of civilization (Brevik and Sauer, 2015). Soils have become one of the world's most vulnerable resources in the face of climate change, land degradation, and biodiversity loss 4. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the primary component of soil organic matter (SOM) and is used to assess soil health. SOC is essential for its contributions to food production, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and attaining the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Soils contain almost twice as much carbon as the atmosphere and two and a half times as much carbon as all living organisms 5. Soils are remarkable in their ability to sequester and retain huge amounts of carbon (C). Soil organic carbon is one component of the much wider global carbon cycle, which includes carbon cycling through the soil, vegetation, ocean, and atmosphere 6. Soils contain the most terrestrial carbon store and play an important role in global carbon balance by regulating dynamic bio-geochemical processes and the exchange of greenhouse gases (GHG) with the atmosphere 7. The majority of soil carbon is organic carbon generated from living creatures that have been preserved in deeper soil layers below 20 cm for hundreds to thousands of years 7, 8. The loss of even relatively small amounts of this soil organic carbon could exacerbate global climate change by releasing substantial amounts of greenhouse gases, such as nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) to the atmosphere 9. Soil is a complex mixture of minerals, organic matter, water, air, and living organisms, as well as environmental aspects like climate, parent materials, relief, organisms, and time 10. Soil holds three times the amount of carbon (C) found in the atmosphere and 3.8 times the amount of carbon (C) found in the biotic pool 11. Soils have the ability to act as an effective carbon sink in the atmosphere 12. Soil carbon sequestration is the process of capturing atmospheric carbon dioxide and storing it in soil as crop residue and other organic substances 13. This transformation has the potential to lower CO2 levels in the atmosphere, lowering global warming and mitigating climate change.

Soil biodiversity increases the reservoir of organic carbon in the soil. In the absence of additional circumstances, high biodiversity ecosystems store more carbon in soil and biota than low biodiversity ecosystems 14. Carbon sequestration from the atmosphere has the potential to benefit both the environment and the economy. Environmental benefits include CO2 removal from the atmosphere, enhanced soil quality, and increased biodiversity 15. As a result, soils play an important role in maintaining a balanced global carbon cycle. Soils store around 1500 Pg of carbon in the form of organic matter globally, which is roughly double the atmospheric carbon pool 16. Consequently, the soil organic-carbon pool and its loss through emissions have a significant influence on the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, and thus on global climate change driven by the greenhouse effect 17.

Land use and soil management practices can have a significant impact on soil carbon dynamics and carbon flux from the soil (Smith, 2008). The carbon content of soil varies substantially throughout space, depending on land use and soil depth 18. Land use and vegetation type influence soil erosion and carbon dynamics, which affect SOC concentration, CO2 flow, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching from soil. Land use changes and management strategies have a significant impact on the dynamics of soil aggregation and SOC. These alterations may have an impact on soil structural stability, SOC storage, and nutrient turnover 19. Many studies have found that converting forest land to other land uses, such as agricultural ecosystems, has an impact on soil attributes, particularly soil organic carbon concentration and stock. The extent and nature of soil changes after forest degradation may be influenced by soil type and extent of degradation. Therefore, the extent and nature of the changes in the properties of a degraded and non-degraded soil of forest reserves in Ondo State was evaluated.

A significant amount of forest conversion is due to agricultural land usage 1. Agricultural operations can alter the chemical, physical, or biological aspects of the soil. Cultivation, tillage, weeding, deep ploughing, fertilizer treatments, liming, draining, irrigation, and biocide application on cultivated crops can all have an impact on soil parameters 10. Deforestation has been the major issue in Nigeria’s forestry sector 20. However, there are suggestions that forest conservation measures may lead to soil conservation as well as improvement in soil properties 21. In addition, anthropogenic activities continue to increase, resulting in disturbances in the earth’s ecosystem to produce food and fiber, which will place greater demand on soils to supply essential nutrients. Intensive and continuous cropping for enhanced crop yield removes substantial amounts of nutrients from soil 1. Land without proper management results in a decline in soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, which aggravates crop yield reduction and food insecurity 22.

