Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) is a very important spice for rural and urban communities in Burkina Faso. Cultivation of ginger is mainly practiced by traditional farmers, and its commercialisation offers substantial income to farmers, traders and processors. The tuber contains enormous medicinal and nutritional potential, and can thus contribute to qualitative improvement of the diet of consumers. Despite the many advantages of this plant, it remained underexploited due to insufficient knowledge of cultivation methods, its cycle duration and its water requirement, which confines the crop mainly to the western region of Burkina Faso. Such under-exploitation has been exacerbated due to little attention dedicated to ginger research in the country. Therefore, preservation and improvement of ginger quality represent an important challenge for the various actors of this crop’s industry. The present review highlights the importance of ginger, its role in crop diversification, its medicinal and nutritional properties, as well as the future areas of selection and genetic improvement of this species in Burkina Faso.
Ginger belongs to the Zingiberaceae family which are perennial monocots. As such, it is a tropical herbaceous plant that is widespread throughout the world 1. The rhizomes are the consumed parts of the plant 2 and are used as a spice and traditional medicine for various diseases 3, 4. Ginger has the particularity of being able to produce very diverse natural substances of great nutritional value.
Ginger accounts for 5-6% of the spices consumed worldwide 5. Most of the world's production comes from India which contribute for more than one million tons 6. In African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries, Nigeria is the largest producer (349.895 tonnes), before Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia and Fiji 6 Ginger exportations are dominated by China (63%), Thailand (7%), Nepal (6%), the Netherlands (5%) and India (4%). As for imports, Bangladesh (11%), Japan (11%), Pakistan (10%), the United States (9%) and Malaysia (7%) are the top five worldwide 5. In Burkina Faso, the ever-increasing demand for ginger has led to an increase in its cultivation in recent years. However, domestic production covers less than 10% of national demand, estimated at about 50.000 tons per year 7. The gap is then filled by imports (0.01% of the world share) from other countries of the sub-region such as Côte d'Ivoire, Mali, Niger and Nigeria. Although largely below the country's needs, ginger from Burkina Faso seems to be very popular internationally because of its quality and its particular spiciness 7. Therefore, a promotion of production in Burkina Faso would provide a highly income-generating activity and a source of economic growth for the country.
Although ginger is of great importance, we have overlooked the crop potential for genetic improvement, its medicinal and nutritional benefits in the prevention and treatment of diseases, as well as its potential for sustainable agricultural production. To this extent, little research has been dedicated to the development of ginger in research centres in Burkina Faso, except a pioneering study carried out by 8. This study made it possible to identify the areas of ginger production and to assess the genetic diversity of cultivated accessions. However, many challenges remain regarding this important but neglected crop, including the promotion of its uses, conservation and evaluation of genetic resources 9, 10. This is necessary to contribute to the diversification of agricultural production and food sources, and thus potentially improve nutritional security.
This review synthesizes knowledge on the use, conservation, genetic diversity of ginger and the prospects for breeding and varietal improvement of this crop species in Burkina Faso.
The species Zingiber officinale is a monocotyledonous plant, perennial herbaceous with aromatic tubers, growing under tropical or subtropical climates, blossoming in shady and humid areas. Its aerial stems are erect and may be sterile (long) or flowering (fertile and short) 11. The leaves are fragrant, lanceolate and biserial in shape and have parallel veins 12. The flowers are of various colours, yellow, white or red, depending on the variety. A short axillary spike appearing at the end of a stem covered with scales indicates the end of flowering. These flowers are often sterile, but when mature, they contain the angular black seeds enclosed in trivalve capsules.
The underground stem is the part of the plant that hypertrophies to provide rhizomes 13, which generally present a pale beige skin and flesh of colour varying from yellowish to dark yellow. Rhizomes are elongated in irregular shapes, as tubers with finger-like ramifications, ending with buds. Additionally, rhizomes become more and more fibrous with age and they are typically known for their aromatic smell, sometimes with a hot flavour and a lemony taste that dwindles with drying 7. It contains nutrients useful for and growing the plant.
Ginger is a useful and important crop. Ginger is an important commercial crop cultivated for its aromatic rhizomes, which are used both as a spice and for organoleptic and medicinal purposes 14, 15. The intensification of cash crops, especially ginger, offers farmers the opportunity to obtain a complementary financial resource, allowing them to improve their living standards.
The species represents an added value to global trade as it is consumed all over the world 16. While India dominates the production and import of ginger, then come the United States (19.035 tonnes), the United Kingdom (10.337 tonnes), Saudi Arabia (8.248 tonnes), Singapore (7.566 tonnes), Malaysia (7.652 tonnes), Korea (6.805 tonnes), the Netherlands (6.981 tonnes), and Canada (4.680 tonnes) 16.
3.2. Nutritional PropertiesGinger has been used worldwide as a spice, dietary supplement and in traditional medicine for centuries 17. This spice is appreciated for its delicate aroma and somewhat hot flavour for the preparation of many dishes. Traditionally, dried ginger is used both for cooking and in the confectionery industry. Indeed, it is used as flavour ingredient in many culinary recipes ranging from bakery products (gingerbread, cakes, sweets, cookies) to alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages (tea, juice, ale and ginger beer), all of which are highly appreciated in global food industries 6, 18. Also, it is used in the preparation of curry powder in fresh, diced, candied or dried forms 19.
3.3. Therapeutic PropertiesGinger is known as medicinal species providing multiple health benefits. It is renowned for its anti-nausea, antiemetic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties due to its long history of medicinal use and its richness in bioactive constituents such as gingerols, paradols, shogaols and essential oil 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26. Used pure in capsules, powder, herbal teas, fresh or syrup or in combination with other species, ginger is widely recommended for the treatment of headaches, colds, coughs, and constipation 17, 27, 28. Also, it proved to have properties such as promoting digestion, stimulating appetite, and improving blood circulation. To this extent, various cosmetic products, some toothpastes, and food supplements contain some ginger. Recognised for its aphrodisiac and tonic properties, ginger seem to improve sperm quality 29. Additionally, studies have proven that ginger extracts have beneficial and calming effects on oxidative stress, hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia. By increasing the catabolism of fats in skeletal muscles and energy expenditure, ginger consumption can reduce obesity; whereas the application of its essential oil on the skin kills pain 30.
Many other suspected virtues of ginger exist but the scientific evidence is insufficient. These include a promising effect of this spice as a soother of arthritis-related pain 31 and a therapeutic agent in the treatment of certain types of cancer, including prostate cancer 32, breasts 33, kidneys 34, pancreas 31, 35, colon and rectum 36, 37, of the cervix 38, 39. The anti-cancer properties are attributed to the activity of 6-gingerol which prevents the proliferation of tumour patches in cancer cells and minimises side effects of cancer treatments 33.
Phytochemical studies have shown that ginger rhizomes contain a wide variety of active compounds, which concentrations vary depending on geographical origin, growing season, harvest period and level of maturity of rhizomes at harvest 40, 41, 42. These compounds also vary depending on the variety, agronomic practices, and especially drying and storage conditions 20.
