Studies on the Preparation of Zinc Oxide from Galvanizing Plant Waste
1Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dhaka
2Bangladesh Universities of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka
Galvanizing plant waste (zinc dross) containing 27.66% zinc was leached in HCl solutions. Zinc in solution was precipitated as Zn(OH)2 by adding ammonium hydroxide. The product was characterized by atomic absorption spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, x-ray diffraction analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed that when heated at 500oC, the product possesses hexagonal zincite structure. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the shape of zinc oxide particles was spherical and compares well with the standard product. A maximum of 93.7% zinc contained in the dross could be extracted and converted to zinc oxide having a purity of 98.8%.
At a glance: Figures
Keywords: galvanizing plant waste, zinc dross, acid-leaching, zinc oxide
American Journal of Materials Engineering and Technology, 2013 1 (4),
Received September 16, 2013; Revised October 30, 2013; Accepted December 01, 2013Copyright © 2014 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Cite this article:
- Rahman, M Mahbubur, et al. "Studies on the Preparation of Zinc Oxide from Galvanizing Plant Waste." American Journal of Materials Engineering and Technology 1.4 (2013): 59-64.
- Rahman, M. M. , Qadir, M. R. , Neger, A. T. , & Kurny, A. (2013). Studies on the Preparation of Zinc Oxide from Galvanizing Plant Waste. American Journal of Materials Engineering and Technology, 1(4), 59-64.
- Rahman, M Mahbubur, Md. Rakibul Qadir, AJM Tahuran Neger, and ASW Kurny. "Studies on the Preparation of Zinc Oxide from Galvanizing Plant Waste." American Journal of Materials Engineering and Technology 1, no. 4 (2013): 59-64.
|Import into BibTeX||Import into EndNote||Import into RefMan||Import into RefWorks|
Recovery and recycling of value materials from industrial wastes reduces the amount of wastes to be finally disposed and thus reduce the waste disposal problems. These wastes usually also contain value materials that can be recovered and reused. Thus recovery of value materials from industrial wastes is important both from economic and environment points of view. Zinc is listed by the Environmental Protection Agency (USA) as one of the 129 priority pollutants . In humans, prolonged excessive exposure to zinc can lead to deficiencies in iron and copper, nausea, fever, headache, tiredness, and abdominal pain .
Zinc oxide has wide applications as white pigment, ceramic glaze, lubricants, ointments, adhesive, sealants, and in rubber tires, dry cell batteries, ferrites, fire retardants and an opaque base in cosmetics [1, 3]. It is also used in catalysis and as adsorbent in steam reforming process [4, 5]. Addition of ZnO improves the resistance of concrete against water , fine particles of zinc oxide have antibacterial action  and are added into various materials including cotton fabrics, rubber, food packaging, etc . It is also a component in tape (called zinc oxide tape) used in athlet’s bandage to prevent soft tissue damage during workouts .
Among the vast variety of the available methods for metal recovery, hydrometallurgical method can be a viable wet technique . Promising results can be obtained by combining methods like conventional liquid–liquid extraction, ion exchange, and/or electrochemical separations used for some metals [5, 10].
A lot of work has been done on the recovery of metallic zinc from galvanizing plant wastes. Hydrometallurgical processes developed for the recovery of metallic zinc from galvanizing plant wastes involve  leaching in a suitable reagent followed by precipitation, solvent extraction, electrochemical reduction etc. However, only one method  could be found in published literature for the preparation of zinc oxide from galvanizing plant dross. The method describes the production of high purity ZnO powder (99.78 – 99.91 percent pure) by oxidizing zinc vapor in oxygen atmosphere. The galvanizing plant waste (zinc dross) was mixed with a reducing agent (e.g., coke, activated carbon) and heated to vaporize zinc.
2. Materials and Methods
The galvanizing plant waste used for this investigation was collected from one galvanizing plant located at Chittagong, Bangladesh. Analytical grade hydrochloric acid (Merck Germany), ammonium hydroxide (Merck Germany), sodium hydroxide (Merck Germany) and hydrogen peroxide (Merck Germany) used in these experiments were collected from local market.2.1. Experimental Procedure
The dross was leached in hydrochloric acid solutions of different concentrations for different periods of time in a round bottom flask. The round bottom flask, fitted with a reflux condenser, was heated by a mantle heater to a fixed temperature and the solution was stirred continuously by a mechanical stirrer. The leach liquor was filtered and concentrated to such a point that precipitation begins on cooling. The residue was separated by filtration. Lead was separated from the leach liquor as lead chloride. The filtrate was diluted and pH was maintained at 3.9 to 4.0 by adding NaOH. Then H2O2 (1% of total volume) was added to a nearly boiling solution. Iron was precipitated from the leach liquor and was separated by filtration. The filtrate was diluted to a certain volume and ammonium hydroxide was added slowly to a hot agitated solution until precipitation of Zn(OH)2 was complete. The precipitates were filtered and washed with distilled water for several times for purification. It was then heated at 140°C in an oven to a constant weight.
