Some Fixed Point Theorems of Integral Type Contraction in Cone b-metric Spaces
Rahim Shah1,, Akbar Zada1, Ishfaq Khan1
1Department of Mathematics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan
Abstract
In the present paper, we introduces the concept of integral type contraction with respect to cone b-metric space. Also we proved some fixed point results of integral type contractive mapping in cone b-metric space. We give an example to support our main result.
Keywords: cone b-metric space, fixed point, integral type contractive mapping
Received August 09, 2015; Revised December 23, 2015; Accepted December 30, 2015
Copyright © 2015 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- Rahim Shah, Akbar Zada, Ishfaq Khan. Some Fixed Point Theorems of Integral Type Contraction in Cone b-metric Spaces. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2015, pp 165-169. http://pubs.sciepub.com/tjant/3/6/5
- Shah, Rahim, Akbar Zada, and Ishfaq Khan. "Some Fixed Point Theorems of Integral Type Contraction in Cone b-metric Spaces." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 3.6 (2015): 165-169.
- Shah, R. , Zada, A. , & Khan, I. (2015). Some Fixed Point Theorems of Integral Type Contraction in Cone b-metric Spaces. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 3(6), 165-169.
- Shah, Rahim, Akbar Zada, and Ishfaq Khan. "Some Fixed Point Theorems of Integral Type Contraction in Cone b-metric Spaces." Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 3, no. 6 (2015): 165-169.
Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
1. Introduction
The study of fixed point theory plays an important role in applications of many branches of mathematics. Finding a fixed point of contractive mappings becomes the center of strong research activity. There are some researchers who have worked about the fixed point of contractive mappings see [4, 11]. In 1922, Banach [4] presented an important result regarding a contraction mapping, known as the Banach contraction principle. Bakhtin in [3] introduced the concept of b-metric spaces as a generalization of metric spaces. He proved the contraction mapping principle in b-metric spaces that generalized the famous Banach contraction principle in metric spaces. The concept of cone metric space was presented by Haung and Zhang [15] in 2007. They replace an ordered Banach space for the real numbers and proved some fixed point theorems of contractive mappings in cone metric space. Hussain and Shah give the concept of cone b-metric space as a generalization of b-metric space and cone metric space in [16]. Also they improved some recent results about KKM mappings in cone b-metric spaces.
In 2002, Branciari [8] introduced the notion of integral type contractive mappings in complete metric spaces and study the existence of fixed points for mappings which are defined on complete metric space satisfying integral type contraction. Recently F. Khojasteh et al. [19], presented the concept of integral type contraction in cone metric spaces and proved some fixed point theorems in such spaces. Many researchers studies various contractions and a lot of fixed point theorems are proved in different spaces; see [1-7,9,10,11,12,13,17,18,20].
In the main section of this paper we presented some fixed point theorems of Integral type contractive mappings in setting of cone b-metric spaces. Moreover, we present suitable example that support our main result.
2. Preliminaries
The following definitions and results will be needed in this paper.
Definition 2.1 [15] Let be a real Banach space and
be a subset of
. Then
is called cone if and only if:
(i) is closed, nonempty and
;
(ii) for all
where
are non-negative real numbers;
(iii)
Definition 2.2 [15] Suppose be a cone in real Banach space
, we define a partial ordering
with respect to
by
. We shall write
to indicate that
but
, while
will stand for
Definition 2.3 [15] The cone is called normal if there is number
such that for all
implies
The least positive number satisfying the above inequality is called the normal constant of cone.
Throughout this paper we always suppose that is a real Banach space,
is a cone in
with int
and
is partial ordering w.r.t cone.
Definition 2.4 [15] Let be a non-empty set. Suppose that the mapping
satisfies:
(d1) for all
with
;
(d2) if and only if
;
(d3) for all
;
(d4) for all
Then d is called a cone metric on Y and (Y, d) is called a cone metric space.
Example 2.5 [15] Suppose
and
such that
where
is a constant. Then
is cone metric space.
Definition 2.6 [16] Let be a non-empty set and
be a given real number. A mapping
is said to be cone b-metric if and only if, for all
in
the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) for all
with
;
(ii) if and only if
;
(iii) for all
;
(iv) for all
Then d is called a cone b-metric on Y and (Y, d) is called a cone b-metric space.
Example 2.7 [14] Let
such that
where
and
are constants. Then
is cone b-metric space.
