Hyers-Ulam Stability of Generalized Tribonacci Functional Equation
S. Arolkar1,
, Y.S. Valaulikar2
1Department of Mathematics, D.M.'s College and Research Centre, Assagao, Goa 403 507- India
2Department of Mathematics, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa 403 206 - India
| Abstract | |
| 1. | Introduction |
| 2. | Existence of General Solution to the Equation (1.3) |
| 3. | Hyers-Ulam Stability |
| 4. | Conclusion |
| References |
Abstract
In this paper we study Hyers-Ulam stability of the generalized Tribonacci functional equation,
where a, b and c are non- zero constants. The functional equation is solved and its stability is established in the class of functions
where X is a Banach space.
Keywords: Fibonacci functional equation, Hyers-Ulam stability, Tribonacci functional equation
Received November 14, 2016; Revised March 06, 2017; Accepted March 23, 2017
Copyright © 2017 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- S. Arolkar, Y.S. Valaulikar. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Generalized Tribonacci Functional Equation. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2017, pp 80-85. http://pubs.sciepub.com/tjant/5/3/1
- Arolkar, S., and Y.S. Valaulikar. "Hyers-Ulam Stability of Generalized Tribonacci Functional Equation." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 5.3 (2017): 80-85.
- Arolkar, S. , & Valaulikar, Y. (2017). Hyers-Ulam Stability of Generalized Tribonacci Functional Equation. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 5(3), 80-85.
- Arolkar, S., and Y.S. Valaulikar. "Hyers-Ulam Stability of Generalized Tribonacci Functional Equation." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 5, no. 3 (2017): 80-85.
| Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
1. Introduction
Stability problems of functional equations have been extensively studied. (see [1, 5, 6] and references therein). The importance of the topic lies in the fact that stability of functional equation is associated with notions of Controlled Chaos [11] and Shadowing [14]. In [7] and [8] Jung discusses the stability problem for Fibonacci functional equation and its extension in Banach Space respectively whereas in [3] the problem is discussed in Modular Functional space. In [10] k-Fibonacci functional equation is discussed. In [2] and [4] solution and stability of Tribonacci functional equation in non-Archimedean Banach spaces and 2-normed spaces have been discussed respectively. Stability of Tribonacci and k-Tribonacci functional equations in Modular spaces is discussed in [13]. In [9], authors investigate the solution of generalized linear Tribonacci functional equation in terms of Fibonacci numbers. In this paper we show that the generalized linear Tribonacci functional equation is associated with generalized Tribonacci sequence and also obtain its stability in the class of functions
where
is a real (or complex) Banach space. Like Fibonacci numbers, Tribonacci numbers also play an important role in problems of combinatorics [12] and also in evaluation of determinants of circulant matrices [15].
Definition 1. The generalized Tribonacci sequence is defined by
![]() | (1.1) |
![]() |
where a, b and c are non-zero fixed real numbers and
is the
term of (1.1) given by Binet type formula,
![]() | (1.2) |
where α, β and γ are distinct roots of the characteristics equation corresponding to (1.1).
Definition 2. Let X be a real (or complex) Banach space. A function
is called a generalized Tribonacci function if it satisfies generalized Tribonacci functional equation
![]() | (1.3) |
2. Existence of General Solution to the Equation (1.3)
In this section we solve equation (1.3) and prove that its solution is in terms of (1.2). To prove this result, we require the following lemma.
Lemma 3. If α, β and γ are distinct roots of the characteristics equation corresponding to (1.1), then the generalized Tribonacci function
satisfies
![]() | (2.1) |

Proof. Characteristics equation corresponding to (1.1) is
![]() | (2.2) |
Since α, β and γ are distinct roots of (2.2), we get
and 
Substituting a, b and c in (1.3), we have
![]() |
which implies
![]() | (2.3) |
Replacing
by
in (2.3), we get
![]() |
and hence (2.3) yields
![]() |
By induction on n, we get
![]() | (2.4) |
Similarly, we have
![]() | (2.5) |
and
![]() | (2.6) |

Now replacing x by x + 1 in (2.3), we get
![]() |
Therefore,
![]() |
Thus by induction on n, we get
![]() |
Similarly, we have
![]() |
and
![]() |

Therefore equations (2.4), (2.5) and (2.6) are true
and 
Now multiplying the equations (2.4), (2.5) and (2.6) by
respectively, and adding we get
![]() |
Using (1.2), this gives
![]() |
We use Lemma 3 to prove the following result.
Theorem 4. A function
is a solution of functional equation (1.3) if and only if there exists a function
such that
![]() | (2.7) |
where
is given by (1.2).
Proof. If
is a solution of (1.3), then by lemma 3
satisfies (2.1). Putting
in (2.1), we get
![]() |
Since
and
, we define a function
by
, then f is of the form (2.7).
Now we assume that f is a function of the form (2.7) and prove that it is a solution of (1.3).
Consider
![]() |
Therefore (2.7) is a solution of (1.3). Hence the theorem is proved.
We next illustrate this result.
Example 5. Consider the following functional equation
![]() | (2.8) |
Define the function
by
![]() | (2.9) |
Note tha
and 5 are distinct roots of the characteristic equation corresponding to Tribonacci sequence defined by
![]() | (2.10) |
![]() |
Therefore (2.7) implies
![]() | (2.11) |
where h(x) is given by (2.9).
3. Hyers-Ulam Stability
In this section we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equation (1.3) by assuming that roots
and
are distinct and
We first prove the lemma required to prove Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equation (1.3).
Lemma 6. If a function
satisfies,
![]() |
for some
and
and
are distinct roots of (2.2) such that
then there exists Tribonacci functions
defined by
![]() |
![]() |
and
![]() |
such that
![]() | (3.1) |
![]() | (3.2) |
and
![]() | (3.3) |