According to 23, forests play a crucial role in carbon sequestration and maintaining ecosystem health. However, many forest reserves in Ondo State, Nigeria, are facing increasing degradation due to factors such as deforestation, illegal logging, farmland expansion, and urbanization 24. This degradation has the potential to significantly impact the soil carbon levels within these forests. Despite the recognized importance of soil carbon for both climate change mitigation and ecosystem sustainability, there is a notable lack of comprehensive studies that assess the specific impact of forest degradation on soil carbon content in Ondo State. This research aims to address this critical knowledge gap and provide insights into the extent and consequences of forest degradation on soil carbon in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State. By doing so, it seeks to compare degraded and non-degraded parts of a forest reserve, inform conservation efforts, and sustainable land management practices, while contributing to the broader understanding of the consequences of forest degradation for global carbon cycles. Therefore, the objectives of the study are to assess and evaluate the impact of forest degradation on soil carbon levels in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State, Nigeria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was carried out in Akure Forest Reserve. Akure Forest Reserve is geographically located in a humid rainforest zone of Akure South Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. It lies between latitudes 7°10’0’’ and 7°27’30’’N of the Equator and longitudes 4°52’30’’ and 5°12’30’’E of the Greenwich Meridian with a total land area cover of 6993 ha. It shares border with Osun State in the Northeast 25. The climate of the study area is characterized by dry season which lasts from November to March while the wet season commences from April and ends in October with the highest rainfall records between July and August. Average annual temperature is 27°C. The mean annual rainfall is about 4000mm with relative humidity of 80–85% annually 26. The soils are predominantly ferruginous tropical soils and are typical of the variety found in the intensively weathered areas of basement complex formations in the rainforest zone of southwest in Nigeria 27. It is slightly neutral; pH of 6.7–7.3 and sandy-loam in nature. The soils are of high agricultural value for both tree and arable crops.

2.2. Soil Sample Collection

The laying of plot for soil sample collection was carried out using the systematic line transects. Two parallel transects of 200m distance apart was used in each of the study sites. 50 m offset was laid in each of the study sites, thereafter four sample plots of 25 m x 25 m each was alternately laid on each transect to represent one hectare. On each sample plot, soil core samples were collected at 5 different points along the diagonal of each plot at three different depths of 0-10cm, 10-20cm and 20-30cm using a soil auger. Samples from each plot at each depth was bulked separately to form composite soil samples. Composite soil samples were well labelled and stored in polythene bags which was taken to the Department of Forestry and Wood Technology laboratory for analysis. The collected soil samples from each categorized area were air-dried at room temperature 320C, gently crushed to reduce heterogeneity and passed through a 2mm sieve to obtain fine earth separates.

2.3. Soil Analyses

A representation of each of the soil samples collected was separated into particulate and mineral sized fractions to determine, analyzed organic carbon, particle size distributions, pH, available phosphorus, total nitrogen.


2.3.1. Fractionation of Soil for Separation Into Particulate and Mineral Size Fractions

The physical fractionation of the soil samples collected was done based on the method proposed by 28. 50 g of ≥2 mm soil sample was transferred into a 250 ml sample bottle and 105 ml distilled water was added to it. The soil suspension was washed through a ≥53 µm sieve and the residue (the soil samples that are above the sieve) was considered Particulate soil organic matter while the filtrate (minute soil samples that passes through the sieve) was considered Mineral associated soil organic matter. The particulate (≥ 53µm) and mineral associated (< 53µm) soil fractions was first air-dried and then oven-dried at 40C in order to avoid destroying any carbon in the samples. The oven-dried samples were ground into powder form using mortar and pestle, and then analyzed for organic carbon content using the wet-oxidation method.


2.3.2. Organic Carbon Determination

The determination of Organic Carbon (Equation 1) in the bulk soil (2mm), ≥53µm, and <53µm soil fractions as Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Particulate Organic Carbon (POC), and Mineral-associated Organic Carbon (MOC) respectively, was carried out using wet oxidation method 29. Each representative sample was crushed with pestle and mortar and then passed through 0.5mm mesh sieve. 1g was weighed into a 250ml flask and 10ml of 0.167M potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was added using a pipette, and swirled gently to disperse the soil. 20ml of concentrated sulphuric acid(H2SO4) was added and swirled vigorously for a minute and left to stand for 30 minutes before 100ml distilled water was added. Three drops of phenonthroline indicators were added and titrated against 0.5M of Iron (II) ammonium sulphate. As the end point approached, the solution will take on a greenish cast and then changed to a dark green. At this point, the Iron (II) ammonium sulphate was added drop by drop until the color changed sharply to brownish-red (Maroon color). The same procedure was followed for blank reading (i.e. without soil sample).

The organic carbon content was calculated using the formula below:

%Organic Carbon = Equation 1

Where:

B = Blank titre value

T = Sample titre value

M = Molarity of (NH4)2 FE(SO4)2 6H2O

wt = Weight of soil sample used

1.33 = the compensation factor for the incomplete combustion of the OM in the procedure


2.3.3. Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Pool

Soil organic carbon (SOC) pool was determined using soil samples collected at 0-10, 10-20, and 20-30 cm depth, calculated using the following equation.

C – Pool = d x BD x SOC

Where, C-pool = soil carbon pool in (t/ha),

D = sampling depth (cm)

BD = bulk density (g/m3)

SOC = soil organic carbon (%)


2.3.4. Particles Size Analysis

The analysis was carried out using Bouyoucos hydrometer method. 50g (< 2mm) of each air-dried soil samples were treated with 50ml of 5% calgon (Sodium hexametaphosphate) along with 100ml of distilled water in clean plastic bottles. The samples were stirred with multi-mix machine for 15minutes. The suspension was transferred to the glass cylinders and topped with distilled water to 1,000ml mark. The top of the cylinder was covered and inverted several times to ensure complete suspension. The cylinder will then be placed on a table and the hydrometer was inserted immediately and the reading was taken after 40 seconds. After the hydrometer reading, the temperature was taken using a thermometer. The second reading was then be taken after 2 hours. Also, the temperature of the suspension was taken after the second hydrometer reading. The first reading measured the percentage of silt and clay in suspension. The second reading indicated the percentage of total clay in the suspension. Thus, the percentage composition of sand, silt and clay was calculated using the formula below (Equation 2 - 5).