Lemma 2.8 [15] Let be a cone metric space and
a normal cone with normal constant
Let
be a sequence in
Then
converges to
if and only if
![]() |
Lemma 2.9 [15] Let be a cone metric space and
a normal cone with normal constant
Let
be a sequence in
Then
is a Cauchy sequence if and only if
![]() |
Lemma 2.10 [15] Let be a cone metric space and
a sequence in
If
is convergent, then it is a Cauchy sequence.
Lemma 2.11 [15] Let be a cone metric space and
be a normal cone with normal constant
Let
and
be two sequences in Y and
as
Then
![]() |
In 2002, Branciari in [8] introduced a general contractive condition of integral type as follows.
Theorem 2.12 [8] Let be a complete metric space,
and
is a mapping such that for all
![]() |
where is nonnegative and Lebesgue-integrable mapping which is summable (i.e., with finite integral) on each compact subset of
such that for each
then f has a unique fixed point
such that for each
In [19], Khojasteh et al. defined new concept of integral with respect to a cone and introduce the Branciaris result in cone metric spaces. We recall their idea so that the paper will be self contained.
Definition 2.13 Suppose that is a normal cone in
. Let
and
We define
![]() |
Definition 2.14 The set is called a partition for
if and only if the sets
are pairwise disjoint and
Definition 2.15 For each partition of
and each increasing function
we define cone lower summation and cone upper summation as
![]() |
![]() |
respectively.
Definition 2.16 Suppose that is a normal cone in
is called an integrable function on
with respect to cone
or to simplicity, Cone integrable function, if and only if for all partition
of
![]() |
where must be unique.
We show the common value by
![]() |
Let denotes the set of all cone integreble functions.
Lemma 2.17 [19] Let The following two statements hold.
• (1) If then
for
• (2) for
Definition 2.18 [19] The function is called subadditive cone integrable function if and only if for all
![]() |
Example 2.19 [19] Let
and
for all
then for all
![]() |
Since thus
therefore
![]() |
Which shows that is a subadditive cone integrable function.
Theorem 2.20 [19] Let be a complete regular cone metric space and
be a mapping on
Suppose that there exist a function
from
into itself which satisfies:
(i) and
for all
(ii) The function is nondecreasing and continuous. Moreover, its inverse is also continuous.
(iii) For all there exist
such that for all
![]() | (2.1) |
(iv) For all a; b 2 Y
![]() | (2.2) |
Then the function H has a unique fixed point.
Remark 2.21 [19] If is a non-vanishing map and a sub-additive cone integrable on each
such that for each
and
must have the continuous inverse, then
is satisfies in all conditions in Theorem 2.20.
3. Main Results
In this section we presented some fixed point results in cone b-metric space by using integral type contractive mappings. Our main result is stated as follows.
Theorem 3.1 Let be a complete cone b-metric space with
and
be a normal cone. Let the mapping
is a nonvanishing map and subadditive cone integrable R on each
such that for each
must have the continuous inverse. If
is a map such that, for all
![]() |
where is a constant. Then
has a unique fixed point in
Proof. Let Choose
We have
![]() |
Since thus
![]() |
If then
and this becomes contradiction, so
![]() |
Next we will show that is a Cauchy sequence. So, for any
![]() |
![]() |
Since so
By a property of function
, we obtain
This means that
is Cauchy sequence. Since
is complete cone b-metric space, their exist
such that
as
Since
![]() |
By using Lemma 2.8. Hence This implies
So
is a fixed point of
For uniqueness, now if
is another fixed point of
then
![]() |
which is contradiction. Thus have a unique fixed point
Corollary 3.2 Let be a complete cone b-metric space with
and
be a normal cone. Let the mapping
is a nonvanishing map and subadditive cone integrable R on each
such that for each
must have the continuous inverse. If
is a map such that, for all
![]() |
where is a constant. Then
has a unique fixed point in
Proof. From Theorem 3.1, has a unique fixed point
.
But so
is also a fixed point of
. Hence
this means that
is a fixed point of
Thus the fixed point of
is also a fixed point of
Hence the fixed point of
is unique.