Proof. Using (2.4) with n = 1 in given condition on f, we have
![]() |
Replacing x by
we have
![]() |
Multiplying both side by 
![]() | (3.4) |
Further,
![]() |
Therefore
![]() | (3.5) |
Thus for
and for any
(3.5) implies that the sequence
is a cauchy sequence.
Therefore, since X is Banach space, we can define a function
by
![]() |
We now prove that
satisfies (1.3).
Consider,
![]() |
Hence
is a Tribonacci function.
Now taking
(3.5) implies
![]() |
Similarly since
using equation (2:6) with
we can prove that there exists a Tribonacci function
given by
![]() |
such that
![]() |
From equation (2.5) with n = 1, it follows that
![]() |
Replacing
by
and multiplying both sides by
we get
![]() | (3.6) |
For 
![]() |
Thus, for all
and
,
![]() | (3.7) |
Equation (3.7) implies that
![]() |
Banach space, we can define a function
by
![]() |
Now Consider,
![]() |
Therefore
is a Tribonacci function. So as
we have
![]() |
We prove the following theorem using Lemma 6.
Theorem 7. If a function
satisfies the inequality,
![]() | (3.8) |
and for some
then there exists a unique solution function
of the functional equation (1.3) such that
![]() |
Proof. From (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3), we see that
![]() |
We now define a function
by
![]() |
Consider,
![]() |
Therefore F is a solution of (1.3). Now we prove the uniqueness of 
Assume that
are solutions of (1.3) and that there exist positive constants C1 and C2 such that
and
for all 
Therefore by Theorem 4, there exist
such that
![]() | (3.9) |
and
![]() | (3.10) |
for any 
Fix t with
It then follows from (3.9) and (3.10) that
![]() |
That is,
![]() |
This implies
![]() | (3.11) |
Dividing both sides by
and by letting
we obtain
![]() |
![]() | (3.12) |
Analogously, if we divide both sides of by
and
and let
then we get
![]() | (3.13) |
and
![]() | (3.14) |
Rewritting equations (3.12), (3.13) and (3.14) in matrix form, we get
![]() | (3.15) |
Note that since
and
are distinct roots,
![]() |
Therefore (3.15) has only trivial solution and we have,


That is,
for all
Therefore, we conclude that
for all 
We illustrate this result.
Example 8. Consider the functional equation
![]() |
and Tribonacci recurrence relation associated to it.
![]() |
Roots of the equation
are
and
. Let
and
Note that roots
are distinct and
and 
Hence the solution is given by
![]() |
where
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Therefore
![]() |
and 
4. Conclusion
Hyers-Ulam stability of generalized Tribonacci functional equation is discussed after obtaining the solution of generalized Tribonacci functional equation in terms of generalized Tribonacci numbers.
References
| [1] | Hyers D.. On the stability of the linear functional Equation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 27(1941). 222-224. | ||
In article | View Article PubMed | ||
| [2] | Gordji M., Naderi M., Rassias Th.. Solution and Stability of Tribonacci functional equation in Non-Archmedean Banach spaces. ScienceDirect, Chaos and Fractrals 39(2009). 1005-1019. | ||
In article | |||
| [3] | Naderi M., Gordji M.. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Fibonacci functional equation in Modular Functional Spaces. Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 10(2014). 1-6. | ||
In article | |||
| [4] | Gordji M., Divandari A., Rostamian M., Park C. and Shin D.. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Tribonacci functional equation in 2-normed spaces. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 16 (2014), 503-508. | ||
In article | |||
| [5] | Rassias M.. On the stability of functional equations and a problem of Ulam, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 62(1) (2000). 23-130. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
| [6] | Jung S. M.. Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Mathematical Analysis, Hadronic Press, Inc., Florida. 2001. | ||
In article | |||
| [7] | Jung S. M.. Hyers-Ulam-Stability of Fibonacci Functional Equation, Bulletin of Iranian Mathematica Society, 35(2) (2009). 217-227. | ||
In article | |||
| [8] | Jung S. M.. Functional Equation f(x) = pf(x-1)-qf(x-2) and its Hyers-Ulam Stability, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2009, Article ID 181678. | ||
In article | |||
| [9] | Jung S. M. and Rassias M.. A linear Functional Equation of Third order Associated with the Fibonacci Numbers, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2014, Article ID 137468. | ||
In article | |||
| [10] | Bidkham M. and Hosseini M.. Hyers-Ulam Stability of k-Fibonacci Functional Equation, Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl.2 (1) (2011) 42-49. | ||
In article | |||
| [11] | Stevic S. Bounded solutions of a class of difference equations in Banach spaces producing controlled chaos, Chaos, Solitonsand fractals, 35(2) (2008). 238-245. | ||
In article | |||
| [12] | Kuhapatanakul K. The Generalized Tribonacci p-numbers and Applications, East- West J. of Mathematics: 14(2) (2012). 144-153. | ||
In article | |||
| [13] | Lather R., Ashish, Kumar M.. On the stability of Tribonacci and k-Tribonacci functional equations in Modular space, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 104(2) (2015), 265-284. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
| [14] | W. Hayes and K.R. Jackson. A survey of shadowing methods for numerical solutions of ordinary differential equations, Applied Numerical Mathematics 53(2-4)(2005), 299-321. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
| [15] | D. Bozkurt, C. M. da Fonseca and F.Yilmaz, The determinant of a circulant and skew-circulant matrices with Tribonacci numbers., Mathematical Sciences and applications e-notes, 2(2) (2014), 67-75. | ||
In article | |||
sciepub.com
Quick Submission













































































In article
CiteULike
Delicious


