Bio-monitoring of Trace Mercury Using Seabirds’ Dejections from Arzew Gulf: A Potential Risk for Human Health
1Laboratory of Macromolecular Physical and Organic Chemistry, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi-Bel-Abbes, BP. 89, Algeria
Pollution of the environment can be determined by means of biological methods with the help of bioindicators-organisms which give information on the quality vance of their environment. In the present study the first trace mercury bio-monitoring using seabirds’ dejections is investigated in the Arzew gulf. Excrements analysis from ten stations using ICP-MS shows high level (Hg) contamination up to 2.27 ± 0.05 µg.g-1. Dejections’ contamination is due to mercury bioaccumulation via web food owing to the presence of this contaminant in coastal area coming from anthropogenic activities. Potential transfer of mercury to human causing health damage is very likely because of population fisheries consummation. Urgent measures must be taken to remedy this pollution aspect and prevent human health.
At a glance: Figures
Keywords: mercury, bio-monitoring, seabirds, fecal matter, chain food, Arzew gulf, coastal pollution
Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health, 2014 2 (1),
Received November 24, 2013; Revised December 18, 2013; Accepted December 30, 2013Copyright © 2013 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Cite this article:
- Salim, BOUCHENTOUF, and AÏNAD TABET Driss. "Bio-monitoring of Trace Mercury Using Seabirds’ Dejections from Arzew Gulf: A Potential Risk for Human Health." Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 2.1 (2014): 7-11.
- Salim, B. , & Driss, A. T. (2014). Bio-monitoring of Trace Mercury Using Seabirds’ Dejections from Arzew Gulf: A Potential Risk for Human Health. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health, 2(1), 7-11.
- Salim, BOUCHENTOUF, and AÏNAD TABET Driss. "Bio-monitoring of Trace Mercury Using Seabirds’ Dejections from Arzew Gulf: A Potential Risk for Human Health." Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 2, no. 1 (2014): 7-11.
|Import into BibTeX||Import into EndNote||Import into RefMan||Import into RefWorks|
Industrial and urban activities in coastal areas introduce signiﬁcant quantities of pollutants in the marine environment, causing permanent disruption of marine systems and therefore environmental and ecological degradation. Contamination of seawater by heavy metals is due to industrial effluents and land saturation by solid waste [1, 2]. These metallic elements are usually found at low concentrations, in the order of ppm, but may pose a potential danger to the health and functioning of the ecosystem. This contamination may occur directly or indirectly by transfer phenomena in the trophic chain [3, 4].
Heavy metals tend to accumulate in advanced organisms through bio-magnification effects in the food chain. Thus they can enter into human body, and accumulate in the human tissues to pose chronic toxicity (Figure 1). Chronic assimilation of heavy metals is known cause of cancer  and can damage vital organ functions. Accumulation of heavy metals in the food web can occur either by accumulation from the surrounding medium, such as water or sediment, or by bioaccumulation from the food source . According to Syed Lal Shah and Ahmet Altindag  heavy metals may affect organisms directly or indirectly by transferring to the next tropic level of the food chain. The most serious results of their persistence are biological amplification through the food chain. In the aquatic environment, heavy metals in dissolved form are easily taken up by aquatic organisms where they are strongly bound with sulfhydryl groups of proteins and accumulate in their tissues .
The accumulation of heavy metals in the tissues of organisms can result in chronic illness and cause potential damage to the population. Mercury (Hg) is a highly toxic heavy metal, widely occurring in the Mediterranean environment due to both natural emissions such as volcanoes, fumaroles, solfataras and geological anomalies, and anthropogenic sources from industry and waste incineration. In fact, Hg concentrations in various seabirds, fish and shellfish have been found to be higher in the Mediterranean than in Atlantic areas. In the Mediterranean in particular, Hg deposition is greatly affected by air mass transportation of particulate and elemental Hg from northern and northeastern Europe. Wet deposition is the most efficient removal pathway for atmospheric Hg, and is predicted to occur in the highest levels over mountainous areas such those in northern Greece, as expected, due to the higher precipitation usually occurring there . Mercury is a special concern in marine ecosystems, where methylation occurs during the process of biotransformation and accumulates in biota [10, 11].