More than 400 different compounds have been found in ginger. The main constituents of rhizomes (Table 1) are carbohydrates, fats, proteins, amino acids, vitamins (thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin A and C), minerals (iron, calcium, phosphorus, zinc, copper), terpenes and polyphenolic compounds 20, 43. According to 41, ginger contains 194 types of volatile oils, 85 types of gingerol and 28 types of diarylheptanoid compounds. Aromatic constituents are zingiberene and bisabolene, whereas oleoresin confers the pungent trait 41, 43, 44. Therefore, oleoresins are very important compounds for the hot and lemony flavour of ginger. Some of these compounds belong to the vanilloid family and also known as gingerols 45, 46. Thus, the characteristic aroma and flavour of ginger are due to volatile oils essentially rich in gingerols and shogaols 44, 45. It appears that gingerols, a series of chemical homologs differentiated by the length of their unbranched alkyl chains, have been identified as the main hot components of ginger oleoresin from fresh rhizomes, with 6-gingerol being the most abundant. However, shogaols are products generated through the dehydration of gingerols during long-term storage or heat treatment 17. Therefore, shogaols predominate hot constituents of oleoresin in dried ginger.
Ginger is a promising crop with high economic potential. Its production remained marginal in Burkina Faso, compared to major food crops and cash crops 47. The average annual production was estimated below 5.000 tons per year, which meets less than 10% of the domestic demand, estimated at around 50.000 tons per year 7. The production fluctuated from year to year, but with overall an increasing trend in recent years 47. This evolution of the production reflects the growing interest of farmers in this crop due to an increasing market demand.
Ginger cultivation has been adopted by many farmers as an option of income diversification and thus provides them with substantial revenues. Diversification of crops contributes significantly to farmers’ resilience to climate change and offers economic benefits to alleviate poverty and food insecurity 48.
However, farmers dedication to large scale production is constrained by the tediousness of the work, the lack of labour and agricultural equipment and the long duration of ginger production cycle. In a survey we conducted in the crop production areas, most of the producers we met testify that ginger is the first crop to plant with early rains, well before even major food and other cash crops (cereals, cotton, groundnut, sesame, etc.). Yet, ginger is one of the last to be harvested. However, it is not known whether this schedule is a season planning option of farming activities or a requirement of the species to complete its cycle. Therefore, future research should clarify whether ginger can be produced in shorter duration.
Furthermore, the most common agricultural practice for ginger cropping is planting on ridges, although often flat sowing is also used. These practices are implemented along with mulching for soil moisture conservation, soil fertility improvement, and seedling protection from excessive sunlight 49.
Such methods are important to sustain ginger cultivation, which seems to deplete soil noticeably 1. Thus, several soil fertility management practices, such as crop rotation and association, have been applied to minimise soil depletion over years.
Ginger is mainly produced in western regions of Burkina Faso, such as the Cascades, the Hauts Bassins and the Sud-Ouest (Figure 1). These regions are the most humid and their pedoclimatic conditions are very conducive to ginger cultivation. Whilst men are predominant in the production activities, ginger processing and commercialisation are generally entitled to women. The business related to this spice proved to be beneficial all actors, including producers, traders and processors 47.
Subsequently, ginger appears as a cash crop with high market value, which is dragged by the crop’s proven or recognized nutritional and medicinal properties 50, 51. However, although its cultivation is increasingly gaining interest, little research is being undertaken on ginger in order to better guide producers and develop successful and adapted cultivars in Burkina Faso.
Successful conservation is a key factor in the preservation of species' genetic resources, in varietal improvement programmes and in commercial quality maintenance. This is even truer with ginger, which is vegetatively propagated and the conservation of seed rhizomes from one crop year to the other can be a big challenge for farmers. Traditionally, ginger is conserved in three main conditions 51, 52: (i) on-site conservation in the field. In this case, the rhizomes are not harvested but are rather kept underground and then covered with straw to minimize the sun’s impact; (ii) the heap storage conservation under shade with adequate mulching, or in a straw-covered hut; finally (iii) conservation in pits covered with earth and straw. The duration of the conservation is dependent on the farmers urge to sell his produce to face variable financial needs (children school fees, social events) or to use them as seeds for the next cropping season.
6.2. Constraints of Conservation and Improvement StrategiesThe long-term preservation of ginger is laborious with traditional, rudimentary and not-always effective methods. Indeed, under traditional storage conditions, ginger rhizome may subject of many serious issues such as quality defects, mould and other attacks of biotic origin (bacteria, fungi, viruses, nematodes) 14, rots, early germination, physiological exhaustion, etc. 16, 53, 54. Farmers' conservation techniques do not warrant rhizomes’ integrity over a long period of time. Long term conservation in traditional condition leads to gradual degeneration and subsequent weakening of their ability to regenerate. This affects the seed system enormously, which remained informal, due to little involvement of both research institutions and the National Seed Service, because the conservation of rhizomes from one season to the next remains uncertain.
Another setback of the traditional conservation system is the loss of genetic variability of ginger, imposed by a kind of natural selection of genotypes that stand long term conservation. Yet, the crop production and varietal improvement depend greatly on the available diversity 55. Therefore, there is a need to improve ginger conservation methods to save the maximum of its genetic resources and develop the ginger industry in the country. To the extent of diversity conservation, maintenance and creation of variability, many modern conservation methods exist that could overcome the limitations of traditional approaches. Of these, in vitro micropropagation of buds used as explants has already been shown to be very effective on the related species Curcuma caesia 56, 57. Tissue culture is a promising method for the maintenance of collections. This technique, already tested on ginger in Jamaica to produce new disease-free seedlings, has the advantage of addressing both the seed multiplication and the species diversity conservation 58.
In the current context of ginger cultivation in Burkina Faso, the challenge of conservation remains a crucial agricultural research theme to investigate. To achieve a thriving ginger production in the country, losses during seed rhizomes storage must be reduced significantly. This requires the development of innovative conservation methods adapted to the environment and the socio-economic conditions of farmers.
As a crop with secondary importance, research in the selection and genetic improvement of ginger is almost non-existent in Burkina Faso. The only known work in this field is that of Nandkangré and co-workers 59 on the genetic characterization of ginger accessions collected in the Hauts-Bassins and Cascades regions, using microsatellite markers. Additionally, pilot research has been under way at Farakoba Agricultural Research Station, where some varieties have been selected. However, not only are there few or no scientific publications addressing ginger research in Burkina Faso, but also there is a lack of hindsight to appreciate the work already done. As a result, nationally defined selection targets are not known.
Nevertheless, the various constraints linked to the production and conservation of quality ginger seed-rhizomes suggest that breeding programmes focus efforts on the selection of genotypes that address these constraints. In this way, breeding activities must contribute to the development of cultivars possessing important traits such as productivity, resistance to diseases and pests, essential oil content, oleoresin content, and fibre content 60.
Also, such research efforts should encompass the genetic improvement of cultivars for adaptation to a wider production area and for their commercial traits 61. Ultimately, cultivar development should lead to new varieties that meet market demand and consumers’ preferences.