Equation 2

Equation 3

(Silt) % = (Equation 2) – (Equation 3)Equation 4

Equation 5


2.3.5. PH of the Soil

Measurement of soil pH using a potentiometer to determine the degree of acidity or alkalinity in soils was carried out. The pH of the soil samples was determined using a glass electrode pH meter. A 1:1 soil to water ratio suspension was prepared by measuring 20g (< 2mm) of air-dried soil into a beaker followed by adding 20ml of distilled water and stirred with a glass rod occasionally. The electrode was inserted in the partly settled solution after allowing the suspension to stand for 30 seconds and the pH was measured 30.


2.3.6. Soil Bulk Density Determination

Soil bulk density was determined using a 2.5 cm diameter cylindrical core sampler. The cylinder was hammered into the soil to collect bulk density samples which was placed in the oven at 650C until a constant weight was attained. The weight of empty cylinder, diameter, radius and height will also be determined to get the volume.

Bulk density calculated as:

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data collected was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to determine statistical differences of selected soil properties. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad prism (Version.10) at p<0.05. (The choice of GraphPad Prism (Version. 10) for statistical analysis was based on its user-friendly interface, precision, and suitability for handling experimental designs like Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). It is highly effective for performing ANOVA, detecting subtle statistical differences, and visualizing data through clear, high-quality graphs. The software’s compatibility with complex datasets and its support for rigorous testing at p<0.05 ensures credible and reproducible results. Its widespread acceptance in scientific research further reinforces its reliability for this study)

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Forest Degradation on Soil Organic Carbon in Akure Forest Reserve

Table 1 indicated that soil degradation alters the particle size distribution of the soil, though the soil texture generally remained within similar categories (sandy clay loam, clay loam, and loam) across degradation levels. Undisturbed forest soils had higher silt content, particularly in deeper layers (20-30 cm), whereas degraded soils exhibited more clay content, notably at the 20-30 cm depth. Forest degradation typically causes soil compaction and loss of structure due to the removal of vegetation, which exacerbates soil erosion and increases clay content. The texture changes observed align with findings by 30, who noted that forest degradation contributes to increased clay content, particularly in deeper soil layers, due to the higher erosion of finer particles. The bulk density also varied significantly with degradation levels, with undisturbed soil having the lowest values, particularly in the upper 0-10 cm depth (0.746 g/cm³). The bulk density increased progressively in partially degraded (0.873 g/cm³) and degraded soils (0.916 g/cm³). Increased bulk density is a sign of soil compaction, which typically follows vegetation removal 31. High bulk density is also associated with reduced pore space and infiltration rates, which can hinder plant root growth and water percolation, further exacerbating degradation effects 32. The pH of the soil increased significantly with forest degradation, as indicated by the values in Table 1. Undisturbed soils exhibited more acidic conditions (pH 4.24-4.48), while degraded soils had relatively neutral to mildly acidic pH levels (pH 6.03-6.25). Increased pH in degraded areas can be attributed to the reduction in organic matter and litter cover, which otherwise would help buffer soil acidity. Organic matter decomposition typically releases organic acids that lower pH in undisturbed systems 33. This shift to higher pH with degradation has been observed in various studies, such as 34, who found that deforestation led to reduced organic matter and increased soil pH in tropical forests.

From the study's results, it is evident that forest degradation, particularly due to deforestation and logging activities, alters the soil's physical and chemical properties. Degraded soils exhibited increased bulk density and reduced porosity, which can be directly attributed to the removal of vegetation cover and increased exposure to rainfall, leading to soil compaction. These changes disrupt the natural water retention capacity of the soil, making it more prone to erosion, especially during heavy rainfall, and diminishing its ability to sequester carbon. For example, undisturbed soils exhibited lower bulk density and higher organic carbon pools compared to degraded soils, which had a more compact structure. The increased bulk density in degraded soils, coupled with altered soil texture (e.g., increased clay content), connote that higher rainfall intensities may wash away finer particles, leaving heavier, less fertile soil behind, this corroborated with the assertion of 35 who noted that less fertile soil can be caused by washing of finer particles during heavy rains. Also, these soils exhibit lower pH levels, indicating the loss of organic material that normally buffers the acidity in the soil. Moreover, the study found that partially degraded soils, where illegal logging activities had occurred, contained higher amounts of particulate organic carbon (POC) due to the accumulation of organic residues such as tree bark and leaves left behind after logging. This means that, while forest degradation negatively impacts carbon sequestration, partial degradation could still retain some carbon if the area is not subject to intense agricultural use. This is an important insight when considering forest management strategies and the potential for regeneration in partially degraded areas. The impact of temperature and precipitation on these dynamics cannot be overstated. According to 36. increased temperatures could further exacerbate the degradation of soils by accelerating organic matter decomposition and reducing the moisture content of soils, which directly affects plant growth and carbon sequestration. Similarly, erratic rainfall patterns, particularly intense rainfall, can accelerate soil erosion, leaching of nutrients, and disruption of the carbon cycle, making soils less effective in carbon storage as stated by 37.