A series of reactions take place during the preparation of zinc oxide and may be represented as follows:
Four sets of experiments were performed by varying (i) concentration of acid (ii) time of reaction (iii) concentration of oxidizing agent (H2O2) and (iv) solid/liquid ratio. In each experiment approximately 10g dross was subjected to react with 10 ml conc. hydrochloric acid (the latter was diluted to different concentrations) at a fixed temperature 95°C for different periods of time. The product in each case was washed carefully, separated, dried and analyzed.
Quantitative analyses of zinc dross and the prepared product were carried out by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS, Instrument: VARIAN, AA 240 FS, Australia). The phase composition of the prepared zinc oxide was determined by x-ray diffraction analysis (Instrument: BRUKER X-ray Diffiactometer model ‘Advanced D8’). Morphological analysis of the prepared product was carried out on a 2600SN Hitachi (Japan) Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with Germanium detector and Diamond window. The thermal behavior of the product obtained was evaluated by using a DTA/TG instrument (Model-DTA/TG 6300, Series-EXSTAR 6000, Brand-SII, Seiko Instrument Inc., Japan). The thermogravimetric and differential thermal analyses were carried out in N2 atmosphere with a heating rate of 20°/min. The temperature difference between an inert (Alumina) reference and the sample was recorded and mass loss was calculated from the thermogravimetric curve.
3. Results and Discussion
The chemical analysis of zinc dross used in this study is shown in Table 1. This table also shows the chemical composition of the other raw materials such as hydrochloric acid, ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide used in this study.
The effect of time of leaching on percent yield of zinc oxide is shown in Table 2. In each case, 10 g zinc dross was leached in 50 ml 1.904M hydrochloric acid solution at a temperature 95°C with constant agitation. The percent yield increased gradually upto 87 percent in 3 hrs. It can also be seen that the amount reacted mass increased with an increase in time, but the percent yield remained unchanged. This may be explained as follows: leaching of zinc in dross was nearly complete in 3 hrs, but lead contained in zinc dross continued to react with HCl to produce lead chloride thus increasing the amount of reacted mass. The percent purity of these samples was nearly 97.
Table 2 also shows that the percent removal of iron increased during first 2 hrs of leaching and then decreased. It is well known that a metal in a solution can replace a metal lower in the reactivity series [http:/en.wikipedia.org./wiki/Reactivity-series] by a single displacement reaction. In these experiments both zinc and iron react with hydrochloric acid and produce zinc chloride and iron chloride. After sometime, when free acid becomes unavailable some metallic zinc from zinc dross reacts with iron chloride to produce metal iron and zinc chloride. As a result after 2 hrs, the amount of iron in the leached solution decreased with an increase of leaching time.
In each of this set of experiments 10g sample was used. Thus the reacted solution may contain a maximum 17mg of iron (the sample of dross contains 0.17 percent iron). But a maximum of around 10mg (60 percent) iron could be removed (Table 2). This also could be attributed to the displacement reaction that takes place during leaching operation.
Table 3 shows the effect of concentration of H2O2 (oxidizing agent), in the range 0.405M to 1.215M, on the precipitation of iron. These experiments were carried out at 95°C with 50 ml 1.904M hydrochloric acid and 10g dross. The pH was maintained at around 4.0. It can be seen that the removal of iron was maximum when the concentration of H2O2 was 0.810M. Concentrations of H2O2 higher than 0.810M did not enhance the extent of removal significantly. The removal of iron was not significant when the concentration of H2O2 was less than 0.810M.
To confirm if zinc contained in the dross reacted first with the acid followed by the reaction of lead, further experiments were carried out and the results are shown in Table 4. This table shows the effect of solid/liquid ratio on the percent yield of zinc oxide. It can be seen that the percent yield remains the same even when the amount of reacting zinc dross is different for the same amount and concentration of acid. This may be attributed to the fact that according to the reactivity series zinc from a mass of zinc-lead-iron reacts first and subsequently lead reacts with hydrochloric acid. This is in good agreement with the relative positions of the two metals in the reactivity series.
The effect of concentration of acid in the range 0.4761 – 2.3808M on percent yield of zinc oxide is shown in Table 5. In this series of experiments 10 ml concentrated hydrochloric acid were diluted to 0.4761M, 0.9523M, 1.4429M, 1.9046M and 2.3808M concentrations and all other leaching parameters were kept the same . It can be seen that the percent yield is the highest (nearly 94 percent) with 0.9523M HCl, the yield decreased with an increase in the concentration of acid.
Figure 1 shows the DTA/TG curves of the prepared product after drying at 140°C. Both the TG and DTG patterns of Figure 1 contain two peaks at around 276°C and 730°C. But the DTA pattern in Figure 1 contains three peaks at around 27°C, 494°C and 730°C. The sample subjected to DTA/TG was a complex Zn5(OH)8Cl2 containing associated water molecule. The peaks at 276°C and 730°C are associated with weight loss, while there is no loss at 494°C. According to published literature (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc_chloride_hydroxide_monohydrate) the complex decomposes at 494°C Thus the weight loss at 276°C may be associated with the loss of water molecule and that at 730°C to the volatilization of ZnCl2, while the peak at 494°C in the DTA pattern to the decomposition of the complex. But in Figure 2, (recorded after drying the compound at 500°C), no change in mass was observed.