Theorem 3.3 Let be a complete cone b-metric space with
and
be a normal cone. Let the mapping
is a nonvanishing map Rand subadditive cone integrable on each
such that for each
must have the continuous inverse. If
is a map such that, for all
![]() |
where is a constant. Then
has a unique fixed point in
Proof. Let Choose
We have
![]() |
Next we will show that is a Cauchy sequence. So, for any
![]() |
![]() |
So By a property of function
, we obtain
This means that
is Cauchy sequence. Since
is complete cone b-metric space, their exist
such that
as
. Since
![]() |
Hence This implies
So
is a fixed point of
For uniqueness, now if
is another fixed point of
then
![]() |
We have Hence
Thus
is the unique fixed point of
Example 3.4 Let
and
be a constant. Take
We define
as
![]() |
Then is complete cone b-metric space. Suppose
as
![]() |
Then the condition of Theorem 3.1 holds, in fact
![]() |
Here is the unique fixed of
References
[1] | A. Azam, M. Arshad, Kannan fixed point theorems on generalized metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., vol. 1, 2008, pp. 45-48. | ||
![]() | |||
[2] | A. Azam, M. Arshad, I. Beg, Banach contraction principle on cone rectengular metric spaces, Applicable Anal. Discrete Math., vol. 3, 2009, pp. 236-241. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[3] | I. A. Bakhtin, The contraction mapping principle in almost metric spaces, Func. Anal. Gos. Ped. Inst. Unianowsk, vol. 30, 1989, pp. 26-37. | ||
![]() | |||
[4] | S. Banach, Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstrait et leur application aux equations, integrals, Fundan. Math., vol. 3, 1922, pp. 133-181. | ||
![]() | |||
[5] | M. Boriceanu, Strict fixed point theorems for multivalued operators in b-metric spaces, Intern. J. Modern Math., vol. 4(3), 2009, pp. 285-301. | ||
![]() | |||
[6] | M. Boriceanu, M. Bota, A. Petrusel, Multivalued fractals in b-metric spaces, Cent. Eur. J. Math., vol. 8(2), 2010, pp. 367-377. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[7] | M. Bota, A. Molnar, V. Csaba, On Ekeland's variational principal in b-metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory, vol. 12, 2011, pp. 21-28. | ||
![]() | |||
[8] | A. Branciari, A _xed point theorem for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 29, no. 9, 2002, pp. 531-536. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[9] | S. Czerwik, Cotraction mapping in b-metric spaces, Acta. Math. Inform. Univ. Ostraviensis, vol. 1, 1993, pp. 5-11. | ||
![]() | |||
[10] | P. Das, B.K. Lahiri, Fixed point of cotractive mappings in generalized metric space, Math. Slovaca., vol. 59, 2009, pp. 499-501. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[11] | K. Deimling, Nonlinerar Functional Analysis, Springer, 1985. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[12] | I.M. Erhan, E. Karapinar, T. Sekulic, Fixed points of (ψ, φ) contractions on generalized metric space, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2012, 220, (2012). | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[13] | R. George, B. Fisher, Some generalized results in cone b-metric space, Math. Moravica., vol. 17(2), 2013, pp. 39-50. | ||
![]() | |||
[14] | H. H. Haung, S. Xu, Fixed point theorems of contractive mappings in cone b-metric spaces and applications, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2012(220), 2012. | ||
![]() | View Article | ||
[15] | L. G. Haung, X. Zhang, Cone metric space and _xed point theorems of contractive mappings, J. Math. Anal., Apal, vol. 332(2), 2007, pp. 1468-1476. | ||
![]() | |||
[16] | N. Hussain, MH. Shah, KKM mapping in cone b-metric spaces, Comput. Math. Appl., vol.62, 2011, pp. 1677{1684. | ||
![]() | |||
[17] | M. Jleli, B. Zhang, The Kannan's fixed point theorem in a cone rectengular metric space, J. Nonlinear Sci. Apal., vol. 2(3), 2009, pp. 161-167. | ||
![]() | |||
[18] | Z. Kadelburg, S. Radenović, On generalized metric space, TWMS J. Pure. Appl. Math., vol. 5(1), 2014, pp. 03-13. | ||
![]() | |||
[19] | F. Khojasteh, Z. Goodarzi, A. Razani, Some Fixed Point Theorems of Integral Type Contraction in Cone Metric Spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., vol. 2010, Article ID 189684, 13 pages, 2010. | ||
![]() | |||
[20] | A. Zada, R. Shah, T. Li, Integral Type Contraction and Coupled Coincidence Fixed Point Theorems for Two Pairs in G-metric Spaces, Hacet. J. Math. Stat. | ||
![]() | |||