The organic matter content was highest in the partially degraded soils across all depths, with values of 4.54%, 2.32%, and 1.55% for the 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, and 20-30 cm depths, respectively. The undisturbed soils had the lowest organic matter content at 0-10 cm (3.58%), 10-20 cm (1.25%), and 20-30 cm (0.88%) as seen in Table 2. The results connote that soil degradation affects the distribution of organic matter. Partially degraded soils had a higher content likely due to the accumulation of forest litter and organic residues from illicit logging activities, which led to a greater organic matter deposit compared to undisturbed soils. This supports findings by 38, which means that degradation processes such as deforestation decrease soil fertility, yet, partially degraded soils can still retain nutrients if not subjected to intense agricultural use. The accumulation of organic residues on these soils plays a key role in maintaining their organic matter content.

At the 0-10 cm depth, the partially degraded soils had the highest soil organic carbon pool (SOCP) value (22.91 t/ha), followed by the degraded soils (21.15 t/ha). Undisturbed soils had the lowest SOCP (15.56 t/ha). The same trend was observed at the 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm depths in Table 3. These results indicate that forest degradation increases the SOCP in the upper soil layers, especially in partially degraded soils. According to 39, deforestation significantly impacts the carbon stock of soils, leading to increased organic carbon in partially degraded soils, likely due to decomposition of forest litter and logging residues. This explains the higher SOCP in these soils compared to undisturbed soils.

The results in Table 4 indicated that, partially degraded soils had the highest total organic carbon (TOC) values at all depths (10.54%, 5.38%, 0.90% for 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, and 20-30 cm, respectively), while undisturbed soils recorded the lowest values (8.30%, 2.90%, 0.51% at the same depths). This result highlights how partial degradation leads to higher TOC content, attributed to the forest litter and organic residues left behind during logging activities. The findings align with 40, who noted that partially degraded soils tend to retain more organic carbon than degraded soil due to minimal disturbance in the ecosystem, unlike undisturbed soils where organic matter decays slowly under the forest canopy.

3.2. Partitioning of Soil Organic Carbon into Stable and Labile Fractions in Akure Forest Reserve

At the 0-10 cm depth, partially degraded soils had the highest particulate organic carbon (POC) content (9.71%), followed by degraded soils (9.18%) and undisturbed soils (7.89%) as revealed in Table 5. This pattern was consistent across all depths, with partially degraded soils retaining the most POC. This could be due to the harvesting method used by the illegal loggers, in which round logs are converted into timber in the forest and leaving the residues (tree barks, leaves, branches, etc.) to decompose on the site (as seen in Appendix). In addition to this, there was no agricultural/farming practices performed on both the degraded and partially degraded forest soils in the study area thus the carbon deposits still remain in the soil. This result coincides with the studies by 41, which found that POC increases with the addition of fresh organic matter such as tree bark and leaves, which rapidly decompose. In this case, the partially degraded soils had the highest POC due to the presence of organic residues left by illegal logging.

MOC was highest in undisturbed soils at all depths, with values of 14.32%, 8.24%, and 4.48% for 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, and 20-30 cm, respectively (Table 6). In contrast, partially degraded and degraded soils had lower MOC values, indicating that mineral-associated organic carbon is more stable and less affected by forest degradation. These findings are consistent with research by 42, who noted that MOC persists in the soil for a longer period due to its slow turnover, which explains the higher MOC in undisturbed soils compared to degraded areas.

Conclusion and Recommendation

The study found out that forest degradation affects SOC and related soil properties in the Akure Forest Reserve. It was established that soil degradation affected the soil texture, the bulk density, and the pH of the soil. These changes, especially the increase in the content of clay and compaction, are indicative of the impact of vegetation removal and soil erosion as a result of deforestation. However, partially degraded soils, which have accumulated organic residues from logging activities, had higher organic matter content, SOCP, and TOC than undisturbed soils. This buildup of organic matter in partially decomposed areas indicates that these soils still contain a good deal of organic carbon, thus implying that there could be some measure of regeneration of soil fertility if the area is not subjected to very heavy traffic. In addition, the study showed that forest degradation influences the distribution of SOC into the stable and labile pools. The most labile POC was found in partially degraded soils because logging left behind organic residues. In contrast, the more stable mineral-associated organic carbon (MOC) was higher in undisturbed soils, suggesting that these forests can effectively sequester carbon in the long term. Therefore, there is a need to implement policies that will help in the fight against the continued cutting of trees in the forests. Conservation of MOC in the forest should be done by preserving the undisturbed forest to retain high MOC, and the rehabilitation of the partially disturbed forest to enhance the accumulation of organic carbon and soil fertility. The conservation of SOC stocks and the overall health of the ecosystem can only be achieved through sustainable forest management practices to avoid further soil degradation.

