In this paper we study and generalize some common fixed point theorems in compact and Hausdorff spaces for a pair of commuting mappings with new contraction conditions. The results presented in this paper include the generalization of some fixed point theorems of Fisher, Jungck, Mukherjee, Pachpatte and Sahu and Sharma.
Fixed point theorey is a fascinating topic for research in modern analysis and topology. The study and research in fixed point theory began with the pioneering work of Banach 2, who in 1922 presented his remarkable contraction mapping theorem popularly known as Banach contraction mapping principle. It has widespread applications in both pure and applied mathematics. In 1961, Edelstein 8 for the first time introduced the concept of contractive mapping defined on compact metric spaces. According to Edelstein "if
is a continuous mapping of a compact metric space
into itself satisfying
for all
then
has unique fixed point in
". In 1976, Jungck 16 generalized contraction mapping theorem for a pair of commuting mappings. Later on several mathematicians have been generalized and improved The Banach contraction mapping theorem for fixed points in several different ways viz, Bondar 3, Browder 4, Chatterjee 5, Ciric 6 are a few to name. For more results in this direction, we refer to 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 23 and references therein. In this paper we want to establish fixed point results in complete, compact and Hausdorff spaces for a pair of commuting mappings. The obtained results are generalizations of some fixed point theorems of Fisher 9, Jungck 16, Mukherjee 17, Pachpatte 18 and Sahu and Sharma 21.
The following fixed point theorems were proved in 9, 16, 17, 18 and 21.
Theorem 1.1. 9 Let T be a mapping of the complete metric space X into itself satisfying the inequality
![]() |
and
then
has a fixed point in 
Theorem 1.2. 16 Let f be a continuous mapping of the complete metric space
into itself. Then f has a fixed point in X if and only if there exists
and a mapping
which commutes with f and satisfies
and
![]() |
then f and g have a common fixed point in X.
Theorem 1.3. 17 Let f and g be mappings of a complete metric space X into itself with f continuous. Let f and g commute with each other and
Also, let g satisfiy the following conditions:
![]() |
with
for all i and
then f and g have a unique common fixed point in X.
Theorem 1.4. 18 Let T be a mapping of the complete metric space X into itself satisfying the inequality
![]() |
and
such that
then T has a unique fixed point.
Theorem 1.5. 21 Let T be a mapping of the complete metric space X into itself satisfy the conditions:
![]() |
and
such that
then T has a unique fixed point in X.
Definition 2.1. Let
be a metric space. A mapping
is said to be sequentially convergent if for every sequence
of
if
is convergent then
has a convergent subsequence.
Definition 2.2. Let
be a continuous self-map of
into itself. Then
is said to be contractive if

Definition 2.3. If X is a non empty set and
is a mapping satisfy the conditions:
(i)
and
if and only if 
(ii) 
(iii) 
Then
is called a metric on
and the pair
is called a metric space.
Definition 2.4. A point
is said to be a fixed point of a self-map
if 
Definition 2.5. (i) A sequence
in a metric space
is said to converge to a point
if for every
there exists
such that
denoted by 
(ii)
is called Cauchy sequence if for some
there exists
such that for
we have
(iii) A metric space
is said to be complete if and only if every Cauchy sequence in
converges to a point of 
In this section we prove our main results on the common fixed points of commuting self-mappings on complete, compact and Hausdorff spaces. We start with the following result.
Theorem 3.1. Let
be a complete metric space and let
be commuting self maps of
into itself with
continuous such that
and
satisfy the conditions
![]() | (3.1) |
where
such that
![]() | (3.2) |
then f and g have a unique common fixed point in X.
Proof Let
be an arbitrary point in
then there exists
such that
we construct sequence
in
such that
since
with
Now by using (3.1), we get
![]() |
or
![]() |
![]() |
or
![]() |
or
![]() |
where
On continous repeation of the above process, we get that 
![]() | (3.3) |
on taking limit as
we get
![]() |
Since X is complete, there exists
such that
![]() |
Since f is continuous and f, g commute, we have
![]() |
also
![]() |
Now by (3.1) we have
![]() |
![]() |
Now, since f is continuous, we have
![]() |
which implies
![]() |
On taking lim as
and use continuity, we obtain
![]() |
![]() |
Since f and g commute, we have
![]() |
![]() |
This implies that
![]() |
We now prove that
is a common fixed point of f and g. By (3.1) we have
![]() |
![]() |
or
![]() |
![]() |
and the inequality is possible only if
![]() |
Hence, we have
![]() |
Uniqueness: To see that f and g have only one common fixed point. Suppose
and
By (3.1) we get
![]() |
![]() |
or
![]() |
which is possible only if
and thus we have
which shows the uniqueness of fixed point of mappings f and 
Corollary 3.2. Let
be a complete metric space and
be a self map of
into itself such that
satisfy the condition
![]() |
where
such that
![]() |
then g has a unique fixed point in X.