7.2. Genetic Diversity of GingerGenetic diversity increases the chances of having alleles favourable to the various traits of interest for selection. Tools for assessing genetic variability include molecular analyses and varietal testing. These tools of common use, allow a better knowledge of the varieties and help in the decision-making during the selection process of the most efficient varieties for the trait(s) of interest 62, 63, 64.
The availability of genetically different clones is essential to implement varietal improvement of vegetatively propagated plants. Thus, biodiversity is crucial to ensure a diversified and sustainable production of the spice plant ginger 65 but also to conduct genetic improvement programme.
In plant breeding, agronomic evaluation is essential to know the level of variability present in the genetic material at hand 66. Thus, many agronomic trials has been conducted, mainly in big ginger-producing countries where ginger is highly appreciated, such as India, China, Japan, Thailand, Brazil and Malaysia 66, 67, 68. Such studies revealed variable levels of diversity in ginger. In addition to presenting genetic variability, trials enable to estimate correlations between traits 66, 68, 69. Thus, relevant information have been provided on the levels of agronomic and commercial traits of the plant, including yields and essential oils content and rhizome’s aesthetics 67. However, this crop appeared to show, overall, a low genetic variability mainly due to its characteristics of vegetative propagation pathways, which minimise sources of variability.
In Burkina Faso, research on ginger is recent and mainly concerns the study of genetic diversity conducted by 59. Cultivars currently under cultivation were issued from selection by the farmers themselves based on the phytosanitary status of rhizomes and their preferences in terms of size, colour and taste (spiciness). Particular attention should therefore be paid to the formal management of ginger seed rhizomes in terms of quality control.
Molecular markers are the most appropriate tool for the assessment of genetic diversity, since they are not prone to the effect of the environment. Genetic diversity studies conducted to date on ginger and other related species used AFLP-like molecular markers 31, 70, 71, 72, ISSR, SSR, RAPD 59, 73, 74 and isoenzyme markers. These markers are renowned for their simplicity, speed and reliability of results. In particular, PCR-based marking systems are known for their effectiveness in genetic diversity studies 55, 71, 75. However, the result that has consistently emerged from the different systems of diversity studies was the low genotypic variability, despite the high morphological diversity known in ginger 60.
In Africa, and particularly in Burkina Faso, there is little or no variability 59. Virtually the same clones may be found in the different producing regions. Generally, vegetatively propagated plants such as ginger have low genetic diversity 57, 76. This is also due to the relatively recent introduction of this spice species in Africa from Asia 13, 45. In addition, in a pivotal study, the analysis of sequence labels expressed had made it possible to detect in the NCBI database, 64026 SNP sites and 7034 sites of indel polymorphism with a frequency of 0.84 SNP / 100 bp 77. There is then a significant variability hidden in the genome, the study of which should detect more molecular polymorphisms at the proportion of the high phenotypic variability. As a result, diversity analyses based on genome sequencing offer interesting prospects for exploiting genetic diversity for breeding the species 78, 79. Advanced analysis of genetic diversity expressed by variants in a linear sequence of DNA, is relevant for detecting genes responsible for traits of agronomic and commercial interests in ginger 80.
Since the available knowledge on the ginger genome is scarce, RAPDs have been the most widely used markers in the crop diversity studies 75, due to their reproducibility and their high level of polymorphism 81. However, SSRs remain until then one of the most powerful markers that make it possible to accurately and quickly assess the level of genetic diversity within germs of any crop. To this end, eight (8) SSR markers have been specifically developed on ginger 75, 81. Nowadays, SNPs have become prime markers in the characterization of genetic material, especially in high-throughput detection and easy integration of genotyping data. They have the advantage of accurately characterizing and describing the complete genome of a species 77, 82. The development of this type of markers on ginger would be very useful to deepen the study of the crop genetic diversity. In addition, the application of molecular markers has proved to be effective in the management of collections of genetic material and varietal identification. Furthermore, they contribute to our understanding of the genetic control of quantitative traits and thus support the breeding process.
7.3. Selection and Improvement MethodsMolecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) offers the advantage of reliably identifying appropriate parental lines and tracking target genes in breeding populations 79, 83. The botanical nature of ginger has made varietal improvement projects delicate. It is a species with an exclusively vegetative propagation mode 60. Thus, clone’s selection activities predominate in research programs dedicated to this crop and hybridisations are rather rare. In addition, the low genotypic variability of this species makes it difficult and slow to progress in genetic gain by sexual routes. Therefore, mutation breeding and tissue culture appear as sources of allelic variability, to provide new genotypic variants in ginger. Mutations in the genome can be induced by gamma irradiation or by the use of mutagens such as ethyl methane sulphonate, diethylsulfate or sodium azide 84, 85, 86, 87.
These methods have been reported as effective in inducing genetic variation in several plant species including groundnuts 85, 86, 87, cowpea 84, chickpea 88, and also another asexually reproducing plant such as banana 61. In addition, tissue culture on ginger can generate somaclonal variants which can thus broaden the genetic basis of the species. Such induced variations are opportunities for the selection and cultivar development of ginger 89, especially in regions where its genetic diversity is trivial.
Ginger is a very widespread plant and consumed all over the world. Therefore, its knowledge and varietal improvement are crucial to enhance the economic value of the crop, develop its industry, and harness its nutritional and therapeutic benefits. The low genotypic diversity of ginger can be compensated on the one hand by the introduction of materials from countries with a high genetic diversity, and on the other hand, by the induction of allelic variability by means of various processes such as mutagenesis and genetic transformation.