Bio-concentration, bioaccumulation and biomagnifications of chemical material in oceanic biota are active processes that depend on chemical characteristics, environmental factors (salinity and temperature), trophic level, concentration of fat, metabolism and bioavailability (entry and transfer of contaminants) . There have been numerous studies dedicated to the study of mercury toxicity. Table 1 shows a few below for the better understanding towards mercury toxicity.
Monitoring the coastal environment has arisen from the need to protect human health and living marine resources. The simplest solution proposed to date has been to measure and compare the concentration levels of pollutants in space and time and, from the data collected, to indentify natural and anthropogenic contamination levels and pinpoint variations. This means of assessing contamination has been widely used for metals in the different compartments of the coastal environment .
Bio-monitoring is essential for evaluating the environmental influence of contamination. Several global bio-monitoring programs have been carried out, including United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) for global monitoring of persistent toxic substances (PTS) and of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Effective bio-monitors are those with low-cost, ease of sampling, and showing a good correlation with environmental quality change of ecosystems .
Various metal-accumulating biomaterials, such as plants, non-parasite organisms (lichens, mosses, algae) and animal tissues and organs (feathers, livers, kidneys, bones) have been used as environmental bio-monitors. Mollusks, especially mussels and oysters, were found promising for monitoring the change of heavy metal contamination in aquatic systems. Using living organism tissues as environmental bio-indicators oftentimes can be limited because of the constraint by different national or international regulations for wildlife protection. In addition, many living organisms are generally difficult to provide a continuous historical record of contamination in an ecosystem. Analysis of trace mercury in fecal matter is a promising way for use of faces as bio-indicator in order to assess contamination and prevent risk that occur human health [15, 16].
At present, a significant portion of global diet consists of foods of aquatic origin, either fresh or processed and from fresh or salt water. This consumption has had a positive economic impact on commercial fishing as the associated food processing industries, and each year a wide variety of manufactured seafood products are launched on the market . Monitoring mercury contamination through the food chain is becoming more and more necessary.
In our study we analyze total mercury (Hg) concentration in dejections of seabirds from Arzew gulf to assess level contamination and show potential risk that occur human by consumption of fish from this gulf.
2. Sampling and Analysis Method2.1. Description of the Study Area
The Arzew gulf (Figure 2) is one of the major units of the continental Algerian West shelf. It is between the Arzew massif (Carbon cape, 0° 20’W) at the West and the Cheliff Delta at the East (Ivi cape, 0° 20’W), which gives a longitudinal development on about 50 km. Two rivers of very unequal importance feed the gulf, the middle Cheliff at East and the minor Macta at the West .2.2. Sources of Mercury in the Gulf of Arzew
Chlorine production is among the human activities most associated to high mercury use. The chlorine industry situated in Mostaganem region is one of the main sources of mercury discharged in the marine environment. This industry uses electrolysis process with mercury cathode. Liquid effluents are directly discharged into the sea without treatment. Petroleum and natural gas processing also contribute signiﬁcantly to mercury liberation into environment. Arzew is the biggest North African oil and gas industry platform .2.3. Sampling
The Arzew golf was chosen to perform this study because of its geographical and demographic importance (important wetlands for migratory birds, more than 2.5 million habitants). It is the receptacle of pollution from several industries including chlorine industry which rejects mercury in the environment. A previous study showed high mercury in surface sediments , the presence of this chemical element in sediments led us to explore its presence in living organisms using seabirds’ dejections knowing the lack of studies on mortality of marine birds in Algeria .
The number of considered sampling points depends essentially on the result of prospection according to the same species seabirds gathering, it depends also on sampler accessibility to sites allowing a fluent course with reduced carbon footprint knowing that the collection was done each two days during four months from distanced and scattered places along the Arzew gulf (50 km).
