Research Article
Open Access Peer-reviewed

Bacterial Communitie’s Diversity of Rhizosphere’s Soils of Two Legumes, Cajanus cajan and Milletia laurentii, Revealed by Illumina Miseq Sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene

Alvychelle Benith Banga1, 2,, Augustin Aimé Lebonguy1, Angélique Espérance Lembella Boumba1, 3, Joseph Goma-Tchimbakala1, 3

1Institut National de Recherche en Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, Brazzaville République du Congo

2Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Brazzaville, République du Congo

3Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agronomie et de Foresterie, Brazzaville République du Congo

World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2022, 10(1), 20-29. DOI: 10.12691/wjar-10-1-4
Received May 08, 2022; Revised June 11, 2022; Accepted June 21, 2022

Abstract

Microbial organic fertilizers have been shown to boost plant productivity. These microorganisms of interest are more numerous in the soil around the roots or rhizosphere. Objective of this study was to assess bacterial communities’ diversity of in the rhizosphere of two legumes, Milletia laurentii and Cajanus cajan, growing on the same soil. First of all, the levels Mg, N, Fe, C total, P, NH4+ and particle size were determined by spectrophotometry, Kjeldahl method, Olsen method, Walkey-Black method, Nessler reagent, DEB method and Robinson pipette method, respectively. Next, bacterial diversity was determined by Sequencing Illumina Miseq of 16S rRNA gene. Results showed that contents of carbon, total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, phosphorus, iron and magnesium were slightly elevated in Milletia rhizosphere compared to Cajanus. According to the USDA's textural triangle, both soils have a sandy loam soil texture. In terms of diversity, all OTUs (1434) were divided into 30 phyla, 50 classes, 158 families and 314 genera for the 2 soils. Proteobacteria (58.62% - 48.71%), Acidobacteria (27.29% - 9.46%), Firmicutes (8.26% - 7.21%) and Bacteroidetes (13.70% - 2.53%) were most dominant phyla in both rhizospheres (Cajanus - Milletia). The most dominant classes were Alphaproteobacteria (51.44% - 38.90%), Acidobacteriia (26.57% - 8.67%), Bacilli (8.19% - 7.18%), Sphingobacteria (9.83% - 2.50%) and Gammaproteobacteria (4.27% - 3.39%). At the family level, Hyphomicrobiaceae (35.05%-24.22%), Bradyrhizobiaceae (17.32%-11.70%) and Bacillaceae (18.98%-6.49%) were most abundant. Finally, Acidobacterium (26.55%-4.58%), Rhodoplanes (21.63%-7.50%), Bradyrhizobium (17.27%-1.96%) and Bacillus (6.43%-6.29%) were the most abundant genera. Thus, bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere of these two legumes encourages their use for the isolation of bacteria with biofertilizing potential.

Keywords:

Illumina - Miseq, rhizosphere, bacterial diversity
[1]  Kumar S., Satyavir S.D., Kumar R.S., 2022. Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Current Research in Microbial Sciences 3(2022) 1000094.View Article  PubMed
 
[2]  Buta M., Korzeniewska E., Harnisz M., Hebeny J., Zielinski W., Rolbiecki D., Bajkacz S., Felis E., Kokoszka K., 2021. Microbial and chemical polluants one the manure-crops pathway in the perspective of “One health” holistic approach. Science of the total Environment 785 (2021) 147411.View Article  PubMed
 
[3]  Felden B., Cattoira V., 2018. Bacterial adaptation to antibiotics through regulatory RNAs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, 1-11.View Article  PubMed
 
[4]  Li S., Zou D., Li L., Wu L., Liu F., Zeng X., Wang H., Zhu Y. and Xiao Z. 2020. Evolution of heavy metals during thermal treatment of manure: A critical review and out looks. Chemosphere.View Article  PubMed
 
[5]  Borquez C., Frias-Espericueta M.G. and Voltolina D. 2016. Removal of cadmium and lead by adapted strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter cloacae. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 32, 407-412.View Article
 
[6]  Gallego S.M., Pena L.B., Barcia R.A., Azpilicueta C.E., Iannone M.F., Rosales E.P., Benavides M.P. 2012. Unravelling cadmium toxicity and tolerance in plants: insight into regulatory mechanisms. Environ. Exp. Bot 83, 33-46.View Article
 
[7]  Okafor N. 2011. Pollution of aquatic systems: Pollution through eutrophication, fecal materials, and oil spills. Environmental Microbiology of aquatic and waste systems, 151-187.View Article
 
[8]  Zhang M.M., Fan S.H., Guan F.Y. and Yin Z.X. 2020. Soil bacterial community structure of mixed bamboo and broad-leaved, Scientific reports, nature research, vol. 1(210). 6522.View Article  PubMed
 
[9]  Prashar P., Kapoor N., Sachdeva S. 2013. Rhizosphere: its structure, bacterial diversity and signifiance. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol.View Article
 
[10]  Mahanty T., Bhattacharjee S., Goswami M., Bhattacharyya P., Das B., Ghosh A and Tribedy P. 2016. Biofertilizers: a potentiel approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 23, 1-21.
 