The authors acknowledge the Regional Directorate of Institute for the Environment and Agricultural Research (INERA) (Farakoba/Bobo-Dioulasso) for providing research facilities. DM has been awarded a scholarship from the Centre for Information, Educational and Vocational Guidance, and Scholarships (CIOSPB/Burkina Faso) to pursue a Doctorate degree at the Université Joseph Ki Zerbo of Ouagadougou.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | Foine A. Les Zingiberaceae en phytothérapie: l’exemple du gingembre. 2017. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | PIP. Guide de bonnes pratiques phytosanitaires pour le gingembre (Zingiber officinale) en pays ACP.pdf. 2009. | ||
In article | |||
[3] | Mohd-Yusof YA, Sieh S, Murad NA, Wan-Ngah WZ. Anticancer effect of ginger extract (Zingiber officinale) on liver cancer cell lines. Malays J Biochem Mol Biol 2002; 7: 38-42. | ||
In article | |||
[4] | Zhang GF, Yang ZB, Wang Y, Yang WR, Jiang SZ, Gai GS. Effects of ginger root (Zingiber officinale) processed to different particle sizes on growth performance, antioxidant status, and serum metabolites of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2009; 88: 2159-2166. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | FIRCA. La filière gingembre. Côte d’Ivoire. | ||
In article | |||
[6] | FAO. La situation mondiale de l’alimentation et de l’agriculture 2017: mettre les systèmes alimentaires au service d’une transformation rurale inclusive. Roma: FAO. | ||
In article | |||
[7] | MAAH. Guide de production du gingembre (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Burkina Faso. | ||
In article | |||
[8] | Nandkangré H. Caractérisation génétique et identification de variétés de gingembre (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) adaptées au système de production au Burkina Faso. 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[9] | Ebert A W. Potential of Underutilized Traditional Vegetables and Legume Crops to Contribute to Food and Nutritional Security, Income and More Sustainable Production Systems. Sustainability 2014; 6: 319-335. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Padulosi S, Leaman D, Quek P. Challenges and Opportunities in Enhancing the Conservation and Use of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 2002; 9: 243-267. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | Randrianarivelo MF. Suivi phénologique et amélioration de la production du gingembre (Zingiber officinale Roscoe).Cas de la région Atsinanana. Université D’Antananarivo. | ||
In article | |||
[12] | Prameela R, Venkaiah M. The Gingers of the north coastal Andhra Pradesh, India. Trop Plant Res 2018; 5: 53-60. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | Butin A. Le gingembre: de son utilisation ancestrale à un avenir prometteur. 2017. | ||
In article | |||
[14] | Meenu G, Jebasingh T. Diseases of Ginger. In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[15] | Pinson C. Gingembre et curcuma: un concentré de bienfaits pour votre santé et votre beauté. Paris: Eyrolles. | ||
In article | |||
[16] | Kaushal M, Gupta A, Vaidya D, Gupta M. Postharvest Management and Value Addition of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A Review. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol 2017; 2: 397-412. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[17] | Shao X, Lishuang L, Tiffany P, Wu H, Ho C-T, Sang S. Quantitative Analysis of Ginger Components in Commercial Products Using Liquid Chromatography with Electrochemical Array Detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010; 12608-12614. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[18] | Sangwan A, Kawatra A, Sehgal S. Nutritional composition of ginger powder prepared using various drying methods. J Food Sci Technol 2014; 51: 2260-2262. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[19] | CTA. gingembre, une épice en vogue. Mag Dév Agric Rural Pays ACP 2012. | ||
In article | |||
[20] | Agrahari P, Panda P, Verma NK, Khan WU, Darbari S. A brief study on Zingiber officinale-A review. 2015; 9. | ||
In article | |||
[21] | Akimoto M, Iizuka M, Kanematsu R, Yoshida M, Takenaga K. Anticancer Effect of Ginger Extract against Pancreatic Cancer Cells Mainly through Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Autotic Cell Death. PLOS ONE 2015: 22. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[22] | Bischoff-Kont I, Fürst R. Benefits of Ginger and Its Constituent 6-Shogaol in Inhibiting Inflammatory Processes. Pharmaceuticals 2021; 14: 571. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[23] | da Silveira Vasconcelos M, Mota EF, Gomes-Rochette NF, Nunes-Pinheiro DCS, Nabavi SM, de Melo DF. Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). In: Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements. Elsevier, 2019: 235-239. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[24] | D’Souza SP, Chavannavar SV, Kanchanashri B, Niveditha SB. Pharmaceutical Perspectives of Spices and Condiments as Alternative Antimicrobial Remedy. J Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 2017; 22: 1002-1010. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[25] | Ezzat SM, Ezzat MI, Okba MM, Menze ET, Abdel-Naim AB. The hidden mechanism beyond ginger ( Zingiber officinale Rosc.) potent in vivo and in vitro anti-inflammatory activity. J Ethnopharmacol 2018; 214: 113-123. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[26] | Shukla Y, Singh M. Cancer preventive properties of ginger: A brief review. Food Chem Toxicol 2007; 45: 683-690. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[27] | Divakar MadhuC, Al-Siyabi A, Varghese ShirleyS, Al- Rubaie M. The Practice of Ethnomedicine in the Northern and Southern Provinces of Oman. Oman Med J 2016; 31: 245-252. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[28] | Pramono S. Utilisation and Functional Components Evaluation of Ginger. In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[29] | Eleazu C, Amadi C, Iwo G, Nwosu P, Ironua C. Chemical Composition and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of 10 Elite Accessions of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). J Clin Toxicol 2013; 03. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[30] | Wang J, Ke W, Bao R, Hu X, Chen F. Beneficial effects of ginger Zingiber officinale Roscoe on obesity and metabolic syndrome: a review: Beneficial effects of ginger in metabolic syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2017; 1398: 83-98. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[31] | Ashraf K, Sultan S, Shah SAA. Phychemistry, phytochemical, pharmacological and molecular study of Zingiber officinale Roscoe: a review. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017; 9: 8. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[32] | Oladunni Balogun F, Tayo AdeyeOluwa E, Omotayo Tom Ashafa A. Pharmacological Potentials of Ginger. In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[33] | Sp N, Kang DY, Lee J-M, Bae SW, Jang K-J. Potential Antitumor Effects of 6-Gingerol in p53-Dependent Mitochondrial Apoptosis and Inhibition of Tumor Sphere Formation in Breast Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 4660. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[34] | Xu S, Zhang H, Liu T, Yang W, Lv W, He D, Guo P, Li L. 6-Gingerol induces cell-cycle G1-phase arrest through AKT–GSK 3β–cyclin D1 pathway in renal-cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85: 379-390. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[35] | Dosch AR, Dai X, Reyzer ML, Mehra S, Srinivasan S, Willobee BA, Kwon D, Kashikar N, Caprioli R, Merchant NB, Nagathihalli NS. Combined Src/EGFR Inhibition Targets STAT3 Signaling and Induces Stromal Remodeling to Improve Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Mol Cancer Res 2020; 18: 623-631. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[36] | Lee S-H, Cekanova M, Baek SJ. Multiple mechanisms are involved in 6-gingerol-induced cell growth arrest and apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. Mol Carcinog 2008; 47: 197-208. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[37] | Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol 2019; 25: 101084. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[38] | Rastogi N, Duggal S, Singh SK, Porwal K, Srivastava VK, Maurya R, Bhatt MLB, Mishra DP. Proteasome inhibition mediates p53 reactivation and anti-cancer activity of 6-Gingerol in cervical cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 43310-43325. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[39] | Zivarpour P, Nikkhah E, Maleki Dana P, Asemi Z, Hallajzadeh J. Molecular and biological functions of gingerol as a natural effective therapeutic drug for cervical cancer. J Ovarian Res 2021; 14: 43. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[40] | Ali BH, Blunden G, Tanira MO, Nemmar A. Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46: 409-420. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[41] | Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang Y. Research Progress on Chemical Constituents of Zingiber officinale Roscoe. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 1-21. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[42] | Wilson R, Haniadka R, Sandhya P, Palatty PL, Baliga MS. Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) the Dietary Agent in Skin Care: A Review. In: Bioactive Dietary Factors and Plant Extracts in Dermatology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2013: 103-111. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[43] | Grzanna R, Lindmark L, Frondoza CG. Ginger—An Herbal Medicinal Product with Broad Anti-Inflammatory Actions. J Med Food 2005; 8: 125-132. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[44] | Prasad S, Tyagi AK. Ginger and Its Constituents: Role in Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 1-11. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[45] | Gigon F. Le gingembre, une épice contre la nausée. Phytothérapie. 2012; 87-91. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[46] | Wohlmuth H, Smith MK, Brooks LO, Myers SP, Leach DN. Essential Oil Composition of Diploid and Tetraploid Clones of Ginger ( Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Grown in Australia. J Agric Food Chem 2006; 54: 1414-1419. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[47] | DGPER. Rapport diagnostique de la filière gingembre et ses chaines de valeurs. Burkina Faso: MAAH | ||
In article | |||
[48] | Ba A, Konipo O, Diarrisso T, Dembele B, Kone AK, Konte MS, Coulibaly D. Déterminants des stratégies de diversification des cultures dans les exploitations agricoles en zone cotonnière du Mali. 2019; 01: 98-107. | ||
In article | |||
[49] | Kpadonou GE, Akponikpè PBI, Adanguidi J, Zougmore RB, Adjogboto A, Likpete DD, Sossavihotogbe CNA, Djenontin AJ, Baco MN. What best practices of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) for vegetable crops production in West Africa? Sci Nat Agron 2019; 31-48. | ||
In article | |||
[50] | Shin S-D, Lee M-S, Lee J-H. Quality characteristics of grain syrups containing ginger (Zingiber officinale). Food Sci Technol 2021; 5. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[51] | Vijayan AK, Gudade BA, Gautam A, Deka TN, Bora SS, Dhanapal K, Remashree AB. Cultivation of Ginger in Sikkim under an Organic System. In: Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[52] | Nandkangre H, Ouedraogo M, Sawadogo M. Caractérisation du système de production du gingembre (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) au Burkina Faso : Potentialités, contraintes et perspectives. Int J Biol Chem Sci 2015; 9: 861. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[53] | Gerbaud P. Les petits exotiques. CIRAD-Fruitrop 2008; 8. | ||
In article | |||
[54] | Sharma Y. Ginger (Zingiber officinale)-An elixir of life a review. Pharma Innov J 2017; 6: 22-27. | ||
In article | |||
[55] | Belattar R. Application des marqueurs moléculaires à la gestion des ressources génétiques d’une accession de blé dur algérien (Triticum durum Desf.). 2018. | ||
In article | |||
[56] | Chowdhury S, Pal K, Chakraborty M, Chakraborty S, Mandal S, Pandit GKr, Maitra S, Sahana N. Conservation and In Vitro Propagation of an Endangered Wild Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) Species from Sub - Himalayan Terai Region of West Bengal. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2020; 9: 2132-2140. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[57] | Jatoi SA, Kikuchi A, Mimura M, San-San-Yi, Watanabe KN. Relationships of Zingiber species, and genetic variability assessment in ginger (Zingiber officinale) accessions from ex-situ genebank, on-farm and rural markets. Breed Sci 2008; 58: 261-270. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[58] | FAO. culture de tissus pour produire du gingembre indemne de maladie en Jamaîque. 2020. Available from: https://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/fr/c/1319907/. | ||
In article | |||
[59] | Nandkangré H, Ouedraogo M, Bado S, Zida SF, Kima AS, Sawadogo M. Genetic diversity analysis of Burkina Faso ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) landraces using microsatellite markers. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2017; 50122-50126. | ||
In article | |||
[60] | Parthasarathy VA, Srinivasan V, Nair RR, Zachariah TJ, Kumar A, Prasath D. Ginger: Botany and Horticulture. In: Janick J, editor. Horticultural Reviews. First Edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012: 273-388. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[61] | Ochatt S, Jain S Mohan (eds). Breeding of Neglected and Under-Utilized Crops, Spices, and Herbs. 0 ed. CRC Press. | ||
In article | |||
[62] | Abdou R, Bakasso Y, Adam T, Saadou M, Baudoin J-P. Biologie, diversité et outils pour l’analyse de la diversité génétique de l’oignon, Allium cepa L. (synthèse bibliographique). Biotechnol Agron Soc Env 2015; 19: 184-196. | ||
In article | |||
[63] | Khennaoui A. Diversité phénotypique et moléculaire du blé dur cultivé en Algérie : identification et caractérisation des accessions. 2018. | ||
In article | |||
[64] | Lefort-Buson M, Hebert Y, Damerval C. Les outils d’évaluation de la diversité génétique et phénotypique. Agronomie 1988; 8: 173-178. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[65] | Adjatin A, Akognon C, Balogoun D, Tossa C, Yedomonhan H, Dansi A. [Diversity and ethnobotanical characteristics of aromatic plants and spices consumed in Central Benin. Int J Innov Appl Stud 2020; 30: 260-273. | ||
In article | |||
[66] | Zambrano Blanco E, Baldin Pinheiro J. Agronomic evaluation and clonal selection of ginger genotypes (Zingiber officinale Roseoe) in Brazil. Agron Colomb 2017; 35: 275-284. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[67] | Das A, Sahoo RK, Barik DP, Subudhi E. Identification of Duplicates in Ginger Germplasm Collection from Odisha Using Morphological and Molecular Characterization. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 2020; 90: 1057-1066. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[68] | Jatoi SA, Watanabe KN. Diversity analysis and relationships among ginger landraces. Pak J Bot 2013; 45: 1203-1214. | ||
In article | |||
[69] | Wang L, Gao F, Xu K, Li X. Natural occurrence of mixploid ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) in China and its morphological variations. Sci Hortic 2014; 172: 54-60. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[70] | Das A, Kesari V, Satyanarayana VM, Parida A, Mitra S, Rangan L. Genetic diversity in ecotypes of the scarce wild medicinal crop Zingiber moran revealed by ISSR and AFLP marker analysis and chromosome number assessment. Plant Biosyst - Int J Deal Asp Plant Biol 2015; 149: 111-120. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[71] | Wahyuni S. Genetic relationships among ginger accessions based on AFLP marker. 2003; 9. | ||
In article | |||