Proof Put
(Identity mapping) in Theorem (3.1) we get the required result.
Remark: If we put
then we get theorem (1.3) in 17
Remark: If we put
then we get theorem (1.1) in 16
Remark: If
and
we get Theorem (1.3) in 21
Example: Let
is a non-empty set and
is a metric on
given by
![]() |
If
and
on
are given by
Then
and
commute with each other such that
and
![]() |
with 0 as the only common fixed point of
and
.
Now we give the proof of the above Theorem(3.2) in the context of complete compact metric space.
Theorem 3.3. Let f and g be two mappings of a compact metric space with f is continuous. Let f and g commute with each other such that
and g satisfy the following condition:
![]() | (3.4) |
and
with
![]() | (3.5) |
then f and g have a unique common fixed point in X.
Proof Let
be an arbitrary point of X. Since
there exists
such that
Continuing this process we get a sequence
in X such that
![]() |
Now from (3.4) we get
![]() |
![]() |
or
![]() |
or
![]() |
![]() |
and
Hence the sequence
is a monotonic decreasing sequence of non-negative real number and so converges to a limit
such that
![]() |
Since X is compact, using sequential compactness of X, there exists a subsequence
of
such that for any
and
we get
![]() |
Now, we use the continuity of g and d to obtain
![]() |
Since
we have
Similarly,
![]() | (3.6) |
Since the sequence
is a subsequence of the sequence
we get
![]() |
Next we claim
Suppose
then
By (3.6) we obtain
![]() |
which is contradiction, hence d = 0. Hence,
![]() | (3.7) |
Since
for each
From (3.7), we get
![]() | (3.8) |
Since the mapping
defined by
is continuous, there exists
such that
![]() |
By (3.8)
and so
Now, since f and g commute, we have
![]() |
Thus
![]() | (3.9) |
and so v is a common fixed point of f and g.
Uniqueness: Next we claim that v is the unique common fixed point of f and g. Suppose on the contrary that there exists another point
such that
with
Using condition (3.4) we get
![]() |
which implies that
or
and this gives the uniqueness of the fixed point.
Corollary 3.4. Let
be a compact metric space and let
be self mappings of
satisfying the condition
![]() |
where
with
then f and g have unique common fixed point in X.
Proof Putting
and
in Theorem (3.3) we get the required result.
Corollary 3.5. Let
be a complete compact metric space and
be a self mapping
satisfying
![]() |
for all
and
such that
then g has a unique fixed point in 
Proof Putting
and
(Identity mapping) in Theorem (3.8), we get the required result.
Corollary 3.6. Let
be a compact metric space and
be a self map of
into itself satisfying the inequality
![]() |
for all
such that
then g has a unique fixed point in X.
Proof Putting
in Theorem (3.8) we get the required result
Remark: Corollary (3.4) is the result of Sahu and Sharma in 21
Remark: Corollary (3.5) is the result of Pachpatte 18
Remark: Corollary (3.6) is the result of Fisher 9
Now we give an example to support the validity of the above theorem (3.3).
Example: Let
be any non-empty set and let d be the metric with ordinary distance. Let the functions f and g on X be defined by
![]() |
Then it is clear that
with f and g commute, continuous and
is a compact metric space. Now it is easy to show that the above example satisfy all the conditions of Theorem (3.3) with 9 as the only common fixed point in X.
Theorem 3.7. Let f and g be two continuous mappings of a hausdorff space X into itself and let f, g commute with each other such that
Let
be a continuous function such that for each pair of
with
![]() | (3.10) |
and
such that
If for some
the sequence
in X has a convergent subsequence. Then f, g have a common fixed point.