References

[1]  Oke D.O., Adekunle, V. A. J., and Okunlola J. O. (2012). Soil carbon pool as affected by forest degradation in some reserved natural forests in southwest Nigeria. Forests and forest products journal, 5:58-65.
In article      
 
[2]  Shackleton, S., Delang, C. O., and Angelsen, A. (2011). From subsistence to safety nets and cash income: exploring the diverse values of non-timber forest products for livelihoods and poverty alleviation. Non-timber forest products in the global context, 55-81.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Sabogal, C., Besacier, C., and McGuire, D. (2015). Forest and landscape restoration: concepts, approaches and challenges for implementation. Unasylva, 66(245), 3.
In article      
 
[4]  FAO, I. (2015). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)–Main Report.
In article      
 
[5]  Le-Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch, S., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., and Zaehle, S. (2016). Global carbon budget 2016. Earth System Science Data, 8(2), 605-649.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Scharlemann, J. P., Tanner, E. V., Hiederer, R., and Kapos, V. (2014). Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon management, 5(1), 81-91.
In article      View Article
 
[7]  Lal, R. (2013). Soil carbon management and climate change. Carbon Management, 4(4), 439-462.
In article      View Article
 
[8]  Fontaine, S., Barot, S., Barré, P., Bdioui, N., Mary, B., and Rumpel, C. (2007). Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature, 450(7167), 277-280.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[9]  Kollah, B., Patra, A., and Mohanty, S. (2018). Microbial Cycling of Greenhouse Gases and Their Impact on Climate Change, 129-143.
In article      View Article
 
[10]  Hartemink, A. E. (2016). The definition of soil since the early 1800s. Advances in Agronomy, 137, 73-126.
In article      View Article
 
[11]  Wong, V. N., Greene, R. S. B., Dalal, R. C., and Murphy, B. W. (2010). Soil carbon dynamics in saline and sodic soils: a review. Soil use and management, 26(1), 2-11.
In article      View Article
 
[12]  Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., and Goulding, K. W. (2011). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re‐examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science, 62(1), 42-55.
In article      View Article
 
[13]  Paustian, K., Robertson, G. P., and Elliott, E. T. (2018). Management impacts on carbon storage and gas fluxes (CO2, CH4) in mid-latitude cropland. In Soil management and greenhouse effect (pp. 69-84). CRC Press.
In article      View Article
 
[14]  Laban, P., Metternicht, G., and Davies, J. (2018). Soil biodiversity and soil organic carbon: keeping drylands alive. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 10.
In article      View Article
 
[15]  Dooley, K., Harrould‐Kolieb, E., and Talberg, A. (2021). Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework. Global Policy, 12, 34-44.
In article      View Article
 
[16]  Sundermeier, T. R., Zhang, N., Vinberg, F., Mustafi, D., Kohno, H., Golczak, M., ... & Palczewski, K. (2014). DICER1 is essential for survival of postmitotic rod photoreceptor cells in mice. The FASEB Journal, 28(8), 3780.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[17]  Genxu, W., Ju, Q., Guodong, C., and Yuanmin, L. (2002). Soil organic carbon pool of grassland soils on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its global implication. Science of the Total Environment, 291(1-3), 207-217.
In article      View Article
 
[18]  Olorunfemi, I. E., Fasinmirin, J. T., and Akinola, F. F. (2018). Soil physico-chemical properties and fertility status of long-term land use and cover changes: A case study in Forest vegetative zone of Nigeria. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 7(2), 133-150.
In article      View Article
 
[19]  Belay-Tedla, A., Zhou, X., Su, B., Wan, S., and Luo, Y. (2009). Labile, recalcitrant, and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools of a tallgrass prairie soil in the US Great Plains subjected to experimental warming and clipping. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(1), 110-116.
In article      View Article
 
[20]  Ogunwusi, A. A. (2014). Wood waste generation in the forest industry in Nigeria and prospects for its industrial utilization. Civil and Environmental Research, 6(9), 62-69.
In article      
 
[21]  Onyekwelu, J.C, Mosandi, R. and Stimm, B., (2008). Tree species diversity and soil status of Primary and degraded tropical rainforest ecosystems in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 20 (3): 193-204.
In article      
 
[22]  Habtamu, A., Heluf, G., Bobe, B., & Enyew, A. (2014). Fertility status of soils under different land uses at Wujiraba Watershed, North-Western Highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(5), 410-419.
In article      View Article
 