[72] | Zambrano Blanco E, Bajay MM, Siqueira MVBM, Zucchi MI, Pinheiro JB. Genetic diversity and structure of Brazilian ginger germplasm (Zingiber officinale) revealed by AFLP markers. Genetica 2016; 144: 627-638. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[73] | Das A, Gaur M, Barik DP, Subudhi E. Genetic diversity analysis of 60 ginger germplasm core accessions using ISSR and SSR markers. Plant Biosyst - Int J Deal Asp Plant Biol 2017; 151: 822-832. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[74] | Lee S-Y, Fai WK, Zakaria M, Ibrahim H, Othman RY, Gwag J-G, Rao V. R, Park Y-J. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers, isolated from ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2007; 1009-1011. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[75] | Ismail NA, Rafii MY, Mahmud TMM, Hanafi MM, Miah G. Molecular markers: a potential resource for ginger genetic diversity studies. Mol Biol Rep 2016; 43: 1347-1358. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[76] | Babu KN, Suraby EJ, Cissin J, Minoo D, Pradeepkumar T, Parthasarathy VA, Peter KV. Status of transgenics in Indian spices. J Trop Agric 2013; 5: 1-14. | ||
In article | |||
[77] | Chandrasekar A, Riju A, Sithara K, Anoop S, Eapen SJ. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphism in ginger using expressed sequence tags. Bioinformation 2009; 4: 119-122. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[78] | Gemenet DC, Kitavi Mercy N, David M, Ndege D, SsaliI RT, Swanckaert J, Makunde G, Yencho GC, Gruneberg W, Carey Edward, Mwanga RO. Andrade MI, Heck S, Campos H. Development of diagnostic SNP markers for quality assurance and control in sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] breeding programs. Res. Artic. 2020: 18. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[79] | Soriano JM. Molecular Marker Technology for Crop Improvement. Agronomy 2020; 10: 1462. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[80] | Han M, Opoku KN, Bissah NAB, Su T. Solanum aethiopicum: The Nutrient-Rich Vegetable Crop with Great Economic, Genetic Biodiversity and Pharmaceutical Potential. Horticulturae 2021; 7: 17. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[81] | Shivakumar N. Biotechnology and Crop Improvement of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020: 13. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[82] | Zhang J, Yang J, Zhang L, Luo J, Zhao H, Zhang J, Wen C. A new SNP genotyping technology Target SNP-seq and its application in genetic analysis of cucumber varieties. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 5623. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[83] | Phougat D, Panwar IS, Punia MS, Sethi SK. Microsatellite markers based characterization in advance breeding lines and cultivars of bread wheat. J Environ Biol 2018; 39: 339-346. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[84] | Gnankambary K, Batieno TBJ, Sawadogo N, Sawadogo M, Tignegre JB, Yonli D, Ouedraogo TJ. Genetic Variability Induced by Gamma Radiation in Cowpea [(Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)] in Burkina Faso. Eur Sci J ESJ 2019; 15. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[85] | Gunasekaran A, Pavadai P. Studies on Induced Physical and Chemical Mutagenesis in Groundnut (Arachis hypogia). Int Lett Nat Sci 2015; 35: 25-35. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[86] | Mensah JK, Obadoni B. Effects of sodium azide on yield parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Afr J Biotechnol 2007; 6: 668-671. | ||
In article | |||
[87] | Tshilenge-Lukanda L, Kalonji-Mbuyi A, C. Nkongolo KK, Kizungu RV. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Morpho-Agronomic Characteristics of Groundnut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.). Am J Plant Sci 2013; 04: 2186-2192. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[88] | Amri-Tiliouine W. Induction de la variabilité génétique par radio-mutagenèse (rayons gamma) chez le pois chiche (Cicer arietinum L.) et évaluation agronomique et génétique (Low-Cost TILLING) de mutants en M2. 2019. | ||
In article | |||
[89] | Anil VS, Bennur S, Lobo S. Somaclonal variations for crop improvement: Selection for disease resistant variants in vitro. Plant Sci Today 2018; 5: 44-54. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2021 Korotimi Deme, Moumouni Konate, Hamed Mahamadi Ouedraogo, Jacob Sanou and Mahamadou Sawadogo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
[1] | Foine A. Les Zingiberaceae en phytothérapie: l’exemple du gingembre. 2017. | ||
In article | |||
[2] | PIP. Guide de bonnes pratiques phytosanitaires pour le gingembre (Zingiber officinale) en pays ACP.pdf. 2009. | ||
In article | |||
[3] | Mohd-Yusof YA, Sieh S, Murad NA, Wan-Ngah WZ. Anticancer effect of ginger extract (Zingiber officinale) on liver cancer cell lines. Malays J Biochem Mol Biol 2002; 7: 38-42. | ||
In article | |||
[4] | Zhang GF, Yang ZB, Wang Y, Yang WR, Jiang SZ, Gai GS. Effects of ginger root (Zingiber officinale) processed to different particle sizes on growth performance, antioxidant status, and serum metabolites of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2009; 88: 2159-2166. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[5] | FIRCA. La filière gingembre. Côte d’Ivoire. | ||
In article | |||
[6] | FAO. La situation mondiale de l’alimentation et de l’agriculture 2017: mettre les systèmes alimentaires au service d’une transformation rurale inclusive. Roma: FAO. | ||
In article | |||
[7] | MAAH. Guide de production du gingembre (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Burkina Faso. | ||
In article | |||
[8] | Nandkangré H. Caractérisation génétique et identification de variétés de gingembre (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) adaptées au système de production au Burkina Faso. 2016. | ||
In article | |||
[9] | Ebert A W. Potential of Underutilized Traditional Vegetables and Legume Crops to Contribute to Food and Nutritional Security, Income and More Sustainable Production Systems. Sustainability 2014; 6: 319-335. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[10] | Padulosi S, Leaman D, Quek P. Challenges and Opportunities in Enhancing the Conservation and Use of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 2002; 9: 243-267. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[11] | Randrianarivelo MF. Suivi phénologique et amélioration de la production du gingembre (Zingiber officinale Roscoe).Cas de la région Atsinanana. Université D’Antananarivo. | ||
In article | |||
[12] | Prameela R, Venkaiah M. The Gingers of the north coastal Andhra Pradesh, India. Trop Plant Res 2018; 5: 53-60. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[13] | Butin A. Le gingembre: de son utilisation ancestrale à un avenir prometteur. 2017. | ||
In article | |||
[14] | Meenu G, Jebasingh T. Diseases of Ginger. In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[15] | Pinson C. Gingembre et curcuma: un concentré de bienfaits pour votre santé et votre beauté. Paris: Eyrolles. | ||
In article | |||
[16] | Kaushal M, Gupta A, Vaidya D, Gupta M. Postharvest Management and Value Addition of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A Review. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol 2017; 2: 397-412. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[17] | Shao X, Lishuang L, Tiffany P, Wu H, Ho C-T, Sang S. Quantitative Analysis of Ginger Components in Commercial Products Using Liquid Chromatography with Electrochemical Array Detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010; 12608-12614. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[18] | Sangwan A, Kawatra A, Sehgal S. Nutritional composition of ginger powder prepared using various drying methods. J Food Sci Technol 2014; 51: 2260-2262. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[19] | CTA. gingembre, une épice en vogue. Mag Dév Agric Rural Pays ACP 2012. | ||
In article | |||
[20] | Agrahari P, Panda P, Verma NK, Khan WU, Darbari S. A brief study on Zingiber officinale-A review. 2015; 9. | ||
In article | |||
