Acoustical Studies of Some Derivatives of Azomethines in Methanol and N, N-Dimethylformamide at 303....

Kapil Bhesaniya, Shipra Baluja

  Open Access OPEN ACCESS  Peer Reviewed PEER-REVIEWED

Acoustical Studies of Some Derivatives of Azomethines in Methanol and N, N-Dimethylformamide at 303.15 K

Kapil Bhesaniya1, Shipra Baluja1,

1Physical Chemical Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India


The acoustical parameters of some synthesized azomethines have been studied from ultrasonic velocity and density measurement at different concentration in methanol and dimethyl formamide at 303.15 K. The apparent adiabatic molar compressibilities and apparent molar volume were also evaluated. The results provide useful information about solute-solute and solute-solvent interactions and are of significant help in understanding the behavior of synthesized compounds in solutions.

At a glance: Figures

Cite this article:

  • Bhesaniya, Kapil, and Shipra Baluja. "Acoustical Studies of Some Derivatives of Azomethines in Methanol and N, N-Dimethylformamide at 303.15 K." Physics and Materials Chemistry 1.1 (2013): 1-4.
  • Bhesaniya, K. , & Baluja, S. (2013). Acoustical Studies of Some Derivatives of Azomethines in Methanol and N, N-Dimethylformamide at 303.15 K. Physics and Materials Chemistry, 1(1), 1-4.
  • Bhesaniya, Kapil, and Shipra Baluja. "Acoustical Studies of Some Derivatives of Azomethines in Methanol and N, N-Dimethylformamide at 303.15 K." Physics and Materials Chemistry 1, no. 1 (2013): 1-4.

Import into BibTeX Import into EndNote Import into RefMan Import into RefWorks

1. Introduction

Azomethines are an important class of compounds, which is becoming increasingly important due to their broad spectrum of biological activities [1, 2, 3, 4]. Literature survey shows that many azomethines are known to exhibit antibacterial [5, 6], antifungal [7] and cytotoxic [8] and anticonvulsant [9] activities.

In continuation of our ongoing program of research [10, 11, 12, 13], this paper reports the systematic measurement of thermodynamic properties of synthesized biologically active azomethines in polar aprotic and protic solvents. The present study is undertaken to determine experimentally density and sound velocity of solutions of different substituted azomethines in N, N-dimethylformamide and methanol at 303.15 K. With this data, the apparent adiabatic molar compressibility and apparent adiabatic molar volumes are computed.

2. Experimental

A mixture of 4-(oxiran-2-ylmethoxy) benzaldehyde (0.01M) and different aromatic amines (0.01M) in 1, 4-Dioxan was refluxed for 9-10 hours in presence of few drops of concentrated HCl as catalyst. After the completion of reaction, the reaction mass was poured into crushed ice and crude product was isolated. The purity of compounds was checked by thin layer chromatography and the characterization was done by IR, 1HNMR and Mass spectral data.

The synthesized azomethines derivatives were recrystallized in methanol and characterized by IR, NMR and Mass spectra. Figure 1 shows the general structure of azomethines.

The solvents, methanol and Dimethylformamide (DMF) used in this study were of LR grade and were purified by the procedure described in the literature [14].

Figure 1. General Structure of Azomethines derivatives

The solutions of azomethines were prepared in methanol/ DMF over a wide range of concentrations. The densities of pure solvents and their solutions were measured by using a single capillary Pyknometer, made of borosil glass having a bulb capacity of 10ml. The ultrasonic velocity of pure solvents and their solutions were measured by using Single Crystal Variable Path Ultrasonic Interferometer operating at 2MHz. The accuracy of density and velocity are ± 0.0001 g/cm3 and ± 0.1% cm/sec respectively. All the measurements were carried out at 303.15K. The uncertainty of temperature is ± 0.1K and that of concentration is 0.0001 moles /dm3.

3. Results and Discussion

According to Newton-Laplace equation [15, 16] the isentropic compressibility of solution κS, is a function of density (ρ) and sound velocity (U).

which provides the link between thermodynamics and acoustics.

The solvation number (Sn) can be calculated according to the equation

where X is the number of grams of solute in 100gm of the solution. M1 and M2 are the molecular weights and κS1 and κS are isentropic compressibility of solvent and solute respectively.

Table 1 shows the experimental density (ρ) and ultrasonic velocity (U) of synthesized compounds in both DMF and methanol solutions. Figure 2 shows the variation of ultrasonic velocity with concentration in both the solvents. It is observed to increase in both DMF and methanol. Figure 3 shows the variation of isentropic compressibility with concentration. Comparison of Figures 2 and 3 shows that in both the solvents, the nature of velocity is reverse of that of isentropic compressibility (κs). The decrease of κs with increasing concentration might be due to aggregation of solvent molecules around solute molecules thereby indicating the presence of solute-solvent interactions.