Proof Since
So, for
we choose
such that
with the sequence
defined by
![]() |
Now by (3.10) we have
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
or
![]() | (3.11) |
Let
Then (3.11) gives us
![]() |
Similarly,
![]() |
Since 
Repeating the above process, we get
![]() |
This shows that the sequence
is bounded which converges along with all its subsequences to some positive real number
If
has a convergent subsequence of
which converges to the real number
Then,
![]() |
Next we show that z is a fixed point of f and g. First we show that z is a fixed point of g. Suppose,
then by (3.5) we have
![]() |
or
![]() |
which is contradiction because
Hence,
Thus,
is a fixed point of g. Since f and g commute and are continuous, we have
![]() |
By the uniqueness of limit we have
![]() |
Uniqueness: Now we claim that z is the unique common fixed point of f and g. Suppose for contradiction that w is another fixed point of f and g such that
then by (3.10) we obtain
![]() |
This implies that
which is contradiction because
![]() |
Hence,
Hence z is the unique common fixed point of f and g.
Finally, we provide example to check the validity of Theorem (3.7).
Corollary 3.8. Let
be a continuous mappings of a hausdorff space X into itself and let
be a continuous function such that for each pair of
with 
![]() |
and
such that
![]() |
If for some
the sequence
in
has a convergent subsequence. Then f has a unique fixed point in X.
Proof Put
(Identity mapping) in Theorem (3.7) we get the required result.
Corollary 3.9. Let f and g be two continuous mappings of a hausdorff space X into itself and let f, g commute with each other such that
Let
be a continuous function such that for each pair of
with 
![]() |
and
such that
If for some
the sequence
in
has a convergent subsequence. Then f, g have a common fixed point.
Proof Put
in Theorem (3.7) we get Corollary (3.9).
Remark: Corollary (3.8) is the result of 17
Remark: Corollary (3.9) is the result of 5
Example: Let
We define
and
by
![]() |
Now, it is clear that the conditions of Theorem (3.7) are satisfied and that 5 is the common fixed point of f and g.
| [1] | Bailey D. F. Some theorems on contractive mappings, J. Londdon. Math. Soc., 101-106, 2(1966). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [2] | Banach S. Sur les operation dans les ensembles abstraits etleur application aux equations integrals Fund. Math. 3: 133-181(1922). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [3] | Bondar K.L. Some fixed point theorems for contractive type mappings on Hausdorff space International Mathematical Forum Vol.6, no.49, 2403-2408 (2011). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [4] | Browder B.E. Remarks on fixed point theorems of contractive type Nonlinear Anal. T. M. A., 3, 657-661 (1979). | ||
| In article | |||
| [5] | Chatterjee H. On generalization of Banach contraction principle, Indian J.pure. appl. Math., 10, 400-403 (1979). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [6] | Ciric Lj. B A generalization of Banach.s Contraction principle Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 45, 267-274 (1974). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [7] | Edelstein M. An extension of Banach.s contraction principle Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 7-10, 12 (1961). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [8] | Edelstein M. On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings J.London Math. Soc., 74-79, 37 (1962). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [9] | Fisher B. Fixed point and constant mappings on metric spaces, Atti Accad, Naz., Lincci Rend. Ci. Sci. Mat. Natur. 61, 329-332 (1976). | ||
| In article | |||
| [10] | Fisher B., Khan M.S., Pairwise contractive mappings on Hausdorff space Bull. math. dela. Soc. Sci. math. delta R.S.de Roumanie Tome, 25(73) no.1, 37-40 (1981). | ||
| In article | |||
| [11] | Fisher B. On three fixed point mappings for compact metric spaces Indian J. Pure and Appl. Math. 8: 479-481 (1977). | ||
| In article | |||
| [12] | Gupta et al Some fixed point theorems for symmetric Hausdorff functions on Hausdorff spaces Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 9(2), 833-839 (2015). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [13] | Jaggi D.S., On common fixed points of contractive mapps Bull.Math. de la Soc. Sct. Math. de la R.S.R., 20, 143-146 (1976). | ||
| In article | |||
| [14] | Jinbiao H. Some fixed point theorems of Compact Hausdorff spaces Fixed point theory and Applications, 6, 67-69 (2007). | ||
| In article | |||
| [15] | Harinath H.K., A chain of results on fixed points Indian J. pure appl. Math., 1484-1490, 10(1979). | ||
| In article | |||
| [16] | Jungck G. Commuting mappings and fixed points Am. Math. Monthly. 83, 261-63 (1976). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [17] | Mukerjee R.N. Common fixed points of some non linear mappings Indian J.purappl. Math. 12(8), 930-933 (1981). | ||