[11]  Mazid M. and Khan T.A. 2015. Future of biofertilizers in Indian agriculture: an overview. International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 3(3): 10-23.View Article
 
[12]  Babolola O.O. and Igiehon O.N. 2017. Biofertilizers and sustainable agriculture: exploring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 101: 4871-4881.View Article  PubMed
 
[13]  Aboubacar K., Ousmane Z.M., Amadou H.I., Issaka S., Zoubeirou A.M. 2013. Effect of rhizobial and mycorrhizal co-inoculation on the agronomic performance of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ] in Niger. Journal of Applied Biosciences 72, 5846-5854.View Article
 
[14]  Murgese P., Santamaria P., Leoni B. and Crecchio C. 2020. Ameliorative effects of PGPB on yield physiological parameters, and nutrient transporters gene expression in Barattiere (Cucumus melo L.). J. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 20,784-793.View Article
 
[15]  Fasusi O.A., Cruz C., Babolola O.O. 2021. Agricultural sustainability: Microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture 11-163.View Article
 
[16]  Mabiala S.T., Goma-Tchimbakala J., Goma-Tchimbakala E.J.C.D., Lebonguy A.A and Banga A.B. 2020. Diversity of the Bacterial Community of Three Soils Revealed by Illumina-Miseq Sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene in the South of Brazzaville, Congo. American Journal of Microbiological Research, vol. 8: 141-149.View Article
 
[17]  Samba-Kimbata M.J. 1978. Le climat du Bas-Congo. Thèse 3ème cycle Géographie, Université de Dijon, Faculté des Sciences Humaines, Centre de recherche de climatologie, 280p.
 
[18]  Vennetier P. 1977. Climat In Atlas de la République Populaire du Congo. Les Editions Jeune Afrique, Paris (France), 10-15.
 
[19]  Nelson D.W. and Sommers L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter, in Methods of soil analysis, Part 2 American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 1982, pp. 539-579.View Article  PubMed
 
[20]  Bremmer J.M. and Mulvaney C.S. 1982. Nitrogen-Total carbon, chez Methods of soil analysis, Chemical and Microbiological properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of Americana, Madison, 1982, 595-624.View Article
 
[21]  Murphey J. and Riley P.P. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural water. Anal. Chimim. Acta, vol. 27, pp.31-36.View Article
 
[22]  Segalen P.P. 1971. La détermination du fer libre dans les sols à sesquioxydes, Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol. Vol. 9(11), pp. 3-27.
 
[23]  Dabin B. 1967. Application des dosages automatiques à l’analyse des sols; 3ème partie, Cahiers ORSTOM, série Pédologie, vol (3), pp. 257-263.
 
[24]  Weil A. and Duval J. 2009. Les amendements organiques, fumiers et composts. Dans Guide de gestion globale de la ferme maraichère biologique et diversifiée; Module 7: Amendement et fertilisation. Equiterre; 1-19.
 
[25]  Alabouvette C. and Cordier C. 2018. Fertilité biologique des sols: des microorganismes utiles à la croissance des plantes. Innovations Agronomiques 69, 61-70.
 
[26]  Hamarashid N.H., Othman M.A. and Hussain M.A.H. 2010. Effects of soil texture on chemical compositions, microbial populations and carbon mineralization in soil, Egypt. J. Expp. Biol. (Bot), vol. 6(11), pp. 59-64.
 
[27]  Robin D. 1997. Interest of biochemical characterization for the evaluation of the proportion of stable organic matter after decomposition in soil and the classification of organomeral products. Agronomy, EDP Sciences 17(3), pp. 157-171.View Article
 
[28]  Lauber C.L., Hamady M., Knight R. and Fierer N. 2009. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol, vol. 75, pp. 5111-5120.View Article  PubMed
 
[29]  Janssen P.H. 2006. Identifying the dominant Soil Bacterial Taxa in Librairies of 16S rRNA Genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72, 1719-1728.View Article  PubMed
 
[30]  Putrie R.F.W., Aryantha I.P. and Antonius I.S. 2020. Diversity of endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria from pineaple (Ananas comosus) plant in semi arid ecosystem. Biodiversitas Vol 21, Number 7, pp: 3084-3093.View Article
 
[31]  Ek-Ramos M.J., Gomez-Flores R., Orozco-Flores A.A., Rodriguez-Padilla C., Gonzalez-Ochoa G. and Tamez-Guerra P. 2009. Bioactive products from plant-endophytic Gram-Positive bacteria. Front Microbiol 10: 463View Article  PubMed
 
[32]  Klein E., Katan J. and Gamliel A. 2016. Soil suppressiveness by organic amendement to Fusarium disease in cucumber: Effect on pathogen and host. Phytoparasitica, vol. 44, pp. 239-249.View Article
 