Table 1. The experimental density and ultrasonic velocity of azomethines compounds in methanol and DMF solutions at 303.15 K

Table 2. Apparent molar compressibility and Apparent Molar Volume of azomethines in methanol and DMF at 303.15 K

Figure 2. The variation of ultrasonic velocity (U) of azomethines against concentration in [A] methanol and [B] DMF at 303.15 K
Figure 3. The variation of isentropic compressibility (κs) of azomethines against concentration in [A] methanol and [B] DMF in at 303.15K

The interaction between solute and solvent molecules is also measured as solvation number (Sn), which is the number of the solvent molecule attached to the central atom/ion by their translational degree of freedom. In the present case, the positive values of Sn indicate appreciable solvation of solutes. This in turn, confirms the structure forming nature of solute i.e., association with solute and solvent molecule. From Figure 4, it is observed that Sn increases with increase in concentration. This indicates that as solute concentration increases, attraction between solute and solvent increases.

Figure 4. Variation of solvation number (Sn) of azomethines against concentration in [A] methanol and [B] DMF at 303.15 K

The apparent molar compressibility (k) of the solution was calculated according to the following equation.

where M2 is the molecular weight of the azomethines derivatives.

The results of adiabatic compressibility have been explained in terms of Bachem's equation [17].

where A and B are constants, C is the molar concentration of azomethines, κs and κ°s, represent the adiabatic compressibility of the solution and solvent, respectively. Table 3 shows the value of constants A and B, which have been determined from the intercept and slope of the plots of (β-β0)/C vs C1/2.

Table 3. Bechem’s constants A and B and Φ°v, Sv, Φ°k and Sk of azomethines in DMF and methanol at 303.15 K

The apparent molar volume (v) can be calculated according to the following equation

where ρ and ρo are the densities of solutions and solvent respectively and C is the molar concentration of azomethines solution.

The calculated values of apparent molar volume (v) are observed negative in both solvent for azomethines, which suggests that when a small amount of compounds are added to the solvent, there is an initial decrease in the molar volume of the solvents. This again proves that due to solute-solvent interactions, compressibility of solution takes place.

Further, apparent molar compressibility and apparent molar volume of solutions is fitted to Gucker’s [18] and Masson’s [19] relations

where °k and °v are limiting apparent molar compressibility and partial molar volume, respectively Sk and Sv are constants. The values of °k, °v, and constants Sk and Sv, have been obtained from the intercept and slope of the plots of k vs C1/2 and v vs C1/2 respectively and are given in Table 3.

It is evident from Table 3 that in both DMF and methanol solutions, A, ok, and ΦVo values are negative whereas B, Sk and Sv values are positive. The lower or negative A, B, ok confirms interaction between solvent and compound molecules. Further, negative values of ΦVo implies electrostrictive solvation of ions [20, 21, 22] i.e., more compressibility in solution. Table 3, shows that in comparison to DMF, for methanol solutions, A, ok and ΦVo are more negative whereas B, Sk and Sv values are more positive. This suggests that compressibility is higher in methanol than that in DMF solutions. The positive and higher values of interaction parameters Sk and Sv confirms the predominance of solute-solvent interactions in the investigated solutions.

Comparison of different azomethines suggests different extent of solute-solvent interactions in methanol and DMF. All the azomethines have aryl substitution with different functional group at para position as mentioned in Figure 1. Comparison of different parameters reported in Table 3 shows that in methanol, overall solute-solvent interaction is maximum for BKC-4 containing nitro benzyl substitution whereas that in DMF is found to be maximum for BKC-3 containing chloro benzyl substitution.

Thus, it is concluded that in both methanol and DMF solutions of studied azomethines, solute-solvent interactions predominate. The extent of interaction depends upon substitution.


