The integration of inquiry-based learning within classroom instruction is increasingly prevalent due to its potential to enhance students' critical thinking abilities while facilitating an engaging learning experience. This study aimed to develop lessons that incorporate conceptual change argument-driven inquiry activities, and to assess their acceptability based on criteria including content, format, presentation, and organization, as well as the accuracy and currency of information. Employing a Research and Development (R&D) methodology, the objective was to produce effective instructional materials that enhance lesson development through the integration of these inquiry activities. The findings indicate that the average scores for the respective evaluation criteria were 3.77 for content, 3.51 for format, 3.43 for presentation and organization, and 3.49 for accuracy and currency. These scores suggest a high level of acceptance across all criteria. Consequently, the developed lessons are deemed suitable for implementation in senior high schools, specifically within grade 11 chemistry courses. Furthermore, these lessons are designed to promote essential 21st-century skills. Educators are strongly encouraged to incorporate the argument-driven learning method into their pedagogical practices, as it has been recognized for its enjoyable, engaging, and learner-centered approach.
| [1] | Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Widodo, A. (2023). The Use of the Constructivist Teaching Sequence (CTS) to Facilitate Changes in the Visual Representations of Fifth-Grade Elementary School Students: A Case Study on Teaching Heat Convection Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-27.View Article |
| [2] | Mugot, M. P., & Fajardo, M. T. M. Technological, Pedagogical, and Sceince Knowledge (TPASK) of Public School Science Teachers. Sci. Int. (Lahore), 33(3), 263-269, 2021. |
| [3] | Arman, I. M. D. (2020). Effectiveness of B lending the Posner and Stepans Models of Conceptual Change in Correcting Misconceptions in 9th Grade Students. https:// dspace. alquds.edu/ handle/20.500.12213/5720.View Article |
| [4] | Stevens, A. L., & Collins, A. (2021). Multiple conceptual models of a complex system. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 177-198). Routledge.View Article |
| [5] | Rohmah, R. S., & Virtayanti, I. A. (2021). Effect of conceptual change text on basic chemistry students’ understanding of acid and base in online learning. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1). AIP Publishing.View Article |
| [6] | Achor, E. E., & Abuh, P. Y. (2020). Fostering students’ academic performance in physics using cognitive conflict instructional strategy and conceptual change pedagogy. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 42-57. 10.31763/ijele.v2i1.118.View Article |
| [7] | Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ezema, M. J., & Orji, E. I. (2023). Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231153851.View Article |
| [8] | Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103905.View Article |
| [9] | Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2022). The Efficiency of Argument-Based Inquiry Practices in Science Teacher Candidate Education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 721-757.View Article |
| [10] | Alfarraj, Y. F., Aldahmash, A. H., & Omar, S. H. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on teaching science through an argumentation-driven inquiry model: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 9(9).View Article PubMed |
| [11] | Tekindur, A., & Kingir, S. (2023). Improving Elementary Students’ Science Achievement, Inquiry and Scientific Writing Skills through Argument-Based Inquiry. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1-22.View Article |
| [12] | Jin, Q., & Kim, M. (2021). Supporting elementary students’ scientific argumentation with argument-focused metacognitive scaffolds (AMS). International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1984-2006.View Article |
| [13] | Walker, J. P., Van Duzor, A. G., & Lower, M. A. (2019). Facilitating argumentation in the laboratory: The challenges of claim change and justification by theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 435-444.View Article |
| [14] | Dawson, V. (2024). Teachers’ support in developing year 7 students’ argumentation skills about water-based socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 46(3), 222-239.View Article |
| [15] | Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Hong, Z. R. (2019). Bridging the gender gap of children’s engagement in learning science and argumentation through a modified argument-driven inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 635-655.View Article |
| [16] | Rahayu, I., Widhiyanti, T., & Mulyani, S. (2024). Analysis of Misconceptions on the Factors that Affect the Reaction Rate. KnE Social Sciences, 140-150.View Article |
| [17] | Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2022). The Efficiency of Argument-Based Inquiry Practices in Science Teacher Candidate Education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 721-757.View Article |
| [18] | Achor, E. E., & Abuh, P. Y. (2020). Fostering students’ academic performance in physics using cognitive conflict instructional strategy and conceptual change pedagogy. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 42-57. 10.31763/ijele.v2i1.118.View Article |