[21] | Akimoto M, Iizuka M, Kanematsu R, Yoshida M, Takenaga K. Anticancer Effect of Ginger Extract against Pancreatic Cancer Cells Mainly through Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Autotic Cell Death. PLOS ONE 2015: 22. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[22] | Bischoff-Kont I, Fürst R. Benefits of Ginger and Its Constituent 6-Shogaol in Inhibiting Inflammatory Processes. Pharmaceuticals 2021; 14: 571. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[23] | da Silveira Vasconcelos M, Mota EF, Gomes-Rochette NF, Nunes-Pinheiro DCS, Nabavi SM, de Melo DF. Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). In: Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements. Elsevier, 2019: 235-239. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[24] | D’Souza SP, Chavannavar SV, Kanchanashri B, Niveditha SB. Pharmaceutical Perspectives of Spices and Condiments as Alternative Antimicrobial Remedy. J Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 2017; 22: 1002-1010. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[25] | Ezzat SM, Ezzat MI, Okba MM, Menze ET, Abdel-Naim AB. The hidden mechanism beyond ginger ( Zingiber officinale Rosc.) potent in vivo and in vitro anti-inflammatory activity. J Ethnopharmacol 2018; 214: 113-123. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[26] | Shukla Y, Singh M. Cancer preventive properties of ginger: A brief review. Food Chem Toxicol 2007; 45: 683-690. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[27] | Divakar MadhuC, Al-Siyabi A, Varghese ShirleyS, Al- Rubaie M. The Practice of Ethnomedicine in the Northern and Southern Provinces of Oman. Oman Med J 2016; 31: 245-252. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[28] | Pramono S. Utilisation and Functional Components Evaluation of Ginger. In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[29] | Eleazu C, Amadi C, Iwo G, Nwosu P, Ironua C. Chemical Composition and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of 10 Elite Accessions of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). J Clin Toxicol 2013; 03. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[30] | Wang J, Ke W, Bao R, Hu X, Chen F. Beneficial effects of ginger Zingiber officinale Roscoe on obesity and metabolic syndrome: a review: Beneficial effects of ginger in metabolic syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2017; 1398: 83-98. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[31] | Ashraf K, Sultan S, Shah SAA. Phychemistry, phytochemical, pharmacological and molecular study of Zingiber officinale Roscoe: a review. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017; 9: 8. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[32] | Oladunni Balogun F, Tayo AdeyeOluwa E, Omotayo Tom Ashafa A. Pharmacological Potentials of Ginger. In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[33] | Sp N, Kang DY, Lee J-M, Bae SW, Jang K-J. Potential Antitumor Effects of 6-Gingerol in p53-Dependent Mitochondrial Apoptosis and Inhibition of Tumor Sphere Formation in Breast Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 4660. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[34] | Xu S, Zhang H, Liu T, Yang W, Lv W, He D, Guo P, Li L. 6-Gingerol induces cell-cycle G1-phase arrest through AKT–GSK 3β–cyclin D1 pathway in renal-cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85: 379-390. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[35] | Dosch AR, Dai X, Reyzer ML, Mehra S, Srinivasan S, Willobee BA, Kwon D, Kashikar N, Caprioli R, Merchant NB, Nagathihalli NS. Combined Src/EGFR Inhibition Targets STAT3 Signaling and Induces Stromal Remodeling to Improve Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Mol Cancer Res 2020; 18: 623-631. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[36] | Lee S-H, Cekanova M, Baek SJ. Multiple mechanisms are involved in 6-gingerol-induced cell growth arrest and apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. Mol Carcinog 2008; 47: 197-208. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[37] | Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol 2019; 25: 101084. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[38] | Rastogi N, Duggal S, Singh SK, Porwal K, Srivastava VK, Maurya R, Bhatt MLB, Mishra DP. Proteasome inhibition mediates p53 reactivation and anti-cancer activity of 6-Gingerol in cervical cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 43310-43325. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[39] | Zivarpour P, Nikkhah E, Maleki Dana P, Asemi Z, Hallajzadeh J. Molecular and biological functions of gingerol as a natural effective therapeutic drug for cervical cancer. J Ovarian Res 2021; 14: 43. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[40] | Ali BH, Blunden G, Tanira MO, Nemmar A. Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46: 409-420. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[41] | Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang Y. Research Progress on Chemical Constituents of Zingiber officinale Roscoe. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 1-21. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[42] | Wilson R, Haniadka R, Sandhya P, Palatty PL, Baliga MS. Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) the Dietary Agent in Skin Care: A Review. In: Bioactive Dietary Factors and Plant Extracts in Dermatology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2013: 103-111. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[43] | Grzanna R, Lindmark L, Frondoza CG. Ginger—An Herbal Medicinal Product with Broad Anti-Inflammatory Actions. J Med Food 2005; 8: 125-132. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[44] | Prasad S, Tyagi AK. Ginger and Its Constituents: Role in Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 1-11. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[45] | Gigon F. Le gingembre, une épice contre la nausée. Phytothérapie. 2012; 87-91. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[46] | Wohlmuth H, Smith MK, Brooks LO, Myers SP, Leach DN. Essential Oil Composition of Diploid and Tetraploid Clones of Ginger ( Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Grown in Australia. J Agric Food Chem 2006; 54: 1414-1419. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[47] | DGPER. Rapport diagnostique de la filière gingembre et ses chaines de valeurs. Burkina Faso: MAAH | ||
In article | |||
[48] | Ba A, Konipo O, Diarrisso T, Dembele B, Kone AK, Konte MS, Coulibaly D. Déterminants des stratégies de diversification des cultures dans les exploitations agricoles en zone cotonnière du Mali. 2019; 01: 98-107. | ||
In article | |||
[49] | Kpadonou GE, Akponikpè PBI, Adanguidi J, Zougmore RB, Adjogboto A, Likpete DD, Sossavihotogbe CNA, Djenontin AJ, Baco MN. What best practices of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) for vegetable crops production in West Africa? Sci Nat Agron 2019; 31-48. | ||
In article | |||
[50] | Shin S-D, Lee M-S, Lee J-H. Quality characteristics of grain syrups containing ginger (Zingiber officinale). Food Sci Technol 2021; 5. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[51] | Vijayan AK, Gudade BA, Gautam A, Deka TN, Bora SS, Dhanapal K, Remashree AB. Cultivation of Ginger in Sikkim under an Organic System. In: Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020. | ||
In article | |||
[52] | Nandkangre H, Ouedraogo M, Sawadogo M. Caractérisation du système de production du gingembre (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) au Burkina Faso : Potentialités, contraintes et perspectives. Int J Biol Chem Sci 2015; 9: 861. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[53] | Gerbaud P. Les petits exotiques. CIRAD-Fruitrop 2008; 8. | ||
In article | |||
[54] | Sharma Y. Ginger (Zingiber officinale)-An elixir of life a review. Pharma Innov J 2017; 6: 22-27. | ||
In article | |||
[55] | Belattar R. Application des marqueurs moléculaires à la gestion des ressources génétiques d’une accession de blé dur algérien (Triticum durum Desf.). 2018. | ||
In article | |||