[23]  Bayley, D., Brickle, P., Brewin, P., Golding, N., and Pelembe, T. (2021). Valuation of kelp forest ecosystem services in the Falkland Islands: A case study integrating blue carbon sequestration potential. One Ecosystem, 6, e62811.
In article      View Article
 
[24]  Adeyemi, A. A., and Olowo, G. E. (2022). Evaluation of forest-cover dynamics and its drivers in Okeluse Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 18(1), 107-125.
In article      
 
[25]  Gbiri, I. A., and Adeoye, N. O. (2019). Analysis of pattern and extent of deforestation in Akure Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Geography, 12(1-2), 1-11.
In article      View Article
 
[26]  Adejoba, O., Kleine, M., and Taboada, T. (2014). Reducing deforestation and forest degradation and enhancing environmental services from Forests (REDDES), with support from the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), IUFRO-SPDC and FORNESSA, Akure, Ondo, Nigeria. IUFRO-SPDC and FORNESSA, Akure, Ondo, Nigeria. Online available at: https://www. iufro. org/download/file/18240/5656/FORNESSA_ Factsheet_Nigeria_final_pdf.
In article      
 
[27]  Onyekwelu, J. C., Adekunle, V. A. J., and Adeduntan, S. A. (2005, November). Does tropical rainforest ecosystem possess the ability to recover from severe degradation. In Sustainable forest management in Nigeria: lessons and prospects. Proceeding of the 30th Annual Conference of Forestry Association of Nigeria, Kaduna, Nigeria (pp. 145-163).
In article      
 
[28]  Cambardella, C.A. and Elliott, E.T. Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56; 777-783. 1992.
In article      View Article
 
[29]  Walkley, A., and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1), 29-38.
In article      View Article
 
[30]  Black, A. P., and Chen, C. L. (1965). Electrophoretic studies of coagulation and flocculation of river sediment suspensions with aluminum sulfate. JournalAmerican Water Works Association, 57(3), 354-362.
In article      View Article
 
[31]  Labelle, E. R., & Jaeger, D. (2011). Soil compaction caused by cut‐to‐length forest operations and possible short‐term natural rehabilitation of soil density. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(6), 2314-2329.
In article      View Article
 
[32]  Osman, K. T., & Osman, K. T. (2014). Physical deterioration of soil. Soil degradation, conservation and remediation, 45-67.
In article      View Article
 
[33]  Clarholm, M., Skyllberg, U., & Rosling, A. (2015). Organic acid induced release of nutrients from metal-stabilized soil organic matter–the unbutton model. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 84, 168-176.
In article      View Article
 
[34]  Gandois, L., Cobb, A. R., Hei, I. C., Lim, L. B. L., Salim, K. A., & Harvey, C. F. (2013). Impact of deforestation on solid and dissolved organic matter characteristics of tropical peat forests: implications for carbon release. Biogeochemistry, 114, 183-199.
In article      View Article
 
[35]  Szczuciński, W., Niedzielski, P., Kozak, L., Frankowski, M., Zioła, A., & Lorenc, S. (2007). Effects of rainy season on mobilization of contaminants from tsunami deposits left in a coastal zone of Thailand by the 26 December 2004 tsunami. Environmental Geology, 53, 253-264.
In article      View Article
 
[36]  AminiTabrizi, R., Dontsova, K., Grachet, N. G., & Tfaily, M. M. (2022). Elevated temperatures drive abiotic and biotic degradation of organic matter in a peat bog under oxic conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 804, 150045.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[37]  Rhodes, C. J. (2014). Soil erosion, climate change and global food security: challenges and strategies. Science progress, 97(2), 97-153.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[38]  Veldkamp, E., Schmidt, M., Powers, J.S. and Corre, M.D., (2020). Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11), pp.590-605.
In article      View Article
 
[39]  Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M.U., Mcmurtrie, R.E. and Mcgilvray, H., 2002. Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? A review of the literature. Global change biology, 8(2), pp.105-123.
In article      View Article
 
[40]  Wang, B., Wang, G., Myo, S.T.Z., Li, Y., Xu, C., Lin, Z., Qian, Z. and Tang, L., 2022. Deforestation for agriculture temporarily improved soil quality and soil organic carbon stocks. Forests, 13(2), p.228.
In article      View Article
 
[41]  Cotrufo, M. F., Soong, J. L., Horton, A. J., Campbell, E. E., Haddix, M. L., Wall, D. H., & Parton, W. J. (2015). Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nature Geoscience, 8(10), 776-779.
In article      View Article
 
[42]  Li, Y., Li, Z., Cui, S., Liang, G. and Zhang, Q., 2021. Microbial-derived carbon components are critical for enhancing soil organic carbon in no-tillage croplands: A global perspective. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, p.104758.
In article      View Article
 

Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2024 Ale Olanrewaju Olabode and Oke David

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Cite this article:

Normal Style
Ale Olanrewaju Olabode, Oke David. Impact of Forest Degradation on Soil Carbon in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State, Nigeria. Applied Ecology and Forestry Science. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2024, pp 10-17. https://pubs.sciepub.com/aefs/6/1/2
MLA Style
Olabode, Ale Olanrewaju, and Oke David. "Impact of Forest Degradation on Soil Carbon in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State, Nigeria." Applied Ecology and Forestry Science 6.1 (2024): 10-17.
APA Style
Olabode, A. O. , & David, O. (2024). Impact of Forest Degradation on Soil Carbon in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State, Nigeria. Applied Ecology and Forestry Science, 6(1), 10-17.
Chicago Style
Olabode, Ale Olanrewaju, and Oke David. "Impact of Forest Degradation on Soil Carbon in Akure Forest Reserve in Ondo State, Nigeria." Applied Ecology and Forestry Science 6, no. 1 (2024): 10-17.
Share
[1]  Oke D.O., Adekunle, V. A. J., and Okunlola J. O. (2012). Soil carbon pool as affected by forest degradation in some reserved natural forests in southwest Nigeria. Forests and forest products journal, 5:58-65.
In article      
 
[2]  Shackleton, S., Delang, C. O., and Angelsen, A. (2011). From subsistence to safety nets and cash income: exploring the diverse values of non-timber forest products for livelihoods and poverty alleviation. Non-timber forest products in the global context, 55-81.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Sabogal, C., Besacier, C., and McGuire, D. (2015). Forest and landscape restoration: concepts, approaches and challenges for implementation. Unasylva, 66(245), 3.
In article      
 
[4]  FAO, I. (2015). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)–Main Report.
In article      
 
[5]  Le-Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch, S., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., and Zaehle, S. (2016). Global carbon budget 2016. Earth System Science Data, 8(2), 605-649.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Scharlemann, J. P., Tanner, E. V., Hiederer, R., and Kapos, V. (2014). Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon management, 5(1), 81-91.
In article      View Article
 
[7]  Lal, R. (2013). Soil carbon management and climate change. Carbon Management, 4(4), 439-462.
In article      View Article
 
[8]  Fontaine, S., Barot, S., Barré, P., Bdioui, N., Mary, B., and Rumpel, C. (2007). Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature, 450(7167), 277-280.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[9]  Kollah, B., Patra, A., and Mohanty, S. (2018). Microbial Cycling of Greenhouse Gases and Their Impact on Climate Change, 129-143.
In article      View Article
 
[10]  Hartemink, A. E. (2016). The definition of soil since the early 1800s. Advances in Agronomy, 137, 73-126.
In article      View Article
 
[11]  Wong, V. N., Greene, R. S. B., Dalal, R. C., and Murphy, B. W. (2010). Soil carbon dynamics in saline and sodic soils: a review. Soil use and management, 26(1), 2-11.
In article      View Article
 
[12]  Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., and Goulding, K. W. (2011). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re‐examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science, 62(1), 42-55.
In article      View Article
 
[13]  Paustian, K., Robertson, G. P., and Elliott, E. T. (2018). Management impacts on carbon storage and gas fluxes (CO2, CH4) in mid-latitude cropland. In Soil management and greenhouse effect (pp. 69-84). CRC Press.
In article      View Article
 
[14]  Laban, P., Metternicht, G., and Davies, J. (2018). Soil biodiversity and soil organic carbon: keeping drylands alive. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 10.
In article      View Article
 
[15]  Dooley, K., Harrould‐Kolieb, E., and Talberg, A. (2021). Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework. Global Policy, 12, 34-44.
In article      View Article
 
[16]  Sundermeier, T. R., Zhang, N., Vinberg, F., Mustafi, D., Kohno, H., Golczak, M., ... & Palczewski, K. (2014). DICER1 is essential for survival of postmitotic rod photoreceptor cells in mice. The FASEB Journal, 28(8), 3780.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[17]  Genxu, W., Ju, Q., Guodong, C., and Yuanmin, L. (2002). Soil organic carbon pool of grassland soils on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its global implication. Science of the Total Environment, 291(1-3), 207-217.
In article      View Article
 
[18]  Olorunfemi, I. E., Fasinmirin, J. T., and Akinola, F. F. (2018). Soil physico-chemical properties and fertility status of long-term land use and cover changes: A case study in Forest vegetative zone of Nigeria. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 7(2), 133-150.
In article      View Article
 
[19]  Belay-Tedla, A., Zhou, X., Su, B., Wan, S., and Luo, Y. (2009). Labile, recalcitrant, and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools of a tallgrass prairie soil in the US Great Plains subjected to experimental warming and clipping. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(1), 110-116.
In article      View Article
 
[20]  Ogunwusi, A. A. (2014). Wood waste generation in the forest industry in Nigeria and prospects for its industrial utilization. Civil and Environmental Research, 6(9), 62-69.
In article      
 
[21]  Onyekwelu, J.C, Mosandi, R. and Stimm, B., (2008). Tree species diversity and soil status of Primary and degraded tropical rainforest ecosystems in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 20 (3): 193-204.
In article      
 
