QK Classes in Clifford Analysis
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia| Abstract | |
| 1. | Introduction |
| 2. | QK –spaces in Clifford Analysis |
| 3. | Conclusion |
| Acknowledgments | |
| References |
Abstract
In this paper, we define the classes QK of quaternion-valued functions, then we characterize quaternion Bloch functions by quaternion QK functions in the unit ball of
, Further, some important basic properties of these functions are also considered.
Keywords: Clifford analysis, quaternion Bloch space, QK spaces
Received April 11, 2016; Revised June 19, 2016; Accepted June 27, 2016
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- M. A. Bakhit. QK Classes in Clifford Analysis. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2016, pp 82-86. http://pubs.sciepub.com/tjant/4/3/5
- Bakhit, M. A.. "QK Classes in Clifford Analysis." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 4.3 (2016): 82-86.
- Bakhit, M. A. (2016). QK Classes in Clifford Analysis. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 4(3), 82-86.
- Bakhit, M. A.. "QK Classes in Clifford Analysis." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 4, no. 3 (2016): 82-86.
| Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
1. Introduction
1.1. Analytic Function SpacesIn [17], Wulan and Wu introduced the so called
spaces. These spaces consist of analytic functions on the unit open complex disk
such that
![]() |
where
is a non-decreasing and righ-continuous function.
Green's function
in the unit disk with logarithmic singularity at
is given by
![]() |
where
.
Moreover,
if
![]() |
For more results of
spaces see [5, 6, 11] and [16]. It is known that the spaces
are Banach spaces under the norm
![]() |
for every
and
. Moreover, it is known that the Green's function
can be replaced by the weight function
.
There are a number of ways we can further generalize the
spaces; see [4] and [14] for example.
Remark 1.1
If
then
see [5]. In particular, if
then
is the Dirichlet space
. Moreover, if
then
coincides with BMOA, the space of analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation.
Two magnitudes
and
are similar, denoted by
if there exist two non-negative real constants
and
such that,
.
In this paper we will work in
, the skew field of quaternions, that is, each element
can be written in the form
![]() |
where
and
are the basis elements of
. For these elements we have the multiplication rules
![]() |
The product is extended by linearity. The quaternionic conjugation
is given by
and we have the property
![]() |
Therefore, if
the quaternion
![]() |
Also, the norm satisfies
for each
.
We identify each point
with a quaternion
of the form
.
Let
be the unit ball in the real three-dimensional space, with boundary
. For
and
, we denote by
the ball with center
and radius
.
Let
be a domain in
, then we will consider
-valued functions defined in
(depending on
):
![]() |
The notation
, has the usual component-wise meaning. On
we define ageneralized Cauchy-Riemann operator
by
![]() |
and it's conjugate operator by
![]() |
The solutions of
are called (left) hyperholomorphic (or monogenic) functions and generalize the class of holomorphic functions from the one-dimensional complex function theory. For more details about quaternionic analysis and general Clifford analysis, we refer to [1], [8] and [15] and others.
We denote by
the class of hyperholomorphic (or monogenic) functions on
. For
the Möbius transform
is defined by
![]() |
Furthermore, let
![]() |
be a multiple scalar of the fundamental solution of the Laplacian in
composed with the Möbius transform
, i.e.
is the modified Green's function in quaternion sense.
For
and
the pseudo-hyperbolic ball
is defined by
![]() |
This is an Euclidean ball, with center and radius given respectively by:
![]() |
Let
the
-Bloch space
of quaternion valued functions given by (see [2, 9]):
![]() |
The space
is called the quaternion Bloch space
. The little quaternion
-Bloch space
is a subspace of
consisting of all
such that
![]() |
The quaternion Dirichlet space
is given by:
![]() |
Let
be a non-decreasing function. Define
as
![]() |
The spaces
of quaternion valued functions given by
![]() |
Moreover, the little quaternion
space consists of those
for which
![]() |
Remark 1.2
Obviously, the quaternion
spaces are not Banach spaces, also are not linear spaces. Nevertheless, if we consider a small neighborhood of the origin
, with an arbitrary but fixed
, then we can add the
-norm of the function
over
to the seminorms, so
spaces will become Banach spaces.
Remark 1.3
It should be remarked that if we put
then
(see [7]). Also, if
, then
, the quaternion Dirichlit space.
Let
be a non-decreasing function, consider the following problems:
1. What conditions must
have in order that
to be non-trivial?
2. Which properties of
and
imply that
?
3. For which a necessary and sufficient conditions on
so that
?
The main aim of this paper is to study these
spaces and their relations to the above mentioned quaternionic Bloch space. We shall develop a general theory for quaternionic
spaces which answers these questions and gives most basic properties of
and
spaces. Our results are extensions of the results due to Essén and Wulan (see [5]) in quaternion sense.