[56] | Chowdhury S, Pal K, Chakraborty M, Chakraborty S, Mandal S, Pandit GKr, Maitra S, Sahana N. Conservation and In Vitro Propagation of an Endangered Wild Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) Species from Sub - Himalayan Terai Region of West Bengal. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2020; 9: 2132-2140. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[57] | Jatoi SA, Kikuchi A, Mimura M, San-San-Yi, Watanabe KN. Relationships of Zingiber species, and genetic variability assessment in ginger (Zingiber officinale) accessions from ex-situ genebank, on-farm and rural markets. Breed Sci 2008; 58: 261-270. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[58] | FAO. culture de tissus pour produire du gingembre indemne de maladie en Jamaîque. 2020. Available from: https://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/fr/c/1319907/. | ||
In article | |||
[59] | Nandkangré H, Ouedraogo M, Bado S, Zida SF, Kima AS, Sawadogo M. Genetic diversity analysis of Burkina Faso ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) landraces using microsatellite markers. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2017; 50122-50126. | ||
In article | |||
[60] | Parthasarathy VA, Srinivasan V, Nair RR, Zachariah TJ, Kumar A, Prasath D. Ginger: Botany and Horticulture. In: Janick J, editor. Horticultural Reviews. First Edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012: 273-388. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[61] | Ochatt S, Jain S Mohan (eds). Breeding of Neglected and Under-Utilized Crops, Spices, and Herbs. 0 ed. CRC Press. | ||
In article | |||
[62] | Abdou R, Bakasso Y, Adam T, Saadou M, Baudoin J-P. Biologie, diversité et outils pour l’analyse de la diversité génétique de l’oignon, Allium cepa L. (synthèse bibliographique). Biotechnol Agron Soc Env 2015; 19: 184-196. | ||
In article | |||
[63] | Khennaoui A. Diversité phénotypique et moléculaire du blé dur cultivé en Algérie : identification et caractérisation des accessions. 2018. | ||
In article | |||
[64] | Lefort-Buson M, Hebert Y, Damerval C. Les outils d’évaluation de la diversité génétique et phénotypique. Agronomie 1988; 8: 173-178. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[65] | Adjatin A, Akognon C, Balogoun D, Tossa C, Yedomonhan H, Dansi A. [Diversity and ethnobotanical characteristics of aromatic plants and spices consumed in Central Benin. Int J Innov Appl Stud 2020; 30: 260-273. | ||
In article | |||
[66] | Zambrano Blanco E, Baldin Pinheiro J. Agronomic evaluation and clonal selection of ginger genotypes (Zingiber officinale Roseoe) in Brazil. Agron Colomb 2017; 35: 275-284. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[67] | Das A, Sahoo RK, Barik DP, Subudhi E. Identification of Duplicates in Ginger Germplasm Collection from Odisha Using Morphological and Molecular Characterization. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 2020; 90: 1057-1066. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[68] | Jatoi SA, Watanabe KN. Diversity analysis and relationships among ginger landraces. Pak J Bot 2013; 45: 1203-1214. | ||
In article | |||
[69] | Wang L, Gao F, Xu K, Li X. Natural occurrence of mixploid ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) in China and its morphological variations. Sci Hortic 2014; 172: 54-60. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[70] | Das A, Kesari V, Satyanarayana VM, Parida A, Mitra S, Rangan L. Genetic diversity in ecotypes of the scarce wild medicinal crop Zingiber moran revealed by ISSR and AFLP marker analysis and chromosome number assessment. Plant Biosyst - Int J Deal Asp Plant Biol 2015; 149: 111-120. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[71] | Wahyuni S. Genetic relationships among ginger accessions based on AFLP marker. 2003; 9. | ||
In article | |||
[72] | Zambrano Blanco E, Bajay MM, Siqueira MVBM, Zucchi MI, Pinheiro JB. Genetic diversity and structure of Brazilian ginger germplasm (Zingiber officinale) revealed by AFLP markers. Genetica 2016; 144: 627-638. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[73] | Das A, Gaur M, Barik DP, Subudhi E. Genetic diversity analysis of 60 ginger germplasm core accessions using ISSR and SSR markers. Plant Biosyst - Int J Deal Asp Plant Biol 2017; 151: 822-832. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[74] | Lee S-Y, Fai WK, Zakaria M, Ibrahim H, Othman RY, Gwag J-G, Rao V. R, Park Y-J. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers, isolated from ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2007; 1009-1011. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[75] | Ismail NA, Rafii MY, Mahmud TMM, Hanafi MM, Miah G. Molecular markers: a potential resource for ginger genetic diversity studies. Mol Biol Rep 2016; 43: 1347-1358. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[76] | Babu KN, Suraby EJ, Cissin J, Minoo D, Pradeepkumar T, Parthasarathy VA, Peter KV. Status of transgenics in Indian spices. J Trop Agric 2013; 5: 1-14. | ||
In article | |||
[77] | Chandrasekar A, Riju A, Sithara K, Anoop S, Eapen SJ. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphism in ginger using expressed sequence tags. Bioinformation 2009; 4: 119-122. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[78] | Gemenet DC, Kitavi Mercy N, David M, Ndege D, SsaliI RT, Swanckaert J, Makunde G, Yencho GC, Gruneberg W, Carey Edward, Mwanga RO. Andrade MI, Heck S, Campos H. Development of diagnostic SNP markers for quality assurance and control in sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] breeding programs. Res. Artic. 2020: 18. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[79] | Soriano JM. Molecular Marker Technology for Crop Improvement. Agronomy 2020; 10: 1462. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[80] | Han M, Opoku KN, Bissah NAB, Su T. Solanum aethiopicum: The Nutrient-Rich Vegetable Crop with Great Economic, Genetic Biodiversity and Pharmaceutical Potential. Horticulturae 2021; 7: 17. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[81] | Shivakumar N. Biotechnology and Crop Improvement of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). In: Wang H, editor. Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials. IntechOpen, 2020: 13. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[82] | Zhang J, Yang J, Zhang L, Luo J, Zhao H, Zhang J, Wen C. A new SNP genotyping technology Target SNP-seq and its application in genetic analysis of cucumber varieties. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 5623. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
[83] | Phougat D, Panwar IS, Punia MS, Sethi SK. Microsatellite markers based characterization in advance breeding lines and cultivars of bread wheat. J Environ Biol 2018; 39: 339-346. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[84] | Gnankambary K, Batieno TBJ, Sawadogo N, Sawadogo M, Tignegre JB, Yonli D, Ouedraogo TJ. Genetic Variability Induced by Gamma Radiation in Cowpea [(Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)] in Burkina Faso. Eur Sci J ESJ 2019; 15. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[85] | Gunasekaran A, Pavadai P. Studies on Induced Physical and Chemical Mutagenesis in Groundnut (Arachis hypogia). Int Lett Nat Sci 2015; 35: 25-35. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[86] | Mensah JK, Obadoni B. Effects of sodium azide on yield parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Afr J Biotechnol 2007; 6: 668-671. | ||
In article | |||
[87] | Tshilenge-Lukanda L, Kalonji-Mbuyi A, C. Nkongolo KK, Kizungu RV. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Morpho-Agronomic Characteristics of Groundnut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.). Am J Plant Sci 2013; 04: 2186-2192. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
[88] | Amri-Tiliouine W. Induction de la variabilité génétique par radio-mutagenèse (rayons gamma) chez le pois chiche (Cicer arietinum L.) et évaluation agronomique et génétique (Low-Cost TILLING) de mutants en M2. 2019. | ||
In article | |||
[89] | Anil VS, Bennur S, Lobo S. Somaclonal variations for crop improvement: Selection for disease resistant variants in vitro. Plant Sci Today 2018; 5: 44-54. | ||
In article | View Article | ||