[22]  Habtamu, A., Heluf, G., Bobe, B., & Enyew, A. (2014). Fertility status of soils under different land uses at Wujiraba Watershed, North-Western Highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(5), 410-419.
In article      View Article
 
[23]  Bayley, D., Brickle, P., Brewin, P., Golding, N., and Pelembe, T. (2021). Valuation of kelp forest ecosystem services in the Falkland Islands: A case study integrating blue carbon sequestration potential. One Ecosystem, 6, e62811.
In article      View Article
 
[24]  Adeyemi, A. A., and Olowo, G. E. (2022). Evaluation of forest-cover dynamics and its drivers in Okeluse Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 18(1), 107-125.
In article      
 
[25]  Gbiri, I. A., and Adeoye, N. O. (2019). Analysis of pattern and extent of deforestation in Akure Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Geography, 12(1-2), 1-11.
In article      View Article
 
[26]  Adejoba, O., Kleine, M., and Taboada, T. (2014). Reducing deforestation and forest degradation and enhancing environmental services from Forests (REDDES), with support from the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), IUFRO-SPDC and FORNESSA, Akure, Ondo, Nigeria. IUFRO-SPDC and FORNESSA, Akure, Ondo, Nigeria. Online available at: https://www. iufro. org/download/file/18240/5656/FORNESSA_ Factsheet_Nigeria_final_pdf.
In article      
 
[27]  Onyekwelu, J. C., Adekunle, V. A. J., and Adeduntan, S. A. (2005, November). Does tropical rainforest ecosystem possess the ability to recover from severe degradation. In Sustainable forest management in Nigeria: lessons and prospects. Proceeding of the 30th Annual Conference of Forestry Association of Nigeria, Kaduna, Nigeria (pp. 145-163).
In article      
 
[28]  Cambardella, C.A. and Elliott, E.T. Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56; 777-783. 1992.
In article      View Article
 
[29]  Walkley, A., and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1), 29-38.
In article      View Article
 
[30]  Black, A. P., and Chen, C. L. (1965). Electrophoretic studies of coagulation and flocculation of river sediment suspensions with aluminum sulfate. JournalAmerican Water Works Association, 57(3), 354-362.
In article      View Article
 
[31]  Labelle, E. R., & Jaeger, D. (2011). Soil compaction caused by cut‐to‐length forest operations and possible short‐term natural rehabilitation of soil density. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(6), 2314-2329.
In article      View Article
 
[32]  Osman, K. T., & Osman, K. T. (2014). Physical deterioration of soil. Soil degradation, conservation and remediation, 45-67.
In article      View Article
 
[33]  Clarholm, M., Skyllberg, U., & Rosling, A. (2015). Organic acid induced release of nutrients from metal-stabilized soil organic matter–the unbutton model. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 84, 168-176.
In article      View Article
 
[34]  Gandois, L., Cobb, A. R., Hei, I. C., Lim, L. B. L., Salim, K. A., & Harvey, C. F. (2013). Impact of deforestation on solid and dissolved organic matter characteristics of tropical peat forests: implications for carbon release. Biogeochemistry, 114, 183-199.
In article      View Article
 
[35]  Szczuciński, W., Niedzielski, P., Kozak, L., Frankowski, M., Zioła, A., & Lorenc, S. (2007). Effects of rainy season on mobilization of contaminants from tsunami deposits left in a coastal zone of Thailand by the 26 December 2004 tsunami. Environmental Geology, 53, 253-264.
In article      View Article
 
[36]  AminiTabrizi, R., Dontsova, K., Grachet, N. G., & Tfaily, M. M. (2022). Elevated temperatures drive abiotic and biotic degradation of organic matter in a peat bog under oxic conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 804, 150045.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[37]  Rhodes, C. J. (2014). Soil erosion, climate change and global food security: challenges and strategies. Science progress, 97(2), 97-153.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[38]  Veldkamp, E., Schmidt, M., Powers, J.S. and Corre, M.D., (2020). Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11), pp.590-605.
In article      View Article
 
[39]  Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M.U., Mcmurtrie, R.E. and Mcgilvray, H., 2002. Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? A review of the literature. Global change biology, 8(2), pp.105-123.
In article      View Article
 
[40]  Wang, B., Wang, G., Myo, S.T.Z., Li, Y., Xu, C., Lin, Z., Qian, Z. and Tang, L., 2022. Deforestation for agriculture temporarily improved soil quality and soil organic carbon stocks. Forests, 13(2), p.228.
In article      View Article
 
[41]  Cotrufo, M. F., Soong, J. L., Horton, A. J., Campbell, E. E., Haddix, M. L., Wall, D. H., & Parton, W. J. (2015). Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nature Geoscience, 8(10), 776-779.
In article      View Article
 
[42]  Li, Y., Li, Z., Cui, S., Liang, G. and Zhang, Q., 2021. Microbial-derived carbon components are critical for enhancing soil organic carbon in no-tillage croplands: A global perspective. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, p.104758.
In article      View Article