Ten sampling sites were chosen and birds were recognized generally as Mediterranean gulls during all sampling period. Figure 2 shows also sampling sites. Fresh excrements were collected between March and June 2013 in each sampling site using stainless steel knife removing any strange matter. The collected samples were stored in polythene bags and frozen prior to sample preparation for chemical analysis. According to Yin  “fresh” excrements mean that it's produced by seabirds or in the past couple of days.2.4. Total Mercury (Hg) Analysis
For each station a homogeneous sample has been constituted in order to be analyzed. Samples were dried under sunlight. They were crushed using agate pestle and mortar before further analytical procedures. According to metal analysis standards, samples were subjected to a pretreatment for determination by ICP-MS. Before analysis, samples were prepared in order to obtain a subsample homogeneous enough to be representative of the main sample. The sample was dried in an oven at 40º C for 16 hours. The sample was then smashed to obtain a fine powder. The mineralization was performed on 0.5 g of this powder with 6 ml of hydrochloric acid and 2 ml of nitric acid (aqua regia). This step was done at 950° C for 75 min on a heating block; the mineral deposit was then adjusted to 50 ml. An appropriate dilution was then performed before analysis. The mercury analysis was made according to the standard ISO 16772-NA.
3. Results and Discussion
Fecal analysis shows presence of mercury in seabirds’ dejections. Figure 3 and Table 2 show total mercury concentration in samples collected from chosen sites in Arzew gulf. The highest concentration was found in station number 04 (2.27 ± 0.05) and the lowest one in station number 07 (0.08 ± 0.02). Relying on previous study , mercury exists and freely circulates in coastal water of Arzew gulf. Presence of mercury in seabirds’ dejections can be due to two factors; first one is chain web; seabirds are omnivorous and their diet is based mostly on fish which can accumulate mercury. The second factor is inhalation via air because chlorine industry presence in Mostaganem region which uses electrolysis process and releases mercury in atmosphere. Sample number 07 gives the lowest mercury concentration; this is can be due to seabirds’ difference diet compared to other sampling sites, and also presence of other migrant seabirds. Table 3 shows mercury concentrations in excrement and seabirds from other regions over the world. It is important to mention that studies on mercury presence in fecal matter are uncommon. Even if mercury concentrations in seabirds’ excrement from Arzew gulf are lower than mean mercury presence in penguins dejections from Antarctic, our results are preoccupant because of economic and demographic context of the region.
As shown above, contamination of excrements is due to Hg bioaccumulation in seabirds and transfer via chain food. This contamination let us understand that sea products are contaminated too by mercury. The Arzew gulf is containing two big towns (Oran and Mostaganem) which have a population around 2 500 000 habitants (ANOS; Algerian National Office of Statics). A Fish consumption ratio in this region exceeds 10 kg/habitant/year (ANOS). The given data show that human health may directly and seriously be affected by this kind of contamination via chain food. It’s important to note that no studies on fish contamination in this region have been done. It’s well known that fisheries production of Arzew gulf is not consummated only by costal population but also distributed to other towns and even exported this fact may have local and international impact.
Our study on seabirds’ dejection contamination by mercury is unique in the South West part of the Mediterranean basin and contributes significantly to the enrichment of the international data base on this kind of contamination. Comparison to other contamination levels around the world can give an overview of the results found elsewhere even if it is not the same bird species used but let’s say that the high contamination level found in Arzew gulf is alarmist.
Results reported in this study constitute the first mercury contamination bio-monitoring using seabirds’ dejections. Important contamination levels founded which have food web and inhalation as origins are alarmist and may affect both human health and marine ecosystems via chain food. Presence of mercury in the coastal environment is due to anthropogenic activities. Urgent measures must be taken in order to prevent human health. Further studies are in perspective to evaluate development mercury pollution aspects.