The concept may be generalized in the context of Clifford analysis to arbitrary real dimensions. We will restrict us for simplicity to
and quaternion-valued functions as (the lowest non-commutative case) a model case. For more studies on quaternion function spaces, we refer to [2, 3, 7, 10] and others.
We will need the following lemma in the sequel (see [12], Lemma 2.2, if
):
Lemma 1.1
Let
and let
. Then for every
, we have
![]() | (1) |
where 
Remark 1.4
If we change the variables
(the Jacobian determinant
has no singularities). In quaternion sense, the problem is that,
is hyperholomorphic, but after the change of variables
is not hyperholomorphic.
But we know from [13] that
is again hyperholomorphic. So, we can solve this problem by the following lemma (see [10], Lemma 2.2):
Lemma 1.2
Let
and let
and let
given by
![]() | (2) |
Then
and
is a subharmonic function.
We also refer to [15] who studied this problem for the four-dimensional case already in 1979.
2. QK –spaces in Clifford Analysis
In this section, relations between
and Bloch spaces, which have been attracted considerable attention are given in quaternion sense. Our results are extensions of the results due to Essen and Wulan (see [5]) in quaternion sense. We consider some essential properties of
spaces of quaternion-valued functions as basic scale properties.
For a non-decreasing function
we say that the space
is trivial if
contains only constant functions. Whether the space
is trivial or not depends on the integral
![]() | (3) |
Proposition 2.1
(i) If the integral (3) is divergent, then the space
is trivial.
(ii) If the integral (3) is convergent, then
.
Proof:
(i) For
and
. Let
given by (2). Then
is a hyperholomorphic function and
is a subharmonic function. By Lemma 2.1, after a change of variables
we have
. Assume that there exists
such that
for some
.
By subharmonicity of
, we have
![]() | (4) |
Thus the integral (3) must be convergent and we have proved (i).
(ii) Conversely, if the integral (3) is convergent and
it follows from the inequality (4) that
i.e., we have
. This completes the proof.
The convergence of (3) is related to the growth order of
. The log-order of the real-valued function
is defined as
![]() |
If
the log-type of the quaternion-valued function
is defined as
![]() |
We always assume that the non-decreasing function
is differentiable and satisfies
if
and
if
. We assume also that the integral (3) is convergent, otherwise,
contains constant functions only.
The following result was proved in [3]:
Proposition 2.2
If the log-order
and the log-type
of a non-decreasing function
satisfy one of the following conditions:
(1)
,
(2)
and
.
Then the space
is trivial.
Remark 2.1
In the critical case
and
,
may be trivial or nontrivial.
From now on and through the remainder of Sections 2 and 3 we assume that the function
is non-decreasing and that the integral (3) is convergent.
Theorem 2.1
Assume that
and set
![]() |
Then
.
Proof:
Since
is non-decreasing and
, it is clear that
. It remains to prove that
. We note that
![]() |
Thus
in
. It suffices to deal with integrals over
.
Now we let
then for
, we have
![]() |
By condition (3), the last integral above is convergent. This shows that
and Theorem 3.1 is proved.
The significance of Theorem 3.1 is that the space
only depends on the behavior of
for
close to 0. In particular, when studying
spaces, we can always assume that
for
. However, we do not make this assumption in our main theorems.
Proposition 2.3
Let
Then, a monogenic function
belongs to the Bloch space
if and only if there exists an
such that
and
![]() | (5) |
Proof:
If
, by the argument in the proof of Theorem 3.1, the supremum in (5) is finite for any 
Conversely, if the supremum in (5) is finite, then
![]() |
The following result gives a characterization of the quaternion Bloch space
by quaternion
spaces.
Theorem 2.2
Let
, then
if and only if
![]() | (6) |
Proof:
Let us first assume that (6) holds. For
, we have
![]() |
Then, for
, we deduce that
![]() |
Here, we used that the Jacobian determinant is
![]() |
Now, using the equality
![]() |
we obtain that,
![]() |
Then, we have
.
To prove that
, we assume that
. For a fixed
let
![]() |
Then, we have
![]() |
By Lemma 1.1, we obtain
![]() |
which implies that,
![]() |
This completes the proof.
The importance of Theorem 2.2 is to give us a characterization for the quaternionic Bloch space by the help of integral norms of
spaces of quaternion valued functions.
Also, with the same arguments used to prove the previous theorem, we can prove the following theorem for characterization of little hyperholomorphic Bloch space.
Theorem 2.3
Let
, then
if and only if (6) holds.
Now we give a characterization for the quaternion
spaces in terms of some different weighted functions in the unit ball of
.
Define
as
![]() |
Theorem 2.4
For
, let
. Then,
![]() | (7) |
Proof:
We consider the equivalence
![]() |
By the change of variable
and Lemma 1.2, we have
![]() |
with
, while
![]() |
where
the Jacobian determinant.
