Figures index

From

Age Effects of Millet Crops on Phytolith Carbon Sequestration

R. Vidhya, L. Arul Pragasan

Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022, 10(12), 747-753 doi:10.12691/aees-10-12-7
  • Figure 1. Map showing the location of sampling sites in Tamil Nadu, India
  • Figure 2. Total organic carbon of soil at different growth stages of crops grown. 1 = 30th day, 2= 60th day and 3 = 90th day. Based on the least significant difference (LSD) test, various lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the P = 0.05 level; error bars represent standard error (n = 3)
  • Figure 3. Plant biomass at different growth stages. 1 = 30th day, 2= 60th day and 3 = 90th day. Based on the least significant difference (LSD) test, various lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the P = 0.05 level; error bars represent standard error (n = 3)
  • Figure 4. Comparison of Phytolith in AGB and BGB at different growing stages of millet varieties. 1 = 30th day, 2= 60th day and 3 = 90th day. A= AGB, B=BGB. Based on the least significant difference (LSD) test, various lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the P = 0.05 level; error bars represent standard error (n = 3)
  • Figure 5. Comparison of PhytOC in AGB and BGB at different growing stages of millet varieties. (A) PhytOC in AGB and (B) PhytOC in BGB.1 = 30th day, 2= 60th day and 3 = 90th day. Based on the least significant difference (LSD) test, various lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the P = 0.05 level; error bars represent standard error. (n = 3)
  • Figure 6. Estimated PhytOC Production Flux of Millet crop Varieties at different age. 1 = 30th day, 2= 60th day and 3 = 90th day. error bars represent standard error. (n = 3)