|||Boucheseiche, C., Cremille E., Pelte T. & Pojer K, Bassin Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse. Guide technique n7, Pollution toxique et l’ecotoxicologie: notion de base. Lyon, Agence de l’Eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, 2002, 83 pp.|
|||Satpathy, K.K., Natesan, U., Sarguru, S., Mohanty, A.K., Prasad, M.V.R., Sarkar, S.K, “Seasonal variations in mercury concentrations in the coastal waters of Kalpakkam, southeast coast of India,” Curr. Sci, 95.2008.|
|||Kannan, K., Smith, R.G., Lee, R.F., Windom, H.L., Heitmuller, P.T., Macauley, J.M., Summers, J.K, “Distribution of Total Mercury and Methyl Mercury in Water, Sediment, and Fish from South Florida Estuaries,” Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 34.109-118. 1998.|
|||Benamar, A., Bouderbala, A. & Boutiba, Z, “Evaluation de la concentration en cadmium d’un poisson pélagique commun, Sardinella aurita, dans la baie d’Oran ,” J. Sci. Hal. Aquat, 1.16-20.2010.|
|||Nabawi, A., Heinzow, B., Kruse, H, “As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg, and Zn in fish from Alexendria Region, Egyption,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 39.889-897.1987.|
|||Tulonen,T., Pihlstrom, M., Arvola, L., Rask, M, “Concentrations of heavy metals in food web components of small, boreal lakes,” Boreal Environ. Res, 11.185-194.2006.|
|||Shah, S.L., Altindag, A, “Effects of heavy metal accumulatio on the 96-h LC50 values in Tench Tinca,” Turk J vet Anim Sci. 29.139-144.2003.|
|||Amirah, M.N., A.S. Afiza, W.I.W. Faizal, M.H. Nurliyana and S.Laili, “Human Health Risk Assessment of Metal Contamination through Consumption of Fish.” Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 1, no. 1 (2013): 1-5.|
|||Vassilis, G., Peter, H.Becker., Vasilios, L, “Low mercury contamination in Mediterranean gull Larus melanocephalus chicks in Greece,” Chemistry and Ecology.|
|||Bryan, G.W., “Bioaccumulation of marine pollutants,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci, 286.483-505.1979.|
|||Lindqvist, O., “Mercury in the Swedish environment, recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods,” Water Air Soil Pollut, 55.1-261.191.|
|||Rocque, D.A., Winker, K., “Biomonitoring of contaminants in birds from two trophic levels in the north Pacific,” Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 23 (3).759-766.2004.|
|||Zahir, F., Rizvi, S. J., Khan, R. H., Haq, S. K, “Low dose mercury toxicity and human health,” Environmental toxicology and Pharmacology, 20.351-360.2005.|
|||Cossa, D, “A review of the use of Mytilus spp. as quantitative indicators of cadmium and mercury contamination in coastal waters” Oceanologica Acta, 12(4).417-432.1989.|
|||Yin, X., Xia, L., Sun, L., Luo, H., Wang, Y, “Animal excrement: A potential biomonitor of heavy metal contamination in the marine environment,” Science of the Total Environment, 399.179-185.2008.|
|||Varsha, G., Prakash B, “Heavy Metal Contamination in Ranthambore National Park: Feces as Bioindicators,” Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 2(6).545-550.2012.|
|||Khaniki, G.R.J., Inteaz, A., Nowroozi, E., Nabizadeh, R, “Mercury contamination in fish and public health aspects: A review” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 4(5). 276-281.2005.|
|||Bouchentouf, S., Benaoula, S.A., Aïnad Tabet, D. and Ramdani, M, “Assessment of petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in intertidal surface sediments of Arzew gulf (West of Algeria) ,”Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 5 (4). 387-392. 2013.|
|||Bouchentouf S, Aïnad Tabet D & Ramdani M, “Mercury pollution in beachrocks from the Arzew gulf (west of Algeria),” Travaux de l’Institut Scientifique, Rabat, 2013, n° 14, under press.|
|||Cooper, J., Baccetti, N., Belda, E.J., Borg, J.J., Oro, D., Papaconstantinou, C., Sanchez, A, “Seabird mortality from longline fishing in the Mediterranean Sea and Macaronesian water: a review and a way forward” SCI.MAR,67.(Suppl. 2). 57-64.2003.|
|||Celis, J., Jara, S., González-Acuña, D., Barra, R., Espejo, W, “A preliminary study of trace metals and porphyrins in excreta of Gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) at two locations of the Antarctic Peninsula,”Arch Med Vet, 44.311-316.2012.|