| [19] | Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ezema, M. J., & Orji, E. I. (2023). Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231153851.View Article |
| [20] | Wilujeng, I., & Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). Alternative learning model in physics learning: Effect of the conceptual change model with cognitive conflict on critical thinking skill. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 111-120.View Article |
| [21] | Selviana, A. S., & Sunarno, W. (2022). The Effectiveness of Using Physics Module with Problem-Based Learning to Enhance Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 19-25.View Article |
| [22] | McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). Students’ understanding of the emergent processes of natural selection: The need for ontological conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1485-1502.View Article |
| [23] | Picardal, M. T. (2019). Does Conceptual Change Process of Instruction Promote Scientific Understanding of Biological Evolution?. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2).View Article |
| [24] | Putri, S. R. S., & Sukarmin, S. (2020). Software Development to Reduce Misconceptions Using Conceptual Change Text Strategy on Chemical Bonding Matter. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 10-16.View Article |
| [25] | Tella, A., & Ogundiya, T. A. (2022). Effects of Concept Mapping and Guided Discovery Instructional Strategies on Students' Achievement in Redox Concept of Chemistry in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business, 14(2). 10.5815/ijieeb.2022.02.05.View Article |
| [26] | Swafiyah, B., Muhammad, B. A., & Yamusa, A. Z. (2023). Effect of Conceptual Change Instructional Strategy on Chemistry Students' Performance in Acids and Bases Concepts. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(1), 47-54. |
| [27] | Nurpatri, Y., Muliani, D., & Indrawati, E. S. (2021, April). Implementation of constructivism approach in physics learning on students’ critical thinking ability of junior high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1876, No. 1, p. 012068). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012068.View Article |
| [28] | Putra, G. D., Samsudin, A., & Saepuzaman, D. (2019, November). Computer simulation-assisted conceptual change text (CS-CCT): a FODEM study on fluid dynamics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 5, p. 052045). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052045.View Article |
| [29] | Sari, N. A., Santyasa, I. W., & Gunadi, I. G. A. (2021). The effect of conceptual change models on students' conceptual understanding in learning physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(2), 94-105.View Article |
| [30] | Palisoa, N., Lumamuly, V. E., & Lumamuly, A. (2023, January). Advance organizer integrated conceptual change learning model to prevent potential misconceptions of high school students in chemical concept. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2642, No. 1). AIP Publishing.View Article |
| [31] | Rahmat, G., Muhammad, H., & Hafnati, R. (2021, September). The Application of the Conceptual Change Learning Model Combined with Predict-Observe-Explain to Overcome Student Misconceptions on Chemical Bonds. In 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Modern Society (ICSTMS 2020) (pp. 151-156). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/ assehr.k.210909.035. |
| [32] | Tella, A., & Ogundiya, T. A. (2022). Effects of Concept Mapping and Guided Discovery Instructional Strategies on Students' Achievement in Redox Concept of Chemistry in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business, 14(2). 10.5815/ijieeb.2022.02.05.View Article |
| [33] | Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103905.View Article |
| [34] | Department of Education. (2009). Guidelines and processes for LRMDS assessment and evaluation. March. https:// lrmds. deped.gov.ph/docs/LRMDSGuidelines.pdf. |
| [35] | Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 56. |
| [36] | Dini, V., Sevian, H., Caushi, K., & Orduña Picón, R. (2020). Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers. Science Education, 104(2), 290-325.View Article |
| [37] | Kazempour, M., Amirshokoohi, A., & Blamey, K. (2020). Putting Theory to Practice: Teaching the 5E Learning Cycle through Immersive Experiences for Pre-Service Teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 67-75.View Article |
| [38] | Adam, U. A., Lameed, S., & Ayodele, B. B. (2022). Attaining meaningful learning of ecological concept: A test of the efficacy of 7e learning cycle model. IJER-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(04), 18–29. |
| [39] | Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Hong, Z. R. (2019). Bridging the gender gap of children’s engagement in learning science and argumentation through a modified argument-driven inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 635-655.View Article |
| [40] | Correia, C. F., & Harrison, C. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(3), 355–376.View Article |
| [41] | Gholam, A. P. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student teachers’ challenges and perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 16(1), 6. |
| [42] | Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC medical education, 19, 1-13.View Article PubMed |
| [43] | DepEd. (2022). Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs). |