[1]  J. Salimon, N. Salih, E. Yousif, A. Hameed, and H. Ibraheem. “Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Activity of Schiff Bases of 2, 5-Dimercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole’’, Aus. J. Bas. Appl. Sci., 4(7) 2016-2021, 2010.
In article      
[2]  N. Sari, S. Arslan, E. Lododlu and Ý. Pakiyan. “Antibacterial Activities of Some New Amino Acid-Schiff Bases”, G. U. J. Sci., 16(2) 283-288, 2003.
In article      
[3]  R. M. Patil,”Synthetic, structural and biological properties of binuclear complexes with some Schiff bases”, Acta Pol. Pharma. Drug Res., 64(4), 345-353, 2007.
In article      
[4]  P. Przybylski, A. Huczynski, K. Pyta, B. Brzezinski and F. Bartl, “Biological Properties of Schiff Bases and Azo Derivatives of Phenols”, Curr. Org. Chem., 13(2), 124-148, 2009.
In article      CrossRef
[5]  A. Malik, S. Sher Khan, R. Wajid, H. Zonera, R. Abdur and I. Muhammad “Cytotoxic, antibacterial activity and physico-chemical properties of some acid catalyzed Schiff bases’’ Afr. J. Bio. 10(2), 209-213, 2011.
In article      
[6]  A. Cinarli1, D. Gürbüz1, A. Tavman1 and A. Seher Birteksöz, “Synthesis, spectral characterizations and antimicrobial activity of some Schiff bases of 4-chloro-2-aminophenol’’, Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 25(3), 407-417, 2011.
In article      
[7]  M. Gnana Ruba Priya, P. Panneerselvam and M. Karikalan. “Synthesis, characterisation and antibacterial, antifungal activities of Schiff bases of 4-(2-aminophenyl) morpholines’’ Int. J. Pharma. Biosci. 2(1), 267-272, 2011.
In article      
[8]  M. T. Tarafder, A. Kasbollah, N. Saravanan, K. A. Crouse, A. M. Ali and O. K. Tin, “S-methyldithiocarbazate and its Schiff bases: evaluation of bondings and biological properties”. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Biophys., 6(2), 85-91, 2002.
In article      CrossRefPubMed
[9]  R. V. Ghadage and P.J. Shirote “Synthesis and anticonvulsant activity of Schiff’s bases of 3-{[2-({(E)-[(substituted) phenyl] methylidene} amino) ethyl] amino} quinoxalin-2(1H)-one’’ Bangladesh J. Pharmacol, 6, 92-99, 2011.
In article      CrossRef
[10]  S. Baluja and S. Oza, “Ultrasonic studies of some derivatives of 6-ethylbenzene-1, 3-diol in 1,4-dioxane,” Fluid Phase Equilib, 208, 83-89, 2003.
In article      CrossRef
[11]  S. Baluja, “Acoustical studies of some Schiff bases in 1, 4-dioxane and dimethylformamide at 318.15 K,” Chin. J. Chem., 24(10), 1327-1331, 2006.
In article      CrossRef
[12]  N. Godvani, J. Movalia, R. Gajera and S. Baluja, “Study of molecular interactions of Loperamide drug in different solvents at 308.15 K”, Res. J. Pharma. Bio. Chem. Sci., 1, 67-73, 2010.
In article      
[13]  S. Baluja and F. Karia, “Ultrasonic velocity studies of solutions of some organic compounds at 298.15 K”, J. Chem. Bio. Phys. Sci., 2, 101-107, 2012.
In article      
[14]  J. A. Riddick, W. B. Bunger and T. Sakano, Organic “Solvents-Physical Properties and methods of purification,” Fourth Edition., Techniques of Chemistry, II, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley. 1989.
In article      
[15]  J. O. Hirschfelder, C. F. Curtis and R. B. Bird, “Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids”, Wiley, New York, 1964, Chapters 5 and 11.
In article      PubMed
[16]  J. S. Rowlinson and F. L. Swinton, “Liquid and Liquid Mixtures”, Butterworths, London, 3rd. edn., 16-17, 1982.
In article      
[17]  H. Falkenhagen and C. Bachem, “Compressibility of electrolytic solutions”, Nature (London, United Kingdom), 135, 830, 1935.
In article      CrossRef
[18]  F. T. Gucker, “The apparent molal heat capacity, volume and compressibility of electrolytes”, Chem. Rev., 13, 111-130 (1933).
In article      CrossRef
[19]  D. O. Masson, “Solute molecular volumes in relation to solvation and ionization”, Philos. Mag., 8, 218-235, 1929.
In article      
[20]  P. S. Nikam and A. R. Hiray, “Temperature and concentration dependence of ultrasonic velocity and allied parameters of monochloroacetic acid in ethanol-nitrobenzene mixtures”, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys., 29, 601-605, 1991.
In article      
[21]  M. Roy, V. Dakua, B. Sinha, “Partial molar volumes, viscosity B-coefficients, and adiabatic compressibilities of sodium molybdate in aqueous 1, 3-dioxolane mixtures from 303.15 to 323.15 K”. Int. J. Thermophys., 28, 1275-1284, 2007.
In article      CrossRef
[22]  S. K. Choudhari, N. Yadav and S. S. Yadava, Ultrasonic viscosities and adiabatic compressibilities for the binary mixtures of methoxy benzene and several chlorohydrocarbons”, J. Pure Appl. Ultrason., 33, 43-45, 2011.
In article      
  • CiteULikeCiteULike
  • MendeleyMendeley
  • StumbleUponStumbleUpon
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • LinkedInLinkedIn