Then, we only need to show
![]() |
This is obvious because of the assumptions for
, and the following obvious facts
•
if 
•
if
.
The proof of Theorem 3.4 is completed.
3. Conclusion
Our aim in this paper lies at the interface of hyperholomorphic function spaces and operator theory. This paper is an attempt to synthesizethe achievements in the theory of hyperholomorphic function spaces. Many interesting and seemingly basic problems remain open. One of those open problems is the following question: What kind of operators act between the weighted hyperholomorphic function spaces like Bloch
and
spaces? In analytic case several authors have studied boundedness and compactness of composition and Toeplitz operators between some weighted classes of function spaces like BMOA (the space of analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation),
and
spaces (see [4, 9, 14] and others).
In quaternion sense the problem is that,
is hyperholomorphic, but
is not hyperholomorphic, where
is a hyperholomorphic self-map of the unit ball B.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the referees for their valuable remarks and comments.
References
| [1] | F. Brackx, R. Delanghe and F. Sommen, Clifford Analysis, Pitman Research Notes in Math. Boston, London,Melbourne, 1982. | ||
In article | |||
| [2] | A. El-Sayed Ahmed, On weighted α-Besov spaces and α-Bloch spaces of quaternion-valued functions, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 29 (9-10), 1046-1081, 2008. | ||
In article | |||
| [3] | A. A. El-Sayed Ahmed, Hyperholomorphic Q Classes, Math. Comput. Modelling, 55 (2012), 1428-1435. | ||
In article | View Article | ||
| [4] | A. El-Sayed Ahmed and M.A. Bakhit, Holomorphic NK and Bergman-type spaces, Birkhuser Series on Operator Theory: AdVances and Applications (2009), BirkhuserVerlag Publisher BaselSwitzerland, 195, 2009, 121-138. | ||
In article | |||
| [5] | M. Essen and H. Wulan, On analytic and meromorphic functions and spaces of QK type, Illinois J. Math.46, 2002, 1233-1258. | ||
In article | |||
| [6] | M. Essn, H. Wulan, and J. Xiao, Several function-theoretic characterizations of Möbius invariant QK spaces, Journal of Functional Analysis, 230(1), 2006, 78-115. | ||
In article | |||
| [7] | K. Gürlebeck, U. Kähler, M. Shapiro, and L.M. Tovar, On QP spaces of quaternion-valued functions, Complex Variables Theory Appl.39, 1999, 115-135. | ||
In article | |||
| [8] | K. Gürlebeck and W. Sprӧssig, Quaternionic and Clifford Calculus for Engineers and Physicists, John Wiley &. Sons, Chichester, 1997. | ||
In article | |||
| [9] | M. M. Khalaf and M. A. Bakhit, Application of Hardy Toeplitz operators on the space of analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation in the unit all, Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 7(3), 2016, 21-32. | ||
In article | |||
| [10] | A.G. Miss, L.F. Resndis, L.M. Tovar, Quaternionic F(p,q,s) function spaces, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, 9, 2015, 999-1024. | ||
In article | |||
| [11] | F. Pérez-Gonzáles and J. Rättyá, Univalent functions in the Möbius invariant QK space, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2011 (2011), Article ID 259796, 11 pages. | ||
In article | |||
| [12] | L.F. Reséndis and L.M. Tovar, Besov-type characterizations for Quaternionic Bloch functions, In: Le Hung Son et al (Eds) finite or infinite complex Analysis and its applications, Adv. Complex Analysis and applications, Boston MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, 207-220. | ||
In article | |||
| [13] | J. Ryan, Conformally covariant operators in Clifford analysis, Z. Anal. Anwend. 14 (4), 1995, 677-704. | ||
In article | |||
| [14] | A.E. Shammaky and M.A. Bakhit, Properties of weighted composition operators on some weighted holomorphic function classes in the unit ball, International Journal of Analysis and Applications, accepted. | ||
In article | |||
| [15] | A. Sudbery, Quaternionic analysis, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 85, 1979, 199-225. | ||
In article | |||
| [16] | H. Wulan, Multivalent functions and QK spaces, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 45-48, 2004, 2537-2546. | ||
In article | |||
| [17] | H. Wulan and P. Wu, Characterizations of QT spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 254, 2001, 484-497. | ||
In article | |||
| [18] | H. Wulan and J. Zhou, QK type spaces of analytic functions, J. Funct. Spaces Appl. 4 (1), 2006, 37-84. | ||
In article | |||
sciepub.com
Quick Submission


















































In article
CiteULike
Delicious


