Keywords: dedekind zeta-function, dirichlet series, mean value
Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 2014 2 (6),
pp 230-232.
DOI: 10.12691/tjant-2-6-8
Received November 05, 2014; Revised December 05, 2014; Accepted December 18, 2014
Copyright © 2013 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
1. Introduction and the Result
Let
be an algebraic number field of degree
over the rational field
, and
be its Dedekind zeta-function. Thus
where
runs over all integral ideals of the field
, and
is the norm of
. If
denotes the number of integral ideals in
with norm
, then we have
It is known that
is a multiplicative function and satisfies
 | (1) |
where
is the divisor function.
It is an important problem to study the function
. In 1927, Landau [7] first proved that
for any arbitrary algebraic number field of degree
, where
is the residue of
at its simple pole
.
It is hard to refine Landau's result. Later, Huxley and Watt [3] and Müller [9] improved the results for the quadratic and cubic fields, respectively.
Until 1993, Nowak [10] obtained the best result
for any arbitrary algebraic number field of degree
.
In [1], Chandraseknaran and Good studied the
-th integral power sum of
in some Galois fields, and they showed that
Theorem 1.0. If
is a Galois extension of
of degree
, then for any
and any integer
, we have
where
, and
is a suitable polynomial in
of degree
.
Recently, Lü and Wang [8] improved the classical result of [1] by replacing
with
.
Motivated by [2, 4, 5], the purpose of this paper is to study the remainder term in mean square, and we shall prove the following result.
Theorem 1.1 Subject to assumptions in Theorem 1.0, and define
 | (2) |
Then we have
for any given
.
Notations. As usual, the Vinogradov symbol
means that
is positive and the ratio
is bounded. The letter
denotes an arbitrary small positive number, not the same at each occurrence.
2. Proof of Theorem 1.1
To prove our Theorem, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 2.1 Let
be a Galois extension of degree
, and
be defined in (1). Define
 | (3) |
Then we have
for any integer
, where
, and
denotes a Dirichlet series, which is absolutely and uniformly convergent for
.
Proof. This is Lemma 2.1 in [8].
Lemma 2.2. Let
be an algebraic number field of degree
, then
for
and any fixed
.
Proof. By Lemma 2.2 in [8] and the Phragmen-Lindelöf principle for a strip (see, e.g. Theorem 5.53 in [6]), Lemma 2.2 follows immediately.
Now we begin to prove our theorem.
Let
be a Galois extension of
of degree
.
Recall
denotes the number of integral ideals in
with norm
, and
Let
From (1), (3) and Perron's formula (see Proposition 5.54 in [6], we get
By the property
only has a simple pole at
for
and Cauchy's residue theorem, we have
where
, and
is a suitable polynomial in
of degree
.
From the definition of
in (2), we have
Therefore to prove Theorem 1.1, we shall prove the following results.
 | (4) |
and
 | (5) |
It is easy to get
 | (6) |
Now we consider the integral
. We have
Then
 | (7) |
To go further, we get
 | (8) |
By (7) and (8)
 | (9) |
From (9), Lemma 2.1 and 2.3, we have (for
)
 | (10) |
Finally we estimate trivial bounds of the integrals
. By Lemma 2.2, we get
which yields
 | (11) |
The inequalities (4), (5) immediately follow from (6), (10) and (11). That is,
Then this completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by The National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 11201107 and 11071186) and by Natural Science Foundation of Anhui province (Grant No. 1208085QA01).
References
| [1] | Chandraseknaran K., Good A., On the number of integral ideals in Galois extensions, Monatsh. Math., 95. 99-109. 1983. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [2] | Heath-Brown D. R., The number of Abelian groups of order at most x, Journtes Arithmttiques, Luminy 1989. |
| In article | |
| |
| [3] | Huxley M. N., Watt N., The number of ideals in a quadratic field II, Israel J. Math. Part A, 120, 125-153. 2000, |
| In article | |
| |
| [4] | Ivic A., The number of finite non-isomorphic Abelian groups in mean square, Hardy-Ramanujan J., 9, 17-23. 1986. |
| In article | |
| |
| [5] | Ivic A., On the Error Term for the Counting Functions of Finite Abelian Groups, Monatsh. Math. 114, 115-124. 1992. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [6] | Iwaniec H., Kowalski E., Analytic Number Theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., 53, 204-216. 2004. |
| In article | |
| |
| [7] | Landau E., Einführung in die elementare and analytische Theorie der algebraischen Zahlen und der Ideale, Teubner, 1927. |
| In article | |
| |
| [8] | Lü G., Wang Y., Note on the number of integral ideals in Galois extension, Sci. China Ser. A, 53, 2417-2424. 2010. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [9] | Müller W., On the distribution of ideals in cubic number fields, Monatsh. Math., 106, 211-219. 1988. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |
| [10] | Nowak W.G., On the distribution of integral ideals in algebraic number theory fields, Math. Nachr., 161, 59-74. 1993. |
| In article | CrossRef |
| |