A sharp and high intensity peak was observed at a 2θ value of less than 15 degree in the x-ray diffraction patterns recorded on samples dried at 140, 180 and 280oC (Figure 3). In addition, there were few broad and low intensity peaks at 2 theta values below 36 degrees. These peaks neither matched the peaks of standard ZnO (PDF file no: 01-089-7102), nor those of standard Zn(OH)2. These peaks were completely absent when the compound was dried at 500oC. A careful analysis of these patterns showed that the diffraction lines match completely with those of a complex Zn5(OH)8Cl2.H2O [Zinc chloride hydroxide complex, known as Simonkolleite: Crystal structure: Rhombohedral; space group: R-3m(166) having cell constants a = 6.34000, b = 6.34000, and c = 23.66000, PDF file no. 00-007-0155]. The x-ray diffraction lines of the compound in Figure 3 dried at 500oC matched completely with the lines of standard ZnO (PDF file no: 01-089-7102). The x-ray diffraction patters of the compound dried at 500oC could be indexed to the hexagonal zincite structure, space group: primitive - P63mc (186), having cell constant a = 3.24950, b = 3.24950 and c = 5.20690 and α = β = 90, γ = 120. Table 6 summarizes the XRD spectrum results of ZnO which almost perfectly match with the results of standard ZnO.
It has been reported that Zn(OH)2 is converted to ZnO at 120°C . The zinc containing precipitate formed in this study required a much higher temperature for transformation, which is perhaps another proof that the product formed was not Zn(OH)2.
Morphology of the prepared zinc oxide was examined under a scanning electron microscope and compared with the morphology of a standard product of E Merck, Germany. The morphology of the prepared product [Figure 4A] compares very well that of the standard product of E Merck [Figure 4B]. The ASTM "grain-size number" or "index number" [calculated as n = 2N-1 where n is the number of grains per square inch when viewed at a magnification of 100X, and N is the ASTM "index number" or "grain-size number" of the prepared product and the standard were quite close, 22.83 and 23.27 respectively. The shapes of particles of these two samples were spherical and agglomerate among themselves.
ZnO could be prepared from galvanizing plant zinc dross by simple leaching followed by precipitation. X-ray diffraction study has shown that a hexagonal zincite structure is obtained only after heating to 500oC. Nearly 93.7 % zinc contained in the dross could be leached out and converted to zinc oxide having a purity of 97 percent. Scanning electron microscopic investigation confirmed that the particles are spherical and agglomerate among themselves.
|||Nadia Alane, Souad Djerad and Lakhdar Tifouti “Acid Leaching of Zinc Oxide from ZnO/ Al2 O3 Catalyst” Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, 63, 2008.|
|||Irwin, R.J., Mouwerik, M.V., Stevens, L., Seese, M.D., Basham, W. Environmental contaminants encyclopedia. National Park Service, Water Resources Division, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1997.|
|||A. Hernandezbattez;R.Gonzalez; J. Viesca; J. Fernandez; J. Diazfernandez; A. MacHado; R. Chou; J. Riba. “CuO, ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles as antiwear additive in oil lubricants”. Wear 265: 422, 2008.|
|||Chen, J.C., Tang, C.T. 2007. Preparation and application of granular ZnO /Al2O3 catalyst for the removal of hazardous trichloroethylene. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142:88-96.|
|In article||CrossRef PubMed|
|||Kim, S.C., Kim, S.J., Yu, E.Y. 1997. The effect of alkali metal salts on ZnO/α-A12O3 and MnO2 catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane. Applied Catalysis A: General, 150: 63-76.|
|||H. E. Brown. Zinc Oxide Rediscovered. New York: The New Jersey Zinc Company. (1957).|
|||Nagarajan Padmavathy, Rajagopalan Vijayaraghavan. “Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles-antimicrobial study”, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 9: 035004. 2008.|
|||M. Saito. “Antibacterial, Deodorizing, and UV Absorbing Materials Obtained with Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Coated Fabrics”. Journal of Industrial Textiles 23: 150. (1993).|
|||Hughes G., McLean N. R., “Zinc oxide tape: a useful dressing for the recalcitrant finger-tip and soft-tissue injury Arch Emerg Med. 5(4): 223-227. 1988 December.|
|In article||CrossRef PubMed|
|||Gupta, A., Johnson, E.F., Schlossel, R.H. 1987. Investigation into the ion exchange of the cyanide complexes of zinc, cadmium and copper ions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26:588-594.|
|||Dvorak, P., Jandova, J. 2005. Hydrometallurgical recovery of zinc from hot dip galvanizing ash. Hydrometallurgy, 77: 29-33.|
|||Masaaki, T., Naotaka, N., Kazutada, S., Hideaki, O., “Preparation of high purity zinc oxide powder”. Chemical Abstracts: 116:238408c, 1992.|