| In article | |||
| [18] | Pachpatte B.G. On certain Fixed point mapping in metric space, Journal of M.A.C.T Vol.13, 59-63 (1980). | ||
| In article | |||
| [19] | Pathak H.K. Some theorems on fixed points in pseudo compact tichonov space Indian J.pure appl. Math., 17(2), 180-1869 (1986). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [20] | Rhoades R.E. Some theorems on weakly contractive maps, Nonlinear Anal., 47, 2483-2693. (2001). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [21] | Sharma P.L. and Sahu M.K A unique fixed point theorem in complete metric space Acta Ciencia Indica Vol. XVII, M, 4, 685. (1991). | ||
| In article | |||
| [22] | Singh K.L. Contraction mappings and fixed point theorems Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles, 83, 33-44. (1968). | ||
| In article | |||
| [23] | Yeh C.C., Common fixed point of continuous mappings in metric spaces Publ.Inst.Math.(Beograd) 27(41), 21-25. (1981). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2017 Mumtaz Ali and Muhammad Arshad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
| [1] | Bailey D. F. Some theorems on contractive mappings, J. Londdon. Math. Soc., 101-106, 2(1966). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [2] | Banach S. Sur les operation dans les ensembles abstraits etleur application aux equations integrals Fund. Math. 3: 133-181(1922). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [3] | Bondar K.L. Some fixed point theorems for contractive type mappings on Hausdorff space International Mathematical Forum Vol.6, no.49, 2403-2408 (2011). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [4] | Browder B.E. Remarks on fixed point theorems of contractive type Nonlinear Anal. T. M. A., 3, 657-661 (1979). | ||
| In article | |||
| [5] | Chatterjee H. On generalization of Banach contraction principle, Indian J.pure. appl. Math., 10, 400-403 (1979). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [6] | Ciric Lj. B A generalization of Banach.s Contraction principle Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 45, 267-274 (1974). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [7] | Edelstein M. An extension of Banach.s contraction principle Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 7-10, 12 (1961). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [8] | Edelstein M. On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings J.London Math. Soc., 74-79, 37 (1962). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [9] | Fisher B. Fixed point and constant mappings on metric spaces, Atti Accad, Naz., Lincci Rend. Ci. Sci. Mat. Natur. 61, 329-332 (1976). | ||
| In article | |||
| [10] | Fisher B., Khan M.S., Pairwise contractive mappings on Hausdorff space Bull. math. dela. Soc. Sci. math. delta R.S.de Roumanie Tome, 25(73) no.1, 37-40 (1981). | ||
| In article | |||
| [11] | Fisher B. On three fixed point mappings for compact metric spaces Indian J. Pure and Appl. Math. 8: 479-481 (1977). | ||
| In article | |||
| [12] | Gupta et al Some fixed point theorems for symmetric Hausdorff functions on Hausdorff spaces Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 9(2), 833-839 (2015). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [13] | Jaggi D.S., On common fixed points of contractive mapps Bull.Math. de la Soc. Sct. Math. de la R.S.R., 20, 143-146 (1976). | ||
| In article | |||
| [14] | Jinbiao H. Some fixed point theorems of Compact Hausdorff spaces Fixed point theory and Applications, 6, 67-69 (2007). | ||
| In article | |||
| [15] | Harinath H.K., A chain of results on fixed points Indian J. pure appl. Math., 1484-1490, 10(1979). | ||
| In article | |||
| [16] | Jungck G. Commuting mappings and fixed points Am. Math. Monthly. 83, 261-63 (1976). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [17] | Mukerjee R.N. Common fixed points of some non linear mappings Indian J.purappl. Math. 12(8), 930-933 (1981). | ||
| In article | |||
| [18] | Pachpatte B.G. On certain Fixed point mapping in metric space, Journal of M.A.C.T Vol.13, 59-63 (1980). | ||
| In article | |||
| [19] | Pathak H.K. Some theorems on fixed points in pseudo compact tichonov space Indian J.pure appl. Math., 17(2), 180-1869 (1986). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [20] | Rhoades R.E. Some theorems on weakly contractive maps, Nonlinear Anal., 47, 2483-2693. (2001). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||
| [21] | Sharma P.L. and Sahu M.K A unique fixed point theorem in complete metric space Acta Ciencia Indica Vol. XVII, M, 4, 685. (1991). | ||
| In article | |||
| [22] | Singh K.L. Contraction mappings and fixed point theorems Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles, 83, 33-44. (1968). | ||
| In article | |||
| [23] | Yeh C.C., Common fixed point of continuous mappings in metric spaces Publ.Inst.Math.(Beograd) 27(41), 21-25. (1981). | ||
| In article | View Article | ||