[33]  Qiu M., Zhang R., Xue C., Zhang S., Li S., Zhang N. and Shen Q. 2012. Application of bio-organic fertilizers can control Fusarium wilt of cucumber plants by regulating microbial community of rhizosphere soil, Biol. Fertil. Soils, vol. 48, pp. 807-816.View Article
 
[34]  Sun B., Dong Z.X., Zhang X.X., Li Y., Cao H. and Cui Z.L. 2011. Rice to Vegetables: Short-Versus Long-term Impact of Land-Use Change on the Indigenous Soil Microbial Community, Microb. Ecol. Vol. 1(262), pp. 474-485.View Article  PubMed
 
[35]  Alami M.M., Xue J., Ma Y., Zhu D., Gong Z., Shu S. and Wang X. 2020. Structure, Diversity, and Composition of Bacterial Communities in Rhizospheric Soil of Coptis chinensis Franch under Continuously Cropped Fields, Diversity, vol, 1(212), 57.View Article
 
[36]  Kennedy A.C. and Smith K.L. 1995. Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agriculture soil, Plant Soil, vol. 170, pp. 75-86.View Article
 
[37]  Antoun S.A. 2016. Bacterial Diversity in hyperarid Atacama Desert Soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeo sciences, 112, G04S17.
 
[38]  Francesco P., Frascella A., Santopolo L., Bazzicalupo M., Biondi E.G., Scotti C. and Mengoni A. 2012. Exploring the plant-associated bacterial communities in Medicago sativa L. BCM Microbiology 12: 78.View Article  PubMed
 
[39]  Uroz S., Marc B., Claude M., Pascal F.K. and Francis M. 2010. Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil. Environmental Microbiology Reports 2(2), 281-288.View Article  PubMed
 
[40]  Wang Q., Jiang X., Guan D., Wei D., Zhao B., Ma M., Chen S., Li L., Cao F. and Li L. 2017. Long-term fertilization changes bacterial communities in the maize rhizosphere of Chinese Mollisols. Applied Soil Ecology.View Article
 
[41]  Xuan X., Liu L., He X., Wang K., Xie Q., O’Donnell A.G. and Chen C. 2015. The Bradyrhizobium-legume symbiosis is dominant in shrubby ecosystem of the karst region Southwest China. European Journal of Soil Biology 68 (2015) 1-8.View Article
 
[42]  Barelli F., Santos F.L., 2021. Plant microbiome structure and benefits for sustainable agriculture. Current Plant Biology 26, 100198, 2021.View Article
 
[43]  Yin P., Shi P., Zhang Y., Hu Z., Ma K., Wang H. and Chai T. 2017. The Response of Soil Bacterial communities to Mining Subsidence in the West China Aeolian Sand Area. Applied Soil Ecology 121, 1-10.View Article
 
[44]  Zubair M., Hamif A., Farzand A., Sheikh M.M.T., Khan R.A., Suleman M., Ayaz M. and Gao X. 2019. Genetic Screening and Expression Analysis of Psychrophilic Bacillus spp. Reveal Their Potentiel to Alleviate Cold Stress and Modulate Phytohormones in Wheat. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 337.View Article  PubMed
 
[45]  Verma J.P., Yadav J., Tiwari N.K. 2012. Enhancement of nodulation and yield of chickpea by co-inoculation of indigenous Mesorhizobium spp. and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on nodulation Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 43, 605-621.View Article
 
[46]  Valverde A., Burgos A., Friscella T., Rivas R., Velaz-quez E., Rodriguez-Barrueco C., Cervantes E., Chamber M. and Igual J.M. 2006. Deferential effects of coinoculations with Pseudomonas jessenii PS06 (a phosphate-solubilizing bacteria) and Mesorhizobium ciceri C-2/2 strains on the growth and seed yield of chickpea under greenhouse and field conditions. Plant Soil 287, 43-50.View Article
 
[47]  Marques A.P.G.C, Pires C., Moreira H., Rangel A.O.S.S., Castro P.M.L. 2010. Assessment of the plant growth promotion abilities of six bacterial isolates using zeamays as indicator plants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 1229-1235.View Article
 
[48]  Tian F., Ding Y., Zhu H., Yao L. and Du B. 2009. Genetic Diversity of Siderophore producing bacteria of Tobacco rhizosphere. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (2009): 40: 276-284.View Article  PubMed
 
[49]  Hu D., Li S., Li Y., Peng J., Wei X., Ma J., Zhang C., Jia N., Wang E. and Wang Z. 2020. Streptomyces sp. Strain TOR3209: a rhizosphere bacterium promoting growth of tomato by affecting the rhizosphere microbial communities.View Article  PubMed
 
[50]  Zheng Z.H., Qiao Y.J., Li Z.Z., Wang X., Zhu B. and Hu Y.G. 2019. Effect of legume-cereal mixtures on the diversity of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, Plant Soil Environ 58. (4